Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch > #6220

Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question

Message-ID <4F53B65E.A18ABEE8@sonic.net> (permalink)
Date 2012-03-04 10:37 -0800
From Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net>
Organization none
Newsgroups comp.arch
Subject Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question
References <999f8083-6a41-4c59-b42f-883d8c8e9192@pz2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Daku wrote:
> 
> Is this reasoning correct ? Or is the
> "hidden bit" not taken into account
> in the 2's complement calculation ?

Shall we assume you're in binary mode, not BCD?
In BCD you get a hidden digit, making BCD
a more compact representation for very short 
floating-point numbers.

Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Daku <dakupoto@gmail.com> - 2012-03-04 05:12 -0800
  Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2012-03-04 10:37 -0800
    Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-04 13:21 -0700
      Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-04 13:49 -0700
    Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2012-03-04 13:08 -0800
      Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-04 14:43 -0700
      Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2012-03-04 16:35 -0800
        Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2012-03-05 01:39 +0000
          Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2012-03-04 18:53 -0800
            Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2012-03-05 04:04 +0000
              Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2012-03-04 21:13 -0800
                Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-03-05 08:27 +0100
                Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-05 01:21 -0700
                Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> - 2012-03-08 16:57 +0100
                Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-03-08 18:55 +0100
                Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2012-03-05 17:01 -0500
        Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-03-04 22:32 -0700
  Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-03-04 11:46 -0800
  Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-04 12:05 -0800
    Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question dakupoto@gmail.com - 2012-03-04 19:40 -0800
      Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-03-04 22:33 -0700
      Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-05 02:16 -0800
  Re: IEEE-754-2008 2's complement question Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2012-03-04 13:09 -0800

csiph-web