Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Message-ID | <4F352BB3.30806@SPAM.comp-arch.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-10 06:37 -0800 |
| From | "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> |
| Organization | comp-arch.net |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Register file splits, a new look. |
| References | <ggtgp-1DA77E.06332706022012@netnews.mchsi.com> <7z1uq4qpf4.fsf@ask.diku.dk> <21254419.964.1328818372560.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqad38> <jh2j7v$18n$1@gosset.csi.cam.ac.uk> |
On 2/10/2012 12:07 AM, nmm1@cam.ac.uk wrote: > In article<21254419.964.1328818372560.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqad38>, > MitchAlsup<MitchAlsup@aol.com> wrote: >> >> In several machines I have worked on, the register files (plus reorder >> buffers, and buffering) were bigger than the computational units >> attached to them! All of these were separate file machines. A lot of >> power is heading down this hole. > > Yes. It's one of the reasons that I think we should stop digging > and look for a way out. My understanding is that most of that is > to attempt to maximise the performance of serial, in-order code, > by making the low-level parallelism and out-of-order logic entirely > transparent. I think that's a mug's game, and the only solution is > to move to better ISAs which, in turn, needs us to move to better > programming paradigms and languages. If those "better ISAs" require significantly larger register files, then they may lose.
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 06:33 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-06 09:29 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-07 07:08 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2012-02-09 11:19 +0100
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-09 12:12 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. "Paul A. Clayton" <paaronclayton@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 15:27 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-09 15:52 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-10 08:07 +0000
Re: Register file splits, a new look. "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-10 06:37 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-10 09:36 +0100
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-10 12:22 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-10 12:26 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-11 07:25 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-16 17:17 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-16 16:25 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-17 14:08 -0600
Re: Register file splits, a new look. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-28 08:54 -0800
Re: Register file splits, a new look. Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-28 19:33 -0600
csiph-web