Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.shells > #257
| From | vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations |
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.shells |
| References | <1qbffa5.1adff801ndrrcbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <y4OdM.3421888$iS99.3297960@fx16.iad> <1qbnhi9.3p966e1nlu1yjN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <ue6eM.2302478$gGD7.405554@fx11.iad> <1qbnyg1.11uoqwl1ybtsjsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | 2023-06-07 23:32 +0000 |
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 20:45:36 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:33:13 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> >> > vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, 28 May 2023 06:17:15 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> >> >> >> > Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases >> >> > from ChatGPT. >> > >> > <https://tinyurl.com/yntupbe4> >> > >> >> Poor example of "don't trust, do verify". >> >> >> >> >> > Hence my earlier (unchallenged) point that ChatGPT does not provide >> > citations. >> > >> > >> It does provide citations sometimes. And sometimes, those citations >> are bogus, which is what happened to our hero the cyberlawyer... >> >> > You'd think that an educated person like a lawyer would check. > I wonder how many naïve people would bother, rather than just accept the > results as facts. I hear that some people even believe what they read > in the papers or see on TV (strange but true). > > [...] So is that the last word on these AI shells? I still use them, even though the novelty has worn off a bit. (I'd still be much more interested if they were "answer machines" instead of "say what sounds good" machines. :) I don't trust them, but do verify them -- and I recommend others do the same. (Still, is it not amusing to see what it comes up with on its own?) -- -v
Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-28 06:17 +0100
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-05-28 08:29 -0400
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 15:53 -0400
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-31 20:27 +0000
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 14:33 +0100
Chatbots produce bogus citations (was: Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-01 19:23 +0000
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 20:45 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-07 23:32 +0000
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-06-08 06:07 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-08 10:37 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-06-08 10:46 -0400
csiph-web