Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.ai.shells > #259

Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations

From snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Newsgroups comp.ai.shells
Subject Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations
Date 2023-06-08 10:37 +0100
Organization Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
Message-ID <1qc04vl.vx64ik14ifcu4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <1qbnhi9.3p966e1nlu1yjN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <ue6eM.2302478$gGD7.405554@fx11.iad> <1qbnyg1.11uoqwl1ybtsjsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> <ked605FpsphU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:

> vallor wrote:
> 
> > So is that the last word on these AI shells?  I still
> > use them, even though the novelty has worn off a bit.  (I'd
> > still be much more interested if they were "answer machines"
> > instead of "say what sounds good" machines. :)
> > 
> > I don't trust them, but do verify them -- and I recommend
> > others do the same.
> 
> I don't use them, though I do notice those people who test them out, or
> believe in the answers blindly, also those who used to be paid to 
> develop them turning against them ... maybe it'll take a multi-million
> dollar lawsuit to make them go away for a decade?
  
It seems to me that they are potentially very powerful tools for
misinformation.  There was a story in the Times recently about 
an AI generated deep-fake video.  Foist some of that sort of 
output onto the uncritical masses and see what you get...  
  
(paywall)
<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ai-deepfake-avatar-donald-trump-htlxp77jl>
(paywall defeated)
<https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Farticle%2Fai-deepfake-avatar-donald-trump-htlxp77jl>
(tinyurl)
<https://tinyurl.com/masshtx9>  

-- 
^Ï^.       –  Sn!pe  –       <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

 My pet rock Gordon just is.    

Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-28 06:17 +0100
  Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-05-28 08:29 -0400
  Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 15:53 -0400
  Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-31 20:27 +0000
    Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 14:33 +0100
      Chatbots produce bogus citations (was: Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-01 19:23 +0000
        Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 20:45 +0100
          Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-07 23:32 +0000
            Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-06-08 06:07 +0100
              Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-08 10:37 +0100
              Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-06-08 10:46 -0400

csiph-web