Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.shells > #259
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.shells |
| Subject | Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations |
| Date | 2023-06-08 10:37 +0100 |
| Organization | Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds |
| Message-ID | <1qc04vl.vx64ik14ifcu4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1qbnhi9.3p966e1nlu1yjN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <ue6eM.2302478$gGD7.405554@fx11.iad> <1qbnyg1.11uoqwl1ybtsjsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> <ked605FpsphU1@mid.individual.net> |
Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: > vallor wrote: > > > So is that the last word on these AI shells? I still > > use them, even though the novelty has worn off a bit. (I'd > > still be much more interested if they were "answer machines" > > instead of "say what sounds good" machines. :) > > > > I don't trust them, but do verify them -- and I recommend > > others do the same. > > I don't use them, though I do notice those people who test them out, or > believe in the answers blindly, also those who used to be paid to > develop them turning against them ... maybe it'll take a multi-million > dollar lawsuit to make them go away for a decade? It seems to me that they are potentially very powerful tools for misinformation. There was a story in the Times recently about an AI generated deep-fake video. Foist some of that sort of output onto the uncritical masses and see what you get... (paywall) <https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ai-deepfake-avatar-donald-trump-htlxp77jl> (paywall defeated) <https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Farticle%2Fai-deepfake-avatar-donald-trump-htlxp77jl> (tinyurl) <https://tinyurl.com/masshtx9> -- ^Ï^. – Sn!pe – <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E> My pet rock Gordon just is.
Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-28 06:17 +0100
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-05-28 08:29 -0400
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 15:53 -0400
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-31 20:27 +0000
Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 14:33 +0100
Chatbots produce bogus citations (was: Re: Lawyer admits using AI for research after citing 'bogus' cases from ChatGPT vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-01 19:23 +0000
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-01 20:45 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-06-07 23:32 +0000
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-06-08 06:07 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-06-08 10:37 +0100
Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-06-08 10:46 -0400
csiph-web