Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > cn.sci.math > #1

Publishers allowing specifying “opposed reviewers” in the context of book publications?

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Mark McGregor <mark.SPAMSTUBmcgregor@gmxSPAMSINK.de>
Newsgroups cn.sci.math
Subject Publishers allowing specifying “opposed reviewers” in the context of book publications?
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:54:32 +0200
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 15
Message-ID <nkc9i6$467$4@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
NNTP-Posting-Host lT10BV8NgbvQyxoLAt1bmg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0
X-Mozilla-News-Host news://news://news://news://news://freenews.netfront.net:119
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com cn.sci.math:1

Show key headers only | View raw

Dear all:

Are there established (mathematics) research publishers who, in the 
context of book publications,

  - allow the author to specify whom NOT to ask for an opinion (i.e., 
not to send the manuscript to), not even in a double-blind way,
  - and actually do respect this choice?

I am welcoming positive and negative nominations, ideally including some 
kind of justification. I'm particularly interested in Springer.

Thanks in advance,

Mark

Back to cn.sci.math | Next | Find similar

Thread

Publishers allowing specifying “opposed reviewers” in the context of book publications? Mark McGregor <mark.SPAMSTUBmcgregor@gmxSPAMSINK.de> - 2016-06-21 22:54 +0200

csiph-web