Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.electronics > #32511 > unrolled thread
| Started by | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-09 21:52 +1100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-15 11:14 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 390 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.electronics
SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 03:31 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 07:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 14:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 15:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 19:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 20:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 20:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 21:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 21:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies pedro <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-12 09:28 +0800
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 21:54 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 07:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 23:49 +1300
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 17:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 17:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 19:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 20:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 03:12 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 05:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 14:25 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 09:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 15:01 -0800
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 12:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 14:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 16:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 19:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-12 04:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 09:38 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 11:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 12:09 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 13:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 14:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 15:08 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-13 18:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 18:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-13 19:41 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 20:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 21:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-13 22:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 23:25 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 06:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 11:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 11:54 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 12:27 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 14:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 14:15 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 16:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 17:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 16:11 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 17:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 19:33 +1000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 21:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 19:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-15 14:47 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 11:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 11:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 20:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies HD <herpem@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-14 20:01 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 21:18 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-14 22:43 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-15 06:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-15 12:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 13:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-15 14:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-15 23:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 08:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-16 15:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 15:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 17:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 04:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 08:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 08:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 10:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 11:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 12:48 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 19:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-17 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 19:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:23 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 08:43 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-17 15:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 09:03 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 20:30 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 10:16 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 09:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-18 11:54 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@your.scary.shadow.edu> - 2017-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 11:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 13:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 14:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 15:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 16:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 17:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 17:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-20 04:16 +0000
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-20 16:18 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 18:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-23 04:37 +0000
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-23 15:27 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-24 04:42 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-20 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 13:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 13:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 16:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 16:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 17:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 21:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 23:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 15:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 16:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 17:41 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 17:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:25 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-17 18:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 08:31 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 10:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 11:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:07 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 13:52 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 16:38 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 15:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 15:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 16:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 17:10 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 20:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 21:01 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2017-02-16 23:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 08:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-02-16 22:02 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 09:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-17 11:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-17 10:36 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2017-02-17 13:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-17 13:24 +1000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:29 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-16 11:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 05:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-16 11:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 11:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 11:48 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 12:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 13:03 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 10:20 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:43 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 10:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 11:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:21 +1100
Re: Cats felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:20 +1100
Re: Cats Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-18 11:53 +0000
Re: Cats felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 23:47 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 00:07 +1100
Re: Cats Peter <noemail@pigpond.com> - 2017-02-19 10:23 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:47 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:09 +0000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:37 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 14:05 +0000
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 08:46 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-19 09:27 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-19 09:25 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-19 18:52 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 14:02 +0000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:49 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 09:58 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 11:20 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 11:23 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 14:16 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:39 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:16 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-20 02:21 +0000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 14:28 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 14:26 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 17:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:03 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 12:06 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:38 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:03 +0000
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 17:45 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:26 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-19 14:32 +1000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 15:57 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:04 +0000
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-19 18:46 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:16 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:37 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:42 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:23 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-20 09:18 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:48 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-20 16:25 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 17:08 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-20 16:21 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 10:31 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 12:37 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 18:04 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-20 16:12 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-21 10:10 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:33 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-21 11:15 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:44 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:42 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 00:54 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:21 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-23 09:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:10 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 10:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:27 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:28 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 11:29 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 19:43 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 19:53 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-20 20:26 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 20:42 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-23 09:56 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 23:59 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-21 00:39 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:50 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 01:46 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:30 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:52 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 18:07 +1100
Re: Cats Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-23 04:10 +0000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-23 16:26 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-25 10:41 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-25 16:06 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-25 21:36 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 08:57 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-26 18:01 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:50 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:52 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:33 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 00:58 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:31 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-22 09:29 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:26 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:44 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:55 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:45 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 13:07 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 13:39 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 14:55 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 17:34 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-22 17:47 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 18:04 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 18:56 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-22 21:54 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 18:55 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 14:17 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 14:32 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 15:00 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:19 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-23 00:29 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:14 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-23 00:30 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 15:43 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:23 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:35 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:36 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:38 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-01 15:49 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-01 16:11 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 00:05 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-01 23:06 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 00:16 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-02 08:13 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 12:49 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 14:26 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-03 08:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-03 10:48 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-03 11:16 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-03 10:35 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-03 14:52 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-03-02 14:22 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 18:03 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 18:12 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-28 09:46 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 09:57 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:40 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-28 09:56 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:39 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 16:38 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 17:28 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 18:06 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-27 18:52 +1000
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-28 06:14 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-28 17:43 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:25 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:52 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:47 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:46 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:23 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:19 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:57 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:46 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-21 12:14 +1000
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 18:10 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 01:00 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:33 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 09:28 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:08 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:30 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-16 13:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-12 10:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 11:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-12 16:07 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-13 10:54 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-13 00:34 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-13 14:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 15:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-13 15:36 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 15:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-15 11:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:19 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-15 10:37 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 07:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-11 07:08 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 08:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-09 22:17 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 10:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 10:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-10 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Tony <nomail@nospam.com> - 2017-02-10 08:46 +0800
Re: SA Greenies ellefranqq@gmail.com - 2019-03-15 19:06 -0700
Re: SA Greenies FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2019-03-16 17:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 12:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-23 12:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 12:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-10 12:42 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 16:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 22:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 18:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 22:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:01 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-12 08:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:03 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-11 16:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-13 15:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 17:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-13 21:07 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:14 +1100
Page 16 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 20 Next page →
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 16:36 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b3bb02$0$61818$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32962 |
F Murtz wrote: > F Murtz wrote: >> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the >>>>>>>>>>>>> act, >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to >>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter >>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>>> trapping >>>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >>>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>>> his >>>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish >>>>>> smell is >>>>>> coming from >>>>> >>>>> You still don't get it. >>>> >>>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >>> >>> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in his >>> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's wander. If >>> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >>> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >>> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >>> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. That >>> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, or 3 >>> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >>> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >>> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>>> it's >>>>> OWN owner's yard. >>>> >>> >> >> >> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food > > > It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you > have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and > training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the > trips to the pound. > one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat > hating dog :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 14:38 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehmu2dFbte8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32963 |
On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: > F Murtz wrote: >> >> >> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >> trips to the pound. >> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >> hating dog :) > you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 15:49 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32980 |
On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: > On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >> F Murtz wrote: >>> >>> >>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>> trips to the pound. >>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >>> hating dog :) >> > > you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 16:11 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b66613$0$9555$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32983 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> F Murtz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>>> trips to the pound. >>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >>>> hating dog :) >>> >> >> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around > > $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have to keep > doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 > https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill them. I vote the last option. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 00:05 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32984 |
On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is >>>>> a cat >>>>> hating dog :) >>>> >>> >>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >> >> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have to >> keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill >> them. > > I vote the last option. > > i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 23:06 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b6c77a$0$10770$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32985 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... > On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a >>>>>> cat >>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>> >>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have to >>> keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill >>> them. >> >> I vote the last option. >> >> > > i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. As you have been told many times your vote does not count. > > > -- > http://thereligionofpeace.com > http://www.barenakedislam.com/ > http://www.siotw.org >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 00:16 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32986 |
On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>> >>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>> >>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill >>>> them. >>> >>> I vote the last option. >>> >>> >> >> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. > > As you have been told many times have I? > your vote does not count. not according to the AEC.. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 08:13 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b7478c$0$18124$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32987 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... > On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>> >>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a >>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>> >>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have to >>>>> keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or kill >>>>> them. >>>> >>>> I vote the last option. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >> >> As you have been told many times > > have I? > >> your vote does not count. > > not according to the AEC.. Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone just laughs at Felix. ;-) > > > -- > http://thereligionofpeace.com > http://www.barenakedislam.com/ > http://www.siotw.org >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 12:49 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehpc28Fr2rhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32988 |
On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>> >>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>> kill them. >>>>> >>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>> >>> As you have been told many times >> >> have I? >> >>> your vote does not count. >> >> not according to the AEC.. > > Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone > just laughs at Felix. ;-) > > that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 14:26 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <f44fbchi1ifap4c8q38nqgbq8o8ocuubu5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32990 |
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:49:47 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>>> kill them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>>> >>>> As you have been told many times >>> >>> have I? >>> >>>> your vote does not count. >>> >>> not according to the AEC.. >> >> Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone >> just laughs at Felix. ;-) >> >> > >that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix Harming a Cat If you kick a cat, you will develop rheumatism in that leg. If you are a farmer and kill a cat, you can expect your cattle to die mysteriously. If you drown a cat, you will fall victim to a drowning. If you kill a cat, you are sacrificing your soul to the Devil Sailors believed that the worst possible cat-related act, guaranteed to raise a storm and bring bad luck of all sorts, was to throw the cat overboard. Some people who wanted to get rid of a cat but were afraid of the consequences went so far as to hire professional feline "hit men." If a cat was thrown overboard, a storm would rise and very bad luck would follow. To end even one of a cat's 9 lives was to risk being haunted by that particular cat for the rest of the murderer's life. To kill a cat brings seventeen years of bad luck -Irish superstition The French believed that if a girl tread on a cat's tail, she would not find a husband before a year is out. -- Petzl (Joel 2:3) Fire devours before them, and behind them a flame burns. The land is like the garden of Eden before them, but behind them a desolate wilderness, and nothing escapes them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 08:15 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <gY-dneyfKJ0aFiXFnZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32992 |
On 2/03/2017 2:26 PM, Petzl wrote: > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:49:47 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> > wrote: > >> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>>>> kill them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>>>> >>>>> As you have been told many times >>>> >>>> have I? >>>> >>>>> your vote does not count. >>>> >>>> not according to the AEC.. >>> >>> Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone >>> just laughs at Felix. ;-) >>> >>> >> >> that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix > > Harming a Cat > > > If you kick a cat, you will develop rheumatism in that leg. > > If you are a farmer and kill a cat, you can expect your cattle to die > mysteriously. > > If you drown a cat, you will fall victim to a drowning. > > If you kill a cat, you are sacrificing your soul to the Devil > > Sailors believed that the worst possible cat-related act, guaranteed > to raise a storm and bring bad luck of all sorts, was to throw the cat > overboard. > > Some people who wanted to get rid of a cat but were afraid of the > consequences went so far as to hire professional feline "hit men." > If a cat was thrown overboard, a storm would rise and very bad luck > would follow. > > To end even one of a cat's 9 lives was to risk being haunted by that > particular cat for the rest of the murderer's life. > > To kill a cat brings seventeen years of bad luck -Irish superstition > > The French believed that if a girl tread on a cat's tail, she would > not find a husband before a year is out. No wonder you believe in a God if you believe all this superstitious crap
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 10:48 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehrpa8FbdfvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32994 |
On Friday, 3 Mar 2017 8:15 AM, de chucka wrote: > On 2/03/2017 2:26 PM, Petzl wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:49:47 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>>>>> kill them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>>>>> >>>>>> As you have been told many times >>>>> >>>>> have I? >>>>> >>>>>> your vote does not count. >>>>> >>>>> not according to the AEC.. >>>> >>>> Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone >>>> just laughs at Felix. ;-) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix >> >> Harming a Cat >> >> >> If you kick a cat, you will develop rheumatism in that leg. >> >> If you are a farmer and kill a cat, you can expect your cattle to die >> mysteriously. >> >> If you drown a cat, you will fall victim to a drowning. >> >> If you kill a cat, you are sacrificing your soul to the Devil >> >> Sailors believed that the worst possible cat-related act, guaranteed >> to raise a storm and bring bad luck of all sorts, was to throw the cat >> overboard. >> >> Some people who wanted to get rid of a cat but were afraid of the >> consequences went so far as to hire professional feline "hit men." >> If a cat was thrown overboard, a storm would rise and very bad luck >> would follow. >> >> To end even one of a cat's 9 lives was to risk being haunted by that >> particular cat for the rest of the murderer's life. >> >> To kill a cat brings seventeen years of bad luck -Irish superstition >> >> The French believed that if a girl tread on a cat's tail, she would >> not find a husband before a year is out. > > No wonder you believe in a God if you believe all this superstitious crap > he never said he believed it -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 11:16 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <BYmdncRLv_VTKCXFnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32995 |
snip >>> The French believed that if a girl tread on a cat's tail, she would >>> not find a husband before a year is out. >> >> No wonder you believe in a God if you believe all this superstitious crap >> > > he never said he believed it He didn't say anything
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 10:35 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b8ba61$0$31167$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32995 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ehrpa8FbdfvU2@mid.individual.net... > On Friday, 3 Mar 2017 8:15 AM, de chucka wrote: >> On 2/03/2017 2:26 PM, Petzl wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:49:47 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>>>>>> kill them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you have been told many times >>>>>> >>>>>> have I? >>>>>> >>>>>>> your vote does not count. >>>>>> >>>>>> not according to the AEC.. >>>>> >>>>> Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone >>>>> just laughs at Felix. ;-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix Not important enuf to be capitalised heh?? >>> >>> Harming a Cat >>> >>> >>> If you kick a cat, you will develop rheumatism in that leg. >>> >>> If you are a farmer and kill a cat, you can expect your cattle to die >>> mysteriously. >>> >>> If you drown a cat, you will fall victim to a drowning. >>> >>> If you kill a cat, you are sacrificing your soul to the Devil >>> >>> Sailors believed that the worst possible cat-related act, guaranteed >>> to raise a storm and bring bad luck of all sorts, was to throw the cat >>> overboard. >>> >>> Some people who wanted to get rid of a cat but were afraid of the >>> consequences went so far as to hire professional feline "hit men." >>> If a cat was thrown overboard, a storm would rise and very bad luck >>> would follow. >>> >>> To end even one of a cat's 9 lives was to risk being haunted by that >>> particular cat for the rest of the murderer's life. >>> >>> To kill a cat brings seventeen years of bad luck -Irish superstition >>> >>> The French believed that if a girl tread on a cat's tail, she would >>> not find a husband before a year is out. >> >> No wonder you believe in a God if you believe all this superstitious crap >> > > he never said he believed it > > > -- > http://thereligionofpeace.com > http://www.barenakedislam.com/ > http://www.siotw.org >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 14:52 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehs7kqFe01cU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32997 |
On Friday, 3 Mar 2017 11:35 AM, SG1 wrote: > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ehrpa8FbdfvU2@mid.individual.net... >> On Friday, 3 Mar 2017 8:15 AM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 2/03/2017 2:26 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:49:47 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you >>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy >>>>>>>>>>> $136 >>>>>>>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>>>>>>> kill them. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As you have been told many times >>>>>>> >>>>>>> have I? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> your vote does not count. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> not according to the AEC.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone >>>>>> just laughs at Felix. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> that's fine cos I'm not Felix I'm felix > > Not important enuf to be capitalised heh?? > whatever you reckon.. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 14:22 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o9831c$isa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32988 |
On 2/03/2017 9:13 AM, SG1 wrote: > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ehnvtuFi8fpU2@mid.individual.net... >> On Thursday, 2 Mar 2017 12:06 AM, SG1 wrote: >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ehnv9bFi693U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Wednesday, 1 Mar 2017 5:11 PM, SG1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ooydnUKy3rJ8zyvFnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>> On 1/03/2017 2:38 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 4:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban >>>>>>>>> yard,but you >>>>>>>>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of >>>>>>>>> annoying and >>>>>>>>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna >>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>> trips to the pound. >>>>>>>>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another >>>>>>>>> is a cat >>>>>>>>> hating dog :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you can also sprinkle cat deterrent pellets around >>>>>> >>>>>> $12 from Bunnings for 500g and it deter dogs as well and you have >>>>>> to keep doing it. Cheaper to trap them ( hire $38/day or buy $136 >>>>>> https://traps.com.au/product/csd310-spring-door-cat-trap/ ) or >>>>>> kill them. >>>>> >>>>> I vote the last option. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> i vote euthanizing all ppl who kill cats!.. >>> >>> As you have been told many times >> >> have I? >> >>> your vote does not count. >> >> not according to the AEC.. > > Back in the 1920s my father laughed at Felix the cat, Now everyone just > laughs at Felix. ;-) Or killfiles him because he's neither use nor ornament.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 18:03 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o90itc$bkp$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32962 |
On 27/02/2017 4:35 PM, F Murtz wrote: > F Murtz wrote: >> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the >>>>>>>>>>>>> act, >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to >>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter >>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>>> trapping >>>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >>>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>>> his >>>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish >>>>>> smell is >>>>>> coming from >>>>> >>>>> You still don't get it. >>>> >>>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >>> >>> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in his >>> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's wander. If >>> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >>> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >>> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >>> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. That >>> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, or 3 >>> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >>> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >>> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>>> it's >>>>> OWN owner's yard. >>>> >>> >> >> >> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food > > > It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you > have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and > training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the > trips to the pound. > one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat > hating dog ") For God's sake! Get a grip! The OWNERS of the cat are the ones who should be responsible! Your silly suggestions are all about imposing the responsibility on a non owner! I've got a great suggestion. You should have my cows in your yard and if you don't want them there then you should install an electric fence to keep them out then hire a truck and ship them back to our farm. Or can't you see how stupid that sort of suggestion is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 18:12 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b3d15f$0$32631$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32966 |
Fran Snortilus wrote: > On 27/02/2017 4:35 PM, F Murtz wrote: >> F Murtz wrote: >>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> act, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> secondly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to >>>>>>>>>>> enter >>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>>>> trapping >>>>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >>>>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish >>>>>>> smell is >>>>>>> coming from >>>>>> >>>>>> You still don't get it. >>>>> >>>>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>>>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >>>> >>>> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in >>>> his >>>> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's >>>> wander. If >>>> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >>>> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >>>> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >>>> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. That >>>> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, >>>> or 3 >>>> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >>>> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >>>> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>>>> it's >>>>>> OWN owner's yard. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >> >> >> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >> trips to the pound. >> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >> hating dog ") > > For God's sake! Get a grip! The OWNERS of the cat are the ones who > should be responsible! Your silly suggestions are all about imposing > the responsibility on a non owner! I've got a great suggestion. You > should have my cows in your yard and if you don't want them there then > you should install an electric fence to keep them out then hire a truck > and ship them back to our farm. Or can't you see how stupid that sort > of suggestion is? > You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how many Trevors there are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 09:46 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o92a4r$m0e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32969 |
On 27/02/2017 6:12 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Fran Snortilus wrote: >> On 27/02/2017 4:35 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> F Murtz wrote: >>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> act, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> returned to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secondly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either >>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to >>>>>>>>>>>> enter >>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>>>>> trapping >>>>>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite >>>>>>>>> legitimately >>>>>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish >>>>>>>> smell is >>>>>>>> coming from >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You still don't get it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>>>>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >>>>> >>>>> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in >>>>> his >>>>> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's >>>>> wander. If >>>>> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >>>>> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >>>>> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >>>>> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. >>>>> That >>>>> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, >>>>> or 3 >>>>> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >>>>> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >>>>> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>>>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>>>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>>>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> OWN owner's yard. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >>> >>> >>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>> trips to the pound. >>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >>> hating dog ") >> >> For God's sake! Get a grip! The OWNERS of the cat are the ones who >> should be responsible! Your silly suggestions are all about imposing >> the responsibility on a non owner! I've got a great suggestion. You >> should have my cows in your yard and if you don't want them there then >> you should install an electric fence to keep them out then hire a truck >> and ship them back to our farm. Or can't you see how stupid that sort >> of suggestion is? >> > > You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how many > Trevors there are. Finally!!!!!! About bloody time that the penny dropped with you that cats DO roam. Now if you'll just stop the other idiot claim about how it's only because Trevor's putting out food that they come into Trevor's yard.................... Then we might get you to take the next move to admit that Trevor should not be expected to put up with OTHER people's animals in HIS yard because those animals AREN'T Trevor's animals.................... But I'd probably have to put some of MY cattle in YOUR yard before that penny drops...............................
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 09:57 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <4mb9bc107i8dh9rekmc0an2nrs96jf59mh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32974 |
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:46:37 +1100, Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> wrote: >>> >> >> You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how many >> Trevors there are. > >Finally!!!!!! About bloody time that the penny dropped with you that >cats DO roam. > >Now if you'll just stop the other idiot claim about how it's only >because Trevor's putting out food that they come into Trevor's >yard.................... > >Then we might get you to take the next move to admit that Trevor should >not be expected to put up with OTHER people's animals in HIS yard >because those animals AREN'T Trevor's animals.................... > >But I'd probably have to put some of MY cattle in YOUR yard before that >penny drops............................... When cats don't roam rats take over. -- Petzl (Joel 2:3) Fire devours before them, and behind them a flame burns. The land is like the garden of Eden before them, but behind them a desolate wilderness, and nothing escapes them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.electronics
csiph-web