Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.electronics > #32511 > unrolled thread
| Started by | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-09 21:52 +1100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-15 11:14 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 390 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.electronics
SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-09 21:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 03:31 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 07:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 14:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 15:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 19:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 20:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 20:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 21:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 21:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 22:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies pedro <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-12 09:28 +0800
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 21:54 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 07:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 23:49 +1300
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 17:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 17:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 19:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 20:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 03:12 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 05:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 14:25 -0800
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 09:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 15:01 -0800
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 12:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 14:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 16:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 19:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-12 04:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 09:38 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 11:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 12:09 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 13:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 14:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 15:08 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-13 18:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 18:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-13 19:41 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 20:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 21:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-13 22:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 23:25 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 06:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 11:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 11:54 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 12:27 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 14:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 14:15 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 16:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:27 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 17:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 16:11 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 17:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-14 19:33 +1000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 21:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-14 16:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 19:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-15 14:47 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 11:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 11:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 12:39 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 20:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies HD <herpem@bigpond.com> - 2017-02-14 20:01 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 21:18 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-14 22:43 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-15 06:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-15 12:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 13:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-15 14:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-15 23:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 08:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-16 15:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 15:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 17:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 04:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 08:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 08:57 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 10:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 11:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 12:48 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 19:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-17 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 19:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:23 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 08:43 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-17 15:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 09:03 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 20:30 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 10:16 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 09:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-18 11:54 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@your.scary.shadow.edu> - 2017-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 11:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 13:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 14:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 15:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 16:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 17:02 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 17:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-20 04:16 +0000
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-20 16:18 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 18:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-23 04:37 +0000
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-23 15:27 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-24 04:42 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-20 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 13:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 13:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 16:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 16:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 17:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 21:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 23:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:31 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 15:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 16:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 17:41 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 17:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 16:25 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 16:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-17 18:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 08:31 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 10:33 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 11:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:07 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 13:52 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 16:38 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 15:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 15:56 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 16:35 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 17:10 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 20:40 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 21:01 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2017-02-16 23:34 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 08:50 +1100
Re: SA Greenies not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-02-16 22:02 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 09:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-17 11:12 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-17 10:36 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2017-02-17 13:59 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-17 13:24 +1000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:29 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-16 11:49 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 05:23 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-16 11:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-16 11:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-17 11:48 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 12:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 13:03 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-17 17:04 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-17 19:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 10:20 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:43 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 10:55 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-18 11:14 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:21 +1100
Re: Cats felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:20 +1100
Re: Cats Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-18 11:53 +0000
Re: Cats felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 23:47 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-19 00:07 +1100
Re: Cats Peter <noemail@pigpond.com> - 2017-02-19 10:23 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:47 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:09 +0000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:37 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 14:05 +0000
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 08:46 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-19 09:27 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-19 09:25 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-19 18:52 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 14:02 +0000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 11:49 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 09:58 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 11:20 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 11:23 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 14:16 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:39 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 13:16 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-20 02:21 +0000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 14:28 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 14:26 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 17:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:03 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 12:06 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:38 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:03 +0000
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 17:45 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:26 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-19 14:32 +1000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 15:57 +1100
Re: Cats Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-19 10:04 +0000
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-19 18:46 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:16 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:37 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 10:42 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 08:23 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-20 09:18 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:48 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-20 16:25 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 17:08 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-20 16:21 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 10:31 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 12:37 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 18:04 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-20 16:12 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-21 10:10 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:33 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-21 11:15 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:44 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:42 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 00:54 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:21 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-23 09:53 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:17 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:10 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-19 10:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-19 12:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 09:27 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 11:28 +1100
Re: Cats Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-20 11:29 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 19:43 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 19:53 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-20 20:26 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-20 20:42 +1100
Re: Cats Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-23 09:56 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-20 23:59 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-21 00:39 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:50 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 01:46 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:30 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:52 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 18:07 +1100
Re: Cats Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-23 04:10 +0000
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-23 16:26 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-25 10:41 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-25 16:06 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-25 21:36 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 08:57 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-26 18:01 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-21 10:41 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:50 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:52 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:33 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 00:58 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:31 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-22 09:29 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:26 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:44 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:55 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:45 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 13:07 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 13:39 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 14:55 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 15:19 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 17:34 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-22 17:47 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 18:04 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 18:56 +1100
Re: Cats Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-22 21:54 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 18:55 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 14:17 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 14:32 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 15:00 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:19 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-23 00:29 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:14 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-23 00:30 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 15:43 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:23 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:35 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 16:36 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:38 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-01 15:49 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-01 16:11 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 00:05 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-01 23:06 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 00:16 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-02 08:13 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-02 12:49 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 14:26 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-03 08:15 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-03 10:48 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-03 11:16 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-03 10:35 +1000
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-03 14:52 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-03-02 14:22 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 18:03 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 18:12 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-28 09:46 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 09:57 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:40 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-28 09:56 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-01 14:39 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 16:38 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-27 17:28 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-27 18:06 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-27 18:52 +1000
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-28 06:14 +1100
Re: Cats Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> - 2017-02-28 17:43 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 10:25 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:52 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 11:47 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:46 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-23 00:23 +1100
Re: Cats Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-21 10:19 +1100
Re: Cats felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-02-22 10:57 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:46 +1100
Re: Cats "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-21 12:14 +1000
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 18:10 +1100
Re: Cats F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 01:00 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-22 07:33 +1100
Re: Cats de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-21 11:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-17 09:28 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-18 09:46 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:08 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-18 21:30 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-18 15:18 +0000
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-16 13:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-12 10:20 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-12 11:22 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-12 16:07 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-13 10:54 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-13 00:34 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-13 14:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-13 15:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-13 15:36 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 15:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-15 11:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:19 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-15 10:37 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 07:32 +1100
Re: SA Greenies "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-11 07:08 +1000
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-11 08:13 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-09 22:17 +0000
Re: SA Greenies Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-10 10:05 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-10 10:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-02-10 14:37 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Tony <nomail@nospam.com> - 2017-02-10 08:46 +0800
Re: SA Greenies ellefranqq@gmail.com - 2019-03-15 19:06 -0700
Re: SA Greenies FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2019-03-16 17:21 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 12:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-23 12:52 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 12:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-10 12:42 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 16:00 +1100
Re: SA Greenies F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 17:26 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-10 22:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 11:58 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 15:36 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 18:24 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:15 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 22:44 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:01 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-12 08:16 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 10:03 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com> - 2017-02-11 16:45 +1100
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-13 15:06 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 17:28 +1100
Re: SA Greenies Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-02-13 21:07 +0000
Re: SA Greenies felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-15 11:14 +1100
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 14:40 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehmu6bFbte8U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32976 |
On Tuesday, 28 Feb 2017 9:57 AM, Petzl wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:46:37 +1100, Fran Snortilus > <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> wrote: > >>> You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how many >>> Trevors there are. >> Finally!!!!!! About bloody time that the penny dropped with you that >> cats DO roam. >> >> Now if you'll just stop the other idiot claim about how it's only >> because Trevor's putting out food that they come into Trevor's >> yard.................... >> >> Then we might get you to take the next move to admit that Trevor should >> not be expected to put up with OTHER people's animals in HIS yard >> because those animals AREN'T Trevor's animals.................... >> >> But I'd probably have to put some of MY cattle in YOUR yard before that >> penny drops............................... > When cats don't roam rats take over. and mice -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 09:56 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <4MKdncVZatoqMynFnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32969 |
On 27/02/2017 6:12 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Fran Snortilus wrote: >> On 27/02/2017 4:35 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> F Murtz wrote: >>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> act, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> returned to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secondly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> animals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either >>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to >>>>>>>>>>>> enter >>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>>>>> trapping >>>>>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite >>>>>>>>> legitimately >>>>>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish >>>>>>>> smell is >>>>>>>> coming from >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You still don't get it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>>>>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >>>>> >>>>> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in >>>>> his >>>>> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's >>>>> wander. If >>>>> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >>>>> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >>>>> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >>>>> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. >>>>> That >>>>> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, >>>>> or 3 >>>>> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >>>>> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >>>>> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>>>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>>>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>>>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> OWN owner's yard. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >>> >>> >>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>> trips to the pound. >>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >>> hating dog ") >> >> For God's sake! Get a grip! The OWNERS of the cat are the ones who >> should be responsible! Your silly suggestions are all about imposing >> the responsibility on a non owner! I've got a great suggestion. You >> should have my cows in your yard and if you don't want them there then >> you should install an electric fence to keep them out then hire a truck >> and ship them back to our farm. Or can't you see how stupid that sort >> of suggestion is? >> > > You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how many > Trevors there are. If you let your cat wander they suffer the consequences because of your irresponsibility. Either a trip to the pound using Trevor's method or a trip to pussy heaven/hell or the nearest rabbit warren using mine. Lost your cat? Check my tyres
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 14:39 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <ehmu4oFbte8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32969 |
On Monday, 27 Feb 2017 6:12 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Fran Snortilus wrote: >> On 27/02/2017 4:35 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> >>> >>> It is relatively easy to deter cats in a small suburban yard,but you >>> have to weight the small cost against the immense fun of annoying and >>> training the neighbors and the cost of the trap and the tuna and the >>> trips to the pound. >>> one such cheap method is proximity switched sprinklers another is a cat >>> hating dog ") >> >> For God's sake! Get a grip! The OWNERS of the cat are the ones who >> should be responsible! Your silly suggestions are all about imposing >> the responsibility on a non owner! I've got a great suggestion. You >> should have my cows in your yard and if you don't want them there then >> you should install an electric fence to keep them out then hire a truck >> and ship them back to our farm. Or can't you see how stupid that sort >> of suggestion is? >> > > You get a grip, you will not ever stop roaming cats , no matter how > many Trevors there are. no, we don't want any more Trevors. one is more than enough.. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 16:38 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o90dsj$p3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32961 |
On 27/02/2017 4:23 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Fran Snortilus wrote: >> On 23/02/2017 12:14 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>> On 22/02/2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>>>>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, >>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart >>>>>>>>>>>> blanche' a >>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>>>>>>> Protection >>>>>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy >>>>>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other >>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably >>>>>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this >>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>>>>> receives >>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the >>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to >>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this >>>>>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the >>>>>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to >>>>>>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>>>>>>> injure >>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter >>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>> property, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did he say that he was? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's >>>>>> trapping >>>>>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >>>>>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in >>>>>> his >>>>>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish smell is >>>>> coming from >>>> >>>> You still don't get it. >>> >>> You don't get it, the cat may never go into the yard if it were not >>> being enticed by the fish in the trap. >> >> Talk to your son, the vet (hopefully he might have some expertise in his >> profession and know something about cats). Ask him if cat's wander. If >> he's at all competent, he'll tell you that they DO wander. It's well >> known and well researched that domestic moggies roam widely unless >> comfined. All tracked and recorded on GPS. Some will roam over >> kilometres whilst others will only roam over a few hundred metres. That >> means that a cat next door to Trevor, or over the road from Trevor, or 3 >> doors down from Trevor WILL go into his yard unless it's confined. >> http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/cat-roam-maps/#..aP9HL3yuqr >> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22567526 >> http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/cat-curfew-gps-tracker-shows-just-how-far-adelaide-cats-roam-at-night/news-story/9064007da1b3411fa3e34bd0af5a59dd >> >> >> http://www.vetstreet.com/our-pet-experts/where-do-outdoor-cats-go-a-gps-tracking-study-can-tell-you >> >> >> >>> The cat is in the yard of someone who does not >>>> want it there and who has every right to say what is in his own >>>> backyard. If it's owners were responsible and didn't let their cat >>>> wander, then it would still smell lots of delicious things but from >>>> it's >>>> OWN owner's yard. >>> >> > > > You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food Cite?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 17:28 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <vMydnet4Bs6wWi7FnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32964 |
snip >> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food > > Cite? Most animals will go where there is a supply of food. My kids are always at the fridge
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 18:06 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o90j1m$bkp$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32965 |
On 27/02/2017 5:28 PM, de chucka wrote: > snip > >>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >> >> Cite? > > Most animals will go where there is a supply of food. My kids are always > at the fridge Your kids are fed at home. The cats are fed at home. Your kids and the cats will stay home if that theory applies. Sadly it doesn't. Kids are social and roam and cats are hunters and roam.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 18:52 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58b3e8d1$0$54290$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32965 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:vMydnet4Bs6wWi7FnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > snip > >>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >> >> Cite? > > Most animals will go where there is a supply of food. My kids are always > at the fridge Eldest son visited this arvo, straight to the fridge. Ah well. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 06:14 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <JMudnTcbX58R5ynFnZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32970 |
On 27/02/2017 7:52 PM, SG1 wrote: > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:vMydnet4Bs6wWi7FnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> snip >> >>>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >>> >>> Cite? >> >> Most animals will go where there is a supply of food. My kids are >> always at the fridge > > Eldest son visited this arvo, straight to the fridge. Ah well. What interests me is they keep going back hoping something has changed in the last 1/2 hour
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran Snortilus <nuts@loathsomeneedshelp.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 17:43 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o93626$odp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32970 |
On 27/02/2017 7:52 PM, SG1 wrote: > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:vMydnet4Bs6wWi7FnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> snip >> >>>> You are right, but a cat will make more visits where there is food >>> >>> Cite? >> >> Most animals will go where there is a supply of food. My kids are >> always at the fridge > > Eldest son visited this arvo, straight to the fridge. Ah well. :-)) Tell SWMBO not to be such a good cook. Or one trick we used at work when someone realised that the chocolates were disappearing from their desk drawer was to make a Laxette treat..................
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 10:25 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <tsipac5lka698m5fpmjaojgseibpg1c1k0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32909 |
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:58:00 +1100, F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>>>> property, >>>> >>>> did he say that he was? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >> >> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's trapping >> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in his >> yard, it's not there with his approval. > > >NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish smell is >coming from > Clevor Trevor is applying these actions in high density suburbia (City of Sydney), not wop wop! This is attacking domestic de-sexed companion cats1! > > No owner of a wandering cat >> should complain if the cat enters a baited trap. In suburbia, no-one >> who does not own a cat should be subject to the incursions of someone >> else's pet on a regular basis. >> >> >>> "**It is indeed. Possum cages work well. A can of tuna or salmon and the >>> cat is caught. The average cat in Australia is reputed to kill something >>> like 7 native animals per year. It's appalling. Cat owners are, in the >>> main, a disgusting sub-set of humanity. That said, not all are like >>> that. A mate's wife owned a cat, so my mate arranged for a large >>> indoor/outdoor area to be securely fenced with chicken wire, so the cat >>> could play and not interact with any native species. He is in the >>> minority." -- Petzl Says a Liberal card carrying *SHILL*! "FRAN" the Shill" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill#Marketing To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 10:52 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <eh4275FiebkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32909 |
On Wednesday, 22 Feb 2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: > Fran Snortilus wrote: >> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>> felix wrote: >>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you >>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a >>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands Protection >>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy >>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>> receives any >>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person >>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its >>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this >>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly the >>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or injure >>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>> provided >>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>>>> property, >>>> >>>> did he say that he was? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >> >> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's trapping >> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in his >> yard, it's not there with his approval. > > > NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish smell is > coming from indeed -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 11:47 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <K7-dnZfW2vcAQjHFnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32920 |
On 22/02/2017 10:52 AM, felix wrote: > On Wednesday, 22 Feb 2017 12:58 AM, F Murtz wrote: >> Fran Snortilus wrote: >>> On 21/02/2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> felix wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you >>>>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a >>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>>>> competent >>>>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands Protection >>>>>>>>> Act >>>>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> land >>>>>>>>> or any >>>>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy >>>>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or >>>>>>>>> harassing an >>>>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in >>>>>>>>> section 30 >>>>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat >>>>>>>>> receives any >>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person >>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>>>> officer >>>>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its >>>>>>>>> owner >>>>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this >>>>>>>>> section >>>>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat >>>>>>>>> extends >>>>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>>>> land as >>>>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly the >>>>>>>>> cat >>>>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it >>>>>>>>> constitute >>>>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or injure >>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you >>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>>>> legislation >>>>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer >>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>>>>> property, >>>>> >>>>> did he say that he was? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >>> >>> There is a difference between "enticing" and "trapping". He's trapping >>> and the food is the bait for the trap. He could quite legitimately >>> claim that he's not doing any "enticing" at all. If the cat is in his >>> yard, it's not there with his approval. >> >> >> NO it is in there trying to find the where the delicious fish smell is >> coming from > > indeed If the cat had responsible owners it wouldn't have a chance to smell it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 10:46 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <eh41rsFibo9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32884 |
On Tuesday, 21 Feb 2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: > felix wrote: >> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you >>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, you >>>>>> are >>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a >>>>>> right >>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>> >>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>> >>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>> competent >>>>>> person enters any >>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>> Protection Act >>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of the >>>>>> land >>>>>> or any >>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy >>>>>> the cat >>>>>> if he or she >>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>> injury to >>>>>> any of those >>>>>> animals. >>>>>> >>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or harassing an >>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in section 30 >>>>>> (1) >>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>> >>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section >>>>>> that >>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat receives any >>>>>> necessary >>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person >>>>>> is an >>>>>> authorised >>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>> authorised >>>>>> officer >>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its >>>>>> owner >>>>>> or taken >>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>> >>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this >>>>>> section >>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>> >>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>> >>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat extends >>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>> quickly and >>>>>> without >>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>> >>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>> land as >>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly >>>>>> the cat >>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply >>>>>> with >>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>> >>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it constitute >>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>> injure any >>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you would be >>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>> legislation >>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer provided >>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I don't >>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>> property, >> >> did he say that he was? > > > > Yes he did,on the 18/02 > "**It is indeed. Possum cages work well. A can of tuna or salmon and > the cat is caught. The average cat in Australia is reputed to kill > something like 7 native animals per year. It's appalling. Cat owners > are, in the main, a disgusting sub-set of humanity. That said, not all > are like that. A mate's wife owned a cat, so my mate arranged for a > large indoor/outdoor area to be securely fenced with chicken wire, so > the cat could play and not interact with any native species. He is in > the minority." > > > yes, I wasn't thinking when I asked that -- http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-23 00:23 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58ad90fb$0$51676$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32918 |
felix wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 Feb 2017 1:46 AM, F Murtz wrote: >> felix wrote: >>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>> birds (I >>>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's >>>>>>>>>>>> cats >>>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you >>>>>>>>>>> also run >>>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any >>>>>>>>>> cats I >>>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, you >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a >>>>>>> right >>>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some >>>>>>> competent >>>>>>> person enters any >>>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands >>>>>>> Protection Act >>>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of the >>>>>>> land >>>>>>> or any >>>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy >>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>> if he or she >>>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause >>>>>>> injury to >>>>>>> any of those >>>>>>> animals. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or harassing an >>>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in section 30 >>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat receives any >>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person >>>>>>> is an >>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the >>>>>>> authorised >>>>>>> officer >>>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its >>>>>>> owner >>>>>>> or taken >>>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this >>>>>>> section >>>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat extends >>>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die >>>>>>> quickly and >>>>>>> without >>>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed >>>>>>> land as >>>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly >>>>>>> the cat >>>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it constitute >>>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or >>>>>>> injure any >>>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you would be >>>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>>> legislation >>>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer provided >>>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I don't >>>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>>> property, >>> >>> did he say that he was? >> >> >> >> Yes he did,on the 18/02 >> "**It is indeed. Possum cages work well. A can of tuna or salmon and >> the cat is caught. The average cat in Australia is reputed to kill >> something like 7 native animals per year. It's appalling. Cat owners >> are, in the main, a disgusting sub-set of humanity. That said, not all >> are like that. A mate's wife owned a cat, so my mate arranged for a >> large indoor/outdoor area to be securely fenced with chicken wire, so >> the cat could play and not interact with any native species. He is in >> the minority." >> >> >> > > yes, I wasn't thinking when I asked that > > Trevor's Noisy miners have been nominated as a threat under the national environment protection act and are causing more damage than Indian myna's http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-14/native-noisy-miners-cause-more-damage-than-introduced-species/5964328
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 10:19 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <u7umactd309luu6lemtifaupbac7ta8pkn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32882 |
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:59:12 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about birds (I >>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill 10,000 >>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's cats >>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you also run >>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any cats I >>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Page 23. >>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, you are >>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a right >>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>> >>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>> >>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some competent >>>>> person enters any >>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act >>>>> 1901 and >>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of the land >>>>> or any >>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy the cat >>>>> if he or she >>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause injury to >>>>> any of those >>>>> animals. >>>>> >>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or harassing an >>>>> animal (other than >>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in section 30 (1) >>>>> (b)) can >>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>> practicable way of >>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>> >>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section that >>>>> results in the injury >>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat receives any >>>>> necessary >>>>> treatment, and >>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person is an >>>>> authorised >>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the authorised >>>>> officer >>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its owner >>>>> or taken >>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>> >>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this section >>>>> for the purpose of >>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>> >>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>> >>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat extends >>>>> only to authorising >>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die quickly and >>>>> without >>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>> .................................................. >>>>> >>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed land as >>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly the cat >>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply with >>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>> >>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it constitute >>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or injure any >>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you would be >>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>> legislation >>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer provided >>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I don't >>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>> >>>> >>> what right do you have to trap them? >> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >> property, > >did he say that he was? > Yes! Tuna or Salmon meaning a cat will really try to get it. Without it no cat would go near his property >> needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. -- Petzl -- Petzl what Australians think about the allegations of torture of suspected terrorists 'If hooking up one rag-head terrorist's testicles to a car battery gets the truth out of the lying little camel shagger to save just one Australian soldiers life, then I have only three things to say; Red is positive, Black is negative and make sure his nuts are wet!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 10:57 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <eh42g5FiebkU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #32887 |
On Tuesday, 21 Feb 2017 10:19 AM, Petzl wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:59:12 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> > wrote: > >> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 7:53 PM, Petzl wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:43:15 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 11:29 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 20/02/2017 11:28 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, 20 Feb 2017 9:27 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 19/02/2017 12:06 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, 19 Feb 2017 10:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2017 9:17 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 17 Feb 2017 7:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In any case, if you are REALLY so fucking concerned about birds (I >>>>>>>>>>> bet >>>>>>>>>>> you're not), then you should be killing cats. Cats kill 10,000 >>>>>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>>>>> more birds than wind turbines do. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, what will you do? Kill a cat today? I send my neighbour's cats >>>>>>>>>>> off >>>>>>>>>>> to the pound when I catch them. >>>>>>>>>> what a prick you are! it's not illegal to own a cat. do you also run >>>>>>>>>> elderly drivers off the road coz they're too slow? >>>>>>>>> **Thanks to NSW state law, I am entitled to exterminate any cats I >>>>>>>>> find on my property. >>>>>>>> I didn't know that >>>>>>> **Yep: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/8444158c-3268-4730-ab8e-eaf50faf4bc2/1998-87.pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Page 23. >>>>>> One would assume that since you are capable of quoting the act, you are >>>>>> also capable of reading it. It does NOT give you 'cart blanche' a right >>>>>> to kill cats on your property, viz... >>>>>> >>>>>> Companion Animals Act 1998 No 87 [NSW] >>>>>> Part 4 Responsibilities for control of cats >>>>>> >>>>>> (3) If a cat that is not under the effective control of some competent >>>>>> person enters any >>>>>> inclosed lands within the meaning of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act >>>>>> 1901 and >>>>>> approaches any animal being farmed on the land, the occupier of the land >>>>>> or any >>>>>> person authorised by the occupier can lawfully injure or destroy the cat >>>>>> if he or she >>>>>> reasonably believes that the cat will molest, attack or cause injury to >>>>>> any of those >>>>>> animals. >>>>>> >>>>>> (4) An authorised officer who finds a cat attacking or harassing an >>>>>> animal (other than >>>>>> vermin) within a wildlife protection area (as defined in section 30 (1) >>>>>> (b)) can >>>>>> lawfully injure or destroy the cat if there is no other reasonably >>>>>> practicable way of >>>>>> protecting the animal. >>>>>> >>>>>> (5) A person who takes action under the authority of this section that >>>>>> results in the injury >>>>>> to or death of a cat must: >>>>>> (a) take reasonable steps to ensure that an injured cat receives any >>>>>> necessary >>>>>> treatment, and >>>>>> (b) report the matter to an authorised officer (unless the person is an >>>>>> authorised >>>>>> officer) and comply with such reasonable directions as the authorised >>>>>> officer >>>>>> may give for the purpose of causing the cat to be returned to its owner >>>>>> or taken >>>>>> to a council pound, and >>>>>> (c) take reasonable steps to inform the owner of the cat. >>>>>> >>>>>> (6) An authorised officer is not to give a direction under this section >>>>>> for the purpose of >>>>>> causing a cat to be taken to a council pound unless the authorised >>>>>> officer is satisfied >>>>>> that the owner of the cat cannot be identified. >>>>>> >>>>>> (7) Nothing in this section authorises a contravention of the >>>>>> >>>>>> (8) The authority conferred by this section to destroy a cat extends >>>>>> only to authorising >>>>>> the destruction of the cat in a manner that causes it to die quickly and >>>>>> without >>>>>> unnecessary suffering. >>>>>> .................................................. >>>>>> >>>>>> firstly the property must comply with the meaning of inclosed land as >>>>>> prescribed by the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, secondly the cat >>>>>> has to be threat to a 'farmed animal', thirdly you need to comply with >>>>>> the directions in section (5), and lastly nothing may be done that >>>>>> contravenes the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979. >>>>>> >>>>>> do you have any farmed animals on your property? does it constitute >>>>>> 'inclosed land'? if not, then you have no right to kill or injure any >>>>>> cat on your premises. and if you do so, I would suggest you would be >>>>>> subject to penalties under the provision of cruelty to animals >>>>>> legislation >>>>> **You are correct. However, the local animal control officer provided >>>>> me sufficient information to deal with all that. Either way, I don't >>>>> kill them. I catch them and send them to the pound. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>> property, >> did he say that he was? >> > Yes! > Tuna or Salmon meaning a cat will really try to get it. yes, what they love most > Without it no cat would go near his property > >>> needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. -- "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 11:46 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <15OdnYVs0IJrEDbFnZ2dnUU7-asAAAAA@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32879 |
snip >> what right do you have to trap them? > > He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his > property, needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. 2 paracetamol tablets in the bait is effective but illegal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 12:14 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <58aba28b$0$41968$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #32896 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:15OdnYVs0IJrEDbFnZ2dnUU7-asAAAAA@westnet.com.au... > snip >>> what right do you have to trap them? >> >> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >> property, needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. > > 2 paracetamol tablets in the bait is effective but illegal Not if the cat has a headache. ;-) >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 18:10 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <-MOdnbkbU_WddTbFnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #32901 |
On 21/02/2017 1:14 PM, SG1 wrote: > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:15OdnYVs0IJrEDbFnZ2dnUU7-asAAAAA@westnet.com.au... >> snip >>>> what right do you have to trap them? >>> >>> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >>> property, needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. >> >> 2 paracetamol tablets in the bait is effective but illegal > > Not if the cat has a headache. ;-) True will cure it's headache and it's habit of wandering
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 01:00 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Cats |
| Message-ID | <o8hh2d$jaf$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32896 |
de chucka wrote: > snip >>> what right do you have to trap them? >> >> He is also putting out baits to entice his neighbors cat to enter his >> property, needs his arse sued off by a lawyer. > > 2 paracetamol tablets in the bait is effective but illegal > There is something else in common use but I won't mention it as it may give cat haters ideas.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.electronics
csiph-web