Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #62098 > unrolled thread
| Started by | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-11-07 10:26 +1100 |
| Last post | 2017-11-09 18:25 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 10:26 +1100
Re: new social media platform de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-07 10:39 +1100
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-07 12:16 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-06 21:44 -0600
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-08 22:04 +1000
Re: new social media platform Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-08 20:04 +0700
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-09 08:36 +1100
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-09 08:35 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 14:16 +1000
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-09 21:23 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 04:36 -0600
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 20:57 +1000
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-10 10:50 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 19:38 -0600
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-08 22:24 -0600
Re: new social media platform de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-09 15:51 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 00:36 -0600
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-09 21:24 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 04:42 -0600
Re: new social media platform Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-07 08:15 +0700
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-06 20:17 -0600
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 13:57 +1100
Re: new social media platform Sandgroper <Sandgroper@noaddress.com> - 2017-11-07 13:50 +0800
Re: new social media platform jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-11-08 01:12 -0800
Re: new social media platform news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2017-11-07 05:53 +0000
Re: new social media platform Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-07 17:05 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 17:20 +1100
Re: new social media platform Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-07 18:47 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 20:46 +1100
Re: new social media platform Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-08 20:40 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 09:52 +1100
Re: new social media platform Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-09 17:59 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-07 19:50 +1000
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 20:58 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-08 22:02 +1000
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 09:54 +1100
Re: new social media platform de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-09 10:29 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 09:47 +1000
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 16:18 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 15:24 +1000
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 16:31 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 15:45 +1000
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 01:08 -0600
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 17:14 +1000
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 18:37 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 19:38 +1000
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 04:30 -0600
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 20:51 +1000
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 07:06 -0600
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-10 00:10 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 23:55 +1100
Re: new social media platform Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-09 20:14 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 03:43 -0600
Re: new social media platform Ördög <abaddon@purgatory.org.invalid> - 2017-11-09 19:50 +0000
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 16:33 -0600
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 18:31 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 19:36 +1000
Re: new social media platform Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-09 18:10 +0700
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 23:37 +1100
Re: new social media platform Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-09 20:13 +0700
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 23:31 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 22:35 +1000
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-09 21:34 +1100
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 20:52 +1000
Re: new social media platform Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-11-10 10:54 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-10 11:29 +1100
Re: new social media platform Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-11-09 19:41 -0600
Re: new social media platform Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-09 18:07 +0700
Re: new social media platform keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 15:31 +1000
Re: new social media platform de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-09 17:02 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 17:33 +1100
Re: new social media platform Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-09 17:58 +1100
Re: new social media platform felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 18:25 +1100
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 16:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6i7h9F5ul8U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62161 |
On 9/11/2017 4:24 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/9/2017 3:18 PM, felix wrote: >> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A new social media platform has just been established >>>>>>>> incorporating all the elements of YouTube, Twitter, and >>>>>>>> Facebook. It's called YouTwitFace.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You thought that up all by yourself? >>>>>> >>>>>> no >>>>> >>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>> that crap then. >>>> >>>> >>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>> >>>> >>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >> >> >> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >> >> > Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a > shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so annoying. only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for everybody -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 15:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f6i8bfF6ab3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62162 |
On 11/9/2017 3:31 PM, felix wrote: > On 9/11/2017 4:24 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/9/2017 3:18 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A new social media platform has just been established >>>>>>>>> incorporating all the elements of YouTube, Twitter, and >>>>>>>>> Facebook. It's called YouTwitFace.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You thought that up all by yourself? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> no >>>>>> >>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>> that crap then. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>> >>> >>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>> >>> >> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so annoying. > > > only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for everybody > Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my assessment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 01:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnp07vnh.sto.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #62164 |
keithr0 wrote: > felix wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> felix wrote: >>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: ----snip---- >>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>> >>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>> >>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>> >>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>> >>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so annoying. >> >> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for everybody > > Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my > assessment. These newsgroupos, Keith, are used three groups of people: there are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hosrile to each other. Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that I've seen that you are bot a good fit for the lunatic brigade. But of course, that's up to you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 17:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f6idi6F7d01U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62170 |
On 11/9/2017 5:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> felix wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> felix wrote: >>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: > > ----snip---- > >>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>> >>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>> >>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so annoying. >>> >>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for everybody >> >> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >> assessment. > > These newsgroupos, Keith, are used three groups of people: there > are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is > vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to > vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's > own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first > two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hosrile to each other. > > Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off > at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in > the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that > I've seen that you are bot a good fit for the lunatic brigade. > > But of course, that's up to you. > If you think that felix is a rational person then it is obvious that you belong to the lunatic fringe or maybe beyond the fringe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 18:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6iet2F7mdbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62171 |
On 9/11/2017 6:14 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/9/2017 5:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> felix wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >> >> ----snip---- >> >>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>> >>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly >>>>>> poke >>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>> >>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>> annoying. >>>> >>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>> everybody >>> >>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>> assessment. >> >> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >> >> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >> >> But of course, that's up to you. >> > If you think that felix is a rational person then it is obvious that > you belong to the lunatic fringe or maybe beyond the fringe. wrong numbnuts. I am a very rational person as anyone who engages in sensible discussion with me would know. and FYI, Ned is a very intelligent and erudite individual, albeit that he doesn't suffer fools lightly -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 19:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f6im1jF975dU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62174 |
On 11/9/2017 5:37 PM, felix wrote: > On 9/11/2017 6:14 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/9/2017 5:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> felix wrote: >>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>> >>> ----snip---- >>> >>>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly >>>>>>> poke >>>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>>> annoying. >>>>> >>>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>>> everybody >>>> >>>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>>> assessment. >>> >>> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >>> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >>> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >>> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >>> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >>> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >>> >>> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >>> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >>> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >>> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >>> >>> But of course, that's up to you. >>> >> If you think that felix is a rational person then it is obvious that >> you belong to the lunatic fringe or maybe beyond the fringe. > > > wrong numbnuts. I am a very rational person as anyone who engages in > sensible discussion with me would know. and FYI, Ned is a very > intelligent and erudite individual, albeit that he doesn't suffer fools > lightly > > No rational person thinks that monster cables are any better than those costing a quarter of their price. As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to heterodocy is vituperation" and troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 04:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnp08bhu.5h9.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #62177 |
keithr0 wrote: > > As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to > heterodocy is vituperation" and troll. That was stupid of you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 20:51 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f6iq96Fa7pjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62181 |
On 11/9/2017 8:30 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> >> As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to >> heterodocy is vituperation" and troll. > > That was stupid of you. > <sarcasm> Oh dear, now I'm terribly worried </sarcasm>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 07:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnp08kmf.bld.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #62185 |
keithr0 wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > keithr0 wrote: > > > > > > As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to > > > heterodocy is vituperation" and troll. > > > > That was stupid of you. > > <sarcasm> Oh dear, now I'm terribly worried </sarcasm> You should be. Looks like you're coming down with Oldtimer's Disease.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-10 00:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6j2djFc2mvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62194 |
On 10/11/2017 12:06 AM, Ned Latham wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> Ned Latham wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to >>>> heterodocy is vituperation" and troll. >>> That was stupid of you. >> <sarcasm> Oh dear, now I'm terribly worried </sarcasm> > You should be. Looks like you're coming down with Oldtimer's Disease. there's something wrong in his brain, that's for sure. his grandkids must be so proud of him (not!) -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 23:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6j1h9FbsbkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62177 |
On 9/11/2017 8:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/9/2017 5:37 PM, felix wrote: >> On 9/11/2017 6:14 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/9/2017 5:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>> >>>> ----snip---- >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 >>>>>>>>>>> newsgroups with >>>>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't >>>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to >>>>>>>> constantly poke >>>>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>>>> annoying. >>>>>> >>>>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>>>> everybody >>>>> >>>>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree >>>>> with my >>>>> assessment. >>>> >>>> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >>>> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >>>> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >>>> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >>>> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >>>> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >>>> >>>> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >>>> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >>>> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >>>> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >>>> >>>> But of course, that's up to you. >>>> >>> If you think that felix is a rational person then it is obvious that >>> you belong to the lunatic fringe or maybe beyond the fringe. >> >> >> wrong numbnuts. I am a very rational person as anyone who engages in >> sensible discussion with me would know. and FYI, Ned is a very >> intelligent and erudite individual, albeit that he doesn't suffer >> fools lightly >> >> > No rational person thinks that monster cables are any better than > those costing a quarter of their price. you don't know what I think > > As for your little buddy Ned, he is a total pseud example "Response to > heterodocy is vituperation" and troll. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor <trevor@home.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 20:14 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ou167h$7j2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #62171 |
On 11/9/2017 5:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > These newsgroupos, Keith, are used three groups of people: there > are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is > vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to > vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's > own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. Actually four if you count your Far Right Fascist Assholes. Trevor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 03:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnp088pt.3il.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #62175 |
Trevor wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > > > These newsgroupos, Keith, are used three groups of people: there > > are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is > > vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to > > vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's > > own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. > > Actually four if you count your Far Right Fascist Assholes. Nope, There are fascists, who are as left wing as any other socialists and there are capitalists, who are right wing. I haven't seen *any* posts by genuine rightards (though of course idiots of Yap-Yap's ilk like to pretend that there are some[1]) and the only genuine fascit I recall seeing posts from is Topaz, who bases himself elsewhere. [1] Simple case of displacement: they can't bear to admit that their most rabid enemy is a fellow-traveller so they call him the opposite of what he is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ördög <abaddon@purgatory.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 19:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ou2bik$k49$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62175 |
It was written by Trevor: > Actually four if you count your Far Right Fascist Assholes. You'll never be able to shake Mad Ned's unshakable high opinion of itself and its political ideals. In other words, that troll's narcissism knows no bounds. -- Ördög, without any apologies
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 16:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnp09lss.fa.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #62197 |
Tne ugly sow's lapdog, aka the Foreskin Peeler (you know, the cowardly retard that sometimes calls itself "Ördög") spewed forth its usual obsessive ranting impersonation of a human being... Pity aboiut the nusg between uts ears.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 18:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6ieitF7k8pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62170 |
On 9/11/2017 6:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> felix wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> felix wrote: >>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: > ----snip---- > >>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>> >>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>> >>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so annoying. >>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for everybody >> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >> assessment. > These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there > are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is > vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to > vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's > own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first > two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. > > Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off > at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in > the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that > I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. > > But of course, that's up to you. well said. Keefy has it in for me, for reasons best known only to himself. -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 19:36 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f6ils8F975dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62173 |
On 11/9/2017 5:31 PM, felix wrote: > On 9/11/2017 6:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> felix wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >> ----snip---- >> >>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>> >>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>> annoying. >>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>> everybody >>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>> assessment. >> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >> >> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >> >> But of course, that's up to you. > > > well said. Keefy has it in for me, for reasons best known only to himself. > > Everybody (other than Ned) has it in for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 18:10 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <asd80ddoa4sshdo7dkck817v3aulrurf7g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #62176 |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 19:36:06 +1000, keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote: >On 11/9/2017 5:31 PM, felix wrote: >> On 9/11/2017 6:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> felix wrote: >>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>> ----snip---- >>> >>>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>>> annoying. >>>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>>> everybody >>>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>>> assessment. >>> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >>> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >>> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >>> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >>> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >>> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >>> >>> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >>> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >>> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >>> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >>> >>> But of course, that's up to you. >> >> >> well said. Keefy has it in for me, for reasons best known only to himself. >> >> >Everybody (other than Ned) has it in for you. And possibly Pretzel... but yes you are right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 23:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f6j0fjFbi82U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62189 |
On 9/11/2017 10:10 PM, Je�us wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 19:36:06 +1000, keithr0 <user@account.invalid> > wrote: > >> On 11/9/2017 5:31 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 9/11/2017 6:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>> ----snip---- >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>>>> annoying. >>>>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>>>> everybody >>>>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>>>> assessment. >>>> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >>>> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >>>> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >>>> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >>>> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >>>> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >>>> >>>> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >>>> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >>>> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >>>> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >>>> >>>> But of course, that's up to you. >>> >>> well said. Keefy has it in for me, for reasons best known only to himself. >>> >>> >> Everybody (other than Ned) has it in for you. > And possibly Pretzel... but yes you are right. not really. just persons of a certain ilk, of which you are one -- http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-09 20:13 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3l80dllcudl9okchulbqrqc936qnio0ms@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #62192 |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:37:08 +1100, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >On 9/11/2017 10:10 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 19:36:06 +1000, keithr0 <user@account.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/9/2017 5:31 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 9/11/2017 6:08 PM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/11/2017 10:47 AM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/2017 8:54 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2017 11:02 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 7:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2017 8:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/7/2017 9:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> ----snip---- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you don't even have that excuse for polluting 3 newsgroups with >>>>>>>>>>>> that crap then. >>>>>>>>>>> get someone to pull out the pole you have shoved up your arse >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are a nasty little bastard when you get criticised aren't you? >>>>>>>>> nup. I just get sick of fuckwits like you who want to constantly poke >>>>>>>>> at me. have you seen that shrink yet? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Haven't you worked out yet why people want to poke you? Perhaps a >>>>>>>> shrink could help you work out why everybody else finds you so >>>>>>>> annoying. >>>>>>> only someone as stupid and vain as you would think he speaks for >>>>>>> everybody >>>>>> Just ask them, the comments about you almost universally agree with my >>>>>> assessment. >>>>> These newsgroups, Keith, are used three groups of people: there >>>>> are a bunch of leftwing lunatics whose response to heterodocy is >>>>> vituperation; there are some rational people, whose response to >>>>> vituperation is contempt (plus, sometimes, a dose of the lunatic's >>>>> own medicine); and there are some who try to be neutral. The first >>>>> two groups are, as you would expect, strongly hostile to each other. >>>>> >>>>> Felix is (as I am) part of the second group. You, by slinging off >>>>> at his attempt to lighten the mood, bid fair to place yourself in >>>>> the first. As it happens, I feel from other posts of yours that >>>>> I've seen that you are not a good fit for the lunatic brigade. >>>>> >>>>> But of course, that's up to you. >>>> >>>> well said. Keefy has it in for me, for reasons best known only to himself. >>>> >>>> >>> Everybody (other than Ned) has it in for you. >> And possibly Pretzel... but yes you are right. > > >not really. just persons of a certain ilk, of which you are one Whatever you say, Baldrick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web