Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #61559 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Max <max@val.morgan> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-10-20 17:21 +1100 |
| Last post | 2017-10-31 14:05 +0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 225 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
Stan, Netflix Max <max@val.morgan> - 2017-10-20 17:21 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-20 17:30 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-10-20 18:01 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Max <max@val.morgan> - 2017-10-20 19:23 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-10-20 13:32 +0000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-21 08:11 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-21 20:25 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-22 02:53 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-22 12:31 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-10-21 10:38 +0000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-22 02:51 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-21 20:22 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-20 19:29 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-20 19:31 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Max <max@val.morgan> - 2017-10-20 19:34 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-20 19:57 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-21 09:36 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-10-21 09:51 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-21 20:21 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix hector <bobble@there.com> - 2017-10-25 00:14 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 11:02 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-25 19:49 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-10-25 19:31 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-28 09:01 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-28 15:11 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Max <max@val.morgan> - 2017-10-28 18:18 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-29 06:46 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-28 17:41 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:17 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-31 16:58 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Max <max@val.morgan> - 2017-10-25 21:35 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-25 21:44 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-27 11:33 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-27 14:24 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-28 12:09 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-28 17:57 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-28 22:50 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-29 16:36 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-29 20:23 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-30 12:27 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 08:13 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-31 13:15 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-31 14:23 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-31 16:55 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 17:25 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 10:05 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 18:55 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:10 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 20:20 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 23:56 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-03 09:26 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:17 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 19:55 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 19:54 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 07:42 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 08:02 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 18:56 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:11 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:13 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 07:41 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:34 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 07:46 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 12:14 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 07:38 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 12:10 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 10:38 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-03 22:37 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-04 17:41 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-06 18:08 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-07 17:13 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 17:56 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-07 18:50 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-08 06:32 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-11-08 01:02 -0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-09 09:23 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-08 06:30 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-08 22:15 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-09 00:05 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-09 10:02 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-09 09:11 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-09 07:17 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-09 06:54 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-09 13:15 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-11-05 21:58 +0000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-06 18:20 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-06 22:45 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-07 06:36 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 09:41 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-08 22:07 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2017-11-06 23:04 +0000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 18:51 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:03 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:30 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:25 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 10:37 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 16:40 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-03 00:18 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-02 18:02 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 19:59 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-03 23:28 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-05 11:44 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-05 16:12 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 12:12 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 11:38 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:26 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-31 16:58 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-31 17:03 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 14:00 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 18:50 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 09:29 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 07:19 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 10:30 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix alvey <alvey@is.invalid> - 2017-11-01 10:13 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 08:15 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 12:07 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 11:35 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 13:09 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 12:39 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-01 09:45 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 14:46 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 14:43 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 19:59 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-02 06:45 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 10:41 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-11-02 18:03 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.au> - 2017-11-02 21:50 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-02 18:34 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-02 16:30 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-03 21:48 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-03 20:38 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-04 06:58 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 19:39 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-04 06:57 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-11-04 12:58 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-04 13:20 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-03 20:30 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-04 07:01 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-04 13:35 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 13:56 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-07 14:51 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 15:45 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-07 22:59 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 14:41 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 15:57 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 19:56 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:28 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:08 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 21:17 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:06 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:51 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-03 21:50 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-04 05:03 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 19:44 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-06 08:31 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 13:43 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 13:12 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 14:47 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 16:09 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 15:28 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 17:32 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 16:38 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 17:44 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 17:05 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 18:40 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 17:49 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:00 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:35 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 21:34 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-03 21:50 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 19:45 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-01 19:58 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 19:39 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:13 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:23 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 20:47 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-01 21:07 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 12:00 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 16:32 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-07 17:10 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 21:27 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 06:42 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 12:04 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 16:33 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 12:04 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 16:50 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 19:52 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-02 06:57 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-02 06:52 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-11-02 16:12 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-11-01 08:17 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-28 09:02 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-28 15:14 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-28 17:54 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-30 14:46 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.au> - 2017-10-30 19:42 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:10 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.au> - 2017-10-31 19:33 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-10-30 22:16 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-31 11:45 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-31 16:28 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:11 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-10-31 15:57 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:04 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-01 20:12 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 11:53 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-03 22:19 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-31 11:37 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:14 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-31 15:26 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 11:28 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-10-31 16:01 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-10-31 15:29 +1000
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 14:04 +0700
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-31 16:36 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 17:23 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:23 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-01 16:31 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-01 19:38 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:43 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 07:35 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-11-02 12:09 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-11-02 10:21 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:41 +1100
Re: Stan, Netflix Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-10-31 13:48 +0800
Re: Stan, Netflix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-10-31 14:05 +0700
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 16:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f5t8f6F7361U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61922 |
On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and dick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and watching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in Thailand. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's pretty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, audio on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and play >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files too >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of exactly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components and >>>>>>>> a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of HT >>>>>>>> systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. what >>>>>>>> does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>> there that suggest that you would know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>>> would sound like. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle >>>>>>>> to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, >>>>>>>> no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no sense of >>>>>>>> immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>> >>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. No >>>>>> thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I concur >>>>> >>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>> >>> >>> you're the arsehole >>> >> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, that >> was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do rather >> better than that. > > > I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment > > OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 17:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5t8ntF75eaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61923 |
On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and dick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in Thailand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's pretty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, audio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of exactly? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components >>>>>>>>> and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of HT >>>>>>>>> systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. what >>>>>>>>> does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with >>>>>>>>> stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no sense >>>>>>>>> of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. No >>>>>>> thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I concur >>>>>> >>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>> >>>> >>>> you're the arsehole >>>> >>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, that >>> was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do rather >>> better than that. >> >> >> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >> >> > OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 17:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f5ta2jF7ch6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61924 |
On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and dick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in Thailand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's pretty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, audio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of exactly? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components >>>>>>>>>> and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of HT >>>>>>>>>> systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. what >>>>>>>>>> does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with >>>>>>>>>> stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no sense >>>>>>>>>> of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. No >>>>>>>> thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>> >>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>> >>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, that >>>> was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do rather >>>> better than that. >>> >>> >>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >>> >>> >> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. > > > so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies to an > innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then > There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting for your evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 18:40 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5tc10F7s57U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61926 |
On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components >>>>>>>>>>> and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of >>>>>>>>>>> HT systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. >>>>>>>>>>> what does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better >>>>>>>>>>>> then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you >>>>>>>>>>> with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no >>>>>>>>>>> sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. >>>>>>>>> No thanks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>> >>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, >>>>> that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do >>>>> rather better than that. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >>>> >>>> >>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >> >> >> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies to >> an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >> > There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting for > your evidence. it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at me. now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 17:49 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f5tcjpF80b8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61927 |
On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components >>>>>>>>>>>> and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of >>>>>>>>>>>> HT systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. >>>>>>>>>>>> what does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better >>>>>>>>>>>>> then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you >>>>>>>>>>>> with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no >>>>>>>>>>>> sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. >>>>>>>>>> No thanks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>> >>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, >>>>>> that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do >>>>>> rather better than that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >>>>> >>>>> >>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>> >>> >>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies to >>> an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>> >> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting for >> your evidence. > > > it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at me. now > why would that be. is he more than a match for you? > > Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 19:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5td79F84csU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61928 |
On 1/11/2017 6:49 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL >>>>>>>>>>>>> components and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the >>>>>>>>>>>>> bees knees of HT systems, but it's pretty good for a >>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic environment. what does your crappy stereo system >>>>>>>>>>>>> consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you >>>>>>>>>>>>> with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> no sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with >>>>>>>>>>>> excellent sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. >>>>>>>>>>> No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, >>>>>>> that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do >>>>>>> rather better than that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your >>>>>> comment >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>>> >>>> >>>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies >>>> to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>>> >>> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting >>> for your evidence. >> >> >> it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at me. >> now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? >> >> > Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your > question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 > years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact" here's a thought. why don't you go and see a good shrink and see if he (or she) can figure out why you have your obsession with me. I can almost guarantee that anytime I see your name in a ng you'll be taking potshots at me. either that or just go fuck yerself. -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 19:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f5tirfF9bs1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61932 |
On 11/1/2017 6:00 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 6:49 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL >>>>>>>>>>>>>> components and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bees knees of HT systems, but it's pretty good for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic environment. what does your crappy stereo system >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with >>>>>>>>>>>>> excellent sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. >>>>>>>>>>>> No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, >>>>>>>> that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do >>>>>>>> rather better than that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your >>>>>>> comment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies >>>>> to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>>>> >>>> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting >>>> for your evidence. >>> >>> >>> it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at me. >>> now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? >>> >>> >> Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your >> question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 >> years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact" > > > here's a thought. why don't you go and see a good shrink and see if he > (or she) can figure out why you have your obsession with me. I can > almost guarantee that anytime I see your name in a ng you'll be taking > potshots at me. either that or just go fuck yerself. > No felix, I'm not obsessed with you, it's only your paranoia that makes it seem so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 21:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5tm60Fa6k5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61952 |
On 1/11/2017 8:35 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/1/2017 6:00 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 6:49 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bees knees of HT systems, but it's pretty good for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic environment. what does your crappy stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of monster cabling you wasted your money on and there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is nothing there that suggest that you would know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and no sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> excellent sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there >>>>>>>>>>>>> too. No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool >>>>>>>>> age, that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults >>>>>>>>> can do rather better than that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your >>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies >>>>>> to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>>>>> >>>>> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting >>>>> for your evidence. >>>> >>>> >>>> it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at >>>> me. now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? >>>> >>>> >>> Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your >>> question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 >>> years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact" >> >> >> here's a thought. why don't you go and see a good shrink and see if >> he (or she) can figure out why you have your obsession with me. I can >> almost guarantee that anytime I see your name in a ng you'll be >> taking potshots at me. either that or just go fuck yerself. >> > No felix, I'm not obsessed with you, it's only your paranoia that > makes it seem so. > the google record would prove me right -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-03 21:50 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f633grFl3t2U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61961 |
On 11/1/2017 8:34 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 8:35 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 11/1/2017 6:00 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 6:49 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bees knees of HT systems, but it's pretty good for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic environment. what does your crappy stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of monster cabling you wasted your money on and there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is nothing there that suggest that you would know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what a decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and no sense of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> excellent sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there >>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool >>>>>>>>>> age, that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults >>>>>>>>>> can do rather better than that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your >>>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who replies >>>>>>> to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>>>>>> >>>>>> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting >>>>>> for your evidence. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at >>>>> me. now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your >>>> question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 >>>> years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact" >>> >>> >>> here's a thought. why don't you go and see a good shrink and see if >>> he (or she) can figure out why you have your obsession with me. I can >>> almost guarantee that anytime I see your name in a ng you'll be >>> taking potshots at me. either that or just go fuck yerself. >>> >> No felix, I'm not obsessed with you, it's only your paranoia that >> makes it seem so. >> > > the google record would prove me right > > Go ahead make my day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-05 19:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f684ulFq4d2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62029 |
On 11/3/2017 9:50 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 11/1/2017 8:34 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 8:35 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 6:00 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 6:49 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 5:40 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:05 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:44 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 5:38 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and dick around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thailand. I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bees knees of HT systems, but it's pretty good for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a domestic environment. what does your crappy stereo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system consist of? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of monster cabling you wasted your money on and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing there that suggest that you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know what a decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better then any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you with stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bass, and no sense of immersion in the overall viewing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> excellent sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. No thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool >>>>>>>>>>> age, that was their standard of discussion then. Most adults >>>>>>>>>>> can do rather better than that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your >>>>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so you're not smart enough to figure out that someone who >>>>>>>> replies to an innocuous remark with abuse qualifies as such then >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> There was no abuse, just an astute observation. I'm still waiting >>>>>>> for your evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> it was Rod's comment I agreed with but your bile was directed at >>>>>> me. now why would that be. is he more than a match for you? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Bile? What a precious little fellow you are. In answer to your >>>>> question, I have been swapping insults with Spood for the last 25 >>>>> years so no. Still waiting for your evidence to back up your "Fact" >>>> >>>> >>>> here's a thought. why don't you go and see a good shrink and see if >>>> he (or she) can figure out why you have your obsession with me. I >>>> can almost guarantee that anytime I see your name in a ng you'll be >>>> taking potshots at me. either that or just go fuck yerself. >>>> >>> No felix, I'm not obsessed with you, it's only your paranoia that >>> makes it seem so. >>> >> >> the google record would prove me right >> >> > Go ahead make my day. OK don't then. I didn't think that you could.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 19:58 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5tgl2F8tf4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61923 |
"keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message news:f5t8f6F7361U1@mid.individual.net... > On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and dick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading and/or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and watching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in Thailand. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's pretty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, audio on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I can see, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and play >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files too >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the novelty >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would want >>>>>>>>>>> to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of exactly? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components and a >>>>>>>>> yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of HT systems, >>>>>>>>> but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. what does your >>>>>>>>> crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of monster >>>>>>>>>>>> cabling you wasted your money on and there is nothing there >>>>>>>>>>>> that suggest that you would know what a decent setup would >>>>>>>>>>>> sound like. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup might >>>>>>>>>> sound like? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>>>>>>>>> cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to >>>>>>>>> a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no >>>>>>>>> sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no sense of immersion in >>>>>>>>> the overall viewing experience >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. No >>>>>>> thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I concur >>>>>> >>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>> >>>> >>>> you're the arsehole >>>> >>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, that was >>> their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do rather better than >>> that. >> >> >> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >> >> > OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. The evidence is in every post of yours.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 19:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f5tj1qF9f71U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61946 |
On 11/1/2017 6:58 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message > news:f5t8f6F7361U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 11/1/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 4:28 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 11/1/2017 3:09 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 2:12 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/1/2017 12:43 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:f5smm8F3ha9U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On 11/1/2017 11:07 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 10:19 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 6:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 9:50 PM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:00 PM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:03:24 +1100, felix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <felix@real_felix.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 4:58 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2017 3:26 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:09:18 +0800, Clocky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <notgonn@happen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you need a DVR, remember to record it and dick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around skipping ads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you go to watch... easier to just take a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minutes to download a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show/movie from a site and stream to my TV or simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on-demand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream. Since I mostly watch ABC/SBS, downloading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or streaming from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SBS on demand and iView is a no-brainer, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even on Plus 7, where video won't play with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker enabled you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply disable the ad-blocker, press play and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and re-enable your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad-blocker and it skips the ads. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My DVR hasn't seen use in some time, it's obsolete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I really can't be bothered with DVRs either. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing called Kodi is very popular here in Thailand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got around to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting it up on my notebook recently and it's pretty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damned good, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must say. It's basically streaming TV, movies, audio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on demand, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free if use use the right plugins ;) From what I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see, there isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much you can't find on there. You can get plug and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play type boxes or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set it up on a laptop/pc/mac etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep. just download from playstore (or the apple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. nothing with 5.1+ sound tho. it makes the files >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big, so only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stereo or simulated surround via home theatre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 or 2.1 suits me just fine. I got over the novelty of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surround >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound a very long time ago. I actually dislike it nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah same, I'm over it too. Bit of a gimmick once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> novelty of it wore off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously neither of you have a decent home theatre setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would you think that? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because there's no way anyone with a decent HT setup would >>>>>>>>>>>> want to watch any half decent movie in stereo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What does your "decent" home theatre system consist of exactly? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> seven speakers and a Sub using B&W, Kef, and JBL components >>>>>>>>>> and a yamaha amp. I'm not suggesting it's the bees knees of HT >>>>>>>>>> systems, but it's pretty good for a domestic environment. what >>>>>>>>>> does your crappy stereo system consist of? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen your collection of ewaste and the bucket of >>>>>>>>>>>>> monster cabling you wasted your money on and there is >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing there that suggest that you would know what a >>>>>>>>>>>>> decent setup would sound like. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> there's not a lot to suggest you have a lot of common sense >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But how do you figure that I can't know what a decent setup >>>>>>>>>>> might sound like? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a >>>>>>>>>> candle to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with >>>>>>>>>> stereo, no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, and no sense >>>>>>>>>> of immersion in the overall viewing experience >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course, if you want an immersive experience with excellent >>>>>>>>> sound, you could get radical and go to a cinema. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And get stuck with all the other cretins like you there too. No >>>>>>>> thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I concur >>>>>>> >>>>>> Snobby little arsehole aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you're the arsehole >>>>> >>>> That really takes me back - to when my kids were preschool age, that >>>> was their standard of discussion then. Most adults can do rather >>>> better than that. >>> >>> >>> I'm not trying to discuss. just stating fact evidenced by your comment >>> >>> >> OK, if it is a fact, back it up with evidence. > > The evidence is in every post of yours. Aww Rod, I never knew that you read every post of mine, that's sweet. Who would have thought that you were such a caring person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor <trevor@home.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 19:13 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <otbvnt$1tn0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #61885 |
On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >> cheap 5.1 system. And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your point? > > comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to a HT > system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub woofer > for ultra low level bass, Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, or just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) Trevor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 20:23 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5ti1rF97gvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61938 |
On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: > On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>> cheap 5.1 system. > > And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your > point? > >> >> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to a >> HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub >> woofer for ultra low level bass, > > Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems > unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did > while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" > speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, or > just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is definitely the way to go with any HT system, simply because a speaker designed to handle just a specific frequency range is going to do a better job at it than a speaker designed to handle multiple frequencies. it's why there are tweeters for example. > > Trevor. > > -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor <trevor@home.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 20:47 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <otc57t$7em$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #61948 |
On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>>> cheap 5.1 system. >> >> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your >> point? >> >>> >>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to a >>> HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub >>> woofer for ultra low level bass, >> >> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, > > not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did > >> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, or >> just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) > > yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is definitely the > way to go with any HT system, simply because a speaker designed to > handle just a specific frequency range is going to do a better job at it > than a speaker designed to handle multiple frequencies. it's why there > are tweeters for example. Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and a 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. Just because some manufacturers call something a "sub woofer" doesn't mean it is any better, or anywhere near as good as another manufacturers "woofer"! It's the result that matters, not the marketing BS. Trevor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 21:07 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5tkljF9qspU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61954 |
On 1/11/2017 8:47 PM, Trevor wrote: > On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>>>> cheap 5.1 system. >>> >>> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your >>> point? >>> >>>> >>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to >>>> a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub >>>> woofer for ultra low level bass, >>> >>> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >>> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, >> >> not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did >> >>> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >>> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, >>> or just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) >> >> yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is definitely >> the way to go with any HT system, simply because a speaker designed >> to handle just a specific frequency range is going to do a better job >> at it than a speaker designed to handle multiple frequencies. it's >> why there are tweeters for example. > > > Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and a > 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. as a bass speaker generally speaking, but not as a sub speaker, if it's designed to handle those low frequencies. you don't need a 12" speaker in a sub because low bass frequency depends on the length of cone excursion much more than speaker size, and the cones ability to execute it without vibration causing spurious frequencies, which depends on cone stiffness and the intensity of the magnetic field affecting the voice coil, which depends on magnet size, coil windings, etc., . plus sub enclosures are designed to resonate to reinforce the low frequencies the driver produces. > Just because some manufacturers call something a "sub woofer" doesn't > mean it is any better, or anywhere near as good as another > manufacturers "woofer"! It's the result that matters, not the > marketing BS. > > Trevor. > > -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor <trevor@home.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-02 12:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <otdqnf$17qc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #61955 |
On 1/11/2017 9:07 PM, felix wrote: > On 1/11/2017 8:47 PM, Trevor wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>>>>> cheap 5.1 system. >>>> >>>> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your >>>> point? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to >>>>> a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub >>>>> woofer for ultra low level bass, >>>> >>>> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >>>> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, >>> >>> not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did >>> >>>> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >>>> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, >>>> or just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) >>> >>> yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is definitely >>> the way to go with any HT system, simply because a speaker designed >>> to handle just a specific frequency range is going to do a better job >>> at it than a speaker designed to handle multiple frequencies. it's >>> why there are tweeters for example. >> >> >> Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and a >> 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. > > as a bass speaker generally speaking, but not as a sub speaker, if it's > designed to handle those low frequencies. you don't need a 12" speaker > in a sub because low bass frequency depends on the length of cone > excursion much more than speaker size, and the cones ability to execute > it without vibration causing spurious frequencies, which depends on cone > stiffness and the intensity of the magnetic field affecting the voice > coil, which depends on magnet size, coil windings, etc., . Dead right, all of which applies equally to any woofer whether it is called a "sub woofer" or not. But there is a limit to linear excursion in a small speaker, resulting in greater distortion or lower max SPL. Usually both. > plus sub enclosures are designed to resonate to reinforce the low > frequencies the driver produces. Ah yes, one note bass. Wonderful! But if you simply mean ported speakers, most larger stand alone speakers are ported also. > >> Just because some manufacturers call something a "sub woofer" doesn't >> mean it is any better, or anywhere near as good as another >> manufacturers "woofer"! It's the result that matters, not the >> marketing BS. Trevor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-02 16:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5voupFoumjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61985 |
On 2/11/2017 12:00 PM, Trevor wrote: > On 1/11/2017 9:07 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 8:47 PM, Trevor wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>> >>>>> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's >>>>> your point? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle >>>>>> to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, >>>>>> no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, >>>>> >>>>> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >>>>> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, >>>> >>>> not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did >>>> >>>>> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >>>>> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, >>>>> or just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) >>>> >>>> yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is >>>> definitely the way to go with any HT system, simply because a >>>> speaker designed to handle just a specific frequency range is going >>>> to do a better job at it than a speaker designed to handle multiple >>>> frequencies. it's why there are tweeters for example. >>> >>> >>> Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and >>> a 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. >> >> as a bass speaker generally speaking, but not as a sub speaker, if >> it's designed to handle those low frequencies. you don't need a 12" >> speaker in a sub because low bass frequency depends on the length of >> cone excursion much more than speaker size, and the cones ability to >> execute it without vibration causing spurious frequencies, which >> depends on cone stiffness and the intensity of the magnetic field >> affecting the voice coil, which depends on magnet size, coil >> windings, etc., . > > Dead right, all of which applies equally to any woofer whether it is > called a "sub woofer" or not. But there is a limit to linear excursion > in a small speaker, resulting in greater distortion or lower max SPL. > Usually both. true. lower frequencies depend on the volume of air moved and that's achieved in a smaller speaker by greater cone extension, but with the limitations you mention, or by a larger speaker with less cone movement. however, in many (most?) domestic environments a sub is more aesthetically suitable than large speakers and easier to accommodate. > > >> plus sub enclosures are designed to resonate to reinforce the low >> frequencies the driver produces. > > Ah yes, one note bass. Wonderful! lol! but in a good sub the enclosure is designed not to produce any peak resonance frequency > But if you simply mean ported speakers, most larger stand alone > speakers are ported also. > > >> >>> Just because some manufacturers call something a "sub woofer" >>> doesn't mean it is any better, or anywhere near as good as another >>> manufacturers "woofer"! It's the result that matters, not the >>> marketing BS. > > Trevor > -- https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor <trevor@home.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-07 17:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <otrioe$1dcq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #62001 |
On 2/11/2017 4:32 PM, felix wrote: > On 2/11/2017 12:00 PM, Trevor wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 9:07 PM, felix wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 8:47 PM, Trevor wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >>>>>> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then >>>>>>>> any cheap 5.1 system. >>>>>> >>>>>> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's >>>>>> your point? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle >>>>>>> to a HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, >>>>>>> no sub woofer for ultra low level bass, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >>>>>> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, >>>>> >>>>> not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did >>>>> >>>>>> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >>>>>> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, >>>>>> or just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) >>>>> >>>>> yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is >>>>> definitely the way to go with any HT system, simply because a >>>>> speaker designed to handle just a specific frequency range is going >>>>> to do a better job at it than a speaker designed to handle multiple >>>>> frequencies. it's why there are tweeters for example. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and >>>> a 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. >>> >>> as a bass speaker generally speaking, but not as a sub speaker, if >>> it's designed to handle those low frequencies. you don't need a 12" >>> speaker in a sub because low bass frequency depends on the length of >>> cone excursion much more than speaker size, and the cones ability to >>> execute it without vibration causing spurious frequencies, which >>> depends on cone stiffness and the intensity of the magnetic field >>> affecting the voice coil, which depends on magnet size, coil >>> windings, etc., . >> >> Dead right, all of which applies equally to any woofer whether it is >> called a "sub woofer" or not. But there is a limit to linear excursion >> in a small speaker, resulting in greater distortion or lower max SPL. >> Usually both. > > true. lower frequencies depend on the volume of air moved and that's > achieved in a smaller speaker by greater cone extension, but with the > limitations you mention, or by a larger speaker with less cone movement. > however, in many (most?) domestic environments a sub is more > aesthetically suitable than large speakers and easier to accommodate. Yep, always a trade off between performance, size, and cost. >> >>> plus sub enclosures are designed to resonate to reinforce the low >>> frequencies the driver produces. >> >> Ah yes, one note bass. Wonderful! > > lol! but in a good sub the enclosure is designed not to produce any peak > resonance frequency Replace "sub" with speaker, and you are correct. > >> But if you simply mean ported speakers, most larger stand alone >> speakers are ported also. Trevor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-11-01 21:27 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <59f9cbb5$0$42987$b1db1813$ba189b79@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #61954 |
On 1/11/2017 5:47 PM, Trevor wrote: > On 1/11/2017 8:23 PM, felix wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 7:13 PM, Trevor wrote: >>> On 1/11/2017 12:07 PM, felix wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2017 11:15 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>> A decent stereo setup will almost certainly sound better then any >>>>> cheap 5.1 system. >>> >>> And a decent 5.1 will sound better than a cheap stereo, what's your >>> point? >>> >>>> >>>> comparing apples with apples no stereo system can hold a candle to a >>>> HT system. the sound focus is in front of you with stereo, no sub >>>> woofer for ultra low level bass, >>> >>> Ultra low level bass has little to do with most HT systems >>> unfortunately. Some stereo speakers have good 15" woofers, >> >> not many. they would be rather expensive speakers systems if they did >> >>> while some HT systems have "sub woofers" using cheap 6" or 8" >>> speakers, which MAY put out 20Hz at below the level of audibility, or >>> just laugh in your face before blowing up! :-) >> >> yep, and some have very good 8" or 10" speakers. a sub is definitely >> the way to go with any HT system, simply because a speaker designed to >> handle just a specific frequency range is going to do a better job at >> it than a speaker designed to handle multiple frequencies. it's why >> there are tweeters for example. > > > Yep, laws of physics apply. A 15" speaker is too big for treble, and a > 6" or 8" speaker is too small for real bass. Just because some > manufacturers call something a "sub woofer" doesn't mean it is any > better, or anywhere near as good as another manufacturers "woofer"! > It's the result that matters, not the marketing BS. > > Trevor. > > Don't forget that you are talking to a bloke whom has been sucked in by the Monster marketing BS so comprehensively that he's actually seeing things that are technically impossible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web