Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #61301 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-29 11:01 +0700 |
| Last post | 2017-10-04 21:11 +1100 |
| Articles | 9 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-09-29 11:01 +0700
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:22 +1000
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-09-29 23:27 +0000
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-09-30 19:48 +1000
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:59 +1100
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-10-01 16:48 +1100
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +1100
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:31 +1100
Re: Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-10-04 21:11 +1100
| From | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 11:01 +0700 |
| Subject | Anyone using Firefox Quantum beta? |
| Message-ID | <p8hrsctrhaojm8pfahunebtepfkj72dems@4ax.com> |
Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using Quantum.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 15:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f363k6F2c0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61301 |
Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote > Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using > ANZ online banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Never seen that with IE11 or Chrome. I don't use firefox much at all. > Much quicker using Quantum.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oqmktj$que$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #61301 |
Je?us <j@j.net> wrote: > Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online > banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using > Quantum. I probably won't be using it every day until the next ESR release, but I might give it a look when the full Firefox 57 release comes out. Stupid name though, quantum computer technology isn't best suited to things like web browsing anyway. Even if it were available. Is there still an option burried away to have a proper drop-down menu bar at the top of the window in this new "Photon" interface? I'll be extremely grumpy if they've taken that away properly now. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-30 19:48 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <1ra7vg34gryhj.116vd2rsew8tv$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #61301 |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: > Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online > banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using > Quantum. I tested it much better and faster then chrome. I also tested it against waterfox and opera, with mixed results as what is quicker. Overall Firefox Quantum looks very good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-01 13:59 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ddm0tc5krdvlrusls2neqi12gg5l62mpuq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61370 |
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:48:39 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote: >On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: > >> Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online >> banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using >> Quantum. > >I tested it much better and faster then chrome. I also tested it against >waterfox and opera, with mixed results as what is quicker. > >Overall Firefox Quantum looks very good. WIN10 64 bit 8 gig ram When FireFox got buggy dumped it and went with Opera which seem good enough to me -- Petzl Same Sex Marriage It is ok to vote no. "two blokes and a cocker spaniel don't make a family" You'll never believe why the Army sacked this decorated intelligence officer https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-01 16:48 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <t8ypa4pcbpps$.19nq2izqn5opx.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #61377 |
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:59:16 +1100, Petzl wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:48:39 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> > wrote: > >>On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: >> >>> Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online >>> banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using >>> Quantum. >> >>I tested it much better and faster then chrome. I also tested it against >>waterfox and opera, with mixed results as what is quicker. >> >>Overall Firefox Quantum looks very good. > > WIN10 64 bit 8 gig ram > When FireFox got buggy dumped it and went with Opera which seem good > enough to me You may want to revisit this decision, as firefox has a lot more addons than Opera and Firefox Quantum uses less memory. At the moment I am sticking with waterfox but when Firefox Quantum is out of beta, I am going to test it again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-01 17:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <6211tcdad4kc02ov7km77th7s34jqh8m15@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61379 |
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 16:48:21 +1100, SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote: >On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:59:16 +1100, Petzl wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:48:39 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: >>> >>>> Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online >>>> banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using >>>> Quantum. >>> >>>I tested it much better and faster then chrome. I also tested it against >>>waterfox and opera, with mixed results as what is quicker. >>> >>>Overall Firefox Quantum looks very good. >> >> WIN10 64 bit 8 gig ram >> When FireFox got buggy dumped it and went with Opera which seem good >> enough to me > >You may want to revisit this decision, as firefox has a lot more addons >than Opera and Firefox Quantum uses less memory. > >At the moment I am sticking with waterfox but when Firefox Quantum is out >of beta, I am going to test it again. > next computer maybe thanks -- Petzl Same Sex Marriage It is ok to vote no. "two blokes and a cocker spaniel don't make a family" You'll never believe why the Army sacked this decorated intelligence officer https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-02 11:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f3dfsoFll4oU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61379 |
"SolomonW" <SolomonW@citi.com> wrote in message news:t8ypa4pcbpps$.19nq2izqn5opx.dlg@40tude.net... > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:59:16 +1100, Petzl wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:48:39 +1000, SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: >>> >>>> Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online >>>> banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using >>>> Quantum. >>> >>>I tested it much better and faster then chrome. I also tested it against >>>waterfox and opera, with mixed results as what is quicker. >>> >>>Overall Firefox Quantum looks very good. >> >> WIN10 64 bit 8 gig ram >> When FireFox got buggy dumped it and went with Opera which seem good >> enough to me > > You may want to revisit this decision, as firefox has a lot more addons > than Opera and Firefox Quantum uses less memory. > > At the moment I am sticking with waterfox Yeah, me too, but weatherzone still fucks it up eventually if you leave it running. > but when Firefox Quantum is out > of beta, I am going to test it again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-04 21:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <1lunbj0v7osbp.12xsnp6vt1lhf$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #61301 |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:01:21 +0700, Jeßus wrote: > Quite an improvement IMO. Enough proof for me is using ANZ online > banking, which has always been painfuly slow. Much quicker using > Quantum. I tried on a 32 bit machine Quantum, it is mych faster but many of my favourite addons no longer work. I pulled it off.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web