Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > aus.computers > #61029 > unrolled thread

iPhone 8

Started byJeßus <j@j.net>
First post2017-09-22 17:21 +0700
Last post2017-09-28 13:32 +1000
Articles 20 on this page of 44 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers


Contents

  iPhone 8 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-09-22 17:21 +0700
    Re: iPhone 8 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-09-22 19:56 +0800
    Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-22 22:13 +1000
    Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 12:14 +1000
      Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-28 12:26 +1000
        Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 12:38 +1000
          Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-28 12:48 +1000
            Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 14:48 +1000
              Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-28 15:45 +1000
                Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 16:19 +1000
                  Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-28 17:21 +1000
                    Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:22 +1000
                      Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-28 19:20 +1000
                        Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:24 +1000
                          Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-28 20:31 +1000
                            Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 23:28 +1000
                              Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-28 23:45 +1000
                                Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 00:31 +1000
                                  Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 00:57 +1000
                                    Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 09:54 +1000
                                      Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 10:04 +1000
                                        Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-29 12:29 +1000
                                          Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 13:01 +1000
                                          Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 13:05 +1000
                                            Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-29 14:59 +1000
                                            Re: iPhone 8 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-09-30 06:47 +0800
                                      Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:14 +1000
                                    Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-29 12:10 +1000
                                      Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 13:00 +1000
                                      Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 13:06 +1000
                              Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-28 23:57 +1000
                                Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 00:29 +1000
                                  Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-29 00:37 +1000
                                  Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 00:39 +1000
                                    Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:29 +1000
                                      Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 10:04 +1000
                                        Re: iPhone 8 Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-09-29 11:49 +1000
                                          Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 12:53 +1000
                                        Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:15 +1000
                                          Re: iPhone 8 Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-09-29 17:19 +1000
                                      Re: iPhone 8 felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-29 10:10 +1000
                                        Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:18 +1000
              Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:23 +1000
      Re: iPhone 8 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:32 +1000

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#61029 — iPhone 8

FromJeßus <j@j.net>
Date2017-09-22 17:21 +0700
SubjectiPhone 8
Message-ID<4uo9scht9oag0afgph3k6ff3qae55sk7li@4ax.com>
https://vimeo.com/234986674

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#61031

FromClocky <notgonn@happen.com>
Date2017-09-22 19:56 +0800
Message-ID<59c4fa83$0$29148$b1db1813$eb6074ea@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#61029
On 22/09/2017 6:21 PM, Je�us wrote:
> https://vimeo.com/234986674
> 


LOL, so true :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61032

FromNoddy <me@home.com>
Date2017-09-22 22:13 +1000
Message-ID<oq2unr$7ve$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61029
On 22/09/17 8:21 PM, Je�us wrote:
> https://vimeo.com/234986674

Sums up apple uses perfectly :)





-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61231

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 12:14 +1000
Message-ID<f33483F9kohU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61029
On 26/09/2017 9:51 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 26/09/17 2:10 PM, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> A clueless shit talker who wouldn't know something decent if you set 
>>> fire to it and shoved it up his ignorant arse.....
>>>
>>>
>> Had all the others Noddy.
>
> Yeah, right.
>
>> The iPhone is the only brand that hasn't given me any grief.
>
> I expect there'd be few phones that would give you "grief" if you took 
> the time to learn how to use them. But you're an Apple Fanboi, and 
> can't allow yourself to admit that there are *far* better products on 
> the market than Iphones.

I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the other 
Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far superior to the 
iPhone. although that may have something to do with who the carrier is?

-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61232

FromNoddy <me@home.com>
Date2017-09-28 12:26 +1000
Message-ID<oqhmji$jq5$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61231
On 28/09/17 12:14 PM, felix wrote:

>> I expect there'd be few phones that would give you "grief" if you took 
>> the time to learn how to use them. But you're an Apple Fanboi, and 
>> can't allow yourself to admit that there are *far* better products on 
>> the market than Iphones.
> 
> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the other 
> Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far superior to the 
> iPhone. although that may have something to do with who the carrier is?

Has a *lot* to do with *many* things. Not the least of which is the carrier.



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61233

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 12:38 +1000
Message-ID<f335koF9sidU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61232
On 28/09/2017 12:26 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 28/09/17 12:14 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>> I expect there'd be few phones that would give you "grief" if you 
>>> took the time to learn how to use them. But you're an Apple Fanboi, 
>>> and can't allow yourself to admit that there are *far* better 
>>> products on the market than Iphones.
>>
>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the other 
>> Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far superior to 
>> the iPhone. although that may have something to do with who the 
>> carrier is?
>
> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.

like what?

> Not the least of which is the carrier.
>
>
>

-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61234

FromNoddy <me@home.com>
Date2017-09-28 12:48 +1000
Message-ID<oqhnr5$qgj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61233
On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:

>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the other 
>>> Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far superior to 
>>> the iPhone. although that may have something to do with who the 
>>> carrier is?
>>
>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
> 
> like what?

Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone can 
give different results at different times.

My wife has an iphone 7 for work, and a Galaxy s7 as her private phone. 
She calls me on both regularly, and the only way I can generally tell 
which one she's using is by looking at the number to see which phone 
she's calling on. They can both be very good *and* very bad depending on 
the outside influences at play.



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61241

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 14:48 +1000
Message-ID<f33d90Fbfh1U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61234
On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do with 
>>>> who the carrier is?
>>>
>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>
>> like what?
>
> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone can 
> give different results at different times.

I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of when 
or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently upgraded 
from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same location with 
the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is remarkably better, 
so that can only be attributable to the phone. also I just realized that 
another friend has an iphone, and their call quality is the same as the 
other iphone, although they are with a different carrier. I have never 
heard call quality as good as with the Samsung which is the model before 
the current one I think.

>
> My wife has an iphone 7 for work, and a Galaxy s7 as her private 
> phone. She calls me on both regularly, and the only way I can 
> generally tell which one she's using is by looking at the number to 
> see which phone she's calling on. They can both be very good *and* 
> very bad depending on the outside influences at play.
>
>
>

-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61242

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-09-28 15:45 +1000
Message-ID<f33giuFc5fnU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61241
On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>
>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do with 
>>>>> who the carrier is?
>>>>
>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>
>>> like what?
>>
>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone can 
>> give different results at different times.
> 
> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of when 
> or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently upgraded 
> from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same location with 
> the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is remarkably better, 
> so that can only be attributable to the phone. also I just realized that 
> another friend has an iphone, and their call quality is the same as the 
> other iphone, although they are with a different carrier. I have never 
> heard call quality as good as with the Samsung which is the model before 
> the current one I think.

Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee Beach had 
a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had poor signal, 
dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead zones in her house 
so she had to make sure she never moved into one when she took or 
initiated a call. That was when I had my iPhone 4S and it worked 
perfectly at her place, in any location - no dead zones. Note, mine was 
with Optus since I live in a *Telstra free zone* (my choice). She then 
bought the same phone, problems over. When I upgraded mine to an SE, she 
did likewise. Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they swapped, so now she 
has an iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the proverbial.


-- 

Xeno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61244

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 16:19 +1000
Message-ID<f33ijiFci9cU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61242
On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do 
>>>>>> with who the carrier is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>
>>>> like what?
>>>
>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone 
>>> can give different results at different times.
>>
>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently 
>> upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same 
>> location with the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is 
>> remarkably better, so that can only be attributable to the phone. 
>> also I just realized that another friend has an iphone, and their 
>> call quality is the same as the other iphone, although they are with 
>> a different carrier. I have never heard call quality as good as with 
>> the Samsung which is the model before the current one I think.
>
> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee Beach 
> had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had poor 
> signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead zones in 
> her house so she had to make sure she never moved into one when she 
> took or initiated a call. That was when I had my iPhone 4S and it 
> worked perfectly at her place, in any location - no dead zones. Note, 
> mine was with Optus since I live in a *Telstra free zone* (my choice). 
> She then bought the same phone, problems over. When I upgraded mine to 
> an SE, she did likewise. Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they 
> swapped, so now she has an iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the 
> proverbial.
>
>

I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as received


-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61247

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-09-28 17:21 +1000
Message-ID<f33m6tFdbobU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61244
On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do 
>>>>>>> with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>
>>>>> like what?
>>>>
>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone 
>>>> can give different results at different times.
>>>
>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently 
>>> upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same 
>>> location with the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is 
>>> remarkably better, so that can only be attributable to the phone. 
>>> also I just realized that another friend has an iphone, and their 
>>> call quality is the same as the other iphone, although they are with 
>>> a different carrier. I have never heard call quality as good as with 
>>> the Samsung which is the model before the current one I think.
>>
>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee Beach 
>> had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had poor 
>> signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead zones in 
>> her house so she had to make sure she never moved into one when she 
>> took or initiated a call. That was when I had my iPhone 4S and it 
>> worked perfectly at her place, in any location - no dead zones. Note, 
>> mine was with Optus since I live in a *Telstra free zone* (my choice). 
>> She then bought the same phone, problems over. When I upgraded mine to 
>> an SE, she did likewise. Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they 
>> swapped, so now she has an iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the 
>> proverbial.
>>
>>
> 
> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as received
> 
> 
That was *included* in what I wrote.

-- 

Xeno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61251

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 18:22 +1000
Message-ID<f33pp1Fe4j4U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61247
On 28/09/2017 5:21 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>>>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>>>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do 
>>>>>>>> with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> like what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone 
>>>>> can give different results at different times.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>>>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently 
>>>> upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same 
>>>> location with the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is 
>>>> remarkably better, so that can only be attributable to the phone. 
>>>> also I just realized that another friend has an iphone, and their 
>>>> call quality is the same as the other iphone, although they are 
>>>> with a different carrier. I have never heard call quality as good 
>>>> as with the Samsung which is the model before the current one I think.
>>>
>>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee Beach 
>>> had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had poor 
>>> signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead zones 
>>> in her house so she had to make sure she never moved into one when 
>>> she took or initiated a call. That was when I had my iPhone 4S and 
>>> it worked perfectly at her place, in any location - no dead zones. 
>>> Note, mine was with Optus since I live in a *Telstra free zone* (my 
>>> choice). She then bought the same phone, problems over. When I 
>>> upgraded mine to an SE, she did likewise. Her daughter went to an 
>>> iPhone 6, they swapped, so now she has an iPhone 6 and is as happy 
>>> as a pig in the proverbial.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as 
>> received
>>
>>
> That was *included* in what I wrote.
>

ok, what I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about how the voice 
sounds, ie. clarity, volume, whether it's just 'flat' or 'full ranging', 
etc., and not about calls dropping or stuff like that


-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61256

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-09-28 19:20 +1000
Message-ID<f33t68Feu52U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61251
On 28/09/2017 6:22 PM, felix wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 5:21 PM, Xeno wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and the 
>>>>>>>>> other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is far 
>>>>>>>>> superior to the iPhone. although that may have something to do 
>>>>>>>>> with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> like what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* phone 
>>>>>> can give different results at different times.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>>>>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung recently 
>>>>> upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call from the same 
>>>>> location with the same carrier with the new phone, and the sound is 
>>>>> remarkably better, so that can only be attributable to the phone. 
>>>>> also I just realized that another friend has an iphone, and their 
>>>>> call quality is the same as the other iphone, although they are 
>>>>> with a different carrier. I have never heard call quality as good 
>>>>> as with the Samsung which is the model before the current one I think.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee Beach 
>>>> had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had poor 
>>>> signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead zones 
>>>> in her house so she had to make sure she never moved into one when 
>>>> she took or initiated a call. That was when I had my iPhone 4S and 
>>>> it worked perfectly at her place, in any location - no dead zones. 
>>>> Note, mine was with Optus since I live in a *Telstra free zone* (my 
>>>> choice). She then bought the same phone, problems over. When I 
>>>> upgraded mine to an SE, she did likewise. Her daughter went to an 
>>>> iPhone 6, they swapped, so now she has an iPhone 6 and is as happy 
>>>> as a pig in the proverbial.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as 
>>> received
>>>
>>>
>> That was *included* in what I wrote.
>>
> 
> ok, what I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about how the voice 
> sounds, ie. clarity, volume, whether it's just 'flat' or 'full ranging', 
> etc., and not about calls dropping or stuff like that
> 
> 
I was talking about the *gamut*, not single issues.

-- 

Xeno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61257

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 19:24 +1000
Message-ID<f33tdgFev04U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61256
On 28/09/2017 7:20 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 6:22 PM, felix wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 5:21 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and 
>>>>>>>>>> the other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is 
>>>>>>>>>> far superior to the iPhone. although that may have something 
>>>>>>>>>> to do with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> like what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* 
>>>>>>> phone can give different results at different times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>>>>>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung 
>>>>>> recently upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call 
>>>>>> from the same location with the same carrier with the new phone, 
>>>>>> and the sound is remarkably better, so that can only be 
>>>>>> attributable to the phone. also I just realized that another 
>>>>>> friend has an iphone, and their call quality is the same as the 
>>>>>> other iphone, although they are with a different carrier. I have 
>>>>>> never heard call quality as good as with the Samsung which is the 
>>>>>> model before the current one I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee 
>>>>> Beach had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had 
>>>>> poor signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead 
>>>>> zones in her house so she had to make sure she never moved into 
>>>>> one when she took or initiated a call. That was when I had my 
>>>>> iPhone 4S and it worked perfectly at her place, in any location - 
>>>>> no dead zones. Note, mine was with Optus since I live in a 
>>>>> *Telstra free zone* (my choice). She then bought the same phone, 
>>>>> problems over. When I upgraded mine to an SE, she did likewise. 
>>>>> Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they swapped, so now she has an 
>>>>> iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the proverbial.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as 
>>>> received
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That was *included* in what I wrote.
>>>
>>
>> ok, what I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about how the voice 
>> sounds, ie. clarity, volume, whether it's just 'flat' or 'full 
>> ranging', etc., and not about calls dropping or stuff like that
>>
>>
> I was talking about the *gamut*, not single issues.
>

you were addressing what I said, and I'm clarifying what I said


-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61259

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-09-28 20:31 +1000
Message-ID<f341ctFfticU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61257
On 28/09/2017 7:24 PM, felix wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 7:20 PM, Xeno wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 6:22 PM, felix wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 5:21 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and 
>>>>>>>>>>> the other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user is 
>>>>>>>>>>> far superior to the iPhone. although that may have something 
>>>>>>>>>>> to do with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> like what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* 
>>>>>>>> phone can give different results at different times.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless of 
>>>>>>> when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung 
>>>>>>> recently upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call 
>>>>>>> from the same location with the same carrier with the new phone, 
>>>>>>> and the sound is remarkably better, so that can only be 
>>>>>>> attributable to the phone. also I just realized that another 
>>>>>>> friend has an iphone, and their call quality is the same as the 
>>>>>>> other iphone, although they are with a different carrier. I have 
>>>>>>> never heard call quality as good as with the Samsung which is the 
>>>>>>> model before the current one I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee 
>>>>>> Beach had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she had 
>>>>>> poor signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There were dead 
>>>>>> zones in her house so she had to make sure she never moved into 
>>>>>> one when she took or initiated a call. That was when I had my 
>>>>>> iPhone 4S and it worked perfectly at her place, in any location - 
>>>>>> no dead zones. Note, mine was with Optus since I live in a 
>>>>>> *Telstra free zone* (my choice). She then bought the same phone, 
>>>>>> problems over. When I upgraded mine to an SE, she did likewise. 
>>>>>> Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they swapped, so now she has an 
>>>>>> iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the proverbial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as 
>>>>> received
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That was *included* in what I wrote.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ok, what I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about how the voice 
>>> sounds, ie. clarity, volume, whether it's just 'flat' or 'full 
>>> ranging', etc., and not about calls dropping or stuff like that
>>>
>>>
>> I was talking about the *gamut*, not single issues.
>>
> 
> you were addressing what I said, and I'm clarifying what I said
> 
> 
Odd, I thought I was addressing my *experience* with Samsung vs iPhone 
which, as I stated, was the reverse of your experience - in every way. 
Actually, it was my friend's experience but it became a *shared 
experience* whenever they tried to ring me or vice versa.

-- 

Xeno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61262

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-28 23:28 +1000
Message-ID<f34bn8Fi9rvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61259
On 28/09/2017 8:31 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 28/09/2017 7:24 PM, felix wrote:
>> On 28/09/2017 7:20 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2017 6:22 PM, felix wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2017 5:21 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 28/09/2017 4:19 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 3:45 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 2:48 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/09/2017 12:48 PM, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28/09/17 12:38 PM, felix wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have two friends who call me often, one has an iPhone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the other Samsung. the call quality from the Samsung user 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is far superior to the iPhone. although that may have 
>>>>>>>>>>>> something to do with who the carrier is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Has a *lot* to do with *many* things.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> like what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like location and network congestion for example. The *same* 
>>>>>>>>> phone can give different results at different times.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't noticed that. it's always the same result regardless 
>>>>>>>> of when or where called from. and the person with the Samsung 
>>>>>>>> recently upgraded from an earlier Samsung model, and they call 
>>>>>>>> from the same location with the same carrier with the new 
>>>>>>>> phone, and the sound is remarkably better, so that can only be 
>>>>>>>> attributable to the phone. also I just realized that another 
>>>>>>>> friend has an iphone, and their call quality is the same as the 
>>>>>>>> other iphone, although they are with a different carrier. I 
>>>>>>>> have never heard call quality as good as with the Samsung which 
>>>>>>>> is the model before the current one I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interesting. My experience is the reverse. My friend at Moonee 
>>>>>>> Beach had a Samsung Galaxy. With either Telstra or Optus, she 
>>>>>>> had poor signal, dropouts, garbled conversations, etc. There 
>>>>>>> were dead zones in her house so she had to make sure she never 
>>>>>>> moved into one when she took or initiated a call. That was when 
>>>>>>> I had my iPhone 4S and it worked perfectly at her place, in any 
>>>>>>> location - no dead zones. Note, mine was with Optus since I live 
>>>>>>> in a *Telstra free zone* (my choice). She then bought the same 
>>>>>>> phone, problems over. When I upgraded mine to an SE, she did 
>>>>>>> likewise. Her daughter went to an iPhone 6, they swapped, so now 
>>>>>>> she has an iPhone 6 and is as happy as a pig in the proverbial.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was only referring to the quality of the voice transmission as 
>>>>>> received
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> That was *included* in what I wrote.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ok, what I'm trying to say is that I'm talking about how the voice 
>>>> sounds, ie. clarity, volume, whether it's just 'flat' or 'full 
>>>> ranging', etc., and not about calls dropping or stuff like that
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I was talking about the *gamut*, not single issues.
>>>
>>
>> you were addressing what I said, and I'm clarifying what I said
>>
>>
> Odd, I thought I was addressing my *experience* with Samsung vs iPhone 
> which, as I stated, was the reverse of your experience - in every way. 
> Actually, it was my friend's experience but it became a *shared 
> experience* whenever they tried to ring me or vice versa.
>

initially you addressed my comments by relating your experience, as you 
often do whether it's called for or not. it seemed to me that you might 
have misinterpreted my remarks so I sought to clarify them. I tried to 
explain that I was talking specifically about the quality of the voice 
transmission I receive. I'm not looking for an argument here.


-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61263

FromNoddy <me@home.com>
Date2017-09-28 23:45 +1000
Message-ID<oqiuch$4nj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61262
On 28/09/17 11:28 PM, felix wrote:

>> Odd, I thought I was addressing my *experience* with Samsung vs iPhone 
>> which, as I stated, was the reverse of your experience - in every way. 
>> Actually, it was my friend's experience but it became a *shared 
>> experience* whenever they tried to ring me or vice versa.
>>
> 
> initially you addressed my comments by relating your experience, as you 
> often do whether it's called for or not. it seemed to me that you might 
> have misinterpreted my remarks so I sought to clarify them. I tried to 
> explain that I was talking specifically about the quality of the voice 
> transmission I receive. I'm not looking for an argument here.

But you're getting one anyway. Krypsis isn't terribly happy at the 
moment as it's been a rough couple of weeks for him. He's had his arse 
slapped from bedtime to breakfast on every subject he's tried to 
bullshit about, and he's getting quite cunty as a result :)

I didn't think there was any need to clarify your comments, and I think 
what you comment about has more to do with the network than the 
handpiece. As I said, my wife's Iphone sounds very good and very bad 
depending on the day.


-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61266

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-29 00:31 +1000
Message-ID<f34fdjFj3phU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61263
On 28/09/2017 11:45 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 28/09/17 11:28 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>> Odd, I thought I was addressing my *experience* with Samsung vs 
>>> iPhone which, as I stated, was the reverse of your experience - in 
>>> every way. Actually, it was my friend's experience but it became a 
>>> *shared experience* whenever they tried to ring me or vice versa.
>>>
>>
>> initially you addressed my comments by relating your experience, as 
>> you often do whether it's called for or not. it seemed to me that you 
>> might have misinterpreted my remarks so I sought to clarify them. I 
>> tried to explain that I was talking specifically about the quality of 
>> the voice transmission I receive. I'm not looking for an argument here.
>
> But you're getting one anyway. Krypsis isn't terribly happy at the 
> moment as it's been a rough couple of weeks for him. He's had his arse 
> slapped from bedtime to breakfast on every subject he's tried to 
> bullshit about, and he's getting quite cunty as a result :)

I doubt he will agree with those remarks :)

>
> I didn't think there was any need to clarify your comments, and I 
> think what you comment about has more to do with the network than the 
> handpiece. 

from my experience it's vice versa

> As I said, my wife's Iphone sounds very good and very bad depending on 
> the day.
>
>



-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61269

FromNoddy <me@home.com>
Date2017-09-29 00:57 +1000
Message-ID<oqj2im$421$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61266
On 29/09/17 12:31 AM, felix wrote:

>> But you're getting one anyway. Krypsis isn't terribly happy at the 
>> moment as it's been a rough couple of weeks for him. He's had his arse 
>> slapped from bedtime to breakfast on every subject he's tried to 
>> bullshit about, and he's getting quite cunty as a result :)
> 
> I doubt he will agree with those remarks :)

Yeah, nah :)

Don't forget this is the moron who came up with the "you deleted them" 
defence after his own bullshit had wrapped itself around his throat and 
threatened to strangle him.

>> I didn't think there was any need to clarify your comments, and I 
>> think what you comment about has more to do with the network than the 
>> handpiece. 
> 
> from my experience it's vice versa
It can be funny at times.

I've got a mate who lives out in Hallam, which I'm sure you know where 
that is, and he calls me semi regularly for a catch up chat. He's a bit 
of a technophobe and has only in the last year or so moved to a 
smartphone after years of using his old Nokia N8. His "new" phone is one 
of those 200 buck Aldi things, and when he calls it's *always* as sharp 
as a bell.

Unless he moves from the spot where he normally sits down to have a cup 
of coffee while he's talking to me, and then it goes pear shaped quite 
quickly.





--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#61282

Fromfelix <felix@real_felix.invalid>
Date2017-09-29 09:54 +1000
Message-ID<f35gcsFqn9jU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#61269
On 29/09/2017 12:57 AM, Noddy wrote:
> On 29/09/17 12:31 AM, felix wrote:
>
>>> But you're getting one anyway. Krypsis isn't terribly happy at the 
>>> moment as it's been a rough couple of weeks for him. He's had his 
>>> arse slapped from bedtime to breakfast on every subject he's tried 
>>> to bullshit about, and he's getting quite cunty as a result :)
>>
>> I doubt he will agree with those remarks :)
>
> Yeah, nah :)
>
> Don't forget this is the moron who came up with the "you deleted them" 
> defence after his own bullshit had wrapped itself around his throat 
> and threatened to strangle him.
>
>>> I didn't think there was any need to clarify your comments, and I 
>>> think what you comment about has more to do with the network than 
>>> the handpiece. 
>>
>> from my experience it's vice versa
> It can be funny at times.
>
> I've got a mate who lives out in Hallam, which I'm sure you know where 
> that is, and he calls me semi regularly for a catch up chat. He's a 
> bit of a technophobe and has only in the last year or so moved to a 
> smartphone after years of using his old Nokia N8. His "new" phone is 
> one of those 200 buck Aldi things, and when he calls it's *always* as 
> sharp as a bell.
>
> Unless he moves from the spot where he normally sits down to have a 
> cup of coffee while he's talking to me, and then it goes pear shaped 
> quite quickly.
>
>

yeah, that's all I've been saying; that some phones 'sound' better than 
others, notwithstanding that other issues can affect their performance

>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Noddy.


-- 
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
Islam: the greatest murder machine
in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers


csiph-web