Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #60933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-09-20 13:15 +0800
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 20:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 16:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 02:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 21:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 04:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:07 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 12:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 04:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:06 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:09 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:31 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 06:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 23:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 16:19 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 07:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 08:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 19:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 18:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:04 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 11:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 00:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:28 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 13:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 21:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:52 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 16:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 18:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 19:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 19:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 21:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 07:25 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 03:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 13:29 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 06:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 16:45 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-25 10:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-25 00:25 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 19:46 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:41 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 13:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:13 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 13:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 16:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:00 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 23:05 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 05:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:35 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 13:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 16:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 17:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 07:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 19:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:42 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 14:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 16:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 04:18 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 05:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 09:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 15:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 17:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 17:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 03:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-09-29 19:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-29 18:48 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 17:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 10:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 19:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 01:14 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 03:37 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 11:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 18:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 20:57 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 10:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 12:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 16:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 08:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:44 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:31 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 18:27 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:32 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 14:43 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:50 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 15:08 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 16:35 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 19:55 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 07:14 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 20:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 20:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 06:21 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 07:33 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 17:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:34 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 16:49 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:41 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 17:16 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 08:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 19:42 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 21:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-09-29 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 17:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 20:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-22 18:07 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:08 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 20:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 07:47 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:36 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 12:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-25 17:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-26 16:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 14:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-27 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-23 18:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 12:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 20:03 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 11:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 13:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000
Page 12 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 19 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 11:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f30ct5FicpeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61181 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... > On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >> Fran wrote: >>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>> >>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>> >>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never bought a >>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>> >> >> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well as >> some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher to >> kitchens if piped that way > > > the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water > connection None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more than 40 years old.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 11:36 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61189 |
On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>> Fran wrote: >>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>> >>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>> >>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>> bought a >>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>> >>> >>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>> to kitchens if piped that way >> >> >> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >> connection > > None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more than > 40 years old. You ave 4 dishwashers? Is this like pez with his 4 waterbeds, tank, flamethrowers etc etc?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f30qa3Fl38pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61195 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>> Fran wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>> >>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>> >>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>> bought a >>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>> >>> >>> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >>> connection >> >> None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more than >> 40 years old. > > > You ave 4 dishwashers? The first one eventually stopped working and it was cheaper to get a used one at the garage sales than to repair it. I then found an even better Bosch that was perfect, for peanuts. I do all the beer stubbys and long necks in the dishwasher and its handy to have more than one so I can put stuff directly from the table into the dishwasher. I only run the main dishwasher every couple of weeks when I run out of clean dinner plates. The one used for long necks and stubbys is run every 24 days when drinking long necks and its convenient to rinse them when waiting for the toast to cook in the morning and put the latest one straight in that dishwasher instead of stacking them and then loading the dishwasher from the milk crates just before starting the long neck run. When drinking stubbys, it’s a similar run rate, but with two stubbys a day. > Is this like pez with his 4 waterbeds, tank, flamethrowers etc etc? That’s the pretzel, stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <k9adna3I8LXkpFbEnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61199 |
On 27/09/2017 3:12 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>> bought a >>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>> >>>> >>>> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >>>> connection >>> >>> None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more than >>> 40 years old. >> >> >> You ave 4 dishwashers? > > The first one eventually stopped working and it was cheaper > to get a used one at the garage sales than to repair it. I then > found an even better Bosch that was perfect, for peanuts. What does it do with the peanuts? snip
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 18:24 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f315hhFnirgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61199 |
On 27/09/2017 3:12 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>> bought a >>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>> >>>> >>>> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >>>> connection >>> >>> None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more >>> than >>> 40 years old. >> >> >> You ave 4 dishwashers? > > The first one eventually stopped working and it was cheaper > to get a used one at the garage sales than to repair it. I then > found an even better Bosch that was perfect, for peanuts. why would you want to wash peanuts? do you only get dirty ones up there? (note to Fran: it's a joke, not a serious question) > > I do all the beer stubbys and long necks in the dishwasher why? do you brew your own beer? > and its handy to have more than one so I can put stuff > directly from the table into the dishwasher. I only run the > main dishwasher every couple of weeks when I run out of > clean dinner plates. The one used for long necks and > stubbys is run every 24 days when drinking long necks > and its convenient to rinse them when waiting for the > toast to cook in the morning and put the latest one > straight in that dishwasher instead of stacking them > and then loading the dishwasher from the milk crates > just before starting the long neck run. When drinking > stubbys, it’s a similar run rate, but with two stubbys a day. > >> Is this like pez with his 4 waterbeds, tank, flamethrowers etc etc? > > That’s the pretzel, stupid. -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 19:42 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f31a56Fok4qU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61214 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:f315hhFnirgU1@mid.individual.net... > On 27/09/2017 3:12 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >>>>> connection >>>> >>>> None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now more >>>> than >>>> 40 years old. >>> >>> >>> You ave 4 dishwashers? >> >> The first one eventually stopped working and it was cheaper >> to get a used one at the garage sales than to repair it. I then >> found an even better Bosch that was perfect, for peanuts. > > why would you want to wash peanuts? Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that peanuts grow in the dirt and that’s a bit gritty on the teeth if you just pull the plant up and start munching. > do you only get dirty ones up there? You only get dirty ones everywhere, stupid. Someone has to wash them. > (note to Fran: it's a joke, not a serious question) She doesn’t read your shit. >> I do all the beer stubbys and long necks in the dishwasher > why? do you brew your own beer? Yep, leaves the commercial stuff for dead. >> and its handy to have more than one so I can put stuff >> directly from the table into the dishwasher. I only run the >> main dishwasher every couple of weeks when I run out of >> clean dinner plates. The one used for long necks and >> stubbys is run every 24 days when drinking long necks >> and its convenient to rinse them when waiting for the >> toast to cook in the morning and put the latest one >> straight in that dishwasher instead of stacking them >> and then loading the dishwasher from the milk crates >> just before starting the long neck run. When drinking >> stubbys, it’s a similar run rate, but with two stubbys a day. >> >>> Is this like pez with his 4 waterbeds, tank, flamethrowers etc etc? >> >> That’s the pretzel, stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 23:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f31o0oFrrd0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61217 |
On 27/09/2017 7:42 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:f315hhFnirgU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 27/09/2017 3:12 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:EaWdnThUXss2nVbEnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>> On 27/09/2017 11:22 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:f308hpFhfceU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold >>>>>>>>>> water. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>>>> well as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have >>>>>>> higher >>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> the (newish) Fisher & Pykal dishwaser here only has a cold water >>>>>> connection >>>>> >>>>> None of my 4 have a hot water connection and the oldest is now >>>>> more than >>>>> 40 years old. >>>> >>>> >>>> You ave 4 dishwashers? >>> >>> The first one eventually stopped working and it was cheaper >>> to get a used one at the garage sales than to repair it. I then >>> found an even better Bosch that was perfect, for peanuts. >> >> why would you want to wash peanuts? > > Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed > that peanuts grow in the dirt and that’s a bit gritty on the > teeth if you just pull the plant up and start munching. > >> do you only get dirty ones up there? > > You only get dirty ones everywhere, stupid. > > Someone has to wash them. > >> (note to Fran: it's a joke, not a serious question) > > She doesn’t read your shit. she doesn't admit she does > >>> I do all the beer stubbys and long necks in the dishwasher > >> why? do you brew your own beer? > > Yep, leaves the commercial stuff for dead. > >>> and its handy to have more than one so I can put stuff >>> directly from the table into the dishwasher. I only run the >>> main dishwasher every couple of weeks when I run out of >>> clean dinner plates. The one used for long necks and >>> stubbys is run every 24 days when drinking long necks >>> and its convenient to rinse them when waiting for the >>> toast to cook in the morning and put the latest one >>> straight in that dishwasher instead of stacking them >>> and then loading the dishwasher from the milk crates >>> just before starting the long neck run. When drinking >>> stubbys, it’s a similar run rate, but with two stubbys a day. >>> >>>> Is this like pez with his 4 waterbeds, tank, flamethrowers etc etc? >>> >>> That’s the pretzel, stupid. > > -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:24 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqfcnb$nu3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61179 |
On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: > Fran wrote: >> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>> >>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >> >> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never bought a >> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >> > > If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well > as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. Not in this household. > water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher to > kitchens if piped that way You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <k9adnazI8LUBpFbEnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61202 |
On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: > On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >> Fran wrote: >>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>> >>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>> >>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never bought a >>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>> >> >> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. > > Not in this household. > >> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >> to kitchens if piped that way > > You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. > exacly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 23:25 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <59cba6c5$0$57150$b1db1813$7c6b8ee7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #61205 |
de chucka wrote: > On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>> Fran wrote: >>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>> >>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>> >>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>> bought a >>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>> >>> >>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >> >> Not in this household. >> >>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>> to kitchens if piped that way >> >> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >> > > > exacly If you do not have instantaneous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 18:20 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqibd0$1lo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61220 |
On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: > de chucka wrote: >> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>> Fran wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>> >>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>> >>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>> bought a >>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>> >>> Not in this household. >>> >>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>> >>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>> >> >> >> exacly > If you do not have instantaneous. There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That temperature to me is way too cold.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f33q1nFe4j4U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61249 |
On 28/09/2017 6:20 PM, Fran wrote: > On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >> de chucka wrote: >>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>> bought a >>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>> well >>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>> >>>> Not in this household. >>>> >>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>> >>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>> >>> >>> >>> exacly >> If you do not have instantaneous. > > There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a > domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves > apparently. and they're invariably disregarded > In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That temperature to me is > way too cold. -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 18:51 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <modpsc1jas6tk9hig1odnshksuquuh907h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61249 |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >> de chucka wrote: >>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>> bought a >>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>> >>>> Not in this household. >>>> >>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>> >>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>> >>> >>> >>> exacly >> If you do not have instantaneous. > >There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >temperature to me is way too cold. The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! (chlorinated). The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, -- Petzl Tiberius Caesar who reigned for 22 years, and his last year was AD 37. wrote: "The extremities of Spain, the various parts of Gaul, the regions of Britain which have never been penetrated by Roman arms, have received the religion of Christ."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 19:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f33thqFev04U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61255 |
On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran > <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: > >> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>> de chucka wrote: >>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>> Not in this household. >>>>> >>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>> >>>> >>>> exacly >>> If you do not have instantaneous. >> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >> temperature to me is way too cold. > The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! > (chlorinated). > The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, but franny doesn't read you or me Petzl, she prefers to remain uneducated :) -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 20:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <aalpschjjrn9h9ktrtt8l7ui98orpdfr4b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61258 |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:26:50 +1000, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran >> <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >> >>> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>>> de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>> Not in this household. >>>>>> >>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> exacly >>>> If you do not have instantaneous. >>> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >>> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >>> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >>> temperature to me is way too cold. >> The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! >> (chlorinated). >> The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, > >but franny doesn't read you or me Petzl, she prefers to remain uneducated :) Her debenture is often a sign of drinking contaminated water -- Petzl We are advised to NOT judge ALL Moslems by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 06:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <3uidnWWd9cITy1DEnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61255 |
On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran > <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: > >> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>> de chucka wrote: >>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as well >>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>> >>>>> Not in this household. >>>>> >>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have higher >>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>> >>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> exacly >>> If you do not have instantaneous. >> >> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >> temperature to me is way too cold. > > The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! > (chlorinated). > The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, When was there a standard 78C in hot water systems and what does it 'disinfect' against? Also over and above chlorination
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 09:17 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f35e9fFq956U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61271 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3uidnWWd9cITy1DEnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran >> <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >> >>> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>>> de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit as >>>>>>> well >>>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not in this household. >>>>>> >>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have >>>>>>> higher >>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>> >>>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> exacly >>>> If you do not have instantaneous. >>> >>> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >>> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >>> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >>> temperature to me is way too cold. >> >> The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! >> (chlorinated). >> The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, > > When was there a standard 78C in hot water systems and what does it > 'disinfect' against? Legionella. > Also over and above chlorination Chlorination does fuck all about legionella, that’s why you still get it in big citys.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 09:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <No2dneFOzMhSGlDEnZ2dnUU7-RvNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61276 |
On 29/09/2017 9:17 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:3uidnWWd9cITy1DEnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran >>> <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>> de chucka wrote: >>>>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold >>>>>>>>>>> water. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit >>>>>>>> as well >>>>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not in this household. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have >>>>>>>> higher >>>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> exacly >>>>> If you do not have instantaneous. >>>> >>>> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >>>> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >>>> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >>>> temperature to me is way too cold. >>> >>> The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! >>> (chlorinated). >>> The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, >> >> When was there a standard 78C in hot water systems and what does it >> 'disinfect' against? > > Legionella. but so will water at 60C > >> Also over and above chlorination > > Chlorination does fuck all about legionella, > that’s why you still get it in big citys. That isn't true https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239530/ The problem is that a/c units are an ideal breeding spot for legionella sp , temp wise, and as they are common in the environment contamination can easily occur
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 10:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <0d3rschjghls83elbt6gjro98vjsp6sbsa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61281 |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:37:44 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 29/09/2017 9:17 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:3uidnWWd9cITy1DEnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran >>>> <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>> de chucka wrote: >>>>>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold >>>>>>>>>>>> water. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit >>>>>>>>> as well >>>>>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not in this household. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have >>>>>>>>> higher >>>>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> exacly >>>>>> If you do not have instantaneous. >>>>> >>>>> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >>>>> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >>>>> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >>>>> temperature to me is way too cold. >>>> >>>> The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! >>>> (chlorinated). >>>> The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, >>> >>> When was there a standard 78C in hot water systems and what does it >>> 'disinfect' against? >> >> Legionella. > >but so will water at 60C > nope. At higher temperatures the more effective chlorine disinfection is "Queensland Health said safety measures remained in place at a Hervey Bay health centre after another round of testing had returned a positive result for legionella bacteria. In January, two tests confirmed the bacteria in two hot water taps at Hervey Bay Oral Health and Cancer Care Centre. The centre's hot water system was then flushed." >> >>> Also over and above chlorination >> >> Chlorination does fuck all about legionella, >> that’s why you still get it in big citys. > >That isn't true https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239530/ > "The results indicate that legionellae are much more resistant to chlorine than are coliform bacteria. At 21 degrees C, pH 7.6, and 0.1 mg of free chlorine residual per liter, a 99% kill of L. pneumophila was achieved within 40 min, compared with less than 1 min for Escherichia coli. The observed resistance is enhanced as conditions for disinfection become less optimal" >The problem is that a/c units are an ideal breeding spot for legionella >sp , temp wise, and as they are common in the environment contamination >can easily occur pH is also a way of disinfection along with chlorination (raised 9 and above ) but not for drinking -- Petzl Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary must apply the law! Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations, ‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-29 11:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ZfOdnb_cpcp0A1DEnZ2dnUU7-WvNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61287 |
On 29/09/2017 10:12 AM, Petzl wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:37:44 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 29/09/2017 9:17 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:3uidnWWd9cITy1DEnZ2dnUU7-KfNnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>> On 28/09/2017 6:51 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 18:20:47 +1000, Fran >>>>> <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 27/09/2017 11:25 PM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>> de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>> On 27/09/2017 3:24 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2017 7:30 AM, FMurtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Fran wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:19 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold >>>>>>>>>>>>> water. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All of mine have only ever used hot water. We would have never >>>>>>>>>>> bought a >>>>>>>>>>> machine that heated water - either a DW or a washing machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have modern hot water it probably heats the water a bit >>>>>>>>>> as well >>>>>>>>>> as some supplies are limited to 50% which is not quite enough. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not in this household. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> water to bathrooms has now not to exceed 50%c but you can have >>>>>>>>>> higher >>>>>>>>>> to kitchens if piped that way >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You just need to know how to turn up the temp on your water heater. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> exacly >>>>>>> If you do not have instantaneous. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are regulations in Oz about the temperature of hot water in a >>>>>> domestic bathroom setting - we can't be trusted nto to burn ourselves >>>>>> apparently. In NSW, IIRC that temperature is 50 degrees That >>>>>> temperature to me is way too cold. >>>>> >>>>> The airheads who set that think all water is disinfected! >>>>> (chlorinated). >>>>> The original 78 Celsius was there for disinfection reasons, >>>> >>>> When was there a standard 78C in hot water systems and what does it >>>> 'disinfect' against? >>> >>> Legionella. >> >> but so will water at 60C >> > > nope. Ah yes it is At higher temperatures the more effective chlorine disinfection > is > > "Queensland Health said safety measures remained in place at a Hervey > Bay health centre after another round of testing had returned a > positive result for legionella bacteria. > > In January, two tests confirmed the bacteria in two hot water taps at > Hervey Bay Oral Health and Cancer Care Centre. > > The centre's hot water system was then flushed." Hot water sitting around at less then 50 is an incubator for some legionella species > > >>> >>>> Also over and above chlorination >>> >>> Chlorination does fuck all about legionella, >>> that’s why you still get it in big citys. >> >> That isn't true https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC239530/ >> > > "The results indicate that legionellae are much more resistant to > chlorine than are coliform bacteria. At 21 degrees C, pH 7.6, and 0.1 > mg of free chlorine residual per liter, a 99% kill of L. pneumophila > was achieved within 40 min, compared with less than 1 min for > Escherichia coli. The observed resistance is enhanced as conditions > for disinfection become less optimal" Thus the claim "Chlorination does fuck all about legionella,"is wrong as I was showing snip
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web