Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #60933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-09-20 13:15 +0800
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 20:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 16:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 02:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 21:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 04:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:07 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 12:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 04:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:06 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:09 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:31 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 06:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 23:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 16:19 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 07:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 08:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 19:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 18:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:04 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 11:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 00:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:28 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 13:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 21:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:52 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 16:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 18:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 19:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 19:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 21:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 07:25 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 03:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 13:29 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 06:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 16:45 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-25 10:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-25 00:25 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 19:46 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:41 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 13:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:13 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 13:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 16:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:00 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 23:05 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 05:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:35 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 13:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 16:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 17:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 07:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 19:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:42 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 14:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 16:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 04:18 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 05:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 09:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 15:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 17:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 17:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 03:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-09-29 19:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-29 18:48 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 17:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 10:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 19:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 01:14 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 03:37 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 11:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 18:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 20:57 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 10:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 12:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 16:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 08:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:44 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:31 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 18:27 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:32 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 14:43 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:50 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 15:08 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 16:35 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 19:55 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 07:14 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 20:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 20:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 06:21 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 07:33 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 17:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:34 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 16:49 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:41 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 17:16 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 08:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 19:42 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 21:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-09-29 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 17:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 20:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-22 18:07 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:08 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 20:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 07:47 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:36 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 12:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-25 17:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-26 16:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 14:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-27 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-23 18:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 12:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 20:03 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 11:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 13:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000
Page 7 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 19 Next page →
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 18:13 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqadr1$kir$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61106 |
On 25/09/2017 7:56 AM, de chucka wrote: > because pez claimed he has a 8kw gas powered back up generator connected > that he bought and installed for $3000 So I went hunting to see what was being said about forecast blackouts on the eastern seaboard. SA and Vic could experience blackouts of up to 4 hours at a time. That was it. I can live quite well for much longer than that without needing a generator. 4 days without power would begin to irritate me, but even if I was in either Vic or SA, those 4 hours would be easy enough to survive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-26 04:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2t0jfFotrlU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61150 |
"Fran" <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> wrote in message news:oqadr1$kir$2@dont-email.me... > On 25/09/2017 7:56 AM, de chucka wrote: > >> because pez claimed he has a 8kw gas powered back up generator connected >> that he bought and installed for $3000 > > So I went hunting to see what was being said about forecast blackouts on > the eastern seaboard. SA and Vic could experience blackouts of up to 4 > hours at a time. That was it. I can live quite well for much longer than > that without needing a generator. 4 days without power would begin to > irritate me, but even if I was in either Vic or SA, those 4 hours would be > easy enough to survive. Easy enough to survive, but if it happens in a period of 10 days over 40C, as it likely will, I prefer to be able run the evap cooler then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 13:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <eeaesc16u5klv16coc54mp3115ubq60idp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61068 |
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:27:09 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> So are solar panels and enough battery backup to >>>>> run everything when the shit has hit the fan. >>>> >>>> No >>> >>> Yep, costs a lot more than his $3K >> >> You can't get8 KVa gas generator for $3 grand even his US cite was $US7K + >> installation > >You cant get a solar system that will deliver 8KVA for long for anything >like that. > Single phase are a lot cheaper than 3 phase but shop around plenty of 2nd hand ones too >>>>> And the batterys wont last forever, the generator may >>>>> well do when its only used during power failures. >>> >>>> Making it more expensive in term of use >>> >>> So the gas powered generator is more viable. >> >> Certainly not > >Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage, and that’s saying something. > >>>>>>> its nothing special and works a lot better than solar panels and >>>>>>> battery backup. >>>>> >>>>>> How so if you solar system is set up properly? >>>>> >>>>> Even you should have noticed that the sun doesn’t >>>>> shine all the time. >>> >>>> That is why you have a storage system >>> >>> Pity about the cost of that. >> >> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >> blackouts. > >But doesn’t deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. > >And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. > >And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system -- Petzl Same Sex Marriage It is ok to vote no. You'll never believe why the Army sacked this decorated intelligence officer https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 15:27 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <bPOdnUA-Z6ap31rEnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61076 |
On 24/09/2017 1:45 PM, Petzl wrote: > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:27:09 +1000, "Rod Speed" > <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> So are solar panels and enough battery backup to >>>>>> run everything when the shit has hit the fan. >>>>> >>>>> No >>>> >>>> Yep, costs a lot more than his $3K >>> >>> You can't get8 KVa gas generator for $3 grand even his US cite was $US7K + >>> installation >> >> You cant get a solar system that will deliver 8KVA for long for anything >> like that. >> > > Single phase are a lot cheaper than 3 phase but shop around plenty of > 2nd hand ones too > >>>>>> And the batterys wont last forever, the generator may >>>>>> well do when its only used during power failures. >>>> >>>>> Making it more expensive in term of use >>>> >>>> So the gas powered generator is more viable. >>> >>> Certainly not >> >> Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage, and that’s saying something. >> >>>>>>>> its nothing special and works a lot better than solar panels and >>>>>>>> battery backup. >>>>>> >>>>>>> How so if you solar system is set up properly? >>>>>> >>>>>> Even you should have noticed that the sun doesn’t >>>>>> shine all the time. >>>> >>>>> That is why you have a storage system >>>> >>>> Pity about the cost of that. >>> >>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>> blackouts. >> >> But doesn’t deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >> >> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >> >> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. > > he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system > Now I know you are talking out of your arse
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 15:33 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61085 |
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>> blackouts. >>> >>> But doesn’t deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>> >>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>> >>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >> >> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >> > > >Now I know you are talking out of your arse When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? -- Petzl http://tinyurl.com/yco7fobz Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always righ :George Orwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 15:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2ouhbFqibrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61088 |
"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>>> blackouts. >>>> >>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>> >>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>> >>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>> >>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>> >> >> >>Now I know you are talking out of your arse > > > When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? But his doesn't need to supply anything like that because its on for much longer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 16:20 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61089 |
On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>>>> blackouts. >>>>> >>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>> >>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>> >>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>> >>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>> >>> >>> >>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >> >> >> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? > > But his doesn't need to supply anything > like that because its on for much longer. Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. Poor pez can only heat water at night not use any other appliances :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 19:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2pcnsFtk61U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61092 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>> >>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>> >>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>> >>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>> >>> >>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >> >> But his doesn't need to supply anything >> like that because its on for much longer. > > Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. Stupid way to do things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 07:58 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61097 |
On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>> >>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>> >>>> >>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>> >>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>> like that because its on for much longer. >> >> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. > > Stupid way to do things. Feeling masochistic I have to ask why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 11:53 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2r5taFbpfuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61107 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from grid >>>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>>> >>>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>>> like that because its on for much longer. >>> >>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >> >> Stupid way to do things. > Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? Its completely stupid to be using PV generated electricity to boost a solar hot water system due to the losses involved. You need a better solar hot water system that doesn’t need boosting instead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 12:00 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <wfydnX5JL5HQ_lXEnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61126 |
On 25/09/2017 11:53 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from >>>>>>>>>> grid >>>>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>>>> >>>>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>>>> like that because its on for much longer. >>>> >>>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >>> >>> Stupid way to do things. > >> Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? > > Its completely stupid to be using PV generated > electricity to boost a solar hot water system due > to the losses involved. Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night You need a better solar hot > water system that doesn’t need boosting instead. When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night I still like a hot shower in the morning. Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 12:08 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2r6peFbuv6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61127 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:wfydnX5JL5HQ_lXEnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 25/09/2017 11:53 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka >>>>>>> <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from >>>>>>>>>>> grid >>>>>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>>>>> >>>>>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>>>>> like that because its on for much longer. >>>>> >>>>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >>>> >>>> Stupid way to do things. >> >>> Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? >> >> Its completely stupid to be using PV generated >> electricity to boost a solar hot water system due >> to the losses involved. > > Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night Which might just be why they store hot water they produce during the day to use any time you need it. Tad radical, I realise. >> You need a better solar hot water system that doesn’t need boosting >> instead. > When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night They don’t when you have a big enough solar hot water system. And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. > I still like a hot shower in the morning. And if you have a big enough solar hot water system, you can still have that. > Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight Stupid waste of the electricity the PV generates and fucks the life of your batterys even more comprehensively.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 12:19 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <9NOdnZ_Ce44s-lXEnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61128 |
On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:wfydnX5JL5HQ_lXEnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >> On 25/09/2017 11:53 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>> On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka >>>>>>>> <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from >>>>>>>>>>>> grid >>>>>>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>>>>>> like that because its on for much longer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >>>>> >>>>> Stupid way to do things. >>> >>>> Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? >>> >>> Its completely stupid to be using PV generated >>> electricity to boost a solar hot water system due >>> to the losses involved. >> >> Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night > > Which might just be why they store hot water they > produce during the day to use any time you need it. > > Tad radical, I realise. I know just like solar panels can charge storage capacity > >>> You need a better solar hot water system that doesn’t need boosting >>> instead. > >> When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night > > They don’t when you have a big enough solar hot water system. Maybe not but why should I up grade > > And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) > >> I still like a hot shower in the morning. > > And if you have a big enough solar hot water system, you can still have > that. Why bother my batteries charged by solar reheat it over night, hey just like off peak hot water heating > >> Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight > > Stupid waste of the electricity the PV generates and fucks > the life of your batterys even more comprehensively. of course it doesn't but hey your ignorance on this subject runs deep
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-24 23:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnosh045.kvi.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #61129 |
The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > Rod Speed wrote: > > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > > > Rod Speed wrote: > > > > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > > > > > Rod Speed wrote: > > > > > > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. > > > > > > > > > > > > Stupid way to do things. > > > > > > > > > > Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? > > > > > > > > Its completely stupid to be using PV generated > > > > electricity to boost a solar hot water system due > > > > to the losses involved. > > > > > > Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night > > > > Which might just be why they store hot water they > > produce during the day to use any time you need it. > > > > Tad radical, I realise. > > I know just like solar panels can charge storage capacity And that's wasteful. > > > > You need a better solar hot water system that doesn?t need boosting > > > > instead. > > > > > > When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night > > > > They don't when you have a big enough solar hot water system. > > Maybe not but why should I up grade So you don't have to blame the kids for using all the hot water. > > And dishwashers don't use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. > > So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) 'Coz you got a shit oldfashioned one. That's the problem with your setup, innit. You're a cheapskate. > > > I still like a hot shower in the morning. > > > > And if you have a big enough solar hot water system, you can still have > > that. > > Why bother my batteries charged by solar reheat it over night, > hey just like off peak hot water heating And using batteries for base loading is an idiotic waste of resources because the rate of their degradation is related to the frequency of their charge/discharge cycles. Battery backup is called "backup" for a very good reason. > > > Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight > > > > Stupid waste of the electricity the PV generates and fucks > > the life of your batterys even more comprehensively. > > of course it doesn't but hey your ignorance on this subject runs deep Wrong pronoun, moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 15:04 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <CPmdnYApdZbHE1XEnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61132 |
On 25/09/2017 2:05 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >> Rod Speed wrote: >>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stupid way to do things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? >>>>> >>>>> Its completely stupid to be using PV generated >>>>> electricity to boost a solar hot water system due >>>>> to the losses involved. >>>> >>>> Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night >>> >>> Which might just be why they store hot water they >>> produce during the day to use any time you need it. >>> >>> Tad radical, I realise. >> >> I know just like solar panels can charge storage capacity > > And that's wasteful. Why? > >>>>> You need a better solar hot water system that doesn?t need boosting >>>>> instead. >>>> >>>> When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night >>> >>> They don't when you have a big enough solar hot water system. >> >> Maybe not but why should I up grade > > So you don't have to blame the kids for using all the hot water. It doesn't worry me I get a hot shower > >>> And dishwashers don't use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. >> >> So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) > > 'Coz you got a shit oldfashioned one. Actually it will heat it's own hot water if necessary but that is very inefficient and expensive > > That's the problem with your setup, innit. You're a cheapskate. > >>>> I still like a hot shower in the morning. >>> >>> And if you have a big enough solar hot water system, you can still have >>> that. >> >> Why bother my batteries charged by solar reheat it over night, >> hey just like off peak hot water heating > > And using batteries for base loading is an idiotic waste of resources > because the rate of their degradation is related to the frequency of > their charge/discharge cycles. Battery backup is called "backup" for > a very good reason. This is not battery back-up > >>>> Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight >>> >>> Stupid waste of the electricity the PV generates and fucks >>> the life of your batterys even more comprehensively. >> >> of course it doesn't but hey your ignorance on this subject runs deep > > Wrong pronoun, moron. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 05:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnoshmv9.uvm.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #61138 |
The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > > > Rod Speed wrote: > > > > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night > > > > > > > > Which might just be why they store hot water they > > > > produce during the day to use any time you need it. > > > > > > > > Tad radical, I realise. > > > > > > I know just like solar panels can charge storage capacity > > > > And that's wasteful. > > Why? Explained below. Pity about your attention span. I've snipped some stuff to shorten the post. Maybe that'll help. > > > > And dishwashers don't use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. > > > > > > So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) > > > > 'Coz you got a shit oldfashioned one. > > Actually it will heat it's own hot water if necessary but that is very > inefficient and expensive Compared with using a HWS? Bullshit. > > And using batteries for base loading is an idiotic waste of resources > > because the rate of their degradation is related to the frequency of > > their charge/discharge cycles. Battery backup is called "backup" for > > a very good reason. > > This is not battery back-up If your batteries are indergoing a high cyclic charge/discharge rate, you're misusing them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 19:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oqbsrj.7h4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61151 |
Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote: [...] > If your batteries are indergoing a high cyclic charge/discharge rate, > you're misusing them. Oops! Then I'd better sell my car(s)!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 14:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnosinu8.d4f.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #61157 |
Frank Slootweg wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > > > If your batteries are indergoing a high cyclic charge/discharge rate, > > you're misusing them. > > Oops! Then I'd better sell my car(s)! Ir you could take a look at the specs of your system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-26 13:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <bpjjscd15bf1o2uueq81gsvqm07c38tkgj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61157 |
On 25 Sep 2017 19:35:54 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: >Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote: >[...] >> If your batteries are indergoing a high cyclic charge/discharge rate, >> you're misusing them. > > Oops! Then I'd better sell my car(s)! what the DAF Daffodil NEVER!!!!!!! https://i.pinimg.com/736x/e6/7a/47/e67a47dfebd6a8ac1d40655d387ee5ba--yellow-nice.jpg -- Petzl Same Sex Marriage It is ok to vote no. You'll never believe why the Army sacked this decorated intelligence officer https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-25 14:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2rfdbFdm0gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61129 |
"de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:9NOdnZ_Ce44s-lXEnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au... > On 25/09/2017 12:08 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:wfydnX5JL5HQ_lXEnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>> On 25/09/2017 11:53 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:AqWdnVYseYkDt1XEnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>> On 24/09/2017 7:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "de chucka" <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:p5ydnf7ZAokp01rEnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@westnet.com.au... >>>>>>> On 24/09/2017 3:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:7rgesc5lnfbn6mb4upokvvfgrfmhsrebtn@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:27:13 +1000, de chucka >>>>>>>>> <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My system pays back in 2 1/2 years with total protection from >>>>>>>>>>>>> grid >>>>>>>>>>>>> blackouts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But doesn't deliver anything even remotely like 8KVA for long. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And one that does wont pay back in 2.5 years either. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And you can't count the FIT scam payments or subsidys. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> he wouldn't even get electric hotwater with his $30K+ system >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now I know you are talking out of your arse >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When on my hot water uses 8KVA alone (night rate)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But his doesn't need to supply anything >>>>>>>> like that because its on for much longer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually it is a solar hot water boost system. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stupid way to do things. >>>> >>>>> Feeling masochistic I have to ask why? >>>> >>>> Its completely stupid to be using PV generated >>>> electricity to boost a solar hot water system due >>>> to the losses involved. >>> >>> Solar hot water systems definitely don't work at night >> >> Which might just be why they store hot water they >> produce during the day to use any time you need it. >> >> Tad radical, I realise. > > I know just like solar panels can charge storage capacity But waste much more of the solar energy by storing it in the battery first before heating the water with it and with the grossly inefficient conversion of solar energy to electricity involved. Directly heating the water with the solar leaves that for dead. >>>> You need a better solar hot water system that doesn’t need boosting >>>> instead. >> >>> When the kids and the dishwasher use all the hot water at night >> >> They don’t when you have a big enough solar hot water system. > > Maybe not No maybe about it. > but why should I up grade Because you are going to have to replace the batterys much sooner. >> And dishwashers don’t use hot water anyway, they heat cold water. > So why is mine connected to the hot water? :-) Because you are that fucking stupid. >>> I still like a hot shower in the morning. >> >> And if you have a big enough solar hot water system, you can still have >> that. > > Why bother Because your batterys will need to be replaced much sooner. > my batteries charged by solar reheat it over night, hey just like off peak > hot water heating Stupid way to do off grid hot water. >>> Oh wait I do get one because the system has been boosted overnight >> >> Stupid waste of the electricity the PV generates and fucks >> the life of your batterys even more comprehensively. > > of course it doesn't but hey your ignorance on this subject runs deep You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web