Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #60933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-09-20 13:15 +0800
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 20:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Lucifer Morningstar <not@for.mail> - 2017-09-23 15:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 16:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 16:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 02:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 17:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 21:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-20 19:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-20 21:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 04:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:07 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 12:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 04:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:06 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:09 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:31 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 06:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 23:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 16:19 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 07:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 08:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 19:56 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 10:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 17:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 18:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 09:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-20 20:04 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 11:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 00:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 01:28 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 13:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-21 16:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-21 21:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 09:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 15:52 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 16:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 18:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 19:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 11:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 12:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 11:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 19:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 21:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 07:25 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 03:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 13:29 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 06:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 16:45 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:54 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-25 10:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-25 00:25 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 19:46 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ördög <devil@hell.net> - 2017-09-24 22:41 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 13:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 18:38 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 09:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:13 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 13:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 16:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 07:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 11:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:00 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 12:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-24 23:05 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 05:35 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:35 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 13:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 14:35 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 15:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-25 16:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-25 17:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 04:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 07:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-25 19:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-25 19:42 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 14:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 16:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 04:18 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-26 19:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 05:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-26 20:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 09:44 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:01 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 15:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 17:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 17:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-27 19:30 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 13:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:18 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:28 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 03:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2017-09-29 19:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-29 18:48 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 17:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 07:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 10:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 10:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-26 19:44 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 01:14 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 17:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-27 03:37 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 06:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 11:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:22 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 11:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 18:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-27 19:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 15:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 18:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 19:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 20:57 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 06:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 10:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 11:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 12:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:08 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 16:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:03 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:56 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:10 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:33 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:51 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:16 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 08:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:44 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:10 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:31 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 18:27 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:32 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 14:43 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 14:50 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 15:08 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-10-02 16:35 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 19:55 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 07:14 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 20:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 17:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 18:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 20:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 06:21 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 07:33 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:46 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-01 17:01 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 11:34 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-02 16:49 +1100
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:31 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:40 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:06 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:26 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:29 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 16:41 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 07:55 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 17:16 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-30 08:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-29 19:42 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 11:58 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:37 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 15:48 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 09:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-27 23:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-28 21:02 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 15:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-09-29 16:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 17:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 18:32 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 19:30 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-29 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-29 20:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-30 11:54 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 20:25 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 15:50 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 19:36 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-22 18:07 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:19 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:08 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 20:24 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-09-23 10:33 +0000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 21:49 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-22 20:43 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 07:47 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-23 06:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-23 13:39 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:01 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-22 23:36 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:17 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-24 12:07 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-24 09:04 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-24 09:14 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-25 17:42 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-25 18:09 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-26 16:23 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 14:59 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-27 15:27 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-09-27 20:11 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-27 23:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> - 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-28 18:34 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-23 18:12 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-09-23 20:05 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 12:47 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:45 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:46 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-09-21 20:03 -0500
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:20 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 10:15 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:41 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 11:21 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 11:26 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 13:38 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 13:53 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-22 14:18 +1000
Re: New phone scam (at least to me) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-09-22 14:24 +1000
Page 18 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 Next page →
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-26 16:23 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2ua3hF35p6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61149 |
On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: > On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 9/23/2017 1:39 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 23/09/2017 6:41 AM, de chucka wrote: >>>> On 22/09/2017 8:43 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>> On 22/09/2017 2:40 PM, de chucka wrote: >>>>>> On 22/09/2017 1:36 PM, Petzl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> tiny penis! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Usually buy a new one each year, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where does one buy a new tiny penis? >>>>> >>>>> I can see why he'd need one given all that boasting about a jacuzzi >>>>> and >>>>> his coffee machine - that boasting is a sure signs of inadequacy on >>>>> his >>>>> part. But his drinking problem will result in any new tiny penis >>>>> being >>>>> non-operational anyway. He should save his money to buy a water >>>>> bed to >>>>> add to the possession boasting. >>>> >>>> >>>> Don't dis water beds >>> >>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines and >>> water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>> >> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. > > There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. > Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 14:59 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqfb7r$gqm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61168 |
On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines and >>>> water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>> >>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >> >> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >> > Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead you to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? If you are so stupid thatyou think that your post was either adult or deserving of a put down then I suggest you need to go way and squeeze some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 15:27 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqfcru$nu3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61196 |
On 27/09/2017 2:59 PM, Fran wrote: > On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: > > >>>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines and >>>>> water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>>> >>>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >>> >>> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >>> >> Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. > > What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead you > to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? > > If you are so stupid that you think that your post was either adult or > undeserving of a put down, then I suggest you need to go way and squeeze > some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face. Corrected. You got what you deserved in response to your puerile post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 20:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f31bqvFp0u9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61203 |
On 9/27/2017 3:27 PM, Fran wrote: > On 27/09/2017 2:59 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >>>> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> >> >>>>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines and >>>>>> water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>>>> >>>>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >>>> >>>> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >>>> >>> Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. >> >> What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead >> you to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? >> >> If you are so stupid that you think that your post was either adult or >> undeserving of a put down, then I suggest you need to go way and >> squeeze some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face. > > Corrected. You got what you deserved in response to your puerile post. > ROFL, since the very mention of the word upsets you so much it would seem to indicate that not only have experienced sex in the places mentioned, but not at all ever. Given your attitudes, that is not surprising.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-27 23:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f31n8rFrke6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61218 |
On 27/09/2017 8:11 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 9/27/2017 3:27 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 27/09/2017 2:59 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines >>>>>>> and water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >>>>> >>>>> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >>>>> >>>> Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. >>> >>> What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead >>> you to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? >>> >>> If you are so stupid that you think that your post was either adult >>> or undeserving of a put down, then I suggest you need to go way and >>> squeeze some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face. >> >> Corrected. You got what you deserved in response to your puerile post. >> > ROFL, since the very mention of the word upsets you so much it would > seem to indicate that not only have experienced sex in the places > mentioned, but not at all ever. err.. typo > > Given your attitudes, that is not surprising. -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fran <franhatesnymshifters@loonynutters.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 18:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oqibof$48j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61218 |
On 27/09/2017 8:11 PM, keithr0 wrote: > On 9/27/2017 3:27 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 27/09/2017 2:59 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines and >>>>>>> water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >>>>> >>>>> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >>>>> >>>> Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. >>> >>> What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead >>> you to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? >>> >>> If you are so stupid that you think that your post was either adult >>> or undeserving of a put down, then I suggest you need to go way and >>> squeeze some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face. >> >> Corrected. You got what you deserved in response to your puerile post. >> > ROFL, since the very mention of the word upsets you so much it would > seem to indicate that not only have experienced sex in the places > mentioned, but not at all ever. I'm irritated that a simple mention of "jacuzzi and a waterbed" is all that it takes to brings out of the woodwork a grubby little man like yourself. > > Given your attitudes, that is not surprising. Give you grubby mind and your fixation of sex, your next fuck will be your first.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-28 18:34 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f33qgpFebepU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61253 |
On 28/09/2017 6:26 PM, Fran wrote: > On 27/09/2017 8:11 PM, keithr0 wrote: >> On 9/27/2017 3:27 PM, Fran wrote: >>> On 27/09/2017 2:59 PM, Fran wrote: >>>> On 26/09/2017 4:23 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 9/25/2017 6:09 PM, Fran wrote: >>>>>> On 25/09/2017 5:42 PM, keithr0 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> I'm dissing dickwads who think that jacuzzis, coffee machines >>>>>>>> and water beds are interesting or worth mentioning. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You've obviously never had sex in a jacuzzi or a waterbed. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no need for you to conflate my experiences with your own. >>>>>> >>>>> Infantile reply from you, I should have expected no better I suppose. >>>> >>>> What was it about the mention of a jacuzzi and a waterbed that lead >>>> you to behave like a wanking 14 year old and post about sex?????????? >>>> >>>> If you are so stupid that you think that your post was either adult >>>> or undeserving of a put down, then I suggest you need to go way and >>>> squeeze some of those pus filled pimples on your prepubescent face. >>> >>> Corrected. You got what you deserved in response to your puerile post. >>> >> ROFL, since the very mention of the word upsets you so much it would >> seem to indicate that not only have experienced sex in the places >> mentioned, but not at all ever. > > I'm irritated that a simple mention of "jacuzzi and a waterbed" is all > that it takes to brings out of the woodwork a grubby little man like > yourself. you made a mountain out of a molehill.. or should I say a waterfall out of a waterbed > >> >> Given your attitudes, that is not surprising. > > Give you grubby mind and your fixation of sex, one comment equals a fixation?? > your next fuck will be your first. considering that he's a great-granded that would be an impossibility -- http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ Islam: the greatest murder machine in history- http://tinyurl.com/pv9r33k http://thereligionofpeace.com https://www.jihadwatch.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-23 18:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2mjb7Fa36cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61030 |
On 22/09/2017 8:43 PM, Fran wrote: > On 22/09/2017 2:40 PM, de chucka wrote: >> On 22/09/2017 1:36 PM, Petzl wrote: > > >>> tiny penis! >>> >>> Usually buy a new one each year, > > > Where does one buy a new tiny penis? ask hubby where he got his > > I can see why he'd need one given all that boasting about a jacuzzi > and his coffee machine - that boasting is a sure signs of inadequacy > on his part. But his drinking problem will result in any new tiny > penis being non-operational anyway. He should save his money to buy a > water bed to add to the possession boasting. -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-23 20:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2mpv2Fbll3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61050 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:f2mjb7Fa36cU1@mid.individual.net... > On 22/09/2017 8:43 PM, Fran wrote: >> On 22/09/2017 2:40 PM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 22/09/2017 1:36 PM, Petzl wrote: >> >> >>>> tiny penis! >>>> >>>> Usually buy a new one each year, >> >> >> Where does one buy a new tiny penis? > ask hubby where he got his No point, it would have been from its parents. >> I can see why he'd need one given all that boasting about a jacuzzi and >> his coffee machine - that boasting is a sure signs of inadequacy on his >> part. But his drinking problem will result in any new tiny penis being >> non-operational anyway. He should save his money to buy a water bed to >> add to the possession boasting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 12:47 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2jbuiFi8jkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61011 |
On 22/09/2017 11:54 AM, Petzl wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:34:42 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 22/09/2017 10:28 AM, felix wrote: >>> On 22/09/2017 9:29 AM, de chucka wrote: >>>> snip >>>>> The "Face" of todays army? >>>>> https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/transgender-in-military2.jpg >>>>> >>>> Your jacuzzi partner? >>>> >>> here's yours http://cdn1.dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ISIS.jpg >> I don't have a jacuzzi > Mines always on as is my cappuccino machine, put in emergency > generator to keep everything going.All because "our" Governments > refusal to build new power stations. NSW needs at least another 2000MW > power station. > http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-14/solar-batteries-like-tesla-exploding-in-popularity/8259830 > > Like no dams policy which had Sydney out of water we are now facing > power shortages. yep. stupid greens bullshit -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f3n8sc1963uo1sd8c8cumi2oa9jk9ovu88@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61000 |
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:28:05 +1000, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >On 22/09/2017 9:29 AM, de chucka wrote: >> snip >>> The "Face" of todays army? >>> https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/transgender-in-military2.jpg >>> >> >> Your jacuzzi partner? >> >here's yours http://cdn1.dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ISIS.jpg Good way to get complete security is put up a couple of Pakistani flags, buy online a ISIS flag, put them up around home and you have complete security 24/7. -- Petzl Same Sex Marriage It is ok to vote no. You'll never believe why the Army sacked this decorated intelligence officer https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <HcednabJXZnEwFnEnZ2dnUU7-YOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61005 |
On 22/09/2017 10:45 AM, Petzl wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:28:05 +1000, felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> > wrote: > >> On 22/09/2017 9:29 AM, de chucka wrote: >>> snip >>>> The "Face" of todays army? >>>> https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/transgender-in-military2.jpg >>>> >>> >>> Your jacuzzi partner? >>> >> here's yours http://cdn1.dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ISIS.jpg > > > Good way to get complete security is put up a couple of Pakistani > flags, buy online a ISIS flag, put them up around home and you have > complete security 24/7. Come on pez give it a go, please please
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-21 20:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <slrnos8ob4.u2l.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #61006 |
The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: > Petzl wrote: > > > > Good way to get complete security is put up a couple of Pakistani > > flags, buy online a ISIS flag, put them up around home and you have > > complete security 24/7. > > Come on pez give it a go, please please Get yourself am irony implant, moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:20 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2j3a3Fgh6qU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #60958 |
On 21/09/2017 8:35 AM, Ned Latham wrote: > The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >> Ned Latham wrote: >>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>> Felix wrote: >>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>> State them. >> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF >> officer to make them. > "Serving"? He was a reservist. yeah, reservists are members too > >> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness ? > He's right. But I don't think he puts enough emphasis on the > invidious influernce of politicians. > >> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. > And he's right there, too. Though he doesn't go the full distance. > >> Just look at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. >> All the politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal >> of Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda >> today controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces >> were in the country ?" > Right again, and again too little emphasis on political interference > with the military. > >> and comments I don't agree about >> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the >> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press release >> read. > He's right there, too. It is not within the ADF's brief to engage > in partisan politics. > >> "The supposedly apolitical ADF is now marching to the beat of a very >> political tune, drummed up by those who demand gay marriage and take >> pleasure in ridiculing Christianity. > He's right again. The ADF should stay OUT of that. > >> "Defence is bending over at every opportunity to help gay members but >> has hauled me over the coals for expressing my religious and political >> beliefs." > And again. Seems that religions aren't the only threats to religious > freedom. > >> Sorry but here are strict rules on what ADF officers can say publicly >> and he breached them even after being warned. > And what about the rules regarding the ADF and political matters? agree with your remarks -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:15 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2j310FgfavU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #60956 |
On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: > On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>> Felix wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>> >>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>> >>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>> >>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>> >>> and his comments about the military leadership. >> >> State them. > > While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer > to make them. > ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence > Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach > shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over > battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … > > "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look > at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the > politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of > Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today > controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in > the country …" > > and comments I don't agree about > "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the > streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, > prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press > release read. I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own regulations > > "The supposedly apolitical ADF is now marching to the beat of a very > political tune, drummed up by those who demand gay marriage and take > pleasure in ridiculing Christianity. > > "Defence is bending over at every opportunity to help gay members but > has hauled me over the coals for expressing my religious and political > beliefs." a cite would have been helpful http://www.smh.com.au/comment/christian-army-officer-bernie-gaynor-pays-the-price-for-marching-out-of-step-with-top-generals-20140709-zt1iq.html http://www.smh.com.au/comment/criticising-islam-gays-sets-army-major-up-for-a-fall-20140316-34va7.html http://bernardgaynor.com.au/press-release-defence-shows-hypocrisy-with-gay-officer/ http://bernardgaynor.com.au/the-australian-defence-force-islam/ > > Sorry but here are strict rules on what ADF officers can say publicly > and he breached them even after being warned. Let's see what the High > Court says about those rules yes, and him saying he spoke as a civilian does not negate them. he's still a serving member in or out of uniform -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 10:41 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <SLCdnQ2OwYnQwVnEnZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #60997 |
On 22/09/2017 10:15 AM, felix wrote: > On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: >> On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>> Felix wrote: >>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>> >>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>> >>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>> >>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>> >>> State them. >> >> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer >> to make them. > >> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … >> >> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look >> at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the >> politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of >> Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today >> controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in >> the country …" >> >> and comments I don't agree about >> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the >> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press >> release read. > > I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own regulations Which ones? snip
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 11:21 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2j6tbFh8bjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61004 |
On 22/09/2017 10:41 AM, de chucka wrote: > On 22/09/2017 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >> On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>> Felix wrote: >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>>> >>>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>>> >>>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>>> >>>> State them. >>> >>> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer >>> to make them. >> >>> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >>> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >>> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >>> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … >>> >>> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look >>> at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the >>> politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of >>> Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today >>> controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in >>> the country …" >>> >>> and comments I don't agree about >>> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the >>> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >>> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press >>> release read. >> >> I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own regulations > > Which ones? see the video 1.02 to 1.16 > > snip > -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 11:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <C4CdnckRrctz-1nEnZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #61009 |
On 22/09/2017 11:21 AM, felix wrote: > On 22/09/2017 10:41 AM, de chucka wrote: >> On 22/09/2017 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >>> On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: >>>> On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>>> Felix wrote: >>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>>>> >>>>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>>>> >>>>> State them. >>>> >>>> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer >>>> to make them. >>> >>>> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >>>> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >>>> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >>>> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … >>>> >>>> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look >>>> at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the >>>> politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of >>>> Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today >>>> controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in >>>> the country …" >>>> >>>> and comments I don't agree about >>>> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the >>>> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >>>> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press >>>> release read. >>> >>> I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own regulations >> >> Which ones? > > see the video 1.02 to 1.16 So the ADF followed the rules. If he'd done the same and also followed orders he wouldn't have been cashiered
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 13:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <2d19schtmf0sfdtnsuiuoo8bl2uqm0ne61@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #61010 |
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:26:56 +1000, de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 22/09/2017 11:21 AM, felix wrote: >> On 22/09/2017 10:41 AM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 22/09/2017 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >>>> On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>>>> Felix wrote: >>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>>>>> >>>>>> State them. >>>>> >>>>> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer >>>>> to make them. >>>> >>>>> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >>>>> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >>>>> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >>>>> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … >>>>> >>>>> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look >>>>> at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the >>>>> politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of >>>>> Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today >>>>> controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in >>>>> the country …" >>>>> >>>>> and comments I don't agree about >>>>> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through the >>>>> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >>>>> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press >>>>> release read. >>>> >>>> I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own regulations >>> >>> Which ones? >> >> see the video 1.02 to 1.16 > >So the ADF followed the rules. If he'd done the same and also followed >orders he wouldn't have been cashiered By george you have it? -- Petzl "To Be A Politician You Need Three Things. Be a Good Liar, A Great Cheat and a Brilliant Thief." Malcolm Turnbull Malcolm applied to be a Senator for the Lobor party https://spectator.com.au/2017/01/turnbulls-labor-dream/ Its time for Malcolm to kick some arse....his own!!! Australian MPs now among the highest paid in the world http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-mps-now-among-the-highest-paid-in-the-world/story-fncynjr2-1226681596923 https://is.gd/nOyfr9 Turnbull draing the swamp! http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/cc61ccd180d35f931bae6ced5e4febaf?width=1024 ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens" *LAST*, Federal State and Council! Or you are voting for Islam and Sharia. For Turnbull, ‘multi-faith’ only means Islam https://is.gd/bunwYB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-22 13:53 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2jfpdFj06pU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61010 |
On 22/09/2017 11:26 AM, de chucka wrote: > On 22/09/2017 11:21 AM, felix wrote: >> On 22/09/2017 10:41 AM, de chucka wrote: >>> On 22/09/2017 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >>>> On 21/09/2017 7:31 AM, de chucka wrote: >>>>> On 21/09/2017 7:19 AM, Ned Latham wrote: >>>>>> The lying coward who hides behind the alias "de chucka" wrote: >>>>>>> Felix wrote: >>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You'll never believe why the Army sacked >>>>>>>>>> this decorated intelligence officer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/kbct75sVRXo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just the usual stupid shit. There is no reason why stuff like >>>>>>>>> that would change if poofters are allowed to marry. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the point is that his performance as a member of the defence force >>>>>>>> was not in question he was only sacked because of his beliefs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and his comments about the military leadership. >>>>>> >>>>>> State them. >>>>> >>>>> While I agree with his comments it is not up to a serving ADF officer >>>>> to make them. >>>> >>>>> ""It is my unpleasant duty to inform you that the Australian Defence >>>>> Force has a fundamentally broken approach to religion, an approach >>>>> shaped partly by the triumph of bureaucratic administration over >>>>> battlefield considerations but mostly by political correctness … >>>>> >>>>> "The ADF has a fundamentally flawed understanding of Islam. Just look >>>>> at Iraq. I was one of the last Australians to serve there. All the >>>>> politicians and military hierarchy were saying the withdrawal of >>>>> Western military force was based on success. And yet al-Qaeda today >>>>> controls more of Iraq than it ever did while Western forces were in >>>>> the country …" >>>>> >>>>> and comments I don't agree about >>>>> "Defence gave approval for its proud uniform to be paraded through >>>>> the >>>>> streets of Sydney during the Mardi Gras, sharing the road with pimps, >>>>> prostitutes and purveyors of moral decadence," Mr Gaynor's press >>>>> release read. >>>> >>>> I do. as he says in the video it contravenes the Army's own >>>> regulations >>> >>> Which ones? >> >> see the video 1.02 to 1.16 > > So the ADF followed the rules. ??? he says the ADF didn't follow their own rules > If he'd done the same and also followed orders he wouldn't have been > cashiered > -- "I used to be forgettful and indecisive. Don't remember when. Think I was. Maybe not."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 18 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web