Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #59297 > unrolled thread
| Started by | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-31 10:29 +1100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-31 15:27 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 81 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 10:29 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 10:41 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:32 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 15:48 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 16:12 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:37 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 22:41 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 05:10 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-01 10:51 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:10 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-01 15:12 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-02 12:07 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-02 13:30 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-02 14:20 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-02 13:40 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-02 14:23 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:27 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 04:17 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-03 10:12 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-03 13:08 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:15 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 13:29 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-03 20:23 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 04:33 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-04 08:45 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 09:44 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-04 09:56 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-04 16:51 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-04 08:43 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 05:01 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:53 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 04:30 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-06 18:12 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:28 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS42 <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-07 13:38 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:21 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 04:54 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-08 15:41 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 08:44 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:07 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 03:24 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-10 14:04 -0600
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:54 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-09 13:15 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-09 13:19 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-05 19:27 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-02 20:22 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-02 20:49 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 03:41 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Blue Heeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-04-02 22:56 +0000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-03 09:44 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:09 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Blue Heeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-04-03 03:18 +0000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-03 09:35 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:11 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-03 10:23 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 13:31 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-03 20:10 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 04:28 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-04 08:37 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 09:42 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-04 09:55 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-04 16:56 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-04 09:22 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-04 17:09 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-04 18:57 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-05 14:07 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-05 15:11 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-05 21:10 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-05 19:19 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-04-05 21:06 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 03:57 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 03:52 +1000
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:22 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 22:11 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 05:06 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-01 10:49 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:09 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-04-01 15:13 +1100
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-03-31 07:46 +0800
Re: LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired) felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 15:27 +1100
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 09:42 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekg4ukF5fhiU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59397 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ekg16lF4qteU1@mid.individual.net... > On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 4:28 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ekeldaFqgjpU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>> >>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>> FTTN. >>>> >>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives >>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>> >>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>> >>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>> >>>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power >>>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>>> >>>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>>> >>>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>>> >>>> Barking mad. >>> >>> Not barking mad, >> >> Corse it is. >> >>> the DHCP server is completely broken. >> >> The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given >> that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem. >> >>> It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the >>> internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to >>> the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was required. That >>> was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but then if something >>> went offline it got a completely different IP address when it cam back >>> on very annoying particularly with things like printers and a bunch of >>> IOT sensors that I have monitoring things like solar power output and >>> solar hot water temperature. The solution, give everything a static >>> address it is trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the >>> picture. >> >> But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd >> like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like >> the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates. > I've never had to reset mine, They have in fact supplied a number of quite different modems, the netcomm NF7, NF12, the Haewai etc. > and I checked the wifi speed last night. it was 22 mbps, so that's very > good considering I'm on the 25mbps plan. But useless on the 100/40 plan. > the modem is Netcomm NF12. maybe TPG also use other other brands? They do indeed and other models of that brand too. > I'm wondering now if I've done the right thing changing to MR especially > since I've signed up for 12 months :( You've got a 100/40 service for less than you were paying for 25/5, get a much better modem than that steaming turd, for $1, get MUCH better support than anything TPG supplies etc etc etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 09:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekg5oaF5jlnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59402 |
On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 9:42 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ekg16lF4qteU1@mid.individual.net... >> On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 4:28 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ekeldaFqgjpU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>>> FTTN. >>>>> >>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>> gives >>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>> >>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>> >>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>>> >>>>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a >>>>>> power >>>>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>>>> >>>>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>>>> >>>>> Barking mad. >>>> >>>> Not barking mad, >>> >>> Corse it is. >>> >>>> the DHCP server is completely broken. >>> >>> The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given >>> that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem. >>> >>>> It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the >>>> internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was >>>> traced to the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was >>>> required. That was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but >>>> then if something went offline it got a completely different IP >>>> address when it cam back on very annoying particularly with things >>>> like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I have monitoring >>>> things like solar power output and solar hot water temperature. The >>>> solution, give everything a static address it is trivial to do and >>>> takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture. >>> >>> But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd >>> like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like >>> the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates. > >> I've never had to reset mine, > > They have in fact supplied a number of quite different modems, > the netcomm NF7, NF12, the Haewai etc. > >> and I checked the wifi speed last night. it was 22 mbps, so that's >> very good considering I'm on the 25mbps plan. > > But useless on the 100/40 plan. > >> the modem is Netcomm NF12. maybe TPG also use other other brands? > > They do indeed and other models of that brand too. > >> I'm wondering now if I've done the right thing changing to MR >> especially since I've signed up for 12 months :( > > You've got a 100/40 service for less than you were paying for > 25/5, get a much better modem than that steaming turd, for $1, > get MUCH better support than anything TPG supplies etc etc etc. yeah, but if I get the slowdowns you've talked about, which I don't get with TPG, I won't be happy! -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 16:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekgudiF9p3mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59394 |
On 4/4/2017 4:28 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message > news:ekeldaFqgjpU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying >>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>> >>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>> >>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>> >>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>> FTTN. >>> >>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives >>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>> >>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >> >> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >> >>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power >>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>> >>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>> >>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>> >>> Barking mad. >> >> Not barking mad, > > Corse it is. > >> the DHCP server is completely broken. > > The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given > that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem. > >> It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the >> internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced >> to the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was required. >> That was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but then if >> something went offline it got a completely different IP address when >> it cam back on very annoying particularly with things like printers >> and a bunch of IOT sensors that I have monitoring things like solar >> power output and solar hot water temperature. The solution, give >> everything a static address it is trivial to do and takes the crap >> DHCP server out of the picture. > > But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd > like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like > the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates. Since I have a 25/5 connection not doing WiFi at the higher rate is irrelevant. I have the Fetch TV box running over a Wifi connection and HD movies from Stan stream perfectly. If I ever upgrade to a 4K or above TV then I may need to do something about it, but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 09:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <58e2d92b$0$24095$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #59391 |
keithr0 wrote: > On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying >>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than >>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>> >>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>> >>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>> >>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>> >>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>> FTTN. >> >>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives >>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >> >> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >> that over wifi and you only use wifi. > > I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. > >>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power >>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >> >> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >> >>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >> >> Barking mad. > > Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to > assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing > for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out > and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making > leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a > completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying > particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I > have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water > temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is > trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 17:09 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekgv5bF9tkgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59399 |
On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying >>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>> >>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>> >>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>> >>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>> FTTN. >>> >>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives >>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>> >>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >> >> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. > > But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. Lets see:- broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines total $69.99/mo I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline for weeks. If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any data at all. >>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power >>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>> >>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>> >>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>> >>> Barking mad. >> >> Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to >> assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing >> for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out >> and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making >> leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a >> completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying >> particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I >> have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water >> temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is >> trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 18:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <58e36013$0$10236$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #59412 |
keithr0 wrote: > On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>> >>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>> FTTN. >>>> >>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives >>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>> >>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>> >>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >> >> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. > > Lets see:- > > broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data > home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines > total $69.99/mo But what speed? Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if you want) > > I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus > landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not > of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly > data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to > change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline > for weeks. > > If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night > then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the > wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any > data at all. > >>>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power >>>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>>> >>>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>>> >>>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>>> >>>> Barking mad. >>> >>> Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to >>> assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing >>> for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out >>> and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making >>> leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a >>> completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying >>> particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I >>> have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water >>> temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is >>> trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture. >> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 14:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekj8t4FntfjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59413 |
On 4/4/2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>>> FTTN. >>>>> >>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>> gives >>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>> >>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>> >>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>> >>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >> >> Lets see:- >> >> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >> total $69.99/mo > But what speed? 25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40. > Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area > But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if > you want) > > >> >> I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus >> landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not >> of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly >> data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to >> change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline >> for weeks. >> >> If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night >> then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the >> wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any >> data at all. >> >>>>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a >>>>>> power >>>>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>>>> >>>>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>>>> >>>>> Barking mad. >>>> >>>> Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to >>>> assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing >>>> for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out >>>> and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making >>>> leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it >>>> got a >>>> completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying >>>> particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors >>>> that I >>>> have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water >>>> temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is >>>> trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture. >>> >> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 15:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <58e47c9b$0$18124$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #59429 |
keithr0 wrote: > On 4/4/2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>>>> FTTN. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>>> gives >>>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>>> >>>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >>> >>> Lets see:- >>> >>> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >>> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >>> total $69.99/mo >> But what speed? > > 25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in > this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a > time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40. As I said why not have faster if it costs no more? > >> Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area >> But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if >> you want) >> >> >>> >>> I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus >>> landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not >>> of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly >>> data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to >>> change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline >>> for weeks. >>> >>> If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night >>> then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the >>> wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any >>> data at all. >>> >>>>>>> Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a >>>>>>> power >>>>>>> cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, that's completely fucked too. >>>>>> >>>>>>> everything in our house is set on static addresses. >>>>>> >>>>>> Barking mad. >>>>> >>>>> Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes >>>>> ages to >>>>> assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing >>>>> for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running >>>>> out >>>>> and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making >>>>> leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it >>>>> got a >>>>> completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying >>>>> particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors >>>>> that I >>>>> have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water >>>>> temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is >>>>> trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture. >>>> >>> >> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 21:10 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekk1kvFsj1bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59431 |
On 4/5/2017 3:11 PM, F Murtz wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> On 4/4/2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ekc1neFavj2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 4/2/2017 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:ekba6oF6l8gU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 12:07 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:ek8nlkFlmqvU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek88dsFj7vuU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek6tk6Fb02aU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek66qkF6k02U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:48 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router issue ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapping out cables, etc., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direct to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supplys. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally switched to a 12/1 service instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The modem certainly is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time in the evening. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ported from TPG, they are notorious for that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah, MR said 6 weeks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and only a quarter as good on ethernet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God knows where you are getting that shit from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You don’t get 5mbps with MR >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you said so in another post >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but the fact that it has means that it could >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they >>>>>>>>> supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the >>>>>>>>> 100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not >>>>>>>>> FTTN. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need >>>>>> one. >>>>> >>>>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >>>> >>>> Lets see:- >>>> >>>> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >>>> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >>>> total $69.99/mo >>> But what speed? >> >> 25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in >> this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a >> time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40. > > > As I said why not have faster if it costs no more? As I have said, the extra bandwidth would be of little or no advantage to me, I'd have to go through the hassle of changing ISPs, I'd either have to change my phone number or do without a phone for a significant period of time and lose my 100 minutes of O/S calls per month. Not worth the effort (at least at present).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 19:19 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekjr63Fr7ivU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59413 |
On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: > keithr0 wrote: >> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>> gives >>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>> >>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>> >>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>> >>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >> >> Lets see:- >> >> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >> total $69.99/mo > But what speed? > > Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area > But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if > you want) I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 21:06 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekk1diFsgk7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59433 |
On 4/5/2017 7:19 PM, felix wrote: > On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>>> gives >>>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>>> >>>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >>> >>> Lets see:- >>> >>> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >>> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >>> total $69.99/mo >> But what speed? >> >> Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area >> But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if >> you want) > > I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls That probably works if you are on your own. With more than one person living together, its much more convenient to have a landline (and usually cheaper too)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-06 03:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekkpfqF2sb3U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59437 |
"keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message news:ekk1diFsgk7U2@mid.individual.net... > On 4/5/2017 7:19 PM, felix wrote: >> On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need >>>>>> one. >>>>> >>>>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >>>> >>>> Lets see:- >>>> >>>> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >>>> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >>>> total $69.99/mo >>> But what speed? >>> >>> Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area >>> But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if >>> you want) >> >> I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls > That probably works if you are on your own. With more than one person > living together, its much more convenient to have a landline Dunno, most incoming calls are to a specific person and so calling their mobile saves farting around with the person who answered the phone not being the one the caller wanted to speak to quite a bit of the time. > (and usually cheaper too) Depends on whether you need the mobiles for when out of the house, most do. In that case the landline line rent is an extra. One of my mates finds that his kid will only answer the landline for some reason, wont answer the mobiles. He's just turned 3.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-06 03:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ekkpfoF2sb3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59433 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ekjr63Fr7ivU1@mid.individual.net... > On Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017 6:57 PM, F Murtz wrote: >> keithr0 wrote: >>> On 4/4/2017 9:22 AM, F Murtz wrote: >>>> keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 4/3/2017 3:41 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test >>>>>>> gives >>>>>>> 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that >>>>>> steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like >>>>>> that over wifi and you only use wifi. >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one. >>>> >>>> But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers. >>> >>> Lets see:- >>> >>> broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data >>> home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines >>> total $69.99/mo >> But what speed? >> >> Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area But >> phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if you >> want) > > I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls Yeah, some I know have cancelled their landline service and just have mobiles. Main downside with that approach is that if you don’t have unlimited calls and texts within the country, its expensive to call operations that can leave you on hold for half an hour or an hour etc. Tho there are unlimited call and text plans which cost less than the landline line rent now. I also know some who have to have a landline for their adsl service who don’t have a phone plugged into it to avoid spam calls too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 17:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek6atkF7avkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59305 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... > On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>> >>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>> >>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>> >>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this >>>> problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >> >> Yes you should have. >> >>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out >>> cables, etc., >> >> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? > > I didn't see any answer there. Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more accurately something viable between the ears. > I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the > problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. It isnt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 22:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek6rsaFal3bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59308 |
On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:22 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... >> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>> >>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>> >>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this >>>>> problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >>> >>> Yes you should have. >>> >>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out >>>> cables, etc., >>> >>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? >> >> I didn't see any answer there. > > Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more > accurately something viable between the ears. so enlighten me then. what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss of connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will be fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I understood or could implement) > >> I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and >> the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. > > It isnt. yeah, thanks, that's a big help -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 05:06 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek7k69FfcvpU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59312 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ek6rsaFal3bU1@mid.individual.net... > On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:22 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>> >>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this >>>>>> problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >>>> >>>> Yes you should have. >>>> >>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out >>>>> cables, etc., >>>> >>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? >>> >>> I didn't see any answer there. >> >> Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more >> accurately something viable between the ears. > > so enlighten me then. No point trying if you couldn’t understand what was suggested in that thread. > what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss of > connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will be > fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I understood Yes, you are that thick. > or could implement) Even sillier than you usually manage. >>> I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the >>> problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >> It isnt. > yeah, thanks, that's a big help You're clearly beyond help and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 10:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek888vFj7vuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59314 |
On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:06 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ek6rsaFal3bU1@mid.individual.net... >> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:22 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that >>>>>>> this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >>>>> >>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>> >>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out >>>>>> cables, etc., >>>>> >>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? >>>> >>>> I didn't see any answer there. >>> >>> Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more >>> accurately something viable between the ears. >> >> so enlighten me then. > > No point trying if you couldn’t understand > what was suggested in that thread. > >> what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss >> of connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will >> be fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I >> understood > > Yes, you are that thick. > >> or could implement) > > Even sillier than you usually manage. I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses > >>>> I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and >>>> the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. > >>> It isnt. > >> yeah, thanks, that's a big help > > You're clearly beyond help not really. no one can do what they don't know how to do > and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always. yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the switch. swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty cable. it even plain to see above in this post. -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 13:09 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek8gf8FkigtU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59318 |
"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message news:ek888vFj7vuU1@mid.individual.net... > On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:06 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >> news:ek6rsaFal3bU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:22 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this >>>>>>>> problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out >>>>>>> cables, etc., >>>>>> >>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? >>>>> >>>>> I didn't see any answer there. >>>> >>>> Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more >>>> accurately something viable between the ears. >>> >>> so enlighten me then. >> >> No point trying if you couldn’t understand >> what was suggested in that thread. >> >>> what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss of >>> connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will be >>> fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I >>> understood >> >> Yes, you are that thick. >> >>> or could implement) >> >> Even sillier than you usually manage. > > I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses You always run that line when you are told to go and fuck yourself, again. >>>>> I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and >>>>> the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue. >> >>>> It isnt. >> >>> yeah, thanks, that's a big help >> >> You're clearly beyond help > > not really. Yes, really. > no one can do what they don't know how to do Even you should be able to read that thread and try the various alternatives and see if it fixes the problem. >> and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always. > yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the switch. > swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty cable. it even > plain to see above in this post. If that is all you tried, you clearly are beyond any help.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-01 15:13 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek8nosFlmqvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #59326 |
On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 1:09 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ek888vFj7vuU1@mid.individual.net... >> On Saturday, 1 Apr 2017 5:06 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:ek6rsaFal3bU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 5:22 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:ek65ejF6cpnU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ek5jepF3d9fU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 10:29 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that >>>>>>>>> this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router >>>>>>>>> issue ?? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes you should have. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping >>>>>>>> out cables, etc., >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't see any answer there. >>>>> >>>>> Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more >>>>> accurately something viable between the ears. >>>> >>>> so enlighten me then. >>> >>> No point trying if you couldn’t understand >>> what was suggested in that thread. >>> >>>> what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the >>>> loss of connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own >>>> words will be fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not >>>> one that I understood >>> >>> Yes, you are that thick. >>> >>>> or could implement) >>> >>> Even sillier than you usually manage. >> >> I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses > > You always run that line when you are told to go and fuck yourself, > again. > >>>>>> I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, >>>>>> and the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem >>>>>> issue. >>> >>>>> It isnt. >>> >>>> yeah, thanks, that's a big help >>> >>> You're clearly beyond help >> >> not really. > > Yes, really. > >> no one can do what they don't know how to do > > Even you should be able to read that thread and try > the various alternatives and see if it fixes the problem. > >>> and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always. > >> yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the >> switch. swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty >> cable. it even plain to see above in this post. > > If that is all you tried, you clearly are beyond any help. not at all. you just either don't know the answer, or don't want to help -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 07:46 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <58dd98ec$0$11127$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #59297 |
On 31/03/2017 7:29 AM, felix wrote: > > I have this same problem. just googled and got this site. > > http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013 > > currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this > problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ?? > > Probably typical Lucky Goldstar but... Did you try this from Baxter? "This is fixed by ensuring your wifi network name is no longer than 8 characters (letters and numbers ONLY) Eg: BaxWiFi And this is the killer trick, your TVs 'Name' as inputted in the settings menu by the factory must also be only 8 letters/numbers long and MUST NOT contain symbols, or spaces. Eg: Was called this: 55LN5710-TE Changed to this: 55LN5710 Now its Perfect. Bulletproof now for 3 days... tested on two modems.. Billion 7800NL and NetGear D6300... On both modems before changes to 8 character names.. constant drop outs and failures. After name change, bulletproof and faultless. :)"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web