Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #58032 > unrolled thread

Civilised Society - according to Felix

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers

Contents

  Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 04:33 -0800
    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 05:52 +1100
      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-30 20:13 +0000
        Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 07:42 +1100
    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 10:01 +1100
      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 10:23 +1100
      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 23:12 -0800
        Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 19:41 +1100
          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 19:54 +1100
            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-01-31 22:30 +1100
              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-31 22:42 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:13 +1100
                  Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:16 +1100
                    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 15:30 +1100
                      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 15:37 +1100
                        Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:08 +1100
                          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:13 +1100
                            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:36 +1100
                              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:57 +1100
                          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:30 +1100
              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-01 05:32 +1100
          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-31 01:53 -0800
            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:15 +1100
              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 12:14 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 12:58 +1100
                  Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:31 +1100
                  Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:28 +1100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#58032 — Civilised Society - according to Felix

On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 2:24:44 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: 
> 
> in a civilized society ppl do consider the impact of their 
> words and deeds on others. that's what civilization is all 
> about. only barbarians have no regard for others 

No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because 
no-one "should" need to go faster than you. 

No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least 
see if it's serious enough for a 000 call. 

No regard, like https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
"more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach 
following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just 
stand idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the 
blood oozing out" 

No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor 
because you're jealous of the tractor. 

Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you. 

Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#58039

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:08 -0800 (PST), dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:

>On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 2:24:44 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: 
>> 
>> in a civilized society ppl do consider the impact of their 
>> words and deeds on others. that's what civilization is all 
>> about. only barbarians have no regard for others 
>
>No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because 
>no-one "should" need to go faster than you. 
>
>No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least 
>see if it's serious enough for a 000 call. 
>
>No regard, like https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
>"more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach 
>following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just 
>stand idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the 
>blood oozing out" 
>
>No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor 
>because you're jealous of the tractor. 
>
>Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you. 
>
>Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?

And this guy (Peter Wood) worked around kids... imagine that. Little
wonder some of them regarded him homophobic and racist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58045

Jeßus wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:08 -0800 (PST), dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 2:24:44 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: 
> >> 
> >> in a civilized society ppl do consider the impact of their 
> >> words and deeds on others. that's what civilization is all 
> >> about. only barbarians have no regard for others 
> > 
> > No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because 
> > no-one "should" need to go faster than you. 
> > 
> > No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least 
> > see if it's serious enough for a 000 call. 
> > 
> > No regard, like
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc
> > 20KBDgAJ:  "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West
> > Australian beach following a shark attack, and begging me to dial
> > 000, I'll just stand idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and
> > watch the blood oozing out"
> > 
> > No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor 
> > because you're jealous of the tractor. 
> > 
> > Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you. 
> > 
> > Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
> 
> And this guy (Peter Wood) worked around kids... imagine that. Little
> wonder some of them regarded him homophobic and racist.

No, no now Fetid felix is saying he is not Peter Wood. Funny thing is
though if you say anything negative about Peter Wood - why fetid races
into battle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58047

On 30 Jan 2017 20:13:00 GMT, "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> wrote:

>Jeßus wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:33:08 -0800 (PST), dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> > On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 2:24:44 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> in a civilized society ppl do consider the impact of their 
>> >> words and deeds on others. that's what civilization is all 
>> >> about. only barbarians have no regard for others 
>> > 
>> > No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because 
>> > no-one "should" need to go faster than you. 
>> > 
>> > No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least 
>> > see if it's serious enough for a 000 call. 
>> > 
>> > No regard, like
>> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc
>> > 20KBDgAJ:  "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West
>> > Australian beach following a shark attack, and begging me to dial
>> > 000, I'll just stand idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and
>> > watch the blood oozing out"
>> > 
>> > No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor 
>> > because you're jealous of the tractor. 
>> > 
>> > Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you. 
>> > 
>> > Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
>> 
>> And this guy (Peter Wood) worked around kids... imagine that. Little
>> wonder some of them regarded him homophobic and racist.
>
>No, no now Fetid felix is saying he is not Peter Wood. Funny thing is
>though if you say anything negative about Peter Wood - why fetid races
>into battle.

LOL, yeah. One day he admits it, the next he's denying it. 
Peter Wood of 'rate my teacher' infamy is definitely felix.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58056

On Monday, 30 Jan 2017 11:33 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?

It would make an interesting psychological study for someone to 
ascertain what mental malaise it is, or psychological aberration, that 
causes aus.cars ppl to have this obsession with me, even to the point of 
following me to other ngs to dodge killfiles


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58062

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:01:47 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:

>On Monday, 30 Jan 2017 11:33 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
>
>It would make an interesting psychological study for someone to 
>ascertain what mental malaise it is, or psychological aberration, that 
>causes aus.cars ppl to have this obsession with me, even to the point of 
>following me to other ngs to dodge killfiles


LOL @ your so-called 'killfile' :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58098

On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 10:01:52 AM UTC+11, felix wrote:
> On Monday, 30 Jan 2017 11:33 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
> 
> It would make an interesting psychological study for someone to 
> ascertain what mental malaise it is, or psychological aberration, that 
> causes aus.cars ppl to have this obsession with me, even to the point of 
> following me to other ngs to dodge killfiles

Well when you ask for proof of a claim, but then jump into your
escape pod (killfile), I just take some simple steps to deliver the
goods that you asked for.

If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might
find you're just narcissistic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58102

On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 6:12 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 10:01:52 AM UTC+11, felix wrote:
>> On Monday, 30 Jan 2017 11:33 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
>> It would make an interesting psychological study for someone to
>> ascertain what mental malaise it is, or psychological aberration, that
>> causes aus.cars ppl to have this obsession with me, even to the point of
>> following me to other ngs to dodge killfiles
> Well when you ask for proof of a claim, but then jump into your
> escape pod (killfile), I just take some simple steps to deliver the
> goods that you asked for.
>
> If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might
> find you're just narcissistic.

Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't want 
me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless..

"No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because no-one 
"should" need to go faster than you. "

never said I did. try proving otherwise

"No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least see if 
it's serious enough for a 000 call"

an accident I wasn't involved in

"No regard, like 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
"more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach 
following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand 
idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out"

like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark

"No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor because 
you're jealous of the tractor."

jealous of a tractor!? 'shirley, you kant be serious!' forgot your meds 
today, did you

"Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you."

that's so ridiculous it doesn't even merit a reply

so that's it then? that's all you have?

"Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?

no, just making a colossal fool of yourself..


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58105

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:41:30 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:

>On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 6:12 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 10:01:52 AM UTC+11, felix wrote:
>>> On Monday, 30 Jan 2017 11:33 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Oh, sorry, am I "dissing" you little princess?
>>> It would make an interesting psychological study for someone to
>>> ascertain what mental malaise it is, or psychological aberration, that
>>> causes aus.cars ppl to have this obsession with me, even to the point of
>>> following me to other ngs to dodge killfiles
>> Well when you ask for proof of a claim, but then jump into your
>> escape pod (killfile), I just take some simple steps to deliver the
>> goods that you asked for.
>>
>> If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might
>> find you're just narcissistic.
>
>Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't want 
>me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless..
>
>"No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because no-one 
>"should" need to go faster than you. "
>
>never said I did. try proving otherwise
>
>"No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least see if 
>it's serious enough for a 000 call"
>
>an accident I wasn't involved in
>
>"No regard, like 
>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
>"more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach 
>following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand 
>idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out"
>
>like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark

Is that your latest defence, that it wasn't a serious remark?

So...

fucked tyres
No need to replace timing belts
Monster cables are 'industry standard'
Old Holdens doing 90MPH in 2nd gear
Different DVDRs and HDMI cables produce a different picture quality...

Oh, like anyone with any sense ever thought they were a serious
remark?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58141

On 31/01/17 7:54 PM, Je�us wrote:

>> "No regard, like
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ:
>> "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach
>> following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand
>> idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out"
>>
>> like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark
>
> Is that your latest defence, that it wasn't a serious remark?
>
> So...
>
> fucked tyres
> No need to replace timing belts
> Monster cables are 'industry standard'
> Old Holdens doing 90MPH in 2nd gear
> Different DVDRs and HDMI cables produce a different picture quality...
>
> Oh, like anyone with any sense ever thought they were a serious
> remark?

No hope of winning a bet with someone who shifts goalposts as much as 
this, huh? :)


-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58144

On 31/01/2017 10:30 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 31/01/17 7:54 PM, Je�us wrote:
>
>>> "No regard, like
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ:
>>>
>>> "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach
>>> following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand
>>> idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing
>>> out"
>>>
>>> like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark
>>
>> Is that your latest defence, that it wasn't a serious remark?
>>
>> So...
>>
>> fucked tyres
>> No need to replace timing belts
>> Monster cables are 'industry standard'
>> Old Holdens doing 90MPH in 2nd gear
>> Different DVDRs and HDMI cables produce a different picture quality...
>>
>> Oh, like anyone with any sense ever thought they were a serious
>> remark?
>
> No hope of winning a bet with someone who shifts goalposts as much as
> this, huh? :)
>
>
Yes, people have tried with you but you've proven to be a goal post 
shifter extraordinaire! You move 'em so fast they're a mere blur!

-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58184

On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 10:42 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 31/01/2017 10:30 PM, Noddy wrote:
>> On 31/01/17 7:54 PM, Je�us wrote:
>>
>>>> "No regard, like
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach
>>>> following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand
>>>> idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing
>>>> out"
>>>>
>>>> like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark
>>>
>>> Is that your latest defence, that it wasn't a serious remark?
>>>
>>> So...
>>>
>>> fucked tyres
>>> No need to replace timing belts
>>> Monster cables are 'industry standard'
>>> Old Holdens doing 90MPH in 2nd gear
>>> Different DVDRs and HDMI cables produce a different picture quality...
>>>
>>> Oh, like anyone with any sense ever thought they were a serious
>>> remark?
>>
>> No hope of winning a bet with someone who shifts goalposts as much as
>> this, huh? :)
>>
>>
> Yes, people have tried with you but you've proven to be a goal post 
> shifter extraordinaire! You move 'em so fast they're a mere blur!
>

If goal post shifting were an Olympic event, he would have a string of 
gold medals, lol


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58221

On 01/02/17 10:13 AM, felix wrote:

>> Yes, people have tried with you but you've proven to be a goal post
>> shifter extraordinaire! You move 'em so fast they're a mere blur!
>>
>
> If goal post shifting were an Olympic event, he would have a string of
> gold medals, lol

This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by two 
"tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time added 
that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon as 
possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that it 
didn't change anything in doing so.

This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)




-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58285

On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 1:16 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 01/02/17 10:13 AM, felix wrote:
>
>>> Yes, people have tried with you but you've proven to be a goal post
>>> shifter extraordinaire! You move 'em so fast they're a mere blur!
>>>
>>
>> If goal post shifting were an Olympic event, he would have a string of
>> gold medals, lol
>
> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by 
> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time 
> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon 
> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that 
> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>
> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>
>

and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were 
another, he would have even more. many more!


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58289

On 01/02/17 3:30 PM, felix wrote:

>> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by
>> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time
>> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon
>> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that
>> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>>
>> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>>
>>
>
> and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were
> another, he would have even more. many more!

So you're *now* saying that this never happened, are you Felix?





-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58319

On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 3:37 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 01/02/17 3:30 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by
>>> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time
>>> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon
>>> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that
>>> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>>>
>>> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were
>> another, he would have even more. many more!
>
> So you're *now* saying that this never happened, are you Felix?
>

certainly not how you've said


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58323

On 01/02/17 4:08 PM, felix wrote:

>>>> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by
>>>> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time
>>>> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon
>>>> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that
>>>> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>>>>
>>>> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were
>>> another, he would have even more. many more!
>>
>> So you're *now* saying that this never happened, are you Felix?
>>
>
> certainly not how you've said

But how I said is *exactly* what happened Felix. There was a great 
debate about your tyres where you claimed very early on that you had 
them looked at by two separate tyre experts who told you that they were 
"okay", and you repeated this story *many* times. Fast forward to about 
a year later when the debate started again and you repeated the same 
story a number of times until you suddenly decided to add the bit where 
you claim you were told "they needed to be changed as soon as possible".

This isn't the case? Cool. Feel free to show *exactly* where I'm wrong 
by citing the original posts.







-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58341

On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 4:13 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 01/02/17 4:08 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>>>> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by
>>>>> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time
>>>>> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as 
>>>>> soon
>>>>> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and 
>>>>> that
>>>>> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were
>>>> another, he would have even more. many more!
>>>
>>> So you're *now* saying that this never happened, are you Felix?
>>>
>>
>> certainly not how you've said
>
> But how I said is *exactly* what happened Felix. There was a great 
> debate about your tyres where you claimed very early on that you had 
> them looked at by two separate tyre experts who told you that they 
> were "okay", and you repeated this story *many* times. Fast forward to 
> about a year later when the debate started again and you repeated the 
> same story a number of times until you suddenly decided to add the bit 
> where you claim you were told "they needed to be changed as soon as 
> possible".
>
> This isn't the case? Cool. Feel free to show *exactly* where I'm wrong 

there was not 99 times of telling the story, and I never 'forgot' to 
mention anything, I just never went into all the detail, and only did so 
eventually, due to persistence with the topic by the cabal. and I never 
said tyre 'experts' looked at them I said tyre dealers

> by citing the original posts.
>
>

you cite them, it's your story, I can't be bothered looking


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58344

On 01/02/17 4:36 PM, felix wrote:

>> This isn't the case? Cool. Feel free to show *exactly* where I'm wrong
>
> there was not 99 times of telling the story, and I never 'forgot' to
> mention anything, I just never went into all the detail, and only did so
> eventually, due to persistence with the topic by the cabal. and I never
> said tyre 'experts' looked at them I said tyre dealers

Right.

And *this* is how you stick your head up your arse and think you don't 
lie. By taking everything literally and pretending that an *entire* 
story is wrong because someone said "tyre expert" rather than "tyre dealer".




-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58385

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:08:47 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:

>On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 3:37 PM, Noddy wrote:
>> On 01/02/17 3:30 PM, felix wrote:
>>
>>>> This from the bloke who for 99 straight times claimed he was told by
>>>> two "tyre experts" that "his tyres were okay", but on the 100th time
>>>> added that he was *also* told that they "needed to be replaced as soon
>>>> as possible" and claims that he simply forgot to add that bit and that
>>>> it didn't change anything in doing so.
>>>>
>>>> This is the bloke who reckons he's never bullshitted on Usenet :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> and of course if exaggeration, distortions, and straight out lies were
>>> another, he would have even more. many more!
>>
>> So you're *now* saying that this never happened, are you Felix?
>>
>
>certainly not how you've said

LOL, you are pathetic. Truly pathetic :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers

csiph-web