Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #57568 > unrolled thread

computer wont boot

Started byfelix <me@nothere.invalid>
First post2017-01-26 08:54 +0930
Last post2017-01-26 15:51 +1100
Articles 20 on this page of 63 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers

Contents

  computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-26 08:54 +0930
    Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-25 23:46 +0000
      Re: computer wont boot Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2017-01-26 11:17 +1100
    Re: computer wont boot "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-01-26 10:45 +1000
      Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-26 14:43 +1100
    Re: computer wont boot Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-26 08:54 +0800
      Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-26 01:04 +0000
        Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-26 12:31 +1100
        Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-26 14:44 +1100
          Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-26 05:48 +0000
            Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-27 08:36 +1100
      Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-26 12:31 +1100
        Re: computer wont boot keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-27 10:34 +1000
          Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-27 12:02 +1100
            Re: computer wont boot keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-27 13:26 +1000
              Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-27 15:05 +1100
        Re: computer wont boot Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-28 09:22 +0800
    Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-26 12:02 +1100
      Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-26 14:45 +1100
      Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-26 16:52 +1100
        Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-27 08:37 +1100
          Re: computer wont boot Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-27 07:15 +0800
            Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-27 19:54 +1100
              Re: computer wont boot Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 19:01 +1000
                Re: computer wont boot jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 01:55 -0800
                  Re: computer wont boot Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2017-01-27 21:22 +1100
                  Re: computer wont boot Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 21:42 +1000
                    Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-27 23:03 +1100
                      Re: computer wont boot Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 23:07 +1000
                        Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-27 20:28 +0000
                          Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 10:52 +1100
                        Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 11:09 +1100
                          Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 02:26 +0000
                            Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-28 16:24 +1100
                              Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 18:03 +1100
                            Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 17:58 +1100
                              Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 07:47 +0000
                                Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 19:20 +1100
                                  Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 09:27 +0000
                                Re: computer wont boot jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-01-28 01:10 -0800
                                  Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 09:28 +0000
                                    Re: computer wont boot jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-01-28 01:52 -0800
                                      Re: computer wont boot Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2017-01-28 21:30 +1100
                                      Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 11:50 +0000
                                Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 11:48 +0000
                                  Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-29 00:00 +1100
                                    Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 20:02 +0000
                                      Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-29 10:01 +1100
                                        Re: computer wont boot Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@nunnya.business.com.au> - 2017-01-29 10:12 +1100
                                          Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-29 12:31 +1100
                                      Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-29 10:05 +1100
                                  Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 20:04 +0000
                        Re: computer wont boot alvey <alvey@play.com> - 2017-01-28 11:39 +1000
                          Re: computer wont boot Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-28 17:39 +1100
                      Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-27 20:27 +0000
                Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-28 08:06 +1100
                  Re: computer wont boot jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-01-28 01:15 -0800
                    Re: computer wont boot "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-28 09:28 +0000
                    Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-29 08:03 +1100
        Re: computer wont boot keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-27 10:37 +1000
          Re: computer wont boot felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-27 12:08 +1100
          Re: computer wont boot Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-27 19:45 +1100
    Re: computer wont boot "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 15:51 +1100

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#57617

FromJeßus <j@j.net>
Date2017-01-27 08:37 +1100
Message-ID<evqk8cpcc9o357q9095fqdp0v3a6q8eo3q@4ax.com>
In reply to#57587
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:52:39 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:

>On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 12:02 PM, felix wrote:
>> On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 10:24 AM, felix wrote:
>>> start computer and the DOS bit says it cant boot. why does it does this?
>>
>> whoa! whoop de doo! some silly person thinks they're clever by forging 
>> posts
>>
>>
>
>I think it might be Franny Wanny from aus.politics. I don't see any of 
>the other likely suspects having the same combination..

No, just another form of your attention seeking most likely.

>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 
>Thunderbird/45.6.0

Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57631

FromClocky <notgonn@happen.com>
Date2017-01-27 07:15 +0800
Message-ID<588a8300$0$1519$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#57617
On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:52:39 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 12:02 PM, felix wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 10:24 AM, felix wrote:
>>>> start computer and the DOS bit says it cant boot. why does it does this?
>>>
>>> whoa! whoop de doo! some silly person thinks they're clever by forging
>>> posts
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think it might be Franny Wanny from aus.politics. I don't see any of
>> the other likely suspects having the same combination..
>
> No, just another form of your attention seeking most likely.
>
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>
> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>

A 1337 one at that!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57706

FromJeßus <j@j.net>
Date2017-01-27 19:54 +1100
Message-ID<hk2m8clqg5urdn12lpuik1pkhghmkg76sm@4ax.com>
In reply to#57631
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

>On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:52:39 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 12:02 PM, felix wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, 26 Jan 2017 10:24 AM, felix wrote:
>>>>> start computer and the DOS bit says it cant boot. why does it does this?
>>>>
>>>> whoa! whoop de doo! some silly person thinks they're clever by forging
>>>> posts
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it might be Franny Wanny from aus.politics. I don't see any of
>>> the other likely suspects having the same combination..
>>
>> No, just another form of your attention seeking most likely.
>>
>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>>
>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>>
>
>A 1337 one at that!

Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57707

FromGrumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-27 19:01 +1000
Message-ID<o6f29m$169t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#57706
On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
>
>> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
.
>>>
>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>>>
>>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>>>
>>
>> A 1337 one at that!
>
> Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
>
What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that 
they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on 
Thunderbird 31.5...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57712

Fromjonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-27 01:55 -0800
Message-ID<a672385c-31fd-4683-9e2e-55739e020b05@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#57707
On Friday, 27 January 2017 20:01:44 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech  wrote:
> On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
> .
> >>>
> >>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
> >>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
> >>>
> >>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
> >>>
> >>
> >> A 1337 one at that!
> >
> > Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
> >
> What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that 
> they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on 
> Thunderbird 31.5...
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
 And your still here!.Man of yer word...(NOT)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57713

FromLucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com>
Date2017-01-27 21:22 +1100
Message-ID<fn7m8cd7melqstbst73mvoejm45inr553o@4ax.com>
In reply to#57712
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:55:26 -0800 (PST), jonz
<johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, 27 January 2017 20:01:44 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech  wrote:
>> On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
>> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> .
>> >>>
>> >>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>> >>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>> >>>
>> >>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> A 1337 one at that!
>> >
>> > Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
>> >
>> What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that=20
>> they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on=20
>> Thunderbird 31.5...
>=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=
>=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC
> And your still here!.Man of yer word...(NOT)

What is the purpose of the
=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=
=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC=C2=AC

-- 
President Trump will make America great again

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57715

FromGrumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-27 21:42 +1000
Message-ID<o6fbmj$1mjk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#57712
On 27/01/2017 7:55 PM, jonz wrote:
> On Friday, 27 January 2017 20:01:44 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech  wrote:
>> On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A 1337 one at that!
>>>
>>> Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
>>>
>> What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that
>> they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on
>> Thunderbird 31.5...
> ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
>   And your still here!.Man of yer word...(NOT)
>
Only because I love you jonz. You do things for my heart that cannot be 
explained. I have these feelings for you that I just had to share...
































And if you believe that I have a large bridge for sale....

then again you believe everything someone else says... Stick to driving 
trucks and going to the pub jonz.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57717

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-27 23:03 +1100
Message-ID<o6fcrf$8kq$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57715
On 27/01/2017 10:42 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 27/01/2017 7:55 PM, jonz wrote:
>> On Friday, 27 January 2017 20:01:44 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech  wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>>>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A 1337 one at that!
>>>>
>>>> Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
>>>>
>>> What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that
>>> they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on
>>> Thunderbird 31.5...
>> ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
>>   And your still here!.Man of yer word...(NOT)
>>
> Only because I love you jonz. You do things for my heart that cannot be
> explained. I have these feelings for you that I just had to share...
>
> And if you believe that I have a large bridge for sale....
>
> then again you believe everything someone else says... Stick to driving
> trucks and going to the pub jonz.

Did you bring some one else's conjones along? For sure yours are wee 
tiny ones!

You will need some a good deal larger and braver than what you currently 
possess.

-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57719

FromGrumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-27 23:07 +1000
Message-ID<o6fgmg$1veu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#57717
On 27/01/2017 10:03 PM, Xeno wrote:
> On 27/01/2017 10:42 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 27/01/2017 7:55 PM, jonz wrote:
>>> On Friday, 27 January 2017 20:01:44 UTC+11, Grumpy Tech  wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/2017 6:54 PM, j@j.net wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 07:15:12 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27/01/2017 5:37 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>>>>>>>> Thunderbird/45.6.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Holy shit, you must be some sort of hacker?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A 1337 one at that!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, he's certainly a member of a very exclusive club.
>>>>>
>>>> What's quite hilarious especially with someone else's bleating is that
>>>> they think it was me who posted as felix. You may notice I'm still on
>>>> Thunderbird 31.5...
>>> ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
>>>   And your still here!.Man of yer word...(NOT)
>>>
>> Only because I love you jonz. You do things for my heart that cannot be
>> explained. I have these feelings for you that I just had to share...
>>
>> And if you believe that I have a large bridge for sale....
>>
>> then again you believe everything someone else says... Stick to driving
>> trucks and going to the pub jonz.
>
> Did you bring some one else's conjones along? For sure yours are wee
> tiny ones!
>
> You will need some a good deal larger and braver than what you currently
> possess.
>
Oh poor xeno, he's feels he's missing out. I'm man enough for both of 
you. Would you like a big kiss? You know you want to.






























A liverpool kiss would be the only one I would give you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57736

From"Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org>
Date2017-01-27 20:28 +0000
Message-ID<ef1or7F6q41U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57719
Grumpy Tech wrote:

> 
> 
> A liverpool kiss would be the only one I would give you.

Oh dear Grumpy, you just earned Xenoscum extra time in the gimp suit,
strapped to the restraint frame tonight.


His husband is apparently the jealous type.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57747

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-28 10:52 +1100
Message-ID<o6gmd5$4bt$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57736
On 28/01/2017 7:28 AM, Blue Peeler wrote:
> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> A liverpool kiss would be the only one I would give you.
>
> Oh dear Grumpy, you just earned Xenoscum extra time in the gimp suit,
> strapped to the restraint frame tonight.

Is that the real Grumpy or the fake Grumpy you created?



-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57748

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-28 11:09 +1100
Message-ID<o6gnd0$6ac$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57719
On 28/01/2017 9:02 AM, Diesel Damo wrote:
> On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 12:07:30 AM UTC+11, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>> Oh poor xeno,
>
> So you're going to let yourself be trolled into rage quitting again?
>
> The reason he was/is on your case so hard is because you and Bluey
> are all he has left.
>
> Tip: You will *never* get him to admit he is wrong about anything,
> no matter how plainly obvious it is to everyone.
>
> Now it's completely up to you, but you might consider ceasing to
> give him oxygen.
>
Look, Grumpy is the one *boasting* about his skills and experience as a 
IT techie. Funny then how he made 2 or more absolute novice mistakes on 
his own Facebook account. First mistake, not looking at *all the 
options* for securing the timeline. Had he done so he might have 
observed that any security changes affects only what is added to the 
timeline *after* security changes are made. Failure to read the screen, 
that's bad enough for an expert, but when he didn't use the facility 
built in to Facebook that allows you to preview what the outside world 
sees, that is just plain incompetent. What's more, a security 
professional would also use an unlinked computer to view facebook and 
see just what is viewable either through Google or whatever other means 
are available searchwise.

His worked gets charged out at $3,000 per hour? He must be joking. 
Heaven help anyone fool enough to pay those rates and have him setting 
up their security.


-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57755

From"Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org>
Date2017-01-28 02:26 +0000
Message-ID<ef2dqfFakdtU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57748
Xeno wrote:

> Look, 


A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of shit
that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms it has.


As soon as you see the work "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57760

Fromfelix <me@nothere.invalid>
Date2017-01-28 16:24 +1100
Message-ID<ef2o85FcarpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57755
On Saturday, 28 Jan 2017 1:26 PM, Blue Peeler wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>
>> Look,
>
> A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of shit
> that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms it has.
>
>
> As soon as you see the work "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
> assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.

but you hate truth, we know that



-- 
"It's not Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you"
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57767

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-28 18:03 +1100
Message-ID<o6hfkj$mch$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57760
On 28/01/2017 4:24 PM, felix wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 Jan 2017 1:26 PM, Blue Peeler wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>>
>>> Look,
>>
>> A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of shit
>> that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms it has.
>>
>>
>> As soon as you see the work "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
>> assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.
>
> but you hate truth, we know that

His idea of truth is remanufactured truth. Take any lie, massage and 
manipulate it well, give it a few doses of bullshit, massage it some 
more and, eventually, it will stink so much that no one will want to 
test it for veracity. It will therefore pass for truth unquestioned.

It's what he did with the general failure story.

Pssstt   It's still a lie, no matter how it's dressed up.  ;-)


-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57766

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-28 17:58 +1100
Message-ID<o6hfav$krn$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57755
On 28/01/2017 1:26 PM, Blue Peeler wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>
>> Look,
>
>
> A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of shit
> that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms it has.
>
>
> As soon as you see the work "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
> assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.
>
As soon as anyone sees any writings at all from you, the assumption 
should be a story filched from elsewhere and adopted/adapted by you for 
your own purposes. It's how you operate.

-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57772

From"Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org>
Date2017-01-28 07:47 +0000
Message-ID<ef30l6FdpgsU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57766
Xeno wrote:

> > A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of
> > shit that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms
> > it has.
> > 
> > 
> > As soon as you see the word "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
> > assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.


Yawn!


Xenoscum - no matter how many times you tell the same lie it will not
work.


I reported accurately what i saw at the time. I then found the DR-DOS
manual that showed both the hex error codes and the ASCII sent to the
console - which of course proved what I said in the first place.


You on the other hand have desperately wailed on and fucking on about
an utterly irrelevant CP/M manual.



You are in full Malvern line weasel mode and for mine I would not piss
on you if you were on fire, you are a dishonest, loathsome creature
devoid of any capacity to experience shame, there is no lie you will
not tell.


In short you are a disgusting, untruthful sack of shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57783

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2017-01-28 19:20 +1100
Message-ID<o6hk62$1ej$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57772
On 28/01/2017 6:47 PM, Blue Peeler wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>
>>> A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of
>>> shit that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms
>>> it has.
>>>
>>>
>>> As soon as you see the word "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
>>> assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.
>
>
> Yawn!
>
>
> Xenoscum - no matter how many times you tell the same lie it will not
> work.
>
>
> I reported accurately what i saw at the time. I then found the DR-DOS
> manual that showed both the hex error codes and the ASCII sent to the
> console - which of course proved what I said in the first place.
>
The manual contradicts you! What you say is sent to the console is 
nothing more than advice to the programmer. The error messages are 
DETAILED in the user guide.
>
> You on the other hand have desperately wailed on and fucking on about
> an utterly irrelevant CP/M manual.
>
Nothing has changed - the error messages remain essentially the same.



-- 

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57798

From"Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org>
Date2017-01-28 09:27 +0000
Message-ID<ef36foFetopU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57783
Xeno wrote:

> On 28/01/2017 6:47 PM, Blue Peeler wrote:
> > Xeno wrote:
> > 
> > > > A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack
> > > > of shit that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip
> > > > dry" nyms it has.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > As soon as you see the word "look" in one of xenoscum's posts,
> > > > be assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.
> > 
> > 
> > Yawn!
> > 
> > 
> > Xenoscum - no matter how many times you tell the same lie it will
> > not work.
> > 
> > 
> > I reported accurately what i saw at the time. I then found the
> > DR-DOS manual that showed both the hex error codes and the ASCII
> > sent to the console - which of course proved what I said in the
> > first place.
> > 
> > 
> Nothing has changed - the error messages remain essentially the same.

Bullshit you lying piece of scum!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57794

Fromjonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-28 01:10 -0800
Message-ID<c31839eb-e0eb-4a7f-8cb0-b398f8391e93@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#57772
On Saturday, 28 January 2017 18:47:52 UTC+11, Blue Peeler  wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
> 
> > > A little tip to those not previously exposed to the lying sack of
> > > shit that sometimes calls itself "xeno" one of many "drip dry" nyms
> > > it has.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As soon as you see the word "look" in one of xenoscum's posts, be
> > > assured that bullshit follows and you should move on.
> 
> 
> Yawn!
> 
> 
> Xenoscum - no matter how many times you tell the same lie it will not
> work.
> 
> 
> I reported accurately what i saw at the time. I then found the DR-DOS
> manual that showed both the hex error codes and the ASCII sent to the
> console - which of course proved what I said in the first place.
> 
> 
> You on the other hand have desperately wailed on and fucking on about
> an utterly irrelevant CP/M manual.
> 
> 
> 
> You are in full Malvern line weasel mode and for mine I would not piss
> on you if you were on fire, you are a dishonest, loathsome creature
> devoid of any capacity to experience shame, there is no lie you will
> not tell.
> 
> 
> In short you are a disgusting, untruthful sack of shit.
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
 YES, you are, all the above, and more!....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers

csiph-web