Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #53874 > unrolled thread
| Started by | felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-30 17:15 +1000 |
| Last post | 2016-07-31 10:42 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 94 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-30 17:15 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-30 20:22 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-30 21:29 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-31 01:03 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 05:14 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-31 10:11 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 10:28 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 10:34 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 10:39 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 10:41 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 10:54 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-31 11:29 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 16:20 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-31 16:49 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 17:09 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-02 12:35 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-02 12:52 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-02 16:11 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-02 16:44 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-02 18:37 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-02 18:43 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-03 00:30 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-04 14:14 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-04 15:55 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 16:25 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-04 22:41 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-04 23:01 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:27 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 08:43 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-08-05 09:02 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 09:52 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 10:16 +1000
Re: Home group problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 11:29 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-07 12:48 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 14:27 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-07 15:10 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-07 17:00 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 19:36 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-07 20:06 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:30 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 12:00 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 14:05 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-08 14:13 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 16:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 15:46 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-07 16:57 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 19:34 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-07 20:08 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:32 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 11:57 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 15:46 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 14:46 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-09 19:56 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 20:30 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-04 22:40 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 06:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 11:10 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-04 22:36 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 06:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:33 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 08:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 11:29 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 11:26 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 15:38 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 17:32 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 18:09 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 07:18 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-06 09:10 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 09:51 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-06 10:36 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 14:16 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-06 14:26 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-06 17:39 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 07:16 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-08-05 16:08 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 18:07 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 14:26 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 15:39 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 17:41 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-05 18:10 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:02 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 14:20 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 16:35 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-08-02 12:36 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem pedro <me@privacy.net> - 2016-08-01 16:55 +0800
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-31 10:09 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 05:17 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-07-31 10:19 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 10:30 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-07-31 10:35 +1000
Re: Homegroup problem Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-07-31 10:42 +1000
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 07:33 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0hqm3FcljeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54061 |
"Jeßus" <j@j.j> wrote in message news:qk87qbd943tonoccq5vs18edmp6rb60afp@j.net... > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: > >>On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>> On 3/08/2016 12:30 AM, felix wrote: >>> >>>> your help was appreciated, but you were and are under no obligation to >>>> me. but you didn't sus out the problem did you, so maybe you should >>>> have >>>> considered the basics. :) >>> >>> I made an assumption that you were sensible enough to know how to >>> follow the basic instructions. >> >>what basic instructions?? "there is a homegroup on this network. do you >>want to connect to it?" .. (click yes) .. "Insert the password from the >>person who set up the homegroup". those instructions you mean. did all >>that. didn't connect did it. >> >>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It wont >>> happen again. >>> >> >>get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the problem. I >>did (eventually). end of story. > > Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your > inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? Yeah, that's the other reason I ignore his questions now. > And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the > problem'. True.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.j> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 08:19 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <kjf7qbpbjtig71t77cn8k8rl6oqii5o16g@j.net> |
| In reply to | #54065 |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:33:52 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >"Jeßus" <j@j.j> wrote in message >news:qk87qbd943tonoccq5vs18edmp6rb60afp@j.net... >> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>> On 3/08/2016 12:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>> >>>>> your help was appreciated, but you were and are under no obligation to >>>>> me. but you didn't sus out the problem did you, so maybe you should >>>>> have >>>>> considered the basics. :) >>>> >>>> I made an assumption that you were sensible enough to know how to >>>> follow the basic instructions. >>> >>>what basic instructions?? "there is a homegroup on this network. do you >>>want to connect to it?" .. (click yes) .. "Insert the password from the >>>person who set up the homegroup". those instructions you mean. did all >>>that. didn't connect did it. >>> >>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It wont >>>> happen again. >>>> >>> >>>get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the problem. I >>>did (eventually). end of story. >> >> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? > >Yeah, that's the other reason I ignore his questions now. That was my last time I'll try to help him. I wasn't overly optimistic that it would end well, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Now he's cross posting this thread to aus.cars to stir up trouble. >> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >> problem'. > >True.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 11:29 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0i8i8Ffif9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54066 |
On 05-August-2016 8:19 AM, Je�us wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:33:52 +1000, "Rod Speed" > <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "Jeßus" <j@j.j> wrote in message >> news:qk87qbd943tonoccq5vs18edmp6rb60afp@j.net... >>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>>> On 3/08/2016 12:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> your help was appreciated, but you were and are under no obligation to >>>>>> me. but you didn't sus out the problem did you, so maybe you should >>>>>> have >>>>>> considered the basics. :) >>>>> I made an assumption that you were sensible enough to know how to >>>>> follow the basic instructions. >>>> what basic instructions?? "there is a homegroup on this network. do you >>>> want to connect to it?" .. (click yes) .. "Insert the password from the >>>> person who set up the homegroup". those instructions you mean. did all >>>> that. didn't connect did it. >>>> >>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It wont >>>>> happen again. >>>>> >>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the problem. I >>>> did (eventually). end of story. >>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >> Yeah, that's the other reason I ignore his questions now. > That was my last time I'll try to help him. I wasn't overly optimistic > that it would end well, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Now > he's cross posting this thread to aus.cars to stir up trouble. wrong again dickhead. I x-posted only one reply because it included an exchange between Xeno and RS in aus.cars -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 11:26 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0i8caFfif9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54061 |
On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: > >> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>> On 3/08/2016 12:30 AM, felix wrote: >>> >>>> your help was appreciated, but you were and are under no obligation to >>>> me. but you didn't sus out the problem did you, so maybe you should have >>>> considered the basics. :) >>> I made an assumption that you were sensible enough to know how to >>> follow the basic instructions. >> what basic instructions?? "there is a homegroup on this network. do you >> want to connect to it?" .. (click yes) .. "Insert the password from the >> person who set up the homegroup". those instructions you mean. did all >> that. didn't connect did it. >> >>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It wont >>> happen again. >>> >> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the problem. I >> did (eventually). end of story. > Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your inadequate > and incorrect description of the problem? it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, any excuse will do > And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the problem'. there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 13:19 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <no10ks$1il$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #54082 |
On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: > On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>> wont happen again. >>>> >>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't followed the instructions and failed google 101. >> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? > > it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and > that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to > look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, > this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, > any excuse will do It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete one. >> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >> problem'. > > there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no > problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about > what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, > yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. > You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the line. You are a terminal fuckwit. I am a very good tech, but I don't have the patience to deal with fuckwits like you who cry help me help me, when if the read the fucking instructions they would be able to figure it out themselves. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US /15f0efb0-8c04-49da-a9c1-c6a876924477/cannot-join-windows-7-homegroup- have-tried-almost-everything?forum=w7itpronetworking Oh look here's a microsoft forum and look at what the person had tried.... You would make a very good crash test dummy... - I'm running 2 Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) desktop computers. No laptop involved. - Both computers can see each other over the local network. - IPv6 is enabled on both. - HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip6\Parameters\DisabledComponents = 0 - Windows Firewall is enabled on both. - AVG Free Anti-Virus on both (not AVG Internet Security/Firewall) - Network type is set to 'Home' on both. - Network discovery is ON on both computers. - 128-bit encryption is ON on both computers. - *Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers*. - Windows is set to manage the homegroup. - Workgroup is same on both computers - HAVE run the Home Group troubleshooter on both computers. Once it complained about the clocks not syncronized but they are set to exactly the same time, (17 seconds difference between the 2 computers). No luck there obviously. See Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 15:38 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0in4nFijrnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54092 |
On 05-August-2016 1:19 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: > On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: > >>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>> wont happen again. >>>>> >>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. > > Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that > password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't > followed the instructions and failed google 101. > >>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >> >> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >> any excuse will do > > It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete one. > >>> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >>> problem'. >> >> there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no >> problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about >> what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, >> yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. >> > > You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the > line. You are a terminal fuckwit. I am a very good tech, but I don't > have the patience to deal with fuckwits like you who cry help me help > me, I asked a simple question. you were under no obligation to respond. you are an arrogant, pretentious, twat! > when if the read the fucking instructions they would be able to > figure it out themselves. > > https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US > /15f0efb0-8c04-49da-a9c1-c6a876924477/cannot-join-windows-7-homegroup- > have-tried-almost-everything?forum=w7itpronetworking > > Oh look here's a microsoft forum and look at what the person had > tried.... I already asked you once where 'the instructions' were and you never replied. but now you quote some forum post. that's supposed to be 'the instructions' is it? oh sorry... 'the fucking instructions' > > You would make a very good crash test dummy... I have never claimed to be any sort of computer expert. but you seem to think because you're a 'very good tech' (to put it politely) that gives you some right to deride others less knowledgeable. as I said, I see you as an arrogant twat, so don't expect any respect from me for your behavior and attitude. and next time I ask a question here, don't bother to reply if you simply want to throw mud. > > > - I'm running 2 Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) desktop computers. No > laptop involved. > - Both computers can see each other over the local network. > - IPv6 is enabled on both. > - > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip6\Parameters\DisabledComponents > > = 0 > - Windows Firewall is enabled on both. > - AVG Free Anti-Virus on both (not AVG Internet Security/Firewall) > - Network type is set to 'Home' on both. > - Network discovery is ON on both computers. > - 128-bit encryption is ON on both computers. > - *Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers*. > - Windows is set to manage the homegroup. > - Workgroup is same on both computers > - HAVE run the Home Group troubleshooter on both computers. Once it > complained about the clocks not syncronized but they are set to exactly > the same time, (17 seconds difference between the 2 computers). No luck > there obviously. > > See Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers. -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 17:32 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0itnrFk490U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54128 |
"felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message news:e0in4nFijrnU1@mid.individual.net... > On 05-August-2016 1:19 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >> On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >>> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >> >>>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>>> wont happen again. >>>>>> >>>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. >> >> Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that >> password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't >> followed the instructions and failed google 101. >> >>>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >>> >>> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >>> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >>> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >>> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >>> any excuse will do >> >> It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete one. >> >>>> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >>>> problem'. >>> >>> there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no >>> problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about >>> what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, >>> yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. >>> >> >> You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the >> line. You are a terminal fuckwit. I am a very good tech, but I don't >> have the patience to deal with fuckwits like you who cry help me help >> me, > > I asked a simple question. Which didn’t include the vital information, as always. > you were under no obligation to respond. And those of us who have noticed how you ALWAYS end up didn’t. > you are an arrogant, pretentious, twat! Bet that will see him curl up and die for sure. >> when if the read the fucking instructions they would be able to figure it >> out themselves. >> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US >> /15f0efb0-8c04-49da-a9c1-c6a876924477/cannot-join-windows-7-homegroup-have-tried-almost-everything?forum=w7itpronetworking >> Oh look here's a microsoft forum and look at what the person had >> tried.... > I already asked you once where 'the instructions' were and you never > replied. but now you quote some forum post. that's supposed to be 'the > instructions' is it? oh sorry... 'the fucking instructions' >> You would make a very good crash test dummy... > I have never claimed to be any sort of computer expert. Just as well. > but you seem to think because you're a 'very good tech' (to put it > politely) that gives you some right to deride others less knowledgeable. Nope, just terminal fuckwits such as yourself. And he hasn’t derided you, just stated the truth. > as I said, I see you as an arrogant twat, And we all know that you are just another terminal fuckwit that never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. > so don't expect any respect from me for your behavior and attitude. You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant. > and next time I ask a question here, don't bother to reply if you simply > want to throw mud. You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever. >> - I'm running 2 Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) desktop computers. No >> laptop involved. >> - Both computers can see each other over the local network. >> - IPv6 is enabled on both. >> - >> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip6\Parameters\DisabledComponents >> = 0 >> - Windows Firewall is enabled on both. >> - AVG Free Anti-Virus on both (not AVG Internet Security/Firewall) >> - Network type is set to 'Home' on both. >> - Network discovery is ON on both computers. >> - 128-bit encryption is ON on both computers. >> - *Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers*. >> - Windows is set to manage the homegroup. >> - Workgroup is same on both computers >> - HAVE run the Home Group troubleshooter on both computers. Once it >> complained about the clocks not syncronized but they are set to exactly >> the same time, (17 seconds difference between the 2 computers). No luck >> there obviously. >> >> See Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 18:09 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0j01iFkk1qU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54154 |
On 05-August-2016 5:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message > news:e0in4nFijrnU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 05-August-2016 1:19 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>> On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>> >>>>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>>>> wont happen again. >>>>>>> >>>>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. >>> >>> Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that >>> password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't >>> followed the instructions and failed google 101. >>> >>>>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>>>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >>>> >>>> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >>>> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >>>> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >>>> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >>>> any excuse will do >>> >>> It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete >>> one. >>> >>>>> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >>>>> problem'. >>>> >>>> there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no >>>> problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about >>>> what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, >>>> yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. >>>> >>> >>> You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the >>> line. You are a terminal fuckwit. I am a very good tech, but I don't >>> have the patience to deal with fuckwits like you who cry help me help >>> me, >> >> I asked a simple question. > > Which didn’t include the vital information, as always. > >> you were under no obligation to respond. > > And those of us who have noticed how you ALWAYS end up didn’t. > >> you are an arrogant, pretentious, twat! > > Bet that will see him curl up and die for sure. > >>> when if the read the fucking instructions they would be able to >>> figure it out themselves. > >>> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US >>> /15f0efb0-8c04-49da-a9c1-c6a876924477/cannot-join-windows-7-homegroup-have-tried-almost-everything?forum=w7itpronetworking >>> > >>> Oh look here's a microsoft forum and look at what the person had >>> tried.... > >> I already asked you once where 'the instructions' were and you never >> replied. but now you quote some forum post. that's supposed to be >> 'the instructions' is it? oh sorry... 'the fucking instructions' > >>> You would make a very good crash test dummy... > >> I have never claimed to be any sort of computer expert. > > Just as well. > >> but you seem to think because you're a 'very good tech' (to put it >> politely) that gives you some right to deride others less knowledgeable. > > Nope, just terminal fuckwits such as yourself. > > And he hasn’t derided you, just stated the truth. > >> as I said, I see you as an arrogant twat, > > And we all know that you are just another terminal fuckwit that > never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. > >> so don't expect any respect from me for your behavior and attitude. > > You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly > irrelevant. > >> and next time I ask a question here, don't bother to reply if you >> simply want to throw mud. > > You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever. > >>> - I'm running 2 Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) desktop computers. No >>> laptop involved. >>> - Both computers can see each other over the local network. >>> - IPv6 is enabled on both. >>> - >>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip6\Parameters\DisabledComponents >>> >>> = 0 >>> - Windows Firewall is enabled on both. >>> - AVG Free Anti-Virus on both (not AVG Internet Security/Firewall) >>> - Network type is set to 'Home' on both. >>> - Network discovery is ON on both computers. >>> - 128-bit encryption is ON on both computers. >>> - *Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers*. >>> - Windows is set to manage the homegroup. >>> - Workgroup is same on both computers >>> - HAVE run the Home Group troubleshooter on both computers. Once it >>> complained about the clocks not syncronized but they are set to exactly >>> the same time, (17 seconds difference between the 2 computers). No luck >>> there obviously. >>> >>> See Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers. > > maybe it's time to stop addressing the criticism and insults ppl want to spew my way. it seems obvious no one has any regard for what I say in response anyway, so maybe it's time to just tell ppl to go and fuck themselves. so I'll start with you... get fucked! -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 07:18 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0ke61F1d21U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54160 |
"felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message news:e0j01iFkk1qU2@mid.individual.net... > On 05-August-2016 5:32 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message >> news:e0in4nFijrnU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 05-August-2016 1:19 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>> On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>>> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>>>>> wont happen again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>>>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. >>>> >>>> Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that >>>> password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't >>>> followed the instructions and failed google 101. >>>> >>>>>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>>>>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >>>>> >>>>> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >>>>> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >>>>> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >>>>> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >>>>> any excuse will do >>>> >>>> It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete >>>> one. >>>> >>>>>> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >>>>>> problem'. >>>>> >>>>> there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no >>>>> problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about >>>>> what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, >>>>> yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the >>>> line. You are a terminal fuckwit. I am a very good tech, but I don't >>>> have the patience to deal with fuckwits like you who cry help me help >>>> me, >>> >>> I asked a simple question. >> >> Which didn’t include the vital information, as always. >> >>> you were under no obligation to respond. >> >> And those of us who have noticed how you ALWAYS end up didn’t. >> >>> you are an arrogant, pretentious, twat! >> >> Bet that will see him curl up and die for sure. >> >>>> when if the read the fucking instructions they would be able to figure >>>> it out themselves. >> >>>> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US >>>> /15f0efb0-8c04-49da-a9c1-c6a876924477/cannot-join-windows-7-homegroup-have-tried-almost-everything?forum=w7itpronetworking >> >>>> Oh look here's a microsoft forum and look at what the person had >>>> tried.... >> >>> I already asked you once where 'the instructions' were and you never >>> replied. but now you quote some forum post. that's supposed to be 'the >>> instructions' is it? oh sorry... 'the fucking instructions' >> >>>> You would make a very good crash test dummy... >> >>> I have never claimed to be any sort of computer expert. >> >> Just as well. >> >>> but you seem to think because you're a 'very good tech' (to put it >>> politely) that gives you some right to deride others less knowledgeable. >> >> Nope, just terminal fuckwits such as yourself. >> >> And he hasn’t derided you, just stated the truth. >> >>> as I said, I see you as an arrogant twat, >> >> And we all know that you are just another terminal fuckwit that >> never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag. >> >>> so don't expect any respect from me for your behavior and attitude. >> >> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly >> irrelevant. >> >>> and next time I ask a question here, don't bother to reply if you simply >>> want to throw mud. >> >> You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever. >> >>>> - I'm running 2 Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) desktop computers. No >>>> laptop involved. >>>> - Both computers can see each other over the local network. >>>> - IPv6 is enabled on both. >>>> - >>>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip6\Parameters\DisabledComponents >>>> = 0 >>>> - Windows Firewall is enabled on both. >>>> - AVG Free Anti-Virus on both (not AVG Internet Security/Firewall) >>>> - Network type is set to 'Home' on both. >>>> - Network discovery is ON on both computers. >>>> - 128-bit encryption is ON on both computers. >>>> - *Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers*. >>>> - Windows is set to manage the homegroup. >>>> - Workgroup is same on both computers >>>> - HAVE run the Home Group troubleshooter on both computers. Once it >>>> complained about the clocks not syncronized but they are set to exactly >>>> the same time, (17 seconds difference between the 2 computers). No luck >>>> there obviously. >>>> >>>> See Password protected sharing is OFF on both computers. >> >> > > maybe it's time to stop addressing the criticism and insults ppl want to > spew my way. Yep, your lies fool no one at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 09:10 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0kkpoF2s3pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54185 |
On 06-August-2016 7:18 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message > news:e0j01iFkk1qU2@mid.individual.net... >> >> maybe it's time to stop addressing the criticism and insults ppl want >> to spew my way. > > Yep, your lies fool no one at all. > > the only liar is you. get fucked! -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 09:51 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0kn3lF3ca4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54196 |
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always ends up with which is why almost everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 10:36 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0kpreF3uiuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54207 |
On 06-August-2016 9:51 AM, Rod Speed wrote: > Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind > felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always > ends up with which is why almost > everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions. the desperately cowering gutless lying fuckwit who loves to dish it out but can't take it, and then hides behind his stock phrase 'some gutless fuckwit, etc..'.. is YOU!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 14:16 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0l6kjF6h65U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54209 |
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always ends up with which is why almost everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 14:26 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0l7aeF6m3cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54223 |
On 06-August-2016 2:16 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind > felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always > ends up with which is why almost > everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions. > the desperately cowering gutless lying fuckwit who loves to dish it out but can't take it, and then hides behind his stock phrase 'some gutless fuckwit, etc..' - is YOU! so now that you've dragged me to your level, and I've played your stupid little game, you must be very happy. but I'll bid you farewell, since I'm not mentally defective like you, and so have no need to perpetuate such puerile nonsense, so fuck off now and have a shithouse day! -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 15:25 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0lamfF7cnfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54225 |
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always ends up with which is why almost everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 17:39 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0likaF931gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54229 |
On 06-August-2016 3:25 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind > felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always > ends up with which is why almost > everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions. > wewy well wodney woo can have the wast word.. -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 07:16 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0n2csFkesjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54242 |
Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit that it always ends up with which is why almost everyone with even half a clue ignores its questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.j> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 16:08 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <3ua8qb9v1iajja9k7acmmjovh5evrt7ccc@j.net> |
| In reply to | #54092 |
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:19:55 +1000, Grumpy Tech <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je?us wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: > >>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>> wont happen again. >>>>> >>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. > >Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that >password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't >followed the instructions and failed google 101. > >>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >> >> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >> any excuse will do I suggested to this piece of shit to check the permissions on 2 August. >It was a very inaccurate description of the issue and an incomplete one. > >>> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >>> problem'. >> >> there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no >> problem until he started with the personal stuff. he boasts about >> what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who disagree with him, >> yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. >> > >You were doing fine right up to there Peter. You just went past the >line. You are a terminal fuckwit. He's a fucking arsehole, more like it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 18:07 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0ivt5Fkk1qU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54135 |
On 05-August-2016 4:08 PM, Je�us wrote: > On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:19:55 +1000, Grumpy Tech > <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 5/08/2016 11:26 AM, felix wrote: >>> On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je?us wrote: >>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It >>>>>> wont happen again. >>>>>> >>>>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the >>>>> problem. I did (eventually). end of story. >> Yet you said you had tried everything. A very quick Google shows that >> password protected sharing has to be off for it to work. You hadn't >> followed the instructions and failed google 101. >> >>>> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your >>>> inadequate and incorrect description of the problem? >>> it was plain enough and clear enough. it was a simple question. and >>> that's how threads start anyway. plenty of examples if you care to >>> look. someone may have been able to provide a simple answer. really, >>> this is just another excuse to criticise me, and as we know, for you, >>> any excuse will do > I suggested to this piece of shit what have I ever done to you? seriously! > to check the permissions on 2 August. at 4:11 pm, and I replied "so what does that mean and how do I fix it?" at 4:44 pm to which you never replied. so you're bullshitting as usual, so you're who's full of shit not me! had you bothered to reply, the problem would have most likely been discovered there and then. you just hate me. that's obvious. why I don't know, but at this point I just don't care. who do you think you are anyway, that I should give a damn?! -- "everything in Islam originates from the testimony of one pedophile" http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 14:26 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Homegroup problem- actually a networking problem - fixed! |
| Message-ID | <e0ija3FhprcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54082 |
"felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message news:e0i8caFfif9U1@mid.individual.net... > On 05-August-2016 6:19 AM, Je�us wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:36:42 +1000, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 04-August-2016 2:14 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>> On 3/08/2016 12:30 AM, felix wrote: >>>> >>>>> your help was appreciated, but you were and are under no obligation to >>>>> me. but you didn't sus out the problem did you, so maybe you should >>>>> have >>>>> considered the basics. :) >>>> I made an assumption that you were sensible enough to know how to >>>> follow the basic instructions. >>> what basic instructions?? "there is a homegroup on this network. do you >>> want to connect to it?" .. (click yes) .. "Insert the password from the >>> person who set up the homegroup". those instructions you mean. did all >>> that. didn't connect did it. >>> >>>> I was wrong. I overestimated your level of intelligence. It wont >>>> happen again. >>>> >>> get over yourself you pretentious twat! you didn't sus the problem. I >>> did (eventually). end of story. >> Is it lost on you that all anybody had to go on was your inadequate >> and incorrect description of the problem? > > it was plain enough and clear enough. Like hell it was. > it was a simple question. Yes, but not at all clear what was working and what wasn’t and what you had tried to see if that had fixed the problem. As always with every question you have ever asked. > and that's how threads start anyway. Plenty have much more useful info about what works and what doesn’t and what has been tried already. > plenty of examples if you care to look. someone may have been able to > provide a simple answer. Very unlikely given you didn’t say clearly what worked and what didn’t. > really, this is just another excuse to criticise me, Even sillier than you usually manage. > and as we know, for you, any excuse will do Even sillier than you usually manage. >> And then you have the hide to boast that he didn't 'didn't sus the >> problem'. > there was considerable discussion. read the thread. there was no problem > until he started with the personal stuff. We can all see that that is another bare faced lie. > he boasts about what a fantastic tech he is, rubbishing anyone who > disagree with him, yet he didn't sus out that it was just a setting. Because you never said what worked and what didn’t and what you had tried that made no difference. As always.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web