Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #49707 > unrolled thread

cd player in car

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers

Contents

  cd player in car "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2016-01-02 15:00 +0800
    Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-02 18:34 +1100
    Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-02 18:57 +1100
    Re: cd player in car Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-01-02 16:27 +0800
      Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-02 20:10 +1100
        Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-02 22:35 +1100
          Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-02 22:50 +1100
            Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-02 23:15 +1100
              Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-02 23:29 +1100
                Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 06:38 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-03 17:41 +1100
                    Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 17:49 +1100
                Re: cd player in car "Jacko" <Jacko_ONE@bigpond.com> - 2016-01-03 16:46 +1000
            Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-02 23:58 +1100
          Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-02 23:57 +1100
          Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 06:36 +1100
            Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 09:24 +1100
              Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 09:58 +1100
                Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 10:22 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 11:31 +1100
                    Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:50 +1100
                      Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 17:48 +1100
                        Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 22:08 +1100
                Re: cd player in car "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.org> - 2016-01-03 00:23 +0000
                Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 11:59 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 12:12 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:53 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.org> - 2016-01-03 02:53 +0000
                  Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-03 17:50 +1100
            Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 10:34 +1100
              Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 11:24 +1100
                Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 12:51 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2016-01-03 13:18 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.org> - 2016-01-03 02:51 +0000
                    Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 14:02 +1100
                      Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 14:05 +1100
                  Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:57 +1100
                Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:56 +1100
              Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:54 +1100
          Re: cd player in car "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.org> - 2016-01-03 00:21 +0000
        Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-02 23:55 +1100
          Re: cd player in car jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 00:53 -0800
          Re: cd player in car "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:05 +1100
          Re: cd player in car Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-01-03 20:37 +1100
            Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 22:12 +1100
    Re: cd player in car "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 06:33 +1100
    Re: cd player in car Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-01-02 20:34 +0000
      Re: cd player in car felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 12:09 +1100
        Re: cd player in car Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-01-03 12:36 +1100
        Re: cd player in car Noddy <me@wardengineering.com> - 2016-01-03 13:48 +1100
        Re: cd player in car "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.org> - 2016-01-03 02:55 +0000

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#49766

On 03/01/16 11:31 AM, Je�us wrote:

> Yeah. Felix wasn't banned from schools due to stalking/harassing the
> school tuck shops, unlike somebody else...

Heh :)

There was a method to his madness. By becoming a massive fat cunt at a 
young age he could pinch casks of Coolabah, pull out the bladders and 
strap them under each tit for a little "feed" every now and then without 
anyone jerrying.


-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49780

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:50:43 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
wrote:

>On 03/01/16 11:31 AM, Je?us wrote:
>
>> Yeah. Felix wasn't banned from schools due to stalking/harassing the
>> school tuck shops, unlike somebody else...
>
>Heh :)
>
>There was a method to his madness. By becoming a massive fat cunt at a 
>young age he could pinch casks of Coolabah, pull out the bladders and 
>strap them under each tit for a little "feed" every now and then without 
>anyone jerrying.

Pity he didn't apply his meagre ration of neurons into something a
little more constructive, like offering himself as landfill, for
example.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49792

On 03/01/16 5:48 PM, Je�us wrote:

> Pity he didn't apply his meagre ration of neurons into something a
> little more constructive, like offering himself as landfill, for
> example.

Lol :)



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49749

Jeßus wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:24:26 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 03/01/16 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
> > 
> >>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
> > > 
> >> Read Lindsay's comment again.
> > 
> > It's as sharp as a watermelon, isn't it?
> 
> It's like another jonz, only with greater literary skills.

Only because Under boy has managed to turn on the spell checker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49754

On 3/01/2016 9:58 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:24:26 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/01/16 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>
>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>> It's as sharp as a watermelon, isn't it?
> It's like another jonz, only with greater literary skills.

everybody's favorite aus.cars pastime.. find fault with felix. if you 
would bother to check you would see that I agreed with Lindsay when he 
said.. "Another possibility the original poster may be facing is that 
he's engineered the disk as a multi-session disk, which can be played in 
a pc and files added to it later, wheras he should master the disk as a 
*audio* disc, which can be played in anything, inc PC's." It was in fact 
the first post I made in the thread.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49756

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:59:28 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:

>On 3/01/2016 9:58 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:24:26 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/01/16 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>
>>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>>> It's as sharp as a watermelon, isn't it?
>> It's like another jonz, only with greater literary skills.
>
>everybody's favorite aus.cars pastime.. find fault with felix. 

I'll say it again: Unbelievable.

>if you 
>would bother to check you would see that I agreed with Lindsay when he 
>said.. "Another possibility the original poster may be facing is that 
>he's engineered the disk as a multi-session disk, which can be played in 
>a pc and files added to it later, wheras he should master the disk as a 
>*audio* disc, which can be played in anything, inc PC's." It was in fact 
>the first post I made in the thread.

What does this have to do with the 'burnt cd'/CD-R issue?
That was more a rhetorical question, no need to reply. I've had
enough.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49768

On 03/01/16 11:59 AM, felix wrote:

> everybody's favorite aus.cars pastime.. find fault with felix. if you
> would bother to check you would see that I agreed with Lindsay when he
> said.. "Another possibility the original poster may be facing is that
> he's engineered the disk as a multi-session disk, which can be played in
> a pc and files added to it later, wheras he should master the disk as a
> *audio* disc, which can be played in anything, inc PC's." It was in fact
> the first post I made in the thread.

And there it is. The persecution complex kicking in at full speed right 
on time.

The cycle usually lasts 24 hours. This time tomorrow he'll be telling 
people to "get f*cked" and threatening them with the "killfile" in 
readiness for the next depressing episode.






-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49769

felix wrote:

> On 3/01/2016 9:58 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:24:26 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > On 03/01/16 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > nope. mine will play burnt cd's
> > > > Read Lindsay's comment again.
> > > It's as sharp as a watermelon, isn't it?
> > It's like another jonz, only with greater literary skills.
> 
> everybody's favorite aus.cars pastime.. find fault with felix. if you
> would bother to check you would see that I agreed with Lindsay when
> he said.. "Another possibility the original poster may be facing is
> that he's engineered the disk as a multi-session disk, which can be
> played in a pc and files added to it later, wheras he should master
> the disk as a audio disc, which can be played in anything, inc PC's."
> It was in fact the first post I made in the thread.

Under boy, if you are working up to one of your "why are you all
picking on me" tantrums prior to you pissing off for a couple of weeks,
how about you spare us the histrionics and just piss off?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49782

On 3/01/2016 11:59 AM, felix wrote:
> On 3/01/2016 9:58 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:24:26 +1100, Noddy <me@wardengineering.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/01/16 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>
>>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>>> It's as sharp as a watermelon, isn't it?
>> It's like another jonz, only with greater literary skills.
>
> everybody's favorite aus.cars pastime.. find fault with felix.


Felix, we dont *find* fault, *you* simply display it for all to see...

> if you
> would bother to check you would see that I agreed with Lindsay when he
> said.. "Another possibility the original poster may be facing is that

yes, yes, thats all very good, Felix, but I think you'll find most have 
taken issue with the bit you left out, and wont reply to. You know...

"I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
Not CD -RW or CD +RW"

"nope. mine will play burnt cd's"

You keep ignoring that little fuck-up....

And then you go and burn a CD-RW and prove me correct as well.
Thank you :-D

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49746

On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>
>> On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
>>> On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>> I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most standard car
>>> stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
> Read Lindsay's comment again.

I'd rather not read Lindsays comments, thanks

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49750

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:34:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:

>On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
>>>> On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>>> I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most standard car
>>>> stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>
>I'd rather not read Lindsays 

Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:

1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so demonstrated
that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.

2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
Not CD -RW or CD +RW"

(and he is correct)

You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"

Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point /again/, a
'burnt cd' is a CD-R. 

Seriously, you should probably look into getting checked out.
Particularly if you are of advanced age, as I suspect. Recently you
really are not making much sense at all and your cognitive skills seem
to be not the best. That is not a gratuitous attempt at an insult
either.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49761

On 3/01/2016 11:24 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:34:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>
>> On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
>>>>> On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most standard car
>>>>> stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>> I'd rather not read Lindsays
> Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:
>
> 1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so demonstrated
> that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.
>
> 2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
> most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
> Not CD -RW or CD +RW"
>
> (and he is correct)
>
> You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"
>
> Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point /again/, a
> 'burnt cd' is a CD-R.

and where is it written in stone , pray tell, that the term 'burnt cd's' 
refers specifically and only to CD-R's? and even if it is 'written in 
stone' somewhere I was not aware of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49764

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:51:04 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:

>On 3/01/2016 11:24 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:34:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most standard car
>>>>>> stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
>>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>>> I'd rather not read Lindsays
>> Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:
>>
>> 1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so demonstrated
>> that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.
>>
>> 2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
>> most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
>> Not CD -RW or CD +RW"
>>
>> (and he is correct)
>>
>> You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"
>>
>> Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point /again/, a
>> 'burnt cd' is a CD-R.
>
>and where is it written in stone , pray tell, that the term 'burnt cd's' 
>refers specifically and only to CD-R's? and even if it is 'written in 
>stone' somewhere I was not aware of it.

Ah. You're trolling. Now it makes sense.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49767

felix wrote:

> On 3/01/2016 11:24 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
> >On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:34:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
> >>>On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
> > > > > > On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
> > > > > > I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most
> > > > > > standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and
> > > > > > CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
> > > > > nope. mine will play burnt cd's
> > > > Read Lindsay's comment again.
> > > I'd rather not read Lindsays
> > Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:
> > 
> > 1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so
> > demonstrated that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.
> > 
> > 2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
> > most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
> > Not CD -RW or CD +RW"
> > 
> > (and he is correct)
> > 
> > You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"
> > 
> > Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point again, a
> > 'burnt cd' is a CD-R.
> 
> and where is it written in stone , pray tell, that the term 'burnt
> cd's' refers specifically and only to CD-R's? and even if it is
> 'written in stone' somewhere I was not aware of it.

So Underboy, did you in fact mean to say (but lacked the wit or
language skill to do so) that your car CD plays CDRWs.\


Or are you now just trying to bullshit your way out of a conundrum
manufactured by your own stupidity?


if the latter you should stop before you hurt yourself because
metaphorically your wits would not allow you to fight your way out of a
wet paper bag.Alternatively, if brains were dynamite, you could not
blow the fleas out of your ears.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49774

On 03-January-2016 1:51 PM, Blue Heeler wrote:
> felix wrote:
>
>> On 3/01/2016 11:24 AM, j@invalid.lan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:34:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03-January-2016 6:36 AM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:35:31 +1100, felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02-January-2016 8:10 PM, Lindsay wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/01/2016 7:27 PM, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most
>>>>>>> standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and
>>>>>>> CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD +RW
>>>>>> nope. mine will play burnt cd's
>>>>> Read Lindsay's comment again.
>>>> I'd rather not read Lindsays
>>> Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:
>>>
>>> 1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so
>>> demonstrated that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.
>>>
>>> 2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
>>> most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
>>> Not CD -RW or CD +RW"
>>>
>>> (and he is correct)
>>>
>>> You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"
>>>
>>> Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point again, a
>>> 'burnt cd' is a CD-R.
>> and where is it written in stone , pray tell, that the term 'burnt
>> cd's' refers specifically and only to CD-R's? and even if it is
>> 'written in stone' somewhere I was not aware of it.
> So Underboy, did you in fact mean to say (but lacked the wit or
> language skill to do so) that your car CD plays CDRWs.\

I assumed it would play any type of cd burnt as an audio cd. I now know 
that it won't. end of story.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49775

On 03/01/16 2:02 PM, felix wrote:

> I assumed it would play any type of cd burnt as an audio cd. I now know
> that it won't. end of story.

Every time you open your trap you make a total cunt out of yourself, 
don't you?

It's about the only thing you seem to know anything about.....



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49773

On 03/01/16 12:51 PM, felix wrote:

> and where is it written in stone , pray tell, that the term 'burnt cd's'
> refers specifically and only to CD-R's? and even if it is 'written in
> stone' somewhere I was not aware of it.

Are you *seriously* this stupid?





-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49772

On 03/01/16 11:24 AM, Je�us wrote:

> Unbelievable. Okay, let's just clarify things here:
>
> 1: You already read his comment, replied, and in doing so demonstrated
> that you didn't fully comprehend what he was saying.
>
> 2: Lindsay said: "I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that
> most standard car stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R.
> Not CD -RW or CD +RW"
>
> (and he is correct)
>
> You replied to him saying "nope. mine will play burnt cd's"
>
> Just so there is no possibility of you missing the point /again/, a
> 'burnt cd' is a CD-R.

Like I said. Sharp as a sponge cake.

> Seriously, you should probably look into getting checked out.
> Particularly if you are of advanced age, as I suspect. Recently you
> really are not making much sense at all and your cognitive skills seem
> to be not the best. That is not a gratuitous attempt at an insult
> either.

..And he's a fucking moron.

(that was)



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49770

On 03/01/16 10:34 AM, felix wrote:

> I'd rather not read Lindsays comments, thanks

You'd rather not read the comments of *anyone* who thought you were a 
fucking idiot, and at last count that was about 98.7% of the world's 
population.



-- 
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#49748

felix wrote:

>
> > I'm gunna go out on a limb here, and suggest that most standard car
> > stereos will only play shop bought Cd's and CD-R. Not CD -RW or CD
> > +RW
> 
> nope. mine will play burnt cd's


Under boy, why is it that you found it necessary to re-state exactly
what the quoted poster said? More to the pont, what value did the word
"nope" add?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers

csiph-web