Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > aus.computers > #73931

Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude

Show key headers only | View raw

Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_b061e567-1729-4ed1-8de4-d92582667a7b

>>>>>> Have fun answering that question with google etc

>>>>> That AI actually shows the search terms and results it's used when
>>>>> you click on "sources" at the bottom, so you can actually see how
>>>>> you could have got results like this with the info in a web search:

>>>>> https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255257954

>>>>> It did translate your garbled question

>>>> Nothing garbled about the question

>>>>> into search terms quite well,

>>>> And google doesnt do that

>>>>> I didn't guess your "Mobile carrier string that is dialled"
>>>>> meant the USSD codes.

>> Your problem

> Oh thank you for going back up the thread and making sure we didn't
> miss that important observation that escaped you the first time.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag

>>>>> But then it's weird that it describes themas   "The USSD codes (like
>>>>> *61...*XX#)".

>>>>> What's the "*61..." prefix   about?

>>>> That's the bit of the string that tells it
>>>> you are changing the delay till voicemail

>>> Then it should say "The USSD codes for changing voicemail settings
>>> (like *61...*XX#)", so it doesn't read as a general definition of
>>> "USSD codes".

>> It doesnt read like a general definition of USSD codes

> Examples in brakets after a term define the term.

More of your mindless bullshit

>>>>> You just use *XX#, eg. "*150#" to show your phone number.

>>>> It isnt about showing you the phone number

>>>>> Again it wastes my time double checking that it's makingup   nonsense
>>>>> instead of me misremembering things myself.

>>>> The obvious way to check if its made up nonsense is to try turning
>>>> live voicemail off and see if that fixes the problem, fuckwit

>>> Then when it makes up nonsense

>> It didn't do that

> It does at least one time in ten according to the study,

Irrelevant to what it did with that particular question

> and a lot   more often when you're asking questionsthat don't have  
> answers all   over the web that areeasily found with a decent web search  
> anyway.

That one doesn't have that

>>> you go and mess up settings that are irrelevent.

>> That setting is completely relevant and its trivial
>> to reset it back to what it previously was if it
>> doesn't do what the AI claimed it would do.

>> Even you should be able to manage that

>> And that's all you can do if you are stupid
>> enough fart around using google instead

> There you can read actual accounts of what   workedand judge whether  
> your problem is similar,

That particular question doesn't

> rather than being sucked into some AI
> fantasy land with misleading statements and advice taken and
> shuffled around from irrelevent webpages without context.

That answer doesn't do anything like that, you pathetic excuse for a  
bullshit artist

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 07:44 +1000
  Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 09:11 +1000
    Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:32 +1000
      Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-16 08:30 +1000
        Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 10:40 +1000
          Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-17 08:27 +1000
            Re: Grok does a much better job with this question than Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:34 +1000

csiph-web