Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #57083

Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI

From felix <me@nothere.invalid>
Newsgroups aus.cars, aus.computers
Subject Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI
Date 2016-12-31 16:35 +1100
Message-ID <ecouctFdg8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (23 earlier) <o470bd$n5t$1@dont-email.me> <ecofbiFrqfkU1@mid.individual.net> <o4758r$v03$1@dont-email.me> <ecom1eFt6jmU1@mid.individual.net> <o479or$gt8$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, 31 Dec 2016 2:49 PM, Noddy wrote:
> On 31/12/16 2:12 PM, felix wrote:
>
>>> Just like the *totally* bullshit excuse you used to cover up the fact
>>> that you pulled the "90 miles per hour" figure out of your arse when
>>> talking about your old grey motor powered heap of shit. The idea that
>>> you "messed up" when doing a metric conversion is an utter *nonsense*.
>>
>> because you say so, right?
>
> Because it was obvious to anyone who read it at the time that it was a 
> feeble "on the fly" cover up that would have been a totally 
> unnecessary thing to do in a car with a MPH speedometer :)

you STILL don't get it

>
>>> I'm not the one who thinks that my opinions are "facts" here Felix,
>>> and if we're going to talk about making "sweeping statements", I'm not
>>> the person who made the utterly ridiculous claim of saying that
>>> something was "industry standard" based on *nothing* other than that's
>>> what I *wanted* it to be.
>>
>> but no matter how many times I explain anything to you, you just go on
>> believing what you want to. I said that was my terminology to reflect
>> the fact that they were considered to be the best
>
> Let me explain something to you Felix if I may.
>
> To declare something as "industry standard" generally indicates that 
> it is regarded by many in a given industry as the product by which all 
> others are measured.

exactly. and that's what monster cables were, until recent times

> There is nothing wrong with that, and there are many industries that 
> have such products. For example, I work in the automotive/engineering 
> industry, and when it comes to precision measuring equipment a 
> Japanese company called "Mitutoyo" makes what is generally regarded as 
> the finest precision measuring equipment in the world and have done 
> for many years.

right. so go googling then and prove it like you want me to do

>
> But that is *not* the case with Monster cables, or your declaration of 
> them being "Industry standard". In this case, that is just a moniker 
> *you* have given them based on nothing other than *your* personal like 
> for their products, 

no

> and you have not been able to show a single credible site that 
> supports your view.
>
> This is the difference between "fact" as you know it to be, and 
> "opinion" to everyone else, and it is the thing you seem to have the 
> greatest trouble in telling apart.
>
>>> You perpetually claim that Monster Cables are superior, yet you back
>>> that with absolutely *nothing* that could be remotely considered
>>> factual. In fact I've asked you a number of times now to point to
>>> *any* credible cite which can support your argument and you go out of
>>> your way to avoid doing so. Instead all you ever do is offer your
>>> *opinion*, which you seem to think is "factual" simply because you say
>>> so.
>>
>> am I supposed to go trolling thru google just for you?
>
> I would imagine that if your wanted your claims to be taken seriously 
> then supporting them in some way with some independent credible source 
> would be the thing to do.

it doesn't matter to me if other ppl believe it or not

> After all, that *is* how you generally determine something to be 
> *Factual* Felix. By being able to *verify* that it is true.

except for things that can't be verified because there's no evidence

>
> However this is not the approach you elect to take. Rather, you seem 
> content on believing in your own greatness 

rather I rely on my experience with them and other cables over several 
decades

> and dismissing everyone who doesn't share your view as an idiot who 
> doesn't know what they're talking about, and all that manages to 
> achieve is to make you look like a fucking *crank*.
>
> For the record Felix I have actually looked, and while there is *lots* 
> of talk on the internet about Monster Cables, very little of what I 
> saw seems to be favourable,

correct. everyone bags them because they want to flog their own. you'll 
find plenty of sites saying 'ours are just as good'. what you won't find 
is 'monster saying 'ours are just as good as brand X',and most likely no 
one saying 'ours are better'. why? because monster were/are regarded as 
the best

> and I certainly found *nothing* from any "industry" source which 
> suggested that they were anything other than over priced shit.

the price is one matter, the performance is another. as I've said 
before, they were the best and introduced some new technologies, but 
like everything else, other companies 'caught up' and then the chinese 
(especially) started producing quality cables at very low prices

>
> I'm just saying. As a "layman" if I was relying on the recommendations 
> of people to invest in new cables, Monster products wouldn't make the 
> short list.
>
>>> That put a *completely* different perspective on things, but you
>>> didn't see it that way. You said, if I remember correctly, that it was
>>> just something you "forgot to mention" (apparently 28 times) and that
>>> it made no difference.
>>
>> I never changed anything. I just expressed it differently
>
> Yeah, you sure did :) You added something later that was left out 
> initially, and which put a completely different complexion on the story.
>
> How different?
>
> Like having a guts ache for three months and telling everyone that 
> "it's okay, I've had it checked out by a doctor and it will pass" only 
> to later declare that the *full* report from the doctor is that you 
> have bowel cancer and that it'll pass when you're dead.
>
> *That* different.

not really. but I guess my expression that they were 'fine' was 
misleading apparently. but if they were not 'fine' the dealers would 
have said they needed to be replaced immediately, but they didn't say 
that, nor did they say they were dangerous, as you claimed. it seems to 
me you're just making a big noise about words.

>
>> Like fuck it didn't. It made all the difference in the world, and
>>> combined with your reluctance to ever repost the photos you showed
>>> here originally paints you up as a fucking lair who is in complete
>>> denial about what he said.
>>
>> the liar is you. I posted the original photo
>
> No, you most certainly did not Felix,

I most certainly did, and it's still there..

http://austek.net/pics/DSCN1030.JPG completely unaltered, and the exif 
data, that you like to make a big fuss about, shows that it was taken on 
the 18th. July 2013, ie. the time of the discussion

> and claims to the contrary are a flat out lie.

no

> When you posted the photos originally they were substantially more 
> detailed,

no, they were LESS detailed and altered, and you've been told why. they 
were posted on a webpage and resized and enhanced to suit. the tyre in 
the photo above in the same tyre you are ranting about, drivers front. 
if you don't want to believe it that's your problem not mine

> and you have never posted them in the same fashion since.

correct

>
> To claim that you have

I have never claimed I have

> is a crock of shit that will trip you up :)
>
>


-- 
I plan on living forever. So far so good!

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 08:50 +1000
  Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-24 09:56 +1100
    Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-24 00:58 +0000
  Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-24 00:57 +0000
    Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:12 +1100
  Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 19:49 +1100
    Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 20:13 +1000
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 21:20 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 20:35 +1000
    Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-24 21:49 +1100
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 00:28 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 07:36 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-25 08:48 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 16:46 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 19:19 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:42 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-25 19:19 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-24 22:08 +0000
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-25 09:15 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 10:24 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 16:35 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 19:20 +1100
  Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-25 01:12 +0800
    Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 16:34 +1100
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 19:15 +1100
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-25 16:26 +0800
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:44 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 00:50 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 01:04 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 01:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 08:30 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 10:04 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:02 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 12:15 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 12:42 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 12:49 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 13:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 13:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 13:41 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 14:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 15:34 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 16:57 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 17:27 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 17:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 18:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 19:09 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-26 10:49 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 21:45 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-26 20:58 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 08:59 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 00:51 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-27 12:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 02:52 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-29 03:39 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-27 16:26 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-12-27 20:17 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 06:39 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 13:12 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 13:34 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:13 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:47 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:25 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:42 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-28 14:20 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI lindsay <ask.me.for.it@nunnya.business.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-28 21:30 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 23:57 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 01:20 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 20:58 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 00:54 -0800
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 06:34 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 06:34 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-26 06:18 +0800
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-25 19:38 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 22:14 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:47 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-26 06:19 +0800
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-25 22:48 +0000
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:20 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 12:14 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 12:38 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 13:04 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-26 10:40 +0800
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 00:45 -0800
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 10:42 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 10:51 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-26 10:49 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 15:47 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-29 06:23 +0800
      Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 21:08 +1000
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 22:21 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 22:01 +1000
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-25 23:29 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:50 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 06:38 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-26 08:05 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 10:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-25 23:41 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 12:19 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 12:20 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 12:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 13:16 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 13:54 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 14:54 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 16:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 15:07 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 16:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 17:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 16:58 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 15:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 16:15 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 17:02 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 08:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-26 08:39 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 10:08 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 10:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 10:44 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:10 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 17:11 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 16:28 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-27 07:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 10:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 11:37 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 00:52 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 11:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-27 12:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 12:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-27 12:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 14:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 03:41 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 16:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 12:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 01:18 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Jacko" <Jacko_ONE@bigpond.com> - 2016-12-27 13:09 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-27 15:27 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 16:27 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 16:57 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Troll Slapper" <felixisadumbcowardlycuntofathing@felixisastrupidcunt.org> - 2016-12-27 06:02 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 12:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 18:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 18:51 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 19:08 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:05 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 21:27 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 22:11 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 22:42 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 00:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 01:17 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@nunnya.business.com.au> - 2016-12-27 07:33 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 18:32 -0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:04 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-26 21:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-26 10:52 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 00:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 01:15 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 21:03 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-27 19:38 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 20:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 20:48 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 10:25 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 22:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 23:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 00:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:37 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 18:05 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 04:27 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 00:46 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 16:05 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 05:36 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 23:41 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 13:37 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 08:29 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 22:30 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 12:41 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-29 11:05 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 14:29 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 15:22 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 17:02 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-29 05:38 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 22:38 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-29 11:15 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 14:38 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 14:37 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 17:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 23:23 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 12:38 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 00:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:38 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 16:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 17:14 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 17:33 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:52 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 19:58 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:28 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:59 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 22:16 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 22:29 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 22:52 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 23:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 00:49 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 08:33 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 14:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 17:21 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 17:46 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 18:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:43 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 10:35 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:44 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-27 17:51 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 08:23 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-28 10:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 10:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-28 11:06 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 11:20 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-29 04:54 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-31 16:00 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2017-01-01 08:23 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 14:45 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 14:54 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 15:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 17:15 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:17 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 17:37 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:46 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:54 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 19:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:45 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 21:49 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 22:52 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 22:55 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 23:11 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:17 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 04:19 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:22 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:58 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 10:37 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 22:52 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 16:55 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 17:11 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 17:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 18:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 20:11 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:31 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 21:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:48 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 21:57 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 22:53 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 19:59 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 20:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 20:48 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 21:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 22:57 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 00:46 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-28 13:58 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 08:35 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-29 14:52 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-29 17:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-31 00:28 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 01:33 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-31 06:53 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-01 21:40 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 21:55 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-02 21:27 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-02 22:06 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Lindsay <ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-28 07:03 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 08:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-28 15:40 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:10 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 22:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-27 23:05 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-27 23:37 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-28 00:25 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 00:30 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 00:43 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 12:04 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 12:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 13:30 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:38 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 14:43 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:33 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-30 21:26 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 22:09 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-30 23:07 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 00:21 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-31 08:34 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 12:08 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-31 12:18 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 13:32 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-31 14:12 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 14:49 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-31 16:35 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 18:59 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-12-31 07:29 -0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2016-12-31 16:56 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Andy <nospam@no.no> - 2016-12-31 10:03 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2017-01-01 08:22 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-01 00:12 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2017-01-01 11:38 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-01 00:58 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2017-01-02 06:58 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 10:57 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-01 01:01 +0000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-01-01 13:00 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-01 08:20 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2017-01-01 11:42 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-01-01 13:42 +1000
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-01 15:56 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-01-01 13:35 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-30 20:42 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-30 22:02 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-30 23:02 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-31 00:24 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI lindsay <ask.me.for.it@nunnya.business.net.ay.you> - 2016-12-31 07:44 +1100
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-30 06:15 +1100
            Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-31 09:06 +0800
              Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-31 14:28 +1100
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-31 15:36 +0800
                Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2016-12-31 19:38 +1100
        Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:48 +1100
          Re: Digital evidence for insurance claim rejected by AAMI Noddy <me@home.com> - 2016-12-26 00:51 +1100

csiph-web