Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #56272
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.tv |
| Subject | Re: stupid youtube |
| Date | 2016-12-08 13:18 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <earu7iFbie8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <n92h4ctdiescg74c8qp03ge6dfdgisl0u8@j.net> <eargf0F8ku8U1@mid.individual.net> <8h3h4cpk55vlpahbgbe1thift2bbbrrvi5@j.net> <eari66F915uU1@mid.individual.net> <935h4c5ih8u342mnergv8jpb7584ndsls2@j.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Thursday, 8 Dec 2016 10:00 AM, Je�us wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:52:33 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 8 Dec 2016 9:37 AM, Je?us wrote: >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:23:07 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, 8 Dec 2016 9:12 AM, Je?us wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:08:13 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, 8 Dec 2016 6:55 AM, Je?us wrote: >>>>>>> Your original question/gripe was: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "why the heck does youtube put those banner ads on videos?" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I answered your question appropriately. The main problem here is your >>>>>>> question was stupid to begin with. >>>>>>> >>>>>> look up rhetorical question >>>>> No need to and that is irrelevant anyway. >>>> no it's not. apparently I keep overestimating the intelligence of usenet >>>> contributors, just as they keep underestimating mine. here's a >>>> 'translation' of my 'question' that should help >>>> >>>> 'how stupid is it of youtube to put those banners on their videos?' >>>> >>>> which in itself is a rhetorical question :) >>> We've come full circle again. Considering the continued success of >>> both youtube and commercial TV stations, I just can't see how they are >>> stupid for placing annoying and obnoxious advertising in their >>> media/programming/whatever. They've been doing it for a long time now, >>> with no apparent decline in their respective audiences. People mostly >>> don't like it, but it doesnt drive them away either. That doesnt mean >>> I approve of it. >> >> because there's no preferable alternative, > Sigh. OK. Consider your reply as having the last word. > >> although it's been suggested >> that commercial FTA tv will disappear in time what IS your problem?
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-06 18:00 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 19:28 +1100
Re: stupid youtube BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-06 08:10 -0700
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-07 12:49 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 13:30 +1100
Re: stupid youtube BruceS <bruces42@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 08:25 -0700
Re: stupid youtube news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-09 21:27 +0000
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-10 09:05 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-10 16:24 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 19:14 +1100
Re: stupid youtube "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 20:09 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-06 23:29 +1100
Re: stupid youtube "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 07:01 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-07 12:51 +1100
Re: stupid youtube "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 15:24 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-07 09:24 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-07 13:02 +1100
Re: stupid youtube news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-07 10:15 +0000
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:03 +1100
Re: stupid youtube news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-07 23:50 +0000
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:30 +1100
Re: stupid youtube news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-07 23:48 +0000
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 13:19 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-08 06:55 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:08 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-08 09:12 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:23 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-08 09:37 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:52 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-08 10:00 +1100
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 13:18 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-09 14:08 +0800
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-09 19:07 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-09 19:54 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-09 17:06 +0800
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-09 20:11 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-09 19:48 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-09 17:06 +0800
Re: stupid youtube news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-12-07 23:53 +0000
Re: stupid youtube "Jacko" <Jacko_ONE@bigpond.com> - 2016-12-08 09:19 +1000
Re: stupid youtube keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-10 21:27 +1000
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-10 21:35 +0800
Re: stupid youtube not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-12-06 21:42 +0000
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-07 13:03 +1100
Re: stupid youtube not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-12-08 22:05 +0000
Re: stupid youtube Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-07 09:19 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-07 07:27 +0800
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-07 14:29 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-07 18:33 +0800
Re: stupid youtube felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-08 09:13 +1100
Re: stupid youtube Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2016-12-08 06:51 +0800
csiph-web