Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.os.development > #18708
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: z/PDOS-generic |
| Date | 2024-08-21 09:51 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20240821095101.00005887@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <v7bbdt$2fj5a$1@dont-email.me> <v7cn7d$dcb$3@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <v7dg52$2uvnf$1@dont-email.me> <20240719093533.00001ee2@gmail.com> <va2tqb$3gr0b$1@dont-email.me> |
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:20:24 +0800 "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not familiar with "clusters". Could you tell me what this > "novelty" port would look like? "Clusters" being "large numbers of discrete systems across which work is distributed," an idea that goes back at least to the Transputer but which really took off in high-performance computing in the early '00s (IIRC,) when commodity PC hardware reached a performance level such that it was practical to use "a bunch of PCs in a network" as a replacement for a single high-performance computer of some other flavor, depending on the job. So, for the sake of argument, let's say you got MS-DOS running on such a platform - certainly possible, since it's fundamentally a PC (leaving aside issues of e.g. real-mode BIOS vs. UEFI or getting packet drivers for the NIC, as well as getting the network stack going.) You then have a large number of DOS PCs on which you can run one (1) job at a time. Now, assuming that you're doing this because you have a large number of jobs which you'd like to power through in a maximally efficient manner, you'd also need some kind of supervisory system to distribute jobs from the pile to individual nodes in the cluster. There's no reason this couldn't also run on MS-DOS; in any case, you'd need software on both ends to *A.* schedule the job for a particular node, *B.* provide that node with access to the files/resources needed to do it, and *C.* keep it rolling from one job right into the next. Now you've got things going; but it's a far cry from maximum efficiency, because the hardware on each node in the cluster is almost certainly capable of multi-threaded operation, but DOS has no support for multi- processing at all. (It's also probably a 64-bit system, but we'll say for the sake of argument that you've got some kind of amd64 equivalent to a DPMI going - has anyone written one yet? - so that your application can at least make full-ish use of a single CPU core.) There's two ways you could go about handling this. You could attempt to extend your single-threaded MS-DOS application into a multi-threaded one, handling all the scheduling and resource-contention issues within itself. At this point, you've more or less implemented a different OS on top of DOS (like pre-NT Windows.) Not terribly ideal, since you are (presumably) still handling I/O through DOS and your DOS-based network stack, which are single-threaded and will bottleneck all the other threads. (This was something that Amiga programmers used to deal with: pre-emptive multitasking bolted awkwardly to a single-threaded DOS.) Alternatively, you could choose to virtualize; modern implementations of the amd64 architecture support this natively in hardware, so you can put even your 64-bit DPMI-enabled mutant MS-DOS program in a container such that it thinks it's running by itself on a single-threaded CPU, and then run as many of those in parallel as you have CPU threads. Of course, you'll need a hypervisor system in place for this; for the sake of argument, you could probably *also* run this on MS-DOS, but I very much doubt anyone's written such a beast, so you'd probably have to do it yourself. You might also need to extend your supervisor-node software to parcel out multiple jobs to each machine, unless all the hypervisor-guest systems appear as individual nodes on the network (which they certainly could.) So, to summarize: all you need in order to accomplish this is 1. a DOS- based hypervisor which almost certainly doesn't exist, 2. a 64-bit DPMI extender which probably doesn't, 3. DOS-based remote job execution tools which might conceivably already exist, but may not, 4. your own particular mutant 64-bit MS-DOS application, and 5. a task sufficiently large/intensive to justify all this effort on in the first place. Should make for a nice weekend project!
Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-07-18 23:07 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-07-18 22:40 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 18:43 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-19 16:18 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB-Alt <bohannonindustriesllc@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 17:12 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-19 23:21 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-07-19 23:31 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-07-20 01:30 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 07:51 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-07-22 15:22 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 09:07 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-07-22 17:37 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-22 18:07 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-07-22 19:38 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 11:18 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 14:16 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-22 20:14 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 18:03 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-07-22 23:58 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 23:06 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-21 04:31 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 02:28 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 16:54 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 16:58 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 18:03 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 11:14 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-08-30 06:49 -0400
Re: z/PDOS-generic George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-08-30 10:27 -0400
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-31 10:21 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-08-31 15:30 -0400
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-09-03 14:27 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2024-08-30 13:29 +0200
Re: z/PDOS-generic Waldek Hebisch <antispam@fricas.org> - 2024-09-03 23:38 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-09-06 07:46 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic J. Curtis <unknown@protocol.invalid> - 2024-09-06 20:08 +0100
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-09-07 08:12 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 17:34 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic J. Curtis <unknown@protocol.invalid> - 2024-07-20 00:02 +0100
Re: z/PDOS-generic Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-03-08 14:42 -0300
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-09 02:09 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-09 15:40 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 12:38 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 14:49 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 15:00 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-03-10 09:21 -0300
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 13:50 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-03-10 14:10 -0300
Studying the system (was Re: z/PDOS-generic) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 18:29 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 05:38 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 19:07 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 19:09 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 13:00 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 20:20 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 07:59 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 15:11 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 23:11 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 10:51 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 08:37 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 17:28 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 05:40 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 12:41 -0700
What is an operating system? (was Re: z/PDOS-generic) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 21:00 +0000
Re: What is an operating system? (was Re: z/PDOS-generic) "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 17:30 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 09:04 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 08:29 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 05:06 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 19:01 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 08:04 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 08:47 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-11 18:15 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 18:29 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 05:52 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-11 23:05 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 23:48 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-12 02:23 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-12 02:34 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 18:41 +1100
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 09:35 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-21 04:20 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-08-21 09:51 -0700
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-22 13:24 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-07-19 19:46 -0500
Re: z/PDOS-generic "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-08-21 04:18 +0800
Re: z/PDOS-generic Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-03-08 14:41 -0300
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-09 01:58 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-03-10 09:31 -0300
Re: z/PDOS-generic cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 14:28 +0000
Re: z/PDOS-generic scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 14:46 +0000
csiph-web