Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.mindcontrol > #3689
| Newsgroups | or.politics, alt.news-media, talk.politics.misc, alt.mindcontrol, co.politics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-09 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2b99681a412ebffcdc03cb7fdb78dd10@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Joe Biden and Democrats are wallowing in dark money - and hypocrisy |
| From | Rudy Canoza gronk Abuser <cap@hendrie.con> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Lol! Fuck you gronk. You ignorant math challenged lying cunt. Democrats hate “Big Money” in politics, unless they get more of it than Republicans. On the second day of confirmation hearings for President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) entertained the nation with a lengthy treatise on how “dark money” is corroding our political system. He spoke nonstop for 27 minutes, lecturing Judge Barrett on the supposedly nefarious Republican plot to put conservative judges on the nation’s courts. He asked not a single question of the nominee. It turns out that Whitehouse had already sprung his presentation, complete with charts and diagrams, on Judge Barrett during his pre-hearing interview. So, the senator’s showboating was not to learn her opinions on matters of the law but instead to show the American people how righteously angry Whitehouse is about the evils of “dark money.” For those confused by the term, “dark money” describes funds given to social welfare nonprofits set up under section 501(c)(4) of the tax code, which do not have to reveal their donors. Those groups can use their funds to influence a campaign but are not allowed to coordinate their efforts with a candidate. It was refreshing to hear Whitehouse rail about dark money in politics; the topic used to be a hot one for Democrats. Lately, not so much. Why is that? Because starting in 2018, Democrats hauled in a lot more such funding than Republicans. In effect, they won the “dark money” race, and never looked back. Denouncing Big Money – dark and light – has been a staple talking point for Democrats, including Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, for years. The former vice president, for instance, joined Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during the Democratic primaries last year in opposing the use of super PACs. Biden refused to take money from such groups, until, that is, he struggled to raise campaign cash, at which point he reversed course and opened his coffers to super PAC dough. As did, by the way, Warren and even Sanders, who finally opened Our Revolution, which operated much like a super PAC. Democrats are, according to NBC, winning the super PAC race this cycle, taking in and spending more than the GOP. Thus, they no longer rant against those vehicles either. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) rebutted Whitehouse’s hypocrisy, pointing out that “Of the top 20 organizations spending money for political speech in the year 2016, 14 of them gave virtually all of their money to Democrats… That meant the top 20 SuperPAC donors contributed $422 million to Democrats and 189 million to Republicans.” Cruz also noted that Whitehouse “talked about big corporate powers without acknowledging that the contributions from the Fortune 500 in this presidential election overwhelmingly favor Joe Biden and The Democrats. Without acknowledging that the contributions from Wall Street in this election overwhelmingly favor Joe Biden and the Democrats.” Cruz is right. Biden positions himself as the candidate who will protect middle class workers from big and powerful corporate interests. But it turns out those big and powerful interests are lining up solidly behind Joe. https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/521179-joe-biden-and- democrats-are-wallowing-in-dark-money-and-hypocrisy
Back to alt.mindcontrol | Previous | Next | Find similar
Joe Biden and Democrats are wallowing in dark money - and hypocrisy Rudy Canoza gronk Abuser <cap@hendrie.con> - 2021-08-09 14:30 +0200
csiph-web