Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.lang.asm |
| Subject | Re: Assembly even in good times |
| Date | 2025-02-07 11:44 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vo4o7a$3fa2b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <vo1lik$2rc96$1@dont-email.me> <slrnvq9lrp.2rj.stone@ganymede.local> <vo475f$3cev6$1@dont-email.me> <vo4cl8$3ddtv$1@dont-email.me> <vo4ite$3e8kh$1@dont-email.me> |
wolfgang,
>> I'm assuming the ASM in the above was ment to be C{something} .(?)
>
> No, I never used C and never ever will use that crap.
I've used several versions of it, including on a RPi (GCC). Not much mind
you, but enough to get a bit of a feeling for it.
> I meant inline ASM, like these stupid variations in Power-Basic and
> friends.
I've never used that. I did use QBasic (which came free with my thanwhile
DOS version), where you had to do a bit of work to "load" the program data
and call it. It allowed me to add mouse (and other) stuff.
> I also meant MASM,TASM,NASM,BASM,QASM,etc...
Oh whait a minute there : you're not going to trash-talk my Borlands Tasm
(16 and 32 versions), are you now ? :-)
> I liked early RosAsm for 32 bit windoze because it allowed me to enter DB
> xx xx ... hex-lines anywhere in between other assembler lines.
I took the avalailability of DB and DW as a given. I can't remember an
assembler (X86 or otherwise) which refused them when encountered in a code
block.
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Back to alt.lang.asm | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Assembly even in good times Stone Fox <stone@unix.dog> - 2025-02-03 20:00 +0000
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-04 09:24 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 07:44 -0800
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-04 18:44 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times Stone Fox <stone@unix.dog> - 2025-02-06 00:21 +0000
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-06 07:39 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times Stone Fox <stone@unix.dog> - 2025-02-06 15:39 +0000
Re: Assembly even in good times wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2025-02-07 06:53 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-07 08:26 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2025-02-07 10:14 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-07 11:44 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2025-02-07 19:59 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-07 22:09 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2025-02-08 03:44 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-08 08:20 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times wolfgang kern <nowhere@never.at> - 2025-02-08 12:52 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:38 +0100
Re: Assembly even in good times "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-03-01 11:25 +0000
Re: Assembly even in good times Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-05 18:00 +0100
csiph-web