Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #147505 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-27 14:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-06-28 18:39 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 204 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-27 14:10 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 08:08 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-06-28 15:38 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 07:01 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-07-01 20:45 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 08:08 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-07-02 00:01 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 10:39 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-01 16:41 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 10:42 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-04 08:48 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-06-28 15:46 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-28 16:04 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2015-06-29 08:22 +0200
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 06:56 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-06-29 12:15 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2015-06-29 16:17 +0200
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 10:22 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-06-29 10:30 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 18:42 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 10:13 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-06-30 12:56 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-01 05:12 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-06-29 19:40 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 20:48 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-06-30 20:50 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-30 14:09 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 17:06 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-01 09:00 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-02 17:35 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-02 20:40 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-03 09:28 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 06:36 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-03 15:27 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-07-03 14:41 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-03 20:53 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Lon <lon.stowell@comcast.net> - 2015-06-30 17:51 -0600
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 04:33 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-06-29 20:04 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2015-06-30 10:27 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-01 05:02 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 08:38 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-01 05:16 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-06-30 12:17 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-29 09:50 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-06-29 12:32 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 04:40 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 04:23 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-06-30 12:56 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-06-30 09:25 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-06-30 17:23 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-06-30 12:39 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-01 10:10 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-01 12:06 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 05:29 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-02 11:44 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-07-02 16:04 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-02 11:32 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-02 20:41 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 05:55 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-02 17:35 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-02 19:05 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-02 21:58 +0200
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2015-07-03 12:31 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-04 04:59 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-07-01 09:18 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-01 11:34 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-01 09:15 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-06-30 19:36 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-01 10:29 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-01 12:06 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 05:36 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-01 12:06 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 05:28 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-01 17:29 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-02 11:44 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 06:56 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-02 09:03 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-07-02 10:01 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-02 16:36 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-02 10:56 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-02 10:55 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-07-02 16:10 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-02 13:27 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 05:48 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-02 21:51 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-07-04 06:39 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 05:47 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-02 11:59 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-07-02 11:50 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-02 13:42 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-03 10:03 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 05:21 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-07-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-02 17:07 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-02 18:04 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 15:02 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-02 21:54 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2015-07-03 12:31 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2015-07-03 08:15 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 05:53 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-03 12:24 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-03 14:12 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-04 11:41 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-04 14:17 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-04 11:59 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-07-06 10:56 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally lawrence@cluon.com - 2015-07-07 16:18 +0200
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2015-07-04 13:55 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 05:40 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-04 20:05 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-05 13:49 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-05 09:05 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-06 11:36 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:45 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:03 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-07-05 23:23 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 15:43 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-06 11:36 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-06 16:02 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:43 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-05 16:37 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-07-06 13:52 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-07 05:42 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 05:20 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-07 17:25 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-07 15:40 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-08 06:46 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-07 18:07 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-08 08:33 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "EspenFucker" <EF4312@nospam.com> - 2015-07-08 14:47 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Kerr Mudd-John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2015-07-08 13:08 -0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-08 16:52 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-07-08 13:26 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-07-08 17:41 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-09 05:00 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-09 00:29 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "EspenFucker" <EF4312@nospam.com> - 2015-07-09 04:45 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-08 14:35 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Kerr Mudd-John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2015-07-08 13:15 -0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-08 10:09 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-07-08 16:25 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Hop David <hopd@nospam.cunews.info> - 2015-07-09 15:36 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-09 04:44 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-08 16:52 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-08 18:08 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-09 09:18 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Morten Reistad <first@last.navn> - 2015-07-08 07:23 +0200
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-09 12:15 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-09 16:04 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 11:49 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-09 12:27 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-07-09 19:02 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 14:05 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-09 12:12 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-10 05:39 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-10 00:45 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-09 23:21 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-10 15:29 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-10 00:30 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 10:22 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 10:26 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 13:06 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-11 04:46 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 05:22 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> - 2015-07-10 05:25 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-08 14:20 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-07-08 16:52 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-09 12:15 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 05:23 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 04:47 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 05:23 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-07 22:02 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-07 13:49 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 05:28 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-08 14:20 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-07-08 11:32 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-07-09 12:15 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 04:51 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-01 05:10 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-30 04:53 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally lynn@garlic.com - 2015-06-29 17:36 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-06-30 11:23 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-06-30 14:07 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-07-01 17:34 -0500
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-07-03 09:42 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-07-01 20:47 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 08:12 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-06-29 07:05 +0000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally simon@twoplaces.co.uk (Simon Turner) - 2015-06-30 10:41 +0100
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-30 09:22 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-30 09:59 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-07-07 10:14 -0700
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-06-28 12:03 -0400
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally "John Chance" <JCJC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-29 06:54 +1000
Re: Credit card fraud solution coming to America...finally Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-06-28 18:39 -0700
Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11 Next page →
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 11:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00051A3386903368@aca41c1e.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #147957 |
Dave Garland wrote: > On 7/5/2015 8:49 AM, jmfbahciv wrote: >> Dave Garland wrote: > >>> If it's the thing known in the electronics world as "motorboating" >>> (low frequency oscillation, sounds like a small outboard idling slow, >>> "putt putt putt") that would definitely be a defective radio. >> >> It is an occillation. So both radios broke on the same day? I decided >> the radio wasn't broken because of that coincidence. > > Ah, you didn't say it was the same on 2 radios. Then probably not the > radio. More likely a defective something else generating noise. > Fluorescent light, neon light, light dimmer, electric stove, there are > a lot of things that can generate RF noise. This doesn't sound like noise generated from lights; the frequency is different. > If a radio is portable, > try carrying it around (even down the street) and try to find where > noise is worst or goes away, hints as to where the source of the > problem is. If it runs on house current, try taking it somewhere else > and see if problem goes away. I had unplugged it to see if the house's electrical system was picking up the noise. Nope. It happens when the radio is on batteries. I'll take it with me the next time I get out. thanks for the suggestion. Now I get to figure out how to triangulate a transmission. It's really annoying. I can receive signals I don't want and can't recieve signals (TV) I do want. > >>> >>> On an AM band, I'd expect bandwidth that was too full to sound like >>> you couldn't clearly tune a station in without having another station >>> audible.But that too could just be a radio that isn't working properly >>> (or was designed too cheaply to have decent selectivity). >> >> I can hear the ocillation and the station. >> >> If it's the radio shouldn't all bands of the radio be affected? > > Usually, but not necessarily. > >> I don't hear it with FM. > > FM is not susceptible to the same sorts of interference as AM. > > I'll have to check for the shortwave >> bands. > > Those are AM as well, just higher frequency, they'll probably pick up > the interference. Some of the short wave did pick up strange noises before this mess happened. I'm not sure I can remember which ones were where. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 16:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BPmdnRIZVrcZBQfInZ2dnUU78T2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #147993 |
On 06/07/2015 12:36, jmfbahciv wrote:
{snip}
> I had unplugged it to see if the house's electrical system was picking
> up the noise. Nope. It happens when the radio is on batteries. I'll
> take it with me the next time I get out. thanks for the suggestion.
>
> Now I get to figure out how to triangulate a transmission.
See if the volume changes when you rotate the radio. Remember the angle
and repeat at a different location.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00051A485D5AD622@aca20eb8.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #148000 |
Andrew Swallow wrote:
> On 06/07/2015 12:36, jmfbahciv wrote:
> {snip}
>
>> I had unplugged it to see if the house's electrical system was picking
>> up the noise. Nope. It happens when the radio is on batteries. I'll
>> take it with me the next time I get out. thanks for the suggestion.
>>
>> Now I get to figure out how to triangulate a transmission.
>
> See if the volume changes when you rotate the radio. Remember the angle
> and repeat at a different location.
I did try that in the house. It didn't seem to change volume but my
ears aren't what they used to be.
/BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 05:43 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d0043dF6218U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #147993 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM00051A3386903368@aca41c1e.ipt.aol.com... > Dave Garland wrote: >> On 7/5/2015 8:49 AM, jmfbahciv wrote: >>> Dave Garland wrote: >> >>>> If it's the thing known in the electronics world as "motorboating" >>>> (low frequency oscillation, sounds like a small outboard idling slow, >>>> "putt putt putt") that would definitely be a defective radio. >>> >>> It is an occillation. So both radios broke on the same day? I decided >>> the radio wasn't broken because of that coincidence. >> >> Ah, you didn't say it was the same on 2 radios. Then probably not the >> radio. More likely a defective something else generating noise. >> Fluorescent light, neon light, light dimmer, electric stove, there are >> a lot of things that can generate RF noise. > > This doesn't sound like noise generated from lights; the frequency is > different. > >> If a radio is portable, >> try carrying it around (even down the street) and try to find where >> noise is worst or goes away, hints as to where the source of the >> problem is. If it runs on house current, try taking it somewhere else >> and see if problem goes away. > > I had unplugged it to see if the house's electrical system was picking > up the noise. Nope. It happens when the radio is on batteries. I'll > take it with me the next time I get out. thanks for the suggestion. > > Now I get to figure out how to triangulate a transmission. > > It's really annoying. I can receive signals I don't want and can't > recieve signals (TV) I do want. > > >> >>>> >>>> On an AM band, I'd expect bandwidth that was too full to sound like >>>> you couldn't clearly tune a station in without having another station >>>> audible.But that too could just be a radio that isn't working properly >>>> (or was designed too cheaply to have decent selectivity). >>> >>> I can hear the ocillation and the station. >>> >>> If it's the radio shouldn't all bands of the radio be affected? >> >> Usually, but not necessarily. >> >>> I don't hear it with FM. >> >> FM is not susceptible to the same sorts of interference as AM. >> >> I'll have to check for the shortwave >>> bands. >> >> Those are AM as well, just higher frequency, they'll probably pick up >> the interference. > Some of the short wave did pick up strange noises before this mess > happened. I'm not sure I can remember which ones were where. Likely a different problem entirely if it doesn’t sound the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-05 16:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1818877938457806789.333466peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #147956 |
jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > Dave Garland wrote: >> On 7/4/2015 6:41 AM, jmfbahciv wrote: >>> Stephen Sprunk wrote: >>>> On 03-Jul-15 07:24, jmfbahciv wrote: > > <snip> > >>> Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >>> My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >>> radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. >>> >> >> Not sure what you're saying. What's a "frequency cycle"? 5Hz (the >> youngsters call them "Hertz" nowadays) is much too low a frequency for >> the human ear, though it might sound like a vibrato. If your radio is >> doing that on the entire AM band, I'd think you have a defective radio. >> >> If it's the thing known in the electronics world as "motorboating" >> (low frequency oscillation, sounds like a small outboard idling slow, >> "putt putt putt") that would definitely be a defective radio. > > It is an occillation. So both radios broke on the same day? I decided > the radio wasn't broken because of that coincidence. >> >> On an AM band, I'd expect bandwidth that was too full to sound like >> you couldn't clearly tune a station in without having another station >> audible.But that too could just be a radio that isn't working properly >> (or was designed too cheaply to have decent selectivity). > > I can hear the ocillation and the station. > > If it's the radio shouldn't all bands of the radio be affected? > I don't hear it with FM. I'll have to check for the shortwave > bands. No. It's RF Interference that shows up with AM. There's something in or around your house that's causing a problem. (IMHO) > > > /BAH > >> -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 13:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <NKvmx.27996$gG6.25954@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #147929 |
jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >Stephen Sprunk wrote: >> >> All of the new residential/consumer stuff I've seen is based on PINs or >> some sort of RF, getting away from the entire concept of keys. >> >> Cars also seem to be going the same way. > >Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. 5hz is not something that you can hear, much less reproduce using a normal speaker. Now an electric fencer, on the other hand, will cause interference at such a rate on amplitude modulated signals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 05:42 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d0041sF61jtU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #147997 |
"Scott Lurndal" <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote in message news:NKvmx.27996$gG6.25954@fx31.iad... > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>Stephen Sprunk wrote: > >>> >>> All of the new residential/consumer stuff I've seen is based on PINs or >>> some sort of RF, getting away from the entire concept of keys. >>> >>> Cars also seem to be going the same way. >> >>Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >>My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >>radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. > > 5hz is not something that you can hear, It is actually with interference. much less reproduce > using a normal speaker. You're assuming a sine wave or close. Perfectly reproducible with a spike at a 5Hz rate. > Now an electric fencer, on the other hand, will cause interference > at such a rate on amplitude modulated signals. But it is rather unlikely that that is what is producing it in her situation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00051A48573D6F94@aca20eb8.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #147997 |
Scott Lurndal wrote: > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>Stephen Sprunk wrote: > >>> >>> All of the new residential/consumer stuff I've seen is based on PINs or >>> some sort of RF, getting away from the entire concept of keys. >>> >>> Cars also seem to be going the same way. >> >>Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >>My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >>radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. > > 5hz is not something that you can hear, much less reproduce > using a normal speaker. > > Now an electric fencer, on the other hand, will cause interference > at such a rate on amplitude modulated signals. I know what that sounds like. It's not a fencer. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 05:20 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d02n4bFqcp7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #148018 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM00051A48573D6F94@aca20eb8.ipt.aol.com... > Scott Lurndal wrote: >> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>Stephen Sprunk wrote: >> >>>> >>>> All of the new residential/consumer stuff I've seen is based on PINs or >>>> some sort of RF, getting away from the entire concept of keys. >>>> >>>> Cars also seem to be going the same way. >>> >>>Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >>>My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >>>radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. >> >> 5hz is not something that you can hear, much less reproduce >> using a normal speaker. >> >> Now an electric fencer, on the other hand, will cause interference >> at such a rate on amplitude modulated signals. > > I know what that sounds like. It's not a fencer. Fencers don’t produce just one type of sound.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00051A4881ACEB28@aca20eb8.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #147997 |
Scott Lurndal wrote: > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>Stephen Sprunk wrote: > >>> >>> All of the new residential/consumer stuff I've seen is based on PINs or >>> some sort of RF, getting away from the entire concept of keys. >>> >>> Cars also seem to be going the same way. >> >>Yea. I'm wondering about all that. Bandwidth isn't infinite. >>My radio started picking up a frequency cycle on the entire AM >>radio band. It's approximately 5cycles/second. > > 5hz is not something that you can hear, much less reproduce > using a normal speaker. Perhaps I should have used the term beeps. it could be a few more but my counting is slow. > > Now an electric fencer, on the other hand, will cause interference > at such a rate on amplitude modulated signals. > Well, I'm hoping this is a summer thing. :-( The point is that RFs are showing up everywhere without FCC intervention. I can remember when we (DEC) had to stop selling terminals because you could read what was displayed on the screens using a B/W TV. Now any random person can broadcast anything easily. The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of changing from analog to digital? /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 17:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mnh21g15mv@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #148021 |
On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of > changing from analog to digital? No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 15:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnh9sl$qca$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #148028 |
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: > On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > >> The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of >> changing from analog to digital? > > No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. Damn straight. And the first politician that runs on the platform of population control has got my vote, regardless of party. I'm not an EE, but from what I read, digital allows for compression, saving huge amounts of bandwidth compared to analog. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 06:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d02s5rFrn5tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #148036 |
"Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message news:mnh9sl$qca$1@dont-email.me... > Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: > >> On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >> >>> The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of >>> changing from analog to digital? >> >> No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. > > Damn straight. > And the first politician that runs on the platform of > population control has got my vote, regardless of party. Not one modern first world country is even self replacing if you take out immigration. > I'm not an EE, but from what I read, > digital allows for compression, saving huge amounts of bandwidth > compared to analog. And there is more involved than compression too. The whole point of the cellphone system is that it allows a hell of a lot more conversations to happen at once than would be possible with analog phones.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 18:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnhig8$154$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #148038 |
"ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> writes: > "Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:mnh9sl$qca$1@dont-email.me... >> Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: >> >>> On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of >>>> changing from analog to digital? >>> >>> No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. >> >> Damn straight. >> And the first politician that runs on the platform of >> population control has got my vote, regardless of party. > > Not one modern first world country is even > self replacing if you take out immigration. Good point. Clearly our leaders need to talk about _world_ population growth. I know. Not going to happen, and I can just imagine the uproar. Still, needs to be said. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 08:33 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d032ojFtc4sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #148041 |
"Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message news:mnhig8$154$1@dont-email.me... > "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> writes: > >> "Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message >> news:mnh9sl$qca$1@dont-email.me... >>> Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of >>>>> changing from analog to digital? >>>> >>>> No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. >>> >>> Damn straight. >>> And the first politician that runs on the platform of >>> population control has got my vote, regardless of party. >> >> Not one modern first world country is even >> self replacing if you take out immigration. > > Good point. > Clearly our leaders need to talk about _world_ population growth. > > I know. Not going to happen, It has happened. Didn’t get very far tho with both the Roman Catholic Church and the Muslims not being interested in birth control. > and I can just imagine the uproar. There wasn’t actually. > Still, needs to be said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "EspenFucker" <EF4312@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 14:47 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d03obgF3ghgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #148042 |
"Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message news:mnhtoc$mdc$1@dont-email.me... > "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> writes: > >> "Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message >> news:mnhig8$154$1@dont-email.me... >>> "ratsack" <ratgsack281@nospam.com> writes: >>> >>>> "Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>> news:mnh9sl$qca$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-07-07, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The bandwidth is getting too crowded. Is this a side effect of >>>>>>> changing from analog to digital? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it's a side effect of too damn many people. >>>>> >>>>> Damn straight. >>>>> And the first politician that runs on the platform of >>>>> population control has got my vote, regardless of party. >>>> >>>> Not one modern first world country is even >>>> self replacing if you take out immigration. >>> >>> Good point. >>> Clearly our leaders need to talk about _world_ population growth. >>> >>> I know. Not going to happen, >> >> It has happened. Didn’t get very far tho with both the Roman Catholic >> Church and the Muslims not being interested in birth control. >> >>> and I can just imagine the uproar. >> >> There wasn’t actually. https://www.google.com/search?q=world+population+summits > The day a president of the US goes before the UN and > says that population growth is a worse problem than global > warming, we'll see whether there is an uproar or not. The US prez is nowhere near as important as that and the uproar would be about the other controversy, global warming and the relativities with population growth given that birth rates are dropping world wide now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr Mudd-John" <notsaying@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 13:08 -0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.x1gj8hh6xefm1i@anyhost.anywhere> |
| In reply to | #148051 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:47:40 -0100, EspenFucker <EF4312@nospam.com> wrote: You've gone beyond the pale now. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 16:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mnjkge0aot@news7.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #148056 |
On 2015-07-08, Kerr Mudd-John <notsaying@invalid.org> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:47:40 -0100, EspenFucker <EF4312@nospam.com> wrote: > > You've gone beyond the pale now. No, that's standard behaviour. Dan joins the ranks of us who have received the highest award for Speedo-baiting. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 13:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnjmdv$it2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #148075 |
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes:
> On 2015-07-08, Kerr Mudd-John <notsaying@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:47:40 -0100, EspenFucker <EF4312@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> You've gone beyond the pale now.
>
> No, that's standard behaviour. Dan joins the ranks of us
> who have received the highest award for Speedo-baiting.
I've had that distinction more than once:
("\"EspenFucker\" <EF4312@nospam.com>" -1000 nil e)
("\"espen fucker\" <ef@gflkr.com>" -1000 nil e)
Pathetic isn't it.
--
Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Wgdnx.85445$ud2.6886@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #148075 |
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes: >On 2015-07-08, Kerr Mudd-John <notsaying@invalid.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:47:40 -0100, EspenFucker <EF4312@nospam.com> wrote: >> >> You've gone beyond the pale now. > >No, that's standard behaviour. Dan joins the ranks of us >who have received the highest award for Speedo-baiting. If everyone would fail to respond to his posts, perhaps he'd go away. Please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web