Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #228930

Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?)

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.sys.pdp11, alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?)
Date 2024-11-15 11:25 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87ed3cti2g.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <9efb03c7-65dc-8aa0-989f-8998145b9275@googlemail.com> <7wcyiy8fh2.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <b18f78b6-837a-8a6e-cb37-0beb121b4949@googlemail.com> <vh5t1e$310hc$4@dont-email.me> <fd6b092e-4849-0026-c3b8-ffc3a018c00a@googlemail.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> writes:
> And while I had to extend the language significantly, it grew
> nicely. Further extensions are planned, like floating point integers

1. Floating point "integers"???

2. TECO is historically important and interesting, and I can sort of
understand wanting to re-implement it as a retrocomputing hack, or maybe
even use it for nerd factor or because you were used to it.  But,
extending it seems pretty niche.  Does SciTECO have more than one user?

The DEC TECOs were themselves very limited compared to the MIT versions
that I guess culminated in the versions underpinning ITS Emacs.

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-14 22:19 +0000
  Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-14 14:34 -0800
    Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-15 00:03 +0000
  Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-14 16:23 -0800
    Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-15 01:52 +0000
  Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> - 2024-11-15 16:26 +0300
    Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-11-15 11:25 -0800
      Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> - 2024-11-16 04:47 +0300
    Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-15 22:13 +0000
      Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-15 15:08 -0800
        Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> - 2024-11-16 05:11 +0300
          Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-16 03:28 +0000
            Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> - 2024-11-16 10:33 +0300
              Re: Interactive Development (was Re: Any interesting PDP/TECO photos out there?) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-16 21:53 +0000

csiph-web