Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #234803

Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432?

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432?
Date Wed, 27 May 2026 12:11:25 -0700
Organization A place where nothing fits quite right
Lines 9
Message-ID <20260527121125.000076fc@gmail.com> (permalink)
References <10v1n8r$1e4qh$1@dont-email.me> <10v2dh8$1ljrf$1@dont-email.me> <10v2j3u$1n4gq$1@dont-email.me> <10v2q1h$1ors5$1@dont-email.me> <mdd4ijurknu.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <IaHRR.2$_yL9.0@fx47.iad>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Wed, 27 May 2026 19:11:30 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; logging-data="3094368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18M5wtAJT2zHyYjuB7VsX49LhbFnTGLUcE="; posting-host="ce952d77431422e5565655c0d8c95722"
Cancel-Lock sha1:UNqZSdezWSfqPOdAihn1cyhUu5E= sha256:dZ2Zgtq+qV5yqrYK4qKhMoy9y8+wj2LbLviwMCmIT3Q= sha1:XoPE16mk92CWTagCVu450IUytC4=
X-Newsreader Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Xref csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:234803

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 27 May 2026 18:59:52 GMT
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:

> Plenty to spare?  Not really.  CXL and other technologies have made
> even a 64-bit address space limiting.

...I'm mildly curious in which applications an address space of 16 EB
would be considered "limiting" o_O

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-05-25 07:44 -0700
  Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-05-25 07:54 -1000
  Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-25 21:04 +0000
    Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-05-25 15:39 -0700
      Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-26 00:38 +0000
        Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-05-25 20:41 -0700
        Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-05-26 16:16 -0400
          Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-27 18:59 +0000
            Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-05-27 12:11 -0700
              Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-27 22:44 +0000
            Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-05-27 13:06 -0700
              Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-27 22:34 +0000
              Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-05-27 22:47 +0000

csiph-web