Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #234670

Re: Today, 50 years ago

From	cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: Today, 50 years ago
Date	2026-04-15 14:04 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<10ro5td$kuu$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<today-20260331204342@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <10rmgl8$gjuj$1@dont-email.me> <10ro2qf$q7a$1@reader1.panix.com> <10ro3v9$v6he$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <10ro3v9$v6he$1@dont-email.me>,
Nuno Silva  <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 2026-04-15, Dan Cross wrote:
>
>> In article <10rmgl8$gjuj$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Jason H  <jason_hindle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>To be fair to them, the whole move to UNIX and, much later, Apple Silicon
>>>was ultimately pretty innovative when compared to the rest of the market.
>>>Unified memory ftw. 
>>
>>
>> Eh....  I dunno.
>>
>> Apple Silicon is pretty nice, though I don't know about ARM.
>> The obvious alternative is RISC-V, but it was not mature enough
>> for use in a high-end product at the time they moved away from
>> Intel.
>>
>> Unix as the basis for an OS wasn't super innovative,
>> particularly when you consider that they were building on NeXT's
>> technology, which was already Mach+4.3BSD, and predated macOS by
>> a few decades.
>
>On that field, I guess there's also SGI Irix? (Better known by its stage
>name, "It's a UNIX system, I know this!")

Irix was basically SVR4 with a bunch of SGI's cool graphics
stuff layered on top of it, but in terms of the actual OS, it
wasn't all _that_ different from other, similar commercial
Unixes out there at the time.  I remember thinking that SunOS,
OSF/1, and even Solaris, were more pleasant to work with.

The weird one was IBM's AIX (which did run on an Apple-branded
PowerPC server machine at one point).  HP's HP-UX was somewhere
in the middle.

Apple had made foray's into Unix before; A/UX was based on SVR3,
if I am not mistaken, and seemed pretty cool.  They had built a
graphical application called "Commando" that could be used to
interactively constuct the invocation for a Unix command, which
was very forward-looking for the time.

	- Dan C.

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Today, 50 years ago ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-03-31 19:58 +0000
  Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-31 20:59 +0000
    Re: Today, 50 years ago Jason H <jason_hindle@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-14 22:55 +0000
      Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-15 05:47 +0000
        Re: Today, 50 years ago oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-15 11:38 +0000
          Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 13:13 +0000
            Re: Today, 50 years ago oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-04-15 13:57 +0000
            Re: Today, 50 years ago moi <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2026-04-15 19:18 +0100
              Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 18:28 +0000
          Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-15 22:08 +0000
        Re: Today, 50 years ago Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-04-15 07:35 -0700
          Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-15 22:05 +0000
            Re: Today, 50 years ago Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2026-04-16 00:01 +0000
              Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-16 00:44 +0000
                Re: Today, 50 years ago Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-16 09:23 +0100
      Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 13:11 +0000
        Re: Today, 50 years ago Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-15 14:31 +0100
          Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 14:04 +0000
            Re: Today, 50 years ago John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 11:21 -0700
              Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 18:41 +0000
              Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-15 22:03 +0000
          Re: Today, 50 years ago scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-04-15 14:55 +0000
        Re: Today, 50 years ago Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-04-15 07:44 -0700
          Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 16:13 +0000
        Re: Today, 50 years ago scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-04-15 14:48 +0000
          Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 16:14 +0000
            Re: Today, 50 years ago John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-04-15 17:19 +0000
              Re: Today, 50 years ago cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-04-15 18:43 +0000
              Re: Today, 50 years ago Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-04-15 19:55 +0000
              Re: Today, 50 years ago scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-04-15 20:08 +0000
                Re: pretty good chips, Today, 50 years ago John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-04-15 21:26 +0000
  Re: Today, 50 years ago Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-05 20:37 +0000

csiph-web