Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.dev.null |
| Subject | Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? |
| Date | 2021-12-15 23:43 +0000 |
| Organization | Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds |
| Message-ID | <1pk95k5.1c965cj80frrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <Lt%sJ.941702$Ah33.916219@usenetxs.com> <a_%sJ.180357$IW4.90839@fx48.iad> <1pk0y7g.14cc63s1ao414eN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <tbsuJ.122611$aF1.566@fx98.iad> <eKsuJ.179637$AJ2.4713@fx33.iad> |
Steve <lammasland@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:26:01 GMT, vallor wrote: [...] > > On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:24:32 +0000, Sn!pe wrote: > > > >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:56:44 -0000, Steve wrote: > >>> > >>> > vallor wrote: > >>> >> This glyph doesn't use zwj, does it look acceptable? > >>> >> > >>> >> ? > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > It's the best looking question mark I've seen in ten minutes. > >>> > > >>> > >>> That'll happen if you're using a newsreader of our forefathers. > >>> > >>> Subject: edited to remove the glyph and everything past it. > >>> > >> > >> Bear in mind the Robustness Principle*, sometimes stated as: > >> > >> "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept". > >> > >> This very important principle is utterly disregarded by the likes of > >> our favourite dilettante Newsreader coder from a froup near you. > >> > >> * <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle> > >> > > > > I've invoked Postel's Law on my own on occasion. > > > > But the state of the art in communication doesn't move forward without > > making a lot of old, stick-in-the-mud conservatives mutter about how things > > are better with ASCII, despite the USENET being global in scope. > > > > And what's funny about this? I can post glyphs and you can't see them, but > > everybody else can. > > Correction: ~some~ others can see them. Dyed-in-the-wool, stick-in-the-mud purists just [shrug] and say "WTF?" > > > > So ?? there. > > > > And???? > > > > I swapped newsreader to read this and it wasn't worth the effort. It seems > to me you may be using the wrong medium. Whatsapp and Telegram has lots > of pretty stickers and stuff to keep you amused. I've even seen colouring > books for adults in the shops. Hours of fun. > I concur. <aol>, even. -- ^Ï^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E> My pet rock Gordon just is.
Back to alt.dev.null | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Test vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-02 04:43 +0000
Re: Test snipeco.2@gmail.com (Absurd Burd) - 2021-12-02 13:08 +0000
Re: Test vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-03 07:49 +0000
Re: Test snipeco.2@gmail.com (Absurd Burd) - 2021-12-03 09:20 +0000
Re: Test vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-07 12:58 +0000
Re: Test snipeco.2@gmail.com (Absurd Burd) - 2021-12-07 13:09 +0000
Re: Test vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-07 14:12 +0000
Re: Test snipeco.2@gmail.com (Absurd Burd) - 2021-12-07 14:52 +0000
Re: Test Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-12-07 20:54 +0000
Unicode not quite ready for prime time? 🪐 (was Re: Test vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-11 10:05 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? ? (was Re: Test Steve <lammasland@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 10:56 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-11 11:31 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-12-11 13:24 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-15 20:26 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? Steve <lammasland@gmail.com> - 2021-12-15 21:03 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-12-15 23:43 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-12-16 02:02 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? Steve <lammasland@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 17:52 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-12-11 18:11 +0000
Re: Unicode not quite ready for prime time? ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-12-11 13:13 +0000
csiph-web