Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.dev.null > #210

Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS:

Show all headers | View raw

John Doe <john.doe@freedom.nl.invalid> wrote (in alt.dev.null):

> In article <1pftmj5.t70yq54xgm6nN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
> > 
> > John Doe <john.doe@freedom.nl.invalid> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > > Guess what eternal-september's policy is about posting 
> > > > > > to alt.dev.null.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I see nothing in their policy against it. I see restrictions for
> > > > > Control: messages but not for just Approved: messages.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No control messages
> > > > > No control messages may be posted through
> > > > > news.eternal-september.org with the following exceptions:
> > > > > Cancel and supersede messages for your own articles that
> > > > > have been posted through Eternal-September
> > > > > newgroup and rmgroup control messages for de.alt.*
> > > > > You should familiar with de.alt.admin conventions and proceedings
> > > > > https://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=terms
> > > > > Control messages to free.*
> > > > > 
> > > > > Am I overlooking something?
> > > > 
> > > > Your use of aioe to post this is interesting.  Can you post via aioe
> > > > to eternal-september.moderated?  I have just tested there.  What
> > > > about posting to live moderated groups? 
> > > 
> > > aioe does not have eternal-september.moderated. I tried to crosspost
> > > but that did not wok either.
> > 
> > I note that you silently set the followup to e-s.m [denied].  
> > Why was that? 
> 
> Gravity wanted a followup header, I don't know why.

Silent followups are most impolite.  

Also, I note that you have switched newsserver to E-S but my query 
was about aioe.  You might have said what you were doing. 

I have now multiposted this to e-s.m as the appropriate place for this
discussion; I think E-S does not permit crossposts into its own groups.

[bye in a.d.n, continue in e-s.m if you wish] 


-- 
^Ï^     <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

Back to alt.dev.null | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-06-02 03:07 +0100
  Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-06-02 02:42 +0000
    Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-06-02 12:33 +0100
  Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: John Doe <john.doe@freedom.nl.invalid> - 2021-09-20 18:47 +0200
    Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-09-20 18:32 +0100
      Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: John Doe <john.doe@freedom.nl.invalid> - 2021-09-20 20:06 +0200
        Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-09-20 20:12 +0100
          Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: John Doe <john.doe@freedom.nl.invalid> - 2021-09-20 23:33 +0200
            Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-09-20 23:23 +0100
              Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-09-20 22:35 +0000
                Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-09-20 23:50 +0100
                Re: CONSERVATIVES DON'T NEED TO BE TOLD THIS: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2021-09-28 21:51 +0100

csiph-web