Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | invalid@invalid.invalid (Ïnvalid Character) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, news.groups, free.control, alt.dev.null |
| Subject | Re: common carrier status for social media? |
| Followup-To | alt.dev.null |
| Date | 2021-02-06 20:42 +0000 |
| Organization | invalid |
| Message-ID | <1p475af.oyu5na8ura84N%invalid@invalid.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <drjhes.ho8.19.1@news.alt.net> <drjhps.lqb.19.1@news.alt.net> <drjhvi.lqb.19.2@news.alt.net> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.dev.null
dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote: > On 2/6/2021 2:56 PM, dale wrote: > > On 2/6/2021 2:50 PM, dale wrote: > >> what about ... > >> > >> common carrier status for social media "providers"? > >> > >> legal warrants for social media "customers" based only on probable cause? > >> > >> not limited to, but including, USENET? > >> > > > > added a couple groups ... [...] Spammer. -- Whistling past the graveyard.
Back to alt.dev.null | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: common carrier status for social media? invalid@invalid.invalid (Ïnvalid Character) - 2021-02-06 20:42 +0000
csiph-web