Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #16782

Re: Bug killer

From Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.firefox
Subject Re: Bug killer
Date 2026-04-22 15:37 +0100
Organization Frantic
Message-ID <82eck7njry.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References <n4qnrlFd256U1@mid.individual.net> <82ik9jnqz1.fsf@example.com> <3lmhukh3tm8gp477hrtr8r2kkoqr3u9ifc@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


croy <croy@spam.invalid.net> writes:

> On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:01:54 +0100, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>>Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> writes:
>
>>> https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/
>
>
>>Are they all fixed? It doesn't mention 271 here:
>
> Notice, in the link above, "vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150"
>
> I assume that Mythos was looking at the released v150.0.0.
>
> Yikes!

Yes, if you follow the release notes for 150:

https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/150.0/releasenotes/

it says "fixed" and then points here:

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-30/

which does not mention 271.

Perhaps these fixes will be in the next release? in which case they
maybe shouldn't be publicised.

Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Bug killer Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-04-21 18:50 -0700
  Re: Bug killer Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-04-22 07:04 +0100
    Re: Bug killer Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2026-04-22 15:52 +0100
  Re: Bug killer Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-04-22 08:08 +0100
  Re: Bug killer Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-04-22 13:01 +0100
    Re: Bug killer croy <croy@spam.invalid.net> - 2026-04-22 07:29 -0700
      Re: Bug killer Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-04-22 15:37 +0100
        Re: Bug killer not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-26 07:44 +1000

csiph-web