Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-98se > #10
| From | Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-98se |
| Subject | Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware |
| Date | 2024-02-17 09:31 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnusu9eb.6f9.anthk@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | <XnsB047BC0098A97itstech3000gmailcom@135.181.20.170> <upb3up$11l6e$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2024-01-30, H1M3M <wipnoah@gmail.com> wrote: > Renn Datravern wrote: >> Is it correct to assume that a AMD Athlon/Athlon XP machine is >> period accurate for Windows 98SE. I built a machine for someone that >> uses a Athlon XP 1700+ with Windows 98SE because I didn't have any >> spare hardware. >> >> Would this be considered correctly period accurate? I usually try to >> stick with Pentium II/III or AMD K6-II. >> > > I got an AMD Athlon XP clocked at 1.6 ghz back in 2001, months before > Windows XP released. Everyone was still using Windows 98SE due to the > Fiasco ME was, so i would say it was still accurate for the final part > of the period. > > If I remember correctly... > > - AMX Athlong XP (K7) 1.6ghz > - 256mb DDR1 ram > - Radeon 7500 64MB That was my setup except for Athlon 2000 (1666 mhz) and a Geforce 2 MX instead of a Radeon 7500.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-98se | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Windows 98 on period accurate hardware Renn Datravern <itstech3000@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware "FE Office" <office@retrospace.net> - 2023-10-29 10:26 +0100
Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware H1M3M <wipnoah@gmail.com> - 2024-01-30 16:17 +0100
Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2024-02-17 09:31 +0000
Re: Windows 98 on period accurate hardware Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2024-06-08 18:22 +0000
csiph-web