Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.linux > #557 > unrolled thread

[X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc)

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.os.linux

Contents

  [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) MarioCPPP <NoliMihiFrangereMentulam@libero.it> - 2023-03-21 23:28 +0100
    Re:[X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) "Sanjay A. Nair" <sanair2007@rediffmail.com> - 2023-04-05 22:23 +0530
      Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) "Y. Sputnik" <sputnikmsdos6.22@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 14:51 +0700
        Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-09 09:35 +0000
          Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) MarioCPPP <NoliMihiFrangereMentulam@libero.it> - 2023-05-10 22:48 +0200
        Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) MarioCPPP <NoliMihiFrangereMentulam@libero.it> - 2023-05-10 16:46 +0200
    Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-05-10 21:15 +0200
      Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) MarioCPPP <NoliMihiFrangereMentulam@libero.it> - 2023-05-10 22:49 +0200
    Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-05-17 06:45 +0000
      Re: [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-05-17 10:35 +0000

#557 — [X-POST] [OT] proposal for an NG dedicated to artificial-intelligence (for arts, coding, etc)

Sorry for both the OT and the crosspost, but this kind of 
call-to-arms is necessarily crosspost (imvho).

I have looked for such NG, and the very few that turned out 
to exist, were all DEAD cold.

Would anybody be intrested of trying to create a new broad 
NG about the use of the new load of AI (GPT4, Dall-E, 
MidJourney, You.com and other) in a variety of scenarios ?

I am testing them for coding (and would be willing to also 
test graphic arts creation) and I feel sort of "thunderstruck".

Maybe the old NG's were born in a period of little general 
interest, but nowadays the IA impact seem disrupting.
I'd really like to share experiences.

Also humour would be fun (I asked for some hints in 
OpenSCAD, which is statically resolved, purely functional 
language, and an IA proposed completely crazy code 
java-like, resolved at runtime and dynamic reassignments of 
variable, with nested functions and other invented features 
and non existing operators like "typeof" ... when I uploaded 
some WORKING refactored code, It said thanks, and then 
explained the code back to me, which was amusingly 
surrealistic).

but yes, they are damn smart in reading and explaining code 
!!!!

What do you think about trying to request a new NG ?

What do you thing would be a suitable proper name for it ?

I apologize for the OT and Xpost ... but I have really gone 
insane with these IA !!!!


-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
MarioCPPP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#559

In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
We should request for one.


-- 
S. A. Nair
Random guy on internet, scripter, student.


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#560

On 05/04/2023 23:53, Sanjay A. Nair wrote:

> In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
> We should request for one

Not request, just _create_.

-- 
Y. Sputnik
sputnikmsdos6.22@gmail.com
I'm using Consolas font on my GNU/Linux machine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#561

On Tue, 9 May 2023 14:51:37 +0700, Y. Sputnik wrote:

> On 05/04/2023 23:53, Sanjay A. Nair wrote:
> 
>> In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
>> We should request for one
> 
> Not request, just _create_.

(I went down this road last week...)

comp.ai
is a moderated newsgroup where you can submit findings
and observations; and 
comp.ai.shells
is a group in which you can post your chat logs,
if that's your thing.  I'd argue that ChatGPT, Bard,
and DALL-E are "ai shells", and it's appropriate to compare
them in that group.  Anyway, that's my rational for starting
to use it, and I'm sticking with it.  You could use it, too.

(Or not; it's totally up to you. :)    )

ng's: snecked slightly, since my newsreader has trouble
with massive crossposts.

There are more comp.ai groups, maybe one of those would be more suited
to your liking.  Or there's comp.misc.  I've also seen some AI discussion
in rec.arts.sf.written.  I wouldn't post an un-annotated chat log in some
groups though, I've found that to be frowned upon in some circles.

Finally, I have an article I've been working on for comp.ai.shells
that compares Bard and ChatGPT:GPT4...

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564

On 09/05/23 11:35, vallor wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 14:51:37 +0700, Y. Sputnik wrote:
> 
>> On 05/04/2023 23:53, Sanjay A. Nair wrote:
>>
>>> In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
>>> We should request for one
>>
>> Not request, just _create_.
> 
> (I went down this road last week...)
> 
> comp.ai
> is a moderated newsgroup where you can submit findings
> and observations; and
> comp.ai.shells
> is a group in which you can post your chat logs,
> if that's your thing.  I'd argue that ChatGPT, Bard,
> and DALL-E are "ai shells", and it's appropriate to compare
> them in that group.  Anyway, that's my rational for starting
> to use it, and I'm sticking with it.  You could use it, too.
> 
> (Or not; it's totally up to you. :)    )
> 
> ng's: snecked slightly, since my newsreader has trouble
> with massive crossposts.
> 
> There are more comp.ai groups, maybe one of those would be more suited
> to your liking.  Or there's comp.misc.  I've also seen some AI discussion
> in rec.arts.sf.written.  I wouldn't post an un-annotated chat log in some
> groups though, I've found that to be frowned upon in some circles.
> 
> Finally, I have an article I've been working on for comp.ai.shells
> that compares Bard and ChatGPT:GPT4...
> 


tnx, I've subscribed a few !

-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
MarioCPPP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#562

On 09/05/23 09:51, Y. Sputnik wrote:
> On 05/04/2023 23:53, Sanjay A. Nair wrote:
> 
>> In my opinion, this is a very interesting idea.
>> We should request for one
> 
> Not request, just _create_.
> 

but how ? If you do know, pls just create and invite us ! :D
Ciao

-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
MarioCPPP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563

Am 21.03.2023 um 23:28:48 Uhr schrieb MarioCPPP:

> Sorry for both the OT and the crosspost, but this kind of 
> call-to-arms is necessarily crosspost (imvho).
> 
> I have looked for such NG, and the very few that turned out 
> to exist, were all DEAD cold.

Check the comp.ai.* hierarchy and post to one of the groups. Maybe
there are still readers.

You can also spread the information about the hierarchy, so other
people might start reading.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#565

On 10/05/23 21:15, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 21.03.2023 um 23:28:48 Uhr schrieb MarioCPPP:
> 
>> Sorry for both the OT and the crosspost, but this kind of
>> call-to-arms is necessarily crosspost (imvho).
>>
>> I have looked for such NG, and the very few that turned out
>> to exist, were all DEAD cold.
> 
> Check the comp.ai.* hierarchy and post to one of the groups. Maybe
> there are still readers.
> 
> You can also spread the information about the hierarchy, so other
> people might start reading.
> 

Tnx. I've subscribed now

-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
MarioCPPP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566

On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:28:48 +0100, MarioCPPP wrote:

> Sorry for both the OT and the crosspost, but this kind of call-to-arms
> is necessarily crosspost (imvho).

I can't crosspost to too many newsgroups, as pan is a bit of a weirdo in
that arena.  Hopefully I've reached you.

> 
> I have looked for such NG, and the very few that turned out to exist,
> were all DEAD cold.
> 
> Would anybody be intrested of trying to create a new broad NG about the
> use of the new load of AI (GPT4, Dall-E, MidJourney, You.com and other)
> in a variety of scenarios ?

comp.ai.shells is open for just this sort of traffic, and it would
be "on topic" for the group, if I am not mistaken. :)

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567

On Wed, 17 May 2023 06:45:39 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:28:48 +0100, MarioCPPP wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for both the OT and the crosspost, but this kind of call-to-arms
>> is necessarily crosspost (imvho).
> 
> I can't crosspost to too many newsgroups, as pan is a bit of a weirdo in
> that arena.  Hopefully I've reached you.

Just tell Pan to comply with your orders. I just did.

>> I have looked for such NG, and the very few that turned out to exist,
>> were all DEAD cold.
>> 
>> Would anybody be intrested of trying to create a new broad NG about the
>> use of the new load of AI (GPT4, Dall-E, MidJourney, You.com and other)
>> in a variety of scenarios ?
> 
> comp.ai.shells is open for just this sort of traffic, and it would be
> "on topic" for the group, if I am not mistaken. :)





-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.os.linux

csiph-web