Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.lang.php > #22 > unrolled thread

Re: Simple php chatroom.

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.lang.php

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Simple php chatroom. "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2020-04-03 19:20 +0200
    Re: Simple php chatroom. "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2020-04-15 07:51 +0200
      Re: Simple php chatroom. kristjan12333@yahoo.com - 2020-09-28 03:04 -0700
        Re: Simple php chatroom. "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2020-09-29 09:51 +0200

#22 — Re: Simple php chatroom.

On 03/04/2020 13.55, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks but please cross post instead of making individual posts to 
multiple user groups, but I guess you are quite limited when you use 
google groups instead of a proper user group provider.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#23

On 15/04/2020 07.24, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
> reede, 3. aprill 2020 20:20.36 UTC+3 kirjutas J.O. Aho:
>> On 03/04/2020 13.55, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Thanks but please cross post instead of making individual posts to
>> multiple user groups, but I guess you are quite limited when you use
>> google groups instead of a proper user group provider.
> 
> In my opinion google groups are very good. What makes you think their not good enough ?

For one thing, you don't seem to be able to cross post (post to more 
than one user group at the same time).

-- 

  //Aho

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#35

kolmapäev, 15. aprill 2020 8:51.36 UTC+3 kirjutas J.O. Aho:
> On 15/04/2020 07.24, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
> > reede, 3. aprill 2020 20:20.36 UTC+3 kirjutas J.O. Aho:
> >> On 03/04/2020 13.55, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks but please cross post instead of making individual posts to
> >> multiple user groups, but I guess you are quite limited when you use
> >> google groups instead of a proper user group provider.
> > 
> > In my opinion google groups are very good. What makes you think their not good enough ?
> 
> For one thing, you don't seem to be able to cross post (post to more 
> than one user group at the same time).
> 
> -- 
> 
>   //Aho

Why would I need it ?
Sorry for being a little bit late.


Kristjan Robam
he12457 @ hotmail . c o m
(372) 6861327

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36

On 28/09/2020 12:04, kristjan12333@yahoo.com wrote:
> kolmapäev, 15. aprill 2020 8:51.36 UTC+3 kirjutas J.O. Aho:
>> On 15/04/2020 07.24, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
>>> reede, 3. aprill 2020 20:20.36 UTC+3 kirjutas J.O. Aho:
>>>> On 03/04/2020 13.55, minajaich@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks but please cross post instead of making individual posts to
>>>> multiple user groups, but I guess you are quite limited when you use
>>>> google groups instead of a proper user group provider.
>>>
>>> In my opinion google groups are very good. What makes you think their not good enough ?
>>
>> For one thing, you don't seem to be able to cross post (post to more
>> than one user group at the same time).
>
> 
> Why would I need it ?

You don't want to repeat yourself many times on multiple newsgroups when 
you are asking the same question, and all the answers regardless of 
which newsgroup the replier subscribes to will be visible for everyone 
and you will get less duplicate answers.

This don't mean you should always crosspost and when you do you shall 
only include relevant newsgroups, for example if you have a microsoft 
windows related question, you don't add unix or macos newsgroups to the 
thread.


Also when you use a real client, the client will be so nice and cut of 
footers (they check for a row that contains only '-- ' and removes it 
and all the lines below, in according to how you are supposed to do when 
you reply.

Sadly you just let footers be in your replies, make the reply look bad, 
waste of space, but then I know microsoft users do not care much about 
rules and tradition, so I don't expect to see any changes.

-- 

  //Aho

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.lang.php

csiph-web