Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #82464 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-20 09:15 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-20 19:39 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 510 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:15 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Bill (not Jillians) Royal Order of the DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2017-03-20 12:23 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 16:23 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:28 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:38 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:43 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:35 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-20 12:01 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-20 18:31 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 19:57 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:17 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 22:37 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:54 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 23:13 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:36 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:10 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:09 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 19:21 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 00:54 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:11 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:22 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:28 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:50 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:49 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:29 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 17:25 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:43 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-20 20:02 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:56 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 22:18 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-21 16:55 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 12:17 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 12:04 -0600
Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:14 -0400
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 12:20 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:21 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:07 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 14:11 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:07 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 01:27 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:17 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-21 16:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 16:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:42 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:22 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:51 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 15:58 -0500
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 13:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:02 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 23:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:47 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:15 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 00:30 -0600
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 01:45 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 00:06 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Emmett BADASS Gulley <emmettgulley71@qmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Rick Mathers <halfdick@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 15:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Albätross <mäil.tö.älbätross@gmäil.cöm> - 2017-03-26 18:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Albätross <mäil.tö.älbätross@gmäil.cöm> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 21:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:39 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-24 05:48 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 18:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Anglo Saxon <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 00:51 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 12:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-22 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 16:17 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:59 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 09:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 08:37 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 14:28 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-24 06:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 09:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 13:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 12:43 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:04 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:10 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:25 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:39 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:42 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:44 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not e ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:46 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not e ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:00 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 17:04 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:06 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:00 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:49 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:51 +0100
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 10:42 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:52 +0100
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 12:49 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:46 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 16:27 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 18:30 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 17:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-24 14:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 13:49 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:31 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:05 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 18:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:56 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 18:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 19:28 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:38 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 16:22 +0000
He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 11:42 -0700
Re: He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 14:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 23:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-26 00:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 13:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:09 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-03-26 17:55 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 02:56 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 04:34 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:35 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 14:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:33 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:22 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:48 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:25 -0700
No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 20:44 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:41 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:29 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:41 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:47 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:22 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 06:59 -0500
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:58 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:10 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:27 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:25 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:08 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-27 23:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 07:55 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:11 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:08 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 20:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 21:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 21:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 09:52 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:13 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:13 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 17:16 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:13 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:29 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:08 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:33 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:09 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 18:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 16:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 15:06 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 00:45 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 20:07 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:33 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:17 +0000
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:00 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:05 -0400
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:17 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:33 -0400
Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:02 -0400
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Hippie Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 19:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:49 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:31 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:41 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:22 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:10 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:30 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:32 -0700
NOMINATION Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:46 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 02:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700
Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 12:09 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:20 +0000
Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 13:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 18:09 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:01 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:12 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:26 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:54 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:04 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:57 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 23:02 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:31 -0500
Re:Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:49 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:53 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:18 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:29 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:32 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:34 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:40 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:42 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:44 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:02 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:30 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:55 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-24 08:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 10:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:14 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:52 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:50 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-23 19:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 08:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:08 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:20 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 15:57 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-24 00:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:09 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 18:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:21 -0400
NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:04 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:58 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:17 -0400
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 19:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Bill (not Jillians) Royal Order of the DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2017-03-21 17:26 -0400
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:30 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 15:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-21 16:03 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:11 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 17:14 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:39 -0400
Page 25 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 17:50 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <oon8dch734hsjlv2ktimr49etrm3j9igtq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83050 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > >> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. > >Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went whining to >some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people out, waaah! > >Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay for >it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion taxpayer >dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those other >programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep you alive. > >All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort and >hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are clearly >unable to function in as an adult. > >Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost billions to >build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill innocent people, >whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and guns, do do those >things. When people don't learn to handle fear in an adult manner, and >still have the minds of scared little babies when they reach voting age, >things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone ends up >worse off. Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 19:44 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <0JWdnWdputJI9knFnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #83101 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard > <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: > >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >> >>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. >> >>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went whining >>to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people out, waaah! >> >>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay >>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion >>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those >>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep you >>alive. >> >>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort and >>hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are clearly >>unable to function in as an adult. >> >>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost billions >>to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill innocent people, >>whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and guns, do do those >>things. When people don't learn to handle fear in an adult manner, and >>still have the minds of scared little babies when they reach voting age, >>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone ends >>up worse off. > > > Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. So, do YOU think that things are going well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 17:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.333e0d61a879d6ab98ff27@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #83116 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <0JWdnWdputJI9knFnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says... > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard > > <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > >> > >>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. > >> > >>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went whining > >>to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people out, waaah! > >> > >>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay > >>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion > >>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those > >>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep you > >>alive. > >> > >>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort and > >>hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are clearly > >>unable to function in as an adult. > >> > >>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost billions > >>to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill innocent people, > >>whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and guns, do do those > >>things. When people don't learn to handle fear in an adult manner, and > >>still have the minds of scared little babies when they reach voting age, > >>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone ends > >>up worse off. > > > > > > Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. > > So, do YOU think that things are going well? "Trump won," etc... -- Checkmate Copyright © 2017 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 ****************************************************** "I'm simply going to focus my efforts. I've dropped my trolling endeavors in six groups just to help increase the pressure on you." Message-ID: <3a893ceb.45886754@news.supernews.com> -Baby Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton explains how he plans to "destroy" me... back in 2001. May he rest in peace. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 10:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <IoGdnUql7JL-qEjFnZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #83118 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:51:19 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article > <0JWdnWdputJI9knFnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > pandora@peak.org says... > > > >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >> > <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >> >> >> >>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. >> >> >> >>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went >> >>whining to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people >> >>out, waaah! >> >> >> >>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay >> >>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion >> >>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those >> >>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep >> >>you alive. >> >> >> >>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort >> >>and hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are >> >>clearly unable to function in as an adult. >> >> >> >>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost >> >>billions to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill >> >>innocent people, whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and >> >>guns, do do those things. When people don't learn to handle fear in >> >>an adult manner, and still have the minds of scared little babies >> >>when they reach voting age, >> >>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone >> >>ends up worse off. >> > >> > >> > Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. >> >> So, do YOU think that things are going well? > > "Trump won," etc... That doesn't answer the question I posed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | " %" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 08:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <a704t6.trh.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #83157 |
pandora wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:51:19 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> posts >> by Checkmate! In article >> <0JWdnWdputJI9knFnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >> pandora@peak.org says... >> >> >> >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >>>> <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. >>>>> >>>>> Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went >>>>> whining to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad >>>>> people >>>>> out, waaah! >>>>> >>>>> Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make >>>>> Mexico >>>>> pay for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 >>>>> billion taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, >>>>> and all those other programs you aging old conservative geezers >>>>> depend on to keep you alive. >>>>> >>>>> All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow >>>>> fort >>>>> and hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you >>>>> are clearly unable to function in as an adult. >>>>> >>>>> Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost >>>>> billions to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill >>>>> innocent people, whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls >>>>> and guns, do do those things. When people don't learn to handle >>>>> fear in an adult manner, and still have the minds of scared >>>>> little babies when they reach voting age, >>>>> things like the Trump administration are the result, and >>>>> everyone >>>>> ends up worse off. >>>> >>>> >>>> Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. >>> >>> So, do YOU think that things are going well? >> >> "Trump won," etc... > > That doesn't answer the question I posed. try asking a different way
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 17:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.333f603e42f06b8698ff33@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #83157 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <IoGdnUql7JL-qEjFnZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says... > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:51:19 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article > > <0JWdnWdputJI9knFnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > > pandora@peak.org says... > > > > > > > >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard > >> > <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: > >> > > >> >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. > >> >> > >> >>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went > >> >>whining to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people > >> >>out, waaah! > >> >> > >> >>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay > >> >>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion > >> >>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those > >> >>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep > >> >>you alive. > >> >> > >> >>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort > >> >>and hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are > >> >>clearly unable to function in as an adult. > >> >> > >> >>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost > >> >>billions to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill > >> >>innocent people, whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and > >> >>guns, do do those things. When people don't learn to handle fear in > >> >>an adult manner, and still have the minds of scared little babies > >> >>when they reach voting age, > >> >>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone > >> >>ends up worse off. > >> > > >> > > >> > Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. > >> > >> So, do YOU think that things are going well? > > > > "Trump won," etc... > > That doesn't answer the question I posed. No, but that's the only answer you're likely to get from the person you posed it to. -- Checkmate Copyright © 2017 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 ****************************************************** "I'm simply going to focus my efforts. I've dropped my trolling endeavors in six groups just to help increase the pressure on you." Message-ID: <3a893ceb.45886754@news.supernews.com> -Baby Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton explains how he plans to "destroy" me... back in 2001. May he rest in peace. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <dqk9dc1hlfvk6p98fe5d6fdfm43v1kl21m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83116 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:44:05 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: >On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >> <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>> >>>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. >>> >>>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went whining >>>to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people out, waaah! >>> >>>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay >>>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion >>>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those >>>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep you >>>alive. >>> >>>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort and >>>hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are clearly >>>unable to function in as an adult. >>> >>>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost billions >>>to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill innocent people, >>>whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and guns, do do those >>>things. When people don't learn to handle fear in an adult manner, and >>>still have the minds of scared little babies when they reach voting age, >>>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone ends >>>up worse off. >> >> >> Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. > >So, do YOU think that things are going well? I get paid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 10:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <IoGdnUWl7JLJq0jFnZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #83144 |
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 02:05:54 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:44:05 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote: > >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:08:19 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >>> <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:20:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snopes is about as credible as a toddler who saw the boogieman. >>>> >>>>Says the toddler who saw the bogeyman (note spelling) and went whining >>>>to some billionaire to build a wall to keep the bad people out, waaah! >>>> >>>>Of course you know he's already broken his promise to make Mexico pay >>>>for it, right? He intends to make YOU pay for it, with 24 billion >>>>taxpayer dollars and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, and all those >>>>other programs you aging old conservative geezers depend on to keep >>>>you alive. >>>> >>>>All because you had a small child's impulse to build a pillow fort and >>>>hide in it in terror of a big, wide, complex world that you are >>>>clearly unable to function in as an adult. >>>> >>>>Thing is, little kids' forts don't destroy the economy or cost >>>>billions to build, and little kids' safety blankets don't kill >>>>innocent people, whereas their adult equivalents, Mexican walls and >>>>guns, do do those things. When people don't learn to handle fear in an >>>>adult manner, and still have the minds of scared little babies when >>>>they reach voting age, >>>>things like the Trump administration are the result, and everyone ends >>>>up worse off. >>> >>> >>> Whne you dry those tears, pack yer bags and head out. >> >>So, do YOU think that things are going well? > > > I get paid. Like you did before? So, again I ask, are things going well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 12:20 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <of48dcpfotp2vddm734r3c53nespvc06ne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83040 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:09:32 -0000 (UTC), Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > >> On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>> >>>> yesterday's events in London >>> >>> Were caused by one deranged person. >> >> Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. #NotAllMuslims, >> right? It's always "mental illness" and can't possibly be the religion >> of peace. > >Yet you snowflakes are always whining "not all whites" and saying it was >"mental illness" whenever a white Christian goes on a violent rampage, >like the Planned Parenthood shooting -- even when the rampager yells >things like "no more baby parts!" that clearly indicate a political motive. > >Hypocrisy, thy name is conservatism. > >Oh, by the way: we now have learned that the London attacker was born and >raised in the UK. So you can nix any thought of using the incident to >support anti-immigration rhetoric as well, stupid snowflake. > >>> It's a great "example" for you propagandists to use, though. >> >> There are new ones every single day to choose from, that's the sad part. >> Brain-dead liberal idiots like you will help to make sure that it keeps >> happening and then, when they have the majority and vote in their own >> with the desire to bring in Sharia, you'll wonder why all of your women >> are being covered up and why your 6 year-old uncovered daughter is being >> raped by some 50 year-old as the police stands by and does nothing. It >> couldn't have possibly been your fault. > >Wow what a nice bit of fearmongering coupled with the slippery slope >fallacy! Not that I expect you to know what that means. Delicate little >right-wing snowflake cucks are notoriously bad at logic. It's probably >something to do with their disbelief in higher education. > >>> At least it was a real event, unlike your hero Trump's completely >>> made-up "yesterday in Sweden" story. Is Obama still tapping his >>> phones? >> >> Nunes just confirmed that Trump and his administration had indeed been >> tapped into _yesterday_. > >Trump and many of his top "men", if I may use that term to refer to a >bunch of scared wimps who need an environment of perfect white-bread >homogeneity and conformity to function without wetting themselves in >fright, are currently being investigated by the FBI for an assortment of >federal crimes. Police investigations commonly involve surveillance of the >suspects. Do you seriously argue that that shouldn't be so? > >> As for "yesterday in Sweden," Trump was AGAIN proven correct and the >> police in Sweden was quick to confirm that there are indeed no-go zones >> in the country. > >From: http://www.snopes.com/sweden-bans-christmas-lights/ > >|| As part of their apparent effort to generate anti-immigrant || >|| hysteria, some of these sites also repeated false reports of || >|| “no-go zones” overrun with lawless migrants in Swedish || >|| cities." || > >Snopes sez there are no "no-go zones" in Sweden. Sorry, rightard. Now do >what all good snowflakes do after the vernal equinox: Melt! Bwahahahahaha Snopes is sketchy in itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 15:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob195i$ha0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #83047 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/03/17 02:20 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:09:32 -0000 (UTC), Libtard > <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >> >>> On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>> >>>>> yesterday's events in London >>>> >>>> Were caused by one deranged person. >>> >>> Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. >>> #NotAllMuslims, right? It's always "mental illness" and can't >>> possibly be the religion of peace. >> >> Yet you snowflakes are always whining "not all whites" and saying >> it was "mental illness" whenever a white Christian goes on a >> violent rampage, like the Planned Parenthood shooting -- even >> when the rampager yells things like "no more baby parts!" that >> clearly indicate a political motive. >> >> Hypocrisy, thy name is conservatism. >> >> Oh, by the way: we now have learned that the London attacker was >> born and raised in the UK. So you can nix any thought of using >> the incident to support anti-immigration rhetoric as well, stupid >> snowflake. >> >>>> It's a great "example" for you propagandists to use, >>>> though. >>> >>> There are new ones every single day to choose from, that's the >>> sad part. Brain-dead liberal idiots like you will help to make >>> sure that it keeps happening and then, when they have the >>> majority and vote in their own with the desire to bring in >>> Sharia, you'll wonder why all of your women are being covered >>> up and why your 6 year-old uncovered daughter is being raped by >>> some 50 year-old as the police stands by and does nothing. It >>> couldn't have possibly been your fault. >> >> Wow what a nice bit of fearmongering coupled with the slippery >> slope fallacy! Not that I expect you to know what that means. >> Delicate little right-wing snowflake cucks are notoriously bad at >> logic. It's probably something to do with their disbelief in >> higher education. >> >>>> At least it was a real event, unlike your hero Trump's >>>> completely made-up "yesterday in Sweden" story. Is Obama >>>> still tapping his phones? >>> >>> Nunes just confirmed that Trump and his administration had >>> indeed been tapped into _yesterday_. >> >> Trump and many of his top "men", if I may use that term to refer >> to a bunch of scared wimps who need an environment of perfect >> white-bread homogeneity and conformity to function without >> wetting themselves in fright, are currently being investigated by >> the FBI for an assortment of federal crimes. Police >> investigations commonly involve surveillance of the suspects. Do >> you seriously argue that that shouldn't be so? >> >>> As for "yesterday in Sweden," Trump was AGAIN proven correct >>> and the police in Sweden was quick to confirm that there are >>> indeed no-go zones in the country. >> >> From: http://www.snopes.com/sweden-bans-christmas-lights/ >> >> || As part of their apparent effort to generate anti-immigrant >> || || hysteria, some of these sites also repeated false reports >> of || || “no-go zones” overrun with lawless migrants in Swedish >> || || cities." >> || >> >> Snopes sez there are no "no-go zones" in Sweden. Sorry, rightard. >> Now do what all good snowflakes do after the vernal equinox: >> Melt! Bwahahahahaha > > > Snopes is sketchy in itself. The fact that Facebook - controller of minds and expert in population surveillance - is using it to determine what is "fake news" should be very telling about how objective and credible it is. - -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY1CihAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3CpsQAMKtnCr1ZeJEASJJOBAYpZqX ckpkGWcODfYD68+XW+6gCBhhxXqD8mSHT7D/AUcSOnrGxKcuMtY/WtJExBbuU9PL LV3+bFqlXmN/am9Wp0Y17cWsC9lZVN1KhEoI83XlhXsVvoxQw5AZgDi68gWMSJbc TWFW7C2EPj7HLEZZTYoCD2yAUKnpQfO8xa0eShYTXf0Fd4t46NVENCxKiQ0wgOX5 2X+igL+t+mSMkQwUB60NsU8Yri+DTy+mMRU5+1JrpErCHORaROsGaj74OnoNE7FW gOmun+39kUtdZJ9GppwuB7JrJ6TSpksPaB/iGrdgaAFu+wqdQnPey5VsiEqkTBCh xcqGJK9NBjmPZY5wlW1n8vBcjSFiJdLmT0TTJW5Lz0fJfbL2V6Qg48bHwN8EIrY2 PWUOPMIv4D+mwetO7wRN9Q5vS+R9BSz0/veLw2fXFCkMIO9+CYhoUDryqhgjfVWa CylpszuP5vMk4lLChIgoqBuRa0nQ3IJpibN2CQKwWMYG606XnTeEumDROQJls0zU 5o2IHBfLrL4GCMh0uEIj1/Q9ACJqQqvTymghfAlQdTvA1FTRl2QysJCHbAZPrfPj SWNvFC1MDcON22PjNdb9L0bY65SMHzZYSmf/+tJHMHoj0TxYcZgUG5LV9ukhLxRw 6CusbQtV1/IV1UjQMw48 =Eliv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 17:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ern8dc9u8ob1kc96res5lp81jsfir2df7o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83056 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:57:21 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 23/03/17 02:20 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:09:32 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >> <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> yesterday's events in London >>>>> >>>>> Were caused by one deranged person. >>>> >>>> Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. >>>> #NotAllMuslims, right? It's always "mental illness" and can't >>>> possibly be the religion of peace. >>> >>> Yet you snowflakes are always whining "not all whites" and saying >>> it was "mental illness" whenever a white Christian goes on a >>> violent rampage, like the Planned Parenthood shooting -- even >>> when the rampager yells things like "no more baby parts!" that >>> clearly indicate a political motive. >>> >>> Hypocrisy, thy name is conservatism. >>> >>> Oh, by the way: we now have learned that the London attacker was >>> born and raised in the UK. So you can nix any thought of using >>> the incident to support anti-immigration rhetoric as well, stupid >>> snowflake. >>> >>>>> It's a great "example" for you propagandists to use, >>>>> though. >>>> >>>> There are new ones every single day to choose from, that's the >>>> sad part. Brain-dead liberal idiots like you will help to make >>>> sure that it keeps happening and then, when they have the >>>> majority and vote in their own with the desire to bring in >>>> Sharia, you'll wonder why all of your women are being covered >>>> up and why your 6 year-old uncovered daughter is being raped by >>>> some 50 year-old as the police stands by and does nothing. It >>>> couldn't have possibly been your fault. >>> >>> Wow what a nice bit of fearmongering coupled with the slippery >>> slope fallacy! Not that I expect you to know what that means. >>> Delicate little right-wing snowflake cucks are notoriously bad at >>> logic. It's probably something to do with their disbelief in >>> higher education. >>> >>>>> At least it was a real event, unlike your hero Trump's >>>>> completely made-up "yesterday in Sweden" story. Is Obama >>>>> still tapping his phones? >>>> >>>> Nunes just confirmed that Trump and his administration had >>>> indeed been tapped into _yesterday_. >>> >>> Trump and many of his top "men", if I may use that term to refer >>> to a bunch of scared wimps who need an environment of perfect >>> white-bread homogeneity and conformity to function without >>> wetting themselves in fright, are currently being investigated by >>> the FBI for an assortment of federal crimes. Police >>> investigations commonly involve surveillance of the suspects. Do >>> you seriously argue that that shouldn't be so? >>> >>>> As for "yesterday in Sweden," Trump was AGAIN proven correct >>>> and the police in Sweden was quick to confirm that there are >>>> indeed no-go zones in the country. >>> >>> From: http://www.snopes.com/sweden-bans-christmas-lights/ >>> >>> || As part of their apparent effort to generate anti-immigrant >>> || || hysteria, some of these sites also repeated false reports >>> of || || “no-go zones” overrun with lawless migrants in Swedish >>> || || cities." >>> || >>> >>> Snopes sez there are no "no-go zones" in Sweden. Sorry, rightard. >>> Now do what all good snowflakes do after the vernal equinox: >>> Melt! Bwahahahahaha >> >> >> Snopes is sketchy in itself. > >The fact that Facebook - controller of minds and expert in population >surveillance - is using it to determine what is "fake news" should be >very telling about how objective and credible it is. It's all bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 00:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob1omp$im9$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #83056 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:57:21 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 23/03/17 02:20 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:09:32 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >> <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> yesterday's events in London >>>>> >>>>> Were caused by one deranged person. >>>> >>>> Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. #NotAllMuslims, >>>> right? It's always "mental illness" and can't possibly be the >>>> religion of peace. >>> >>> Yet you snowflakes are always whining "not all whites" and saying it >>> was "mental illness" whenever a white Christian goes on a violent >>> rampage, like the Planned Parenthood shooting -- even when the >>> rampager yells things like "no more baby parts!" that clearly indicate >>> a political motive. >>> >>> Hypocrisy, thy name is conservatism. >>> >>> Oh, by the way: we now have learned that the London attacker was born >>> and raised in the UK. So you can nix any thought of using the incident >>> to support anti-immigration rhetoric as well, stupid snowflake. >>> >>>>> It's a great "example" for you propagandists to use, though. >>>> >>>> There are new ones every single day to choose from, that's the sad >>>> part. Brain-dead liberal idiots like you will help to make sure that >>>> it keeps happening and then, when they have the majority and vote in >>>> their own with the desire to bring in Sharia, you'll wonder why all >>>> of your women are being covered up and why your 6 year-old uncovered >>>> daughter is being raped by some 50 year-old as the police stands by >>>> and does nothing. It couldn't have possibly been your fault. >>> >>> Wow what a nice bit of fearmongering coupled with the slippery slope >>> fallacy! Not that I expect you to know what that means. Delicate >>> little right-wing snowflake cucks are notoriously bad at logic. It's >>> probably something to do with their disbelief in higher education. >>> >>>>> At least it was a real event, unlike your hero Trump's completely >>>>> made-up "yesterday in Sweden" story. Is Obama still tapping his >>>>> phones? >>>> >>>> Nunes just confirmed that Trump and his administration had indeed >>>> been tapped into _yesterday_. >>> >>> Trump and many of his top "men", if I may use that term to refer to a >>> bunch of scared wimps who need an environment of perfect white-bread >>> homogeneity and conformity to function without wetting themselves in >>> fright, are currently being investigated by the FBI for an assortment >>> of federal crimes. Police investigations commonly involve surveillance >>> of the suspects. Do you seriously argue that that shouldn't be so? >>> >>>> As for "yesterday in Sweden," Trump was AGAIN proven correct and the >>>> police in Sweden was quick to confirm that there are indeed no-go >>>> zones in the country. >>> >>> From: http://www.snopes.com/sweden-bans-christmas-lights/ >>> >>> || As part of their apparent effort to generate anti-immigrant || || >>> hysteria, some of these sites also repeated false reports of || || >>> “no-go zones” overrun with lawless migrants in Swedish || || cities." >>> || >>> >>> Snopes sez there are no "no-go zones" in Sweden. Sorry, rightard. Now >>> do what all good snowflakes do after the vernal equinox: >>> Melt! Bwahahahahaha >> >> Snopes is sketchy in itself. > > The fact that Facebook - controller of minds and expert in population > surveillance - is using it to determine what is "fake news" should be > very telling about how objective and credible it is. <ALERT> Kook Konspiracy Theory Detected <ALERT> Captain, we have a Kook Konspiracy Theory in Sector 5! -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 17:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.333e09ff2d11aa7c98ff23@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #83110 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ob1omp$im9$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > The fact that Facebook - controller of minds and expert in population > > surveillance - is using it to determine what is "fake news" should be > > very telling about how objective and credible it is. > > <ALERT> Kook Konspiracy Theory Detected <ALERT> > > Captain, we have a Kook Konspiracy Theory in Sector 5! > You mean Facebook "doesn't" engage in population surveillance? Next, you'll be saying Google doesn't do that either... and neither one of them provide domestic intelligence to The Government. I've long suspected there's an awful lot of quid pro quo going on between the Feds and those two companies, that seem to have gotten extremely rich doing what they do. -- Checkmate Copyright © 2017 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 ****************************************************** "I'm simply going to focus my efforts. I've dropped my trolling endeavors in six groups just to help increase the pressure on you." Message-ID: <3a893ceb.45886754@news.supernews.com> -Baby Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton explains how he plans to "destroy" me... back in 2001. May he rest in peace. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-22 16:09 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <6gt5dcle21l6riv75itb49fp5cboj1itdo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #82841 |
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:15:41 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: >On 22/03/17 03:17 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:40:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: >> >> >>> Well, I guess now we know why young adults who go to university in the >>> United States become so damned brain-dead in addition to amassing an >>> enormous debt and developing no useful job skills. They're not learning >>> anything, destroying whatever ability that they had to reason and >>> turning into the most vile protesters the world has ever seen. The >>> Communists are destroying the United States from within... >> >> Nikita Khrushchev was prophetic... >> >> "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you." > >And that's exactly what is going to happen, especially since today's >youth has already been indoctrinated, will facilitate the takeover >against the "racists" and then, when they're forced to wear a burka >and/or are starving in food lines, will wonder how everything went to Hell. BINGO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-22 18:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.333cc99b2aa9a4898ff15@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #82841 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <oaupce$pfo$2@dont-email.me>, sl@im.er says... > > On 22/03/17 03:17 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:40:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> wrote: > > > > > >> Well, I guess now we know why young adults who go to university in the > >> United States become so damned brain-dead in addition to amassing an > >> enormous debt and developing no useful job skills. They're not learning > >> anything, destroying whatever ability that they had to reason and > >> turning into the most vile protesters the world has ever seen. The > >> Communists are destroying the United States from within... > > > > Nikita Khrushchev was prophetic... > > > > "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you." > > And that's exactly what is going to happen, especially since today's > youth has already been indoctrinated, will facilitate the takeover > against the "racists" and then, when they're forced to wear a burka > and/or are starving in food lines, will wonder how everything went to Hell. I've seen some wimmin that would actually look better in a burka... jest sayin'... -- Checkmate Copyright © 2017 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 ****************************************************** "I'm simply going to focus my efforts. I've dropped my trolling endeavors in six groups just to help increase the pressure on you." Message-ID: <3a893ceb.45886754@news.supernews.com> -Baby Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton explains how he plans to "destroy" me... back in 2001. May he rest in peace. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 08:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob0gm2$k0n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #82850 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 22/03/17 09:49 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > posts by Checkmate! In article <oaupce$pfo$2@dont-email.me>, > sl@im.er says... > > >> >> On 22/03/17 03:17 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:40:18 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel >>> <sl@im.er> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Well, I guess now we know why young adults who go to >>>> university in the United States become so damned brain-dead >>>> in addition to amassing an enormous debt and developing no >>>> useful job skills. They're not learning anything, destroying >>>> whatever ability that they had to reason and turning into the >>>> most vile protesters the world has ever seen. The Communists >>>> are destroying the United States from within... >>> >>> Nikita Khrushchev was prophetic... >>> >>> "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will >>> bury you." >> >> And that's exactly what is going to happen, especially since >> today's youth has already been indoctrinated, will facilitate the >> takeover against the "racists" and then, when they're forced to >> wear a burka and/or are starving in food lines, will wonder how >> everything went to Hell. > > I've seen some wimmin that would actually look better in a burka... > jest sayin'... Anyone over 160lbs might as well do it; they'd be doing the world a favour. :) - -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY08axAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3W+EP/2YWuYdsObkxm0WbC91MXujv QiToMdQcLRwmiwkoFOisiagWqJR0Fbj2edIZBtg76dobE4YwVDH4CdktCOIX+R8E S4VMQ5own2IBPuobQubBWLMHSs7usSWKF8tiF5if3ZS/jpvlKxOsVGRpQCkvN4d6 rS8N+w5lASdu+QFfu/l7IZlPwi9nN6+SpoOr+PRjKF/GQvWSnu5jo3vX381b1gOI CnKRWtBiBqqBT4K1YhPahnIyBRfdRxldSfo1zEZyxk2OQzyV7wZUzhz2FuiNu0Fr pvb2RnVTFzXZ1J41WPBj6aWsWE2EXQbOikGHGUcGD7wdxWfR2mT6VFLBk1IBuHmg hFSt0WhWintXGhGzWEZugC8gy76VkQ7n98kCKqiC4lO/MhHZKYA8b3B7SLWFz32g GClemUrZJvJAK8FxiZOfaiOJItC5o/0DUIdjOo/MNv5egsiHFvDfTapmJ+IABmwB FCUJoIcj7+FLpESHc4mH857mTMkbKei5cyG9lcRT/0pBVYqrYMmvlwVUckmQfTRz MNXLSB34boatx9g1fbHmL0mNwsKOAv8BOLhSttqKdNH6uaSjO0rBVPnBw51+/d5r EiDfMtpgBnUkymn91mTiFOzBwo/pZuJB5wNU860X+3kjC4PxsIcGKZOn1jZyeulI 1OqPGIWoPAiwWLFQyTjs =9yMf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 12:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob0usf$1adn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #83026 |
On 3/23/2017 8:59 AM, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > >> I've seen some wimmin that would actually look better in a burka... >> jest sayin'... > > Anyone over 160lbs might as well do it; they'd be doing the world a > favour. :) Surprise, surprise! Slimeball's a sexist pig as well as a racist right-wing troglodyte. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 14:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <rf48dc94f1a574ga0ielhtn8qjrl36mk7l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83032 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:58:53 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On 3/23/2017 8:59 AM, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >>> I've seen some wimmin that would actually look better in a burka... >>> jest sayin'... >> >> Anyone over 160lbs might as well do it; they'd be doing the world a >> favour. :) > >Surprise, surprise! Slimeball's a sexist pig as well as a racist >right-wing troglodyte. Is and ad hom all you have, professor? No wonder you have not made a name for yourself in your chosen field. -- "Being both astute and erudite, I say a man not mince words in order to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned and the ignorant." --Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-21 01:04 +0000 |
| Subject | NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish |
| Message-ID | <oapu7p$252$23@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #82500 |
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:17:27 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > Kaczynski was a loon, sufficiently so as to have one of the AUK Awards named after him. Here, let me nitpick just one bit of wrongness from the massive pile of wrongness that he wrote, and that you posted. > <SNIP!> > "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," > "dude" or "fellow." Nope. Men refer to one another with the latter three terms, but I don't think it's ever been commonplace for women to use the former two among themselves; it was men who did so. So there's no symmetry there. (Some women later may have reclaimed the word "chick", though.) > <giant SNIP!> > 19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of > inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a > self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not > wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power > and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the > capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce > his unpleasant behavior. This one point might be considered *somewhat* accurate, though. Donald Drumpf is definitely not a leftist. <snicker> > 2<MUSHROOM CLOUD!> 334 lines of anti-leftist screed. Between that and the source you chose to extensively cite, I can't think of a more appropriate nomination than this: ---------- Unabomber Surprise This award is intended to honor those who have the gift for saying the least with the most. Those who, for some reason only they may fathom, more than all others crave the art of saying infinite amounts of Nothing... and are PROUD OF IT. ---------- Congratulations, kook, you're now Fakey's competition for March's Unabomber Surprise. <snicker> -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-20 18:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish |
| Message-ID | <MPG.333a28aeaa8f955298fede@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #82513 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <oapu7p$252$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," > > "dude" or "fellow." > > Nope. Men refer to one another with the latter three terms, but I don't > think it's ever been commonplace for women to use the former two among > themselves; it was men who did so. So there's no symmetry there. (Some > women later may have reclaimed the word "chick", though.) > Some chicks call each other "dude" now. -- Checkmate Copyright © 2017 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 ****************************************************** "I'm simply going to focus my efforts. I've dropped my trolling endeavors in six groups just to help increase the pressure on you." Message-ID: <3a893ceb.45886754@news.supernews.com> -Baby Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton explains how he plans to "destroy" me... back in 2001. May he rest in peace. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 25 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web