Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #3438336 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Calvinism is false.

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why Calvinism is false. Robert <robert@no.way> - 2025-03-22 23:39 -0700
    Re: Why Calvinism is false. jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-23 15:01 +0000
      Re: Why Calvinism is false. Robert <robert@no.way> - 2025-03-23 13:26 -0700
        Re: Why Calvinism is false. jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:30 +0000
          Re: Why Calvinism is false. Robert <robert@no.way> - 2025-03-26 19:17 -0700
            Re: Why Calvinism is false. .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 07:11 -0500
              Re: Why Calvinism is false. Robert <robert@no.way> - 2025-03-27 22:48 -0700
                Re: Why Calvinism is false. .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 01:26 -0500
            Re: Why Calvinism is false. jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-28 09:30 +0000
      Re: Why Calvinism is false. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 16:19 -0500
        Re: Why Calvinism is false. jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:31 +0000
          Re: Why Calvinism is false. Rudy Canoza <rc@j.kone.invalid> - 2025-03-24 10:13 -0400
            Re: Why Calvinism is false. jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 15:11 +0000
    Re: Why Calvinism is false. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 16:21 -0500
      Re: Why Calvinism is false. Robert <robert@no.way> - 2025-03-26 19:26 -0700
        Re: Why Calvinism is false. .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 07:09 -0500

#3438336 — Re: Why Calvinism is false.

On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):

> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
> > This was enlightening.
> >
> > Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>
> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
> without Christian Baptism?"
>
> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
> Calvinists.
>
> Dawn

The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.

-- 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438375

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> 
>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>> This was enlightening.
>>>
>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>
>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>
>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>> Calvinists.
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
> 

can baptism be done using virtual water?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438429

On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
(Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):

> Robert wrote:
> > On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> > (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> >
> > > On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
> > > > This was enlightening.
> > > >
> > > > Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
> > >
> > > Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
> > > without Christian Baptism?"
> > >
> > > If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
> > > Calvinists.
> > >
> > > Dawn
> >
> > The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>
> can baptism be done using virtual water?

For whom, and what purpose?

-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438539

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> 
>> Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>
>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>
>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>
>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>>
>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
> 
> For whom, and what purpose?
> 

oh, just asking for a friend.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438924

On Mar 24, 2025, jojo wrote
(Message-ID:<d44a8ad4-b66d-9084-514f-e44329ed1d2a@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):

> Robert wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
> > (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> >
> > > Robert wrote:
> > > > On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> > > > (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> > > >
> > > > > On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
> > > > > > This was enlightening.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
> > > > >
> > > > > Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
> > > > > without Christian Baptism?"
> > > > >
> > > > > If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
> > > > > Calvinists.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dawn
> > > >
> > > > The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
> > >
> > > can baptism be done using virtual water?
> >
> > For whom, and what purpose?
>
> oh, just asking for a friend.

Well, it has no value for spiritual reasons, and the parents usually bath 
their children anyhow. A baby cannot make a decision for itself, it lacks the 
capabilty.

-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438966

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<d44a8ad4-b66d-9084-514f-e44329ed1d2a@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> 
>> Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
>>> (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>
>>>> Robert wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>>>>
>>>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>>
>>> For whom, and what purpose?
>>
>> oh, just asking for a friend.
> 
> Well, it has no value for spiritual reasons and the parents usually bathe
> their children anyhow. A baby cannot make a decision for itself it lacks the
> capability to stick a needle up its dick and call it a catheter.
> 
Babies make decisions all the time.  Crawl here crawl there eat this cry 
now wtf are you talking about?
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3439102

On Mar 27, 2025, v]andrak|≡... wrote
(Message-ID: <m4ktjeFbildU7@mid.individual.net>):

> Robert wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2025, jojo wrote
> > (Message-ID:<d44a8ad4-b66d-9084-514f-e44329ed1d2a@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> >
> > > Robert wrote:
> > > > On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
> > > > (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> > > >
> > > > > Robert wrote:
> > > > > > On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> > > > > > (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
> > > > > > > > This was enlightening.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
> > > > > > > without Christian Baptism?"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
> > > > > > > Calvinists.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dawn
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of
> > > > > > not.
> > > > >
> > > > > can baptism be done using virtual water?
> > > >
> > > > For whom, and what purpose?
> > >
> > > oh, just asking for a friend.
> >
> > Well, it has no value for spiritual reasons and the parents usually bathe
> > their children anyhow. A baby cannot make a decision for itself'

> it lacks the capability to stick a needle up its dick and call it a catheter.
> Babies make decisions all the time. Crawl here crawl there eat this cry
> now wtf are you talking about?

Why can’t you speak rationally.

-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3439104

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2025, v]andrak|≡... wrote
> (Message-ID: <m4ktjeFbildU7@mid.individual.net>):
> 
>> Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2025, jojo wrote
>>> (Message-ID:<d44a8ad4-b66d-9084-514f-e44329ed1d2a@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>
>>>> Robert wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>>>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>>>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of
>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>>>>
>>>>> For whom, and what purpose?
>>>>
>>>> oh, just asking for a friend.
>>>
>>> Well, it has no value for spiritual reasons and the parents usually bathe
>>> their children anyhow. A baby cannot make a decision for itself'
> 
>> it lacks the capability to stick a needle up its dick and call it a catheter.
>> Babies make decisions all the time. Crawl here crawl there eat this cry
>> now wtf are you talking about?
> 
> Why can’t you speak rationally.
> 
This baby has made the decision to killfile you.
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3439117

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<d44a8ad4-b66d-9084-514f-e44329ed1d2a@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> 
>> Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 23, 2025, jojo wrote
>>> (Message-ID:<458151f5-0785-6fc7-ec4b-922d59059606@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>
>>>> Robert wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>>>>
>>>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>>
>>> For whom, and what purpose?
>>
>> oh, just asking for a friend.
> 
> Well, it has no value for spiritual reasons, and the parents usually bath
> their children anyhow. A baby cannot make a decision for itself, it lacks the
> capabilty.
> 

i think you doing the virtual baptism would be better.

its the same thing, electrons in water are the same as electrons 
online.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438446

On 3/23/2025 10:01 AM, jojo wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>
>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>
>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>
>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>> Calvinists.
>>>
>>> Dawn
>>
>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>>
> 
> can baptism be done using virtual water?
> 

You're getting funnier!  Keep at it!!

Dawn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438540

Dawn Flood wrote:
> On 3/23/2025 10:01 AM, jojo wrote:
>> Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>
>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>
>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of 
>>>> infants who die
>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>
>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop 
>>>> criticizing
>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been 
>>> baptized of not.
>>>
>>
>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>
> 
> You're getting funnier!  Keep at it!!
> 
> Dawn

thanks, i dont like getting serious, but sometimes in some 
places, people make me serious, and then they feel my wrath.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438543

jojo wrote:
> Dawn Flood wrote:
>> On 3/23/2025 10:01 AM, jojo wrote:
>>> Robert wrote:
>>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawn
>>>>
>>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of 
>>>> not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>>
>>
>> You're getting funnier!  Keep at it!!
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> thanks, i dont like getting serious, but sometimes in some places, 
> people make me serious, and then they feel my wrath.
> 
 >
Did Dawn Run my pal Ted off because of his
proclivity for black ass sucking?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438547

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>> On 3/23/2025 10:01 AM, jojo wrote:
>>>> Robert wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of 
>>>>>> infants who die
>>>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop 
>>>>>> criticizing
>>>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been 
>>>>> baptized of not.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> can baptism be done using virtual water?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're getting funnier!  Keep at it!!
>>>
>>> Dawn
>>
>> thanks, i dont like getting serious, but sometimes in some 
>> places, people make me serious, and then they feel my wrath.
>>
>  >
> Did Dawn Run my pal Ted off because of his
> proclivity for black ass sucking?

i dont think so, ted might just be taking a break from his 
hobbies lol

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438448

On 3/23/2025 1:39 AM, Robert wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> 
>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>> This was enlightening.
>>>
>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>
>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>
>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>> Calvinists.
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
> 

Glad that you said that now and not 500 years ago!  Be thankful, Robert, 
that we do not live in a theocratic Christian society!!

Dawn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438928

On Mar 23, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <vrpu03$381ue$6@dont-email.me>):

> On 3/23/2025 1:39 AM, Robert wrote:
> > On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> > (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
> >
> > > On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
> > > > This was enlightening.
> > > >
> > > > Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
> > >
> > > Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
> > > without Christian Baptism?"
> > >
> > > If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
> > > Calvinists.
> > >
> > > Dawn
> >
> > The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>
> Glad that you said that now and not 500 years ago! Be thankful, Robert,
> that we do not live in a theocratic Christian society!!
>
> Dawn

It has has alway been that way, since the time of Jesus. Only certain 
religious groups came up with that idea, and it is not scriptural, like 
purgatory, and its predecessor buying indulgences. The Rich were conned with 
indulgences, which left the poor with no way out if they did not follow God, 
so they came up with purgatory as their way to heaven. Only the rich could 
buy a get out of hell free card.

-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#3438965

Robert wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> (Message-ID: <vrpu03$381ue$6@dont-email.me>):
> 
>> On 3/23/2025 1:39 AM, Robert wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>> (Message-ID: <vrfqcq$22lln$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>
>>>> On 3/19/25 5:56 AM, In the Name of Jesus wrote:
>>>>> This was enlightening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Calvinists discount that we are primarily...
>>>>
>>>> Ask them what I have asked you -- "What is the fate of infants who die
>>>> without Christian Baptism?"
>>>>
>>>> If you can't or won't answer this question, then stop criticizing
>>>> Calvinists.
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> The fate of an infant is the same whether they have been baptized of not.
>>
>> Glad that you said that now and not 500 years ago! Be thankful, Robert,
>> that we do not live in a theocratic Christian society!!
>>
>> Dawn
> 
> It has has alway been that way, since the time of Jesus. Only certain
> religious groups came up with that idea, and it is not scriptural, like
> purgatory, and its predecessor buying indulgences. The Rich were conned with
> indulgences, which left the poor with no way out if they did not follow God,
> so they came up with purgatory as their way to heaven. Only the rich could
> buy a get out of hell free card.
> 
You're living in fantasy Danzig land.  No one comes back from Hell.
-- 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkoFImDpx_M

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web