Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup > #6141
| From | BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup |
| Subject | Re: In other news |
| Date | 2023-07-14 14:08 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <u8rdr1$sro$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <XnsB03853E599FEBKamilot@135.181.20.170> <u8a1rk$1etv2$2@dont-email.me> <XnsB03B70311C61AKamilot@135.181.20.170> <u8hi9m$2jid9$2@dont-email.me> <XnsB03F4B14CE67FKamilot@135.181.20.170> |
On 12.07.2023 13.22, Merlyne wrote: > BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in > news:u8hi9m$2jid9$2@dont-email.me: > >> On 08.07.2023 17.01, Merlyne wrote: >>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in >>> news:u8a1rk$1etv2$2@dont-email.me: >>> >>>> On 05.07.2023 14.14, Merlyne wrote: >>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>> news:u813bf$3m74$1@dont-email.me: >>>>> >>>>>> On 02.07.2023 16.29, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>> news:u7mb17$2h0fa$2@dont-email.me: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 28.06.2023 13.31, Merlyne wrote: >>>>>>>>> I got a new phone and a better plan. >>>>>>>>> Why are cell plans so much more expensive in my country vs the >>>>>>>>> US? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CAPITALISM! It's always capitalism. We've been over this. >>>>>>> Sure. Are you sure that it's not related to population base? >>>>>> If you pay the same country-wide and you the same coverage in >>>>>> sparsely populated areas (I know you have some of those), then >>>>>> maybe. But most likely capitalism. >>>>>> >>>>> Ugh! >>>>>>>>> I got a new S21 and 20GB of data for $47/month taxes in. >>>>>>>> I pay a base fee of ~$4/month (deducted from consumption) with >>>>>>>> slightly higher per-minute charge and no free data. But then I >>>>>>>> only use data in emergency (which haven't happened yet) and make >>>>>>>> maybe two calls and two texts/month. >>>>>>> I used to have a prepaid cell for like $10 a month back in 2003 >>>>>>> when it was my emergency phone. >>>>>>> Once I started using it all the time, it was more cost-efficient >>>>>>> to have a plan with unlimited talk and text. I would say that I >>>>>>> am most frequently contacted by text than by other modes i.e. >>>>>>> voice call or email. >>>>>>>> On the other hand I still pay for a landline (IP) even though it >>>>>>>> hasn't made a sound (or call) in several years. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also have a landline. My Dad calls it and a few places where I >>>>>>> keep forgetting to change my contact info to my cell. I think the >>>>>>> landline isn't VOIP it's whatever came before that but after >>>>>>> rotary dial phones. >>>>>> >>>>>> Analog... (rotary dials relied on counting the impulses - one for >>>>>> each digit passed on return; pushbutton 'dialing' relied on the >>>>>> frequency of the tone correspondig to each digit/button) >>>>>> >>>>>>> They will probably phase it out eventually. >>>>>> Like they did with teevee signals, thus making everyone get new >>>>>> teevees... >>>>> >>>>> I thought I got a new tv because the old one stopped working. >>>> That may be, but lots of people got new tvs because their old one >>>> couldn't receive/decode the digital signal. >>>> >>> >>> The cable company gave out digital conversion boxes to people. >> Can you still get one of those. To use on an old teevee that you buy >> at an antique shop? >> > I doubt anything would work on a tv that old. In theory it would. It would require a digital to analog conversion and probably a granularity reduction from HD to PAL or [whatever the American format is called]. An old cable converter might just work if one could bypass the subscription bit. > >> People without a cable subscription didn't get any, I'll bet. >> > Probably not. No one is that nice. Especially not cable companies. -- BeH " We are trapped by language to such a degree that every attempt to formulate insight is a play on words." - Niels Bohr
Back to alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-06-28 11:31 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 12:33 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-02 14:29 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 14:29 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-05 12:14 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 23:59 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-08 15:01 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:22 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-12 11:22 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 14:08 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-18 11:24 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-20 16:19 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-22 15:21 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 13:34 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-07-27 13:32 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:39 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-01 11:32 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 11:41 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-09 12:19 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 00:26 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-13 21:28 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 15:01 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-18 12:51 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:20 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-24 14:55 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 16:52 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-08-30 12:42 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 09:07 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-09-06 12:22 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 21:17 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-09-09 20:51 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 15:55 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-09-17 17:50 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 17:17 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-09-23 21:14 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 21:31 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-09-26 12:11 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 00:25 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-10-04 14:13 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-10-12 16:47 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-10-18 11:55 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-10-21 23:27 +0200
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-10-25 14:26 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-11-06 21:45 +0100
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-11-08 13:11 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-11-20 00:59 +0100
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-11-22 13:33 +0000
Re: In other news BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-11-26 04:30 +0100
Re: In other news Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-11-29 14:47 +0000
csiph-web