Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richmond Newsgroups: uk.telecom Subject: Re: Virgin Media are appalling Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:48:43 +0100 Organization: Frantic Lines: 21 Message-ID: <86efrkm4is.fsf@example.com> References: <86bmmqty44.fsf@example.com> <863781u4ye.fsf_-_@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: PvntusSwr4q7vyFfAigJOw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zdOon0TJbIW1L8OumVvx7+AMLQ0= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com uk.telecom:26609 pete@never.here writes: > Sorry to hear about you bad experiences with VM. Mine has been the > opposite. I've been with them, though their various guises since they > were United Artists in the Croydon (S London) area back in the 90s. > With them from dial up through to 200+ Mb/s BB. > > Largely consistent service over the years. I've had problems, who > hasn't, whichever supplier you are with, but mainly minor ones, easily > sorted and nothing that has tempted me to move away from them. Like > both Tweed and Woody in the thread above I've been happy with the > service since 2000 & before. But you are on the internet. What are people who are not on the internet supposed to do? I said some foul words, sorry about that. But that's what it does to you when you have to put up with stuff like this. -- ~