Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richmond Newsgroups: uk.telecom Subject: Re: Have BT been making unannounced changes? Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:51:58 +0100 Organization: Frantic Message-ID: <82a4s4phs1.fsf@example.com> References: <112arbi$3gli$1@dont-email.me> <112bn8j$d7sq$1@dont-email.me> <112diuj$11odt$3@dont-email.me> <112dlnk$10qmj$1@dont-email.me> <2iqm4ll5leenn3incffpg120febnmb986f@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="94633"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQbwZMsD4mKlqYFqiwj24keuRZc= sha1:j9xqfmNg/CV5srPAjtgTg8IbuaM= X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXxEJl5xSR/09YEqDxHmfQY2JSVCuJrjxv3Xz9TUGGxXIVotJmYNrYTfsBMaYRgQ== Xref: csiph.com uk.telecom:39641 Trolleybus writes: > On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:33:21 +0100, Andy Burns > wrote: > >>David Wade wrote: >> >>> The ZEN product is provisioned via the SIP support in the Fritz!Box >>> router, so if its "BT Digital Voice" being resold does that mean BT >>> is using standard protocols? >>Maybe Zen have at various times >>> resold DV, and other times their own >>VoIP, I do remember customers >>> talking about it being DV >> >>I imagine everyone uses standard protocols, why wouldn't they? > > I attended meetings at BT in about 2000. At one time BT had submitted > 1000 change requests to SIP and related protocols as they planned for > what is now DV. They use their own protocols to hide what they are doing and lock you into their hardware. Let's call it the Amazon model.