Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 20:09:41 +0100 Lines: 72 Message-ID: References: <1075j7c$rso5$1@dont-email.me> <1075o0u$rso5$2@dont-email.me> <1075t30$vdme$2@dont-email.me> <1077s68$1d40a$1@dont-email.me> <1078a8g$1d433$1@dont-email.me> <1078iku$1he2o$2@dont-email.me> <107aske$22qav$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net iiOYvB+57F3y8YiXXvtfKA5Cmytf6FWXJXs+mzkAi+UPJGgb/n Cancel-Lock: sha1:URMOrbKwi6YfaOil/9zPR52Cknk= sha256:iulKk/4uwmWqmKLA1gfQwvKCT7LNT3qUb3nq3q/aF6U= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <107aske$22qav$2@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181672 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136516 On 10/08/2025 20:41, Alan wrote: > On 2025-08-10 01:46, David B. wrote: >> On 09/08/2025 23:38, Alan wrote: >>> On 2025-08-09 14:49, David B. wrote: >>>> On 09/08/2025 21:15, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2025-08-09 10:58, David B. wrote: >>>>>> On 09/08/2025 17:15, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-08-09 01:50, David B. wrote: >>>>>>>> On 08/08/2025 23:18, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> [....] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here's what Mr Daniel showed about himself:- https:// >>>>>>>>>>>> i.ibb.co/ bRRy3cwQ/ Screenshot-2022-04-19-at-17-13-29.png >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be >>>>>>>>>>>> identified. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That’s a colourful turn of phrase, but it does rather >>>>>>>>>> underline my point: >>>>>>>>>> when faced with a fair and reasonable technical question, you >>>>>>>>>> choose to respond with personal abuse instead of facts. >>>>>>>>> I wasn't given a "fair and reasonable" question, because you >>>>>>>>> aren't a fair and reasonable person. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're an asshole who I wouldn't bother to put out if he was on >>>>>>>>> fire... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your personal opinion of me is noted, but irrelevant to the >>>>>>>> point at hand. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is as relevant as your attacks on someone else. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan, >>>>>> >>>>>> The distinction is that I’m questioning software and its developer in >>>>>> the context of user security — not making remarks about someone’s >>>>>> personal worth. >>>>> Bully for you. >>>>> >>>>> You're a lying piece of shit, so what you say you are doing doesn't >>>>> matter at all. >>>> >>>> Just whose sock-puppet are you, dear boy? >>>> >>> >>> No one's, you lying sack of shit. >> >> I don't lie about anything, laddie! :-P > > You're lying about that. > >>> And don't you just hate that. >> >> I'd very much like to know which post(s) you, personally, made in THIS >> thread! > > > https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/is-etrecheck-safe-to-use-and-is- >> this-safe-place-to-download.2034144/page-2 >> >> Do tell! > > Sure. I've never seen that thread or to my best recollection ever posted > anything on those forums. Do you know ANYTHING about Apple software?!!! Or hardware?!!!