Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:46:09 +0100 Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: <1075j7c$rso5$1@dont-email.me> <1075o0u$rso5$2@dont-email.me> <1075t30$vdme$2@dont-email.me> <1077s68$1d40a$1@dont-email.me> <1078a8g$1d433$1@dont-email.me> <1078iku$1he2o$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net HTOAcxxv99f/in0ybcFv1QCRx2GjKwpvmv8YQ5tXXzwYHtSIiC Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z9jVatZxKi7ahrP06Cps6Peve8c= sha256:wP4MHvJMmSW6dXQUhoCjUvwfSC8ZjLlzr2yJFmK3quk= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <1078iku$1he2o$2@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181625 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136408 On 09/08/2025 23:38, Alan wrote: > On 2025-08-09 14:49, David B. wrote: >> On 09/08/2025 21:15, Alan wrote: >>> On 2025-08-09 10:58, David B. wrote: >>>> On 09/08/2025 17:15, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2025-08-09 01:50, David B. wrote: >>>>>> On 08/08/2025 23:18, Alan wrote: >>>>>> [....] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here's what Mr Daniel showed about himself:- https://i.ibb.co/ >>>>>>>>>> bRRy3cwQ/ Screenshot-2022-04-19-at-17-13-29.png >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be >>>>>>>>>> identified. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That’s a colourful turn of phrase, but it does rather underline >>>>>>>> my point: >>>>>>>> when faced with a fair and reasonable technical question, you >>>>>>>> choose to respond with personal abuse instead of facts. >>>>>>> I wasn't given a "fair and reasonable" question, because you >>>>>>> aren't a fair and reasonable person. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're an asshole who I wouldn't bother to put out if he was on >>>>>>> fire... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Your personal opinion of me is noted, but irrelevant to the point >>>>>> at hand. >>>>> >>>>> It is as relevant as your attacks on someone else. >>>> >>>> Alan, >>>> >>>> The distinction is that I’m questioning software and its developer in >>>> the context of user security — not making remarks about someone’s >>>> personal worth. >>> Bully for you. >>> >>> You're a lying piece of shit, so what you say you are doing doesn't >>> matter at all. >> >> Just whose sock-puppet are you, dear boy? >> > > No one's, you lying sack of shit. I don't lie about anything, laddie! :-P > And don't you just hate that. I'd very much like to know which post(s) you, personally, made in THIS thread! https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/is-etrecheck-safe-to-use-and-is-this-safe-place-to-download.2034144/page-2 Do tell!