Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 22:49:44 +0100 Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: <1075j7c$rso5$1@dont-email.me> <1075o0u$rso5$2@dont-email.me> <1075t30$vdme$2@dont-email.me> <1077s68$1d40a$1@dont-email.me> <1078a8g$1d433$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net YC/hmPYLVvPFgdCaP/kXWAqMGcBi4qOpqZnKtxj78qvTA14ftD Cancel-Lock: sha1:GOY7MVjiQrbdawN5imaJhKgcaKU= sha256:1BKboQ/tmdYIWUpJxnPg/2stM3ReXKs64GrWmytuTBY= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <1078a8g$1d433$1@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181620 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136389 On 09/08/2025 21:15, Alan wrote: > On 2025-08-09 10:58, David B. wrote: >> On 09/08/2025 17:15, Alan wrote: >>> On 2025-08-09 01:50, David B. wrote: >>>> On 08/08/2025 23:18, Alan wrote: >>>> [....] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's what Mr Daniel showed about himself:- https://i.ibb.co/ >>>>>>>> bRRy3cwQ/ Screenshot-2022-04-19-at-17-13-29.png >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be >>>>>>>> identified. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. >>>>>> >>>>>> That’s a colourful turn of phrase, but it does rather underline my >>>>>> point: >>>>>> when faced with a fair and reasonable technical question, you >>>>>> choose to respond with personal abuse instead of facts. >>>>> I wasn't given a "fair and reasonable" question, because you aren't >>>>> a fair and reasonable person. >>>>> >>>>> You're an asshole who I wouldn't bother to put out if he was on >>>>> fire... >>>> >>>> >>>> Alan, >>>> >>>> Your personal opinion of me is noted, but irrelevant to the point at >>>> hand. >>> >>> It is as relevant as your attacks on someone else. >> >> Alan, >> >> The distinction is that I’m questioning software and its developer in >> the context of user security — not making remarks about someone’s >> personal worth. > Bully for you. > > You're a lying piece of shit, so what you say you are doing doesn't > matter at all. Just whose sock-puppet are you, dear boy?