Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 09:50:31 +0100 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <1075j7c$rso5$1@dont-email.me> <1075o0u$rso5$2@dont-email.me> <1075t30$vdme$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 0HYPgrX+UX57/znT07bLQAUi7suenA2gFkWY+Mm2ArGKUMAXik Cancel-Lock: sha1:/kk+FKNWXakfvdwlVhI0VpVHzbY= sha256:IZ4YOIpKx0T1Zeog0bX9F1e5geDA4vJoHV2QZwAj4E0= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <1075t30$vdme$2@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181604 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136375 On 08/08/2025 23:18, Alan wrote: [....] >>>> >>>> Here's what Mr Daniel showed about himself:- https://i.ibb.co/ >>>> bRRy3cwQ/ Screenshot-2022-04-19-at-17-13-29.png >>>> >>>> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be identified. >> >>> I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. >> >> That’s a colourful turn of phrase, but it does rather underline my point: >> when faced with a fair and reasonable technical question, you choose >> to respond with personal abuse instead of facts. > I wasn't given a "fair and reasonable" question, because you aren't a > fair and reasonable person. > > You're an asshole who I wouldn't bother to put out if he was on fire... Alan, Your personal opinion of me is noted, but irrelevant to the point at hand. You still haven’t addressed the core question: Why is there no publicly verifiable record of other commercial software products by John Daniel, despite his claimed history of such work? If you believe the answer exists, simply cite your sources so we can all examine them. If you don’t have an answer, that’s fine too — but personal abuse isn’t a substitute for evidence.