Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "David B." Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 11:19:58 +0100 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net dDxUKEtXVgpDM/FKf1cksASXgcwssl5c5pOD0dX8wvzYRWU2Pd Cancel-Lock: sha1:ov+dgx/GQacWm28zGHMEMeGQyxs= sha256:2YJBgNZZMa43uJr7OFz/YMdSmWGYOsrzWLR5c3iQfdo= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181580 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:136316 On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: > "David B." news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net Tue, > 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! > > This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the software. > You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's not the case > because the author will not engage with you. You are once again, knowingly > dishonestly, sliming the product. Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? Please explain HOW you know this. Have you TESTED a Mac - for real? >> Your thoughts requested, folks! > > I'm looking forward to reading those thoughts, David. Nobody cares. :-(