Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Reminder: Ionizing radiation Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 04:20:13 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: References: <57562dec$0$31329$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="14900"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QEv8E9TUkMycco+SJJ1hr" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7Dpq/Eeo9j2jPdKzfdd8TgAGrkg= Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:583479 benj wrote: > On 06/06/2016 02:57 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Ionizing radiation >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation >> >>> Ionizing (or ionising in British English) radiation is radiation that >>> carries enough energy to free electrons from atoms or molecules, >>> thereby ionizing them. Ionizing radiation is made up of energetic >>> subatomic particles, ions or atoms moving at high speeds (usually >>> greater than 1% of the speed of light), and electromagnetic waves on >>> the high-energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum. >>> >>> Gamma rays, X-rays, and the higher ultraviolet part of the >>> electromagnetic spectrum are ionizing, whereas the lower ultraviolet >>> part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and also the lower part of the >>> spectrum below UV, including visible light (including nearly all >>> types of laser light), infrared, microwaves, and radio waves are all >>> considered non-ionizing radiation. >> >> >> Something to think about when reading the media's frenzy concerning >> cell phone radiation. >> >> Study that found cell phones cause cancer in rats is riddled with >> red flags >>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/05/study-that-found-cell-phones-cause-cancer-in-rats-is-riddled-with-red-flags/ > > Gosh, Sammy, I"m sure there is no big money financial interest in > finding a link between cellphones and cancer. That certainly makes for > honest and open science! > > Hey Sammy, what is the "safe" dose of inonizing radiation? > > Any idea? As a propagandist for establishment I'm sure you'll tell us > that all "routine" radiation is "safe". And of course you be a liar. > > THERE IS NO "SAFE" DOSE OF IONIZING RADIATION! > > Remember that at your next trip to the dentist! Remember that the next time you are outside of a lead room anywhere on the planet and especially near stone buildings and stone sculptures. -- Jim Pennino