Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics
Subject: Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do.
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 23:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <szb80380ab.ahu3@rooftop.invalid>
References: <nnpjedt72jhl4l5uavmvfkt3r715b23hul@4ax.com>   <afooed17kq03d8gj0sn5p069ripe90crla@4ax.com> <n1voedlivmh6kcbgd8gvmd9i5bgn0r12dr@4ax.com> <szb9037g9a.ghuo@rooftop.invalid> <fl3ensF4od2U1@mid.individual.net> <sz9b89880ga.guo4@rooftop.invalid> <fl5s5aFktnpU1@mid.individual.net> <zv903ag.ahuo3@rooftop.invalid> <fl67ddFnfgvU1@mid.individual.net> <azb908tag.h3@rooftop.invalid> <fl6h5bFpkh2U2@mid.individual.net> <9b9zsfb83.ahou3@rooftop.invalid> <fl6r0kFrk24U1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Face: $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{<KrBxl"%XcV >(/67bP(YB}rjV^h><g$kPGE_caHX,aa}4A1~sto7YJo#ob/SgNiMsoaMMXiOX9%DjyJM_-=$`F5b' JM,?/R/;V1RI%|eClL6ymI}LbZERB=q+"pJ)uI{ngj1DRF1;E5[r$f[4mgt9=7Pw@vl8@I%eYs6KWJ e%LU3#U@M[X^YBp2VY]-'1*reGDbk%#n1ve'*RffQ3j,(TCYivjb*M`qmuC5rHgbN)nSsx)697q/vt //''?=gM'C.salgG^f)>cUh
User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:450562 sci.physics:683940

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 5/5/18 2:16 PM, owl wrote:
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/5/18 12:47 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/5/18 8:29 AM, owl wrote:

>> one of the comments to that article:
>> <quote>
>> Casey Noble
>> actually, I was told by Child Protective Services DIRECTLY that any form of hitting your child is illegal AT LEAST in the state of Indiana
>> </quote>
> 
> What law?
> 

Who knows, but the guy in the case above was convicted of assault.


>> Another from the land of libtards:
>> <quote>
>> Massachusetts lawmakers say a proposed measure that would ban parents from
>> spanking their children, even in their own homes, is a way to protect
>> kids from abuse. But many parents believe it's an example of government
>> run amok.
> 
> What law?
> 

Apparently the one Nurse Libtard moved forward to a vote.


>> In all 50 states, parents are legally allowed to spank their children. But
>> in 29 states it's illegal for a teacher to practice corporal punishment,
>> including spanking.
> 
> OK. A teacher cannot touch my kids. Sure.
> 

Teachers have to put up with your brats six hours a day.  They should
be allowed to administer the discipline that is not available in the
typical libtard home.


>> A Massachusetts nurse is hoping to change that and make the state the
>> first in the nation to ban corporal punishment at home.
> 
> A nurse. One. Um, OK.
> 

She got the bill moved to a vote.


>> "I think it's ironic that domestic violence applies to everyone except the most vulnerable — children," said Kathleen Wolf, who wrote the bill.
>> 
>> Massachusetts lawmakers will consider the bill today.
>> </quote>
>> 
>> That was from 2007.  Don't know how it came out.  But it's easy to see
>> that the agenda is there.  Keep America sane.  Vote conservative.
> 
> The agenda of a nurse? One person?
> 

Do you doubt she is a liberal?  2007 was a little early for the stupid
pink hats, but I'll bet she's got one now.