Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: WHY NASSA DOES NOT USE ' CURVED SPACE ''!!?? Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <73d9a5b7-e3fc-4e2a-ac8b-c490099b0866@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1540912386 3954 192.74.137.71 (30 Oct 2018 15:13:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:710354 yporat08@gmail.com writes: >On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 4:04:10 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> NASA trajectories are all in regions of weak gravity, and there Newtonian >> physics, though an approximation, is generally adequate to high precision. >> Other applications in higher gravitational fields or to even higher >> precision than what NASA requires might well require GR. >COMMON super SMARTY !! >Nassa does not need the** highest ** responsible **precision >in sending human beings to Mars ???!! Calculate the percent difference of measurements using GR and the masses of Mars and the earth, and the velocity of a spaceship taking 6 months to get there, and Newtonian calculations for the same. Compare that to the various measurement errors. You claimed to have been an engineer that designed many bridges, so as an engineer you should know all about this. I haven't heard of any news stories about many bridges in Israel collapsing, so I guess you got something right at one time.