Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Each dimension is a spin- 3 spins, 3 dimensions
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 17:43:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <phgck3$1ul$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <8049c04c-1462-4a65-92f4-9019d9d759aa@googlegroups.com>  <2594c71b-3c38-4722-955b-e0d9c211ce4f@googlegroups.com>  <phbas9$1bj6$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <ba6857b4-3cd7-4ad5-b4f2-bf40910e6a2b@googlegroups.com>  <phbmg0$1tbr$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <06fbb171-f729-44bf-8346-1b0ef5925e76@googlegroups.com> <64412de9-7a38-4591-98a5-42d57778896d@googlegroups.com>  <phbush$7gf$3@gioia.aioe.org>  <0f6260b8-ad90-4ae9-a473-0351f321b9fb@googlegroups.com>  <phc14i$c47$1@pcls7.std.com>  <095a18a4-32d6-40ef-ba78-00af8ff99f26@googlegroups.com>  <phc38r$t7v$1@pcls7.std.com>  <6adefd41-75a0-4fba-8f8f-0a230317cfb2@googlegroups.com> <phc7p3$8og$1@pcls7.std.com>  <b03a6cab-7775-404e-bc59-70dd22772343@googlegroups.com>  <phd72d$708$1@pcls7.std.com>  <28195872-13b6-4461-8535-686d0783d917@googlegroups.com>  <phdel4$6p9$1@pcls7.std.com>  <56342f30-ade6-445b-9188-c5af7979513c@googlegroups.com> <d7719a91-d90e-4478-b51f-682e755c0242@googlegroups.com> <phg3nt$16gl$2@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1530639811 2005 192.74.137.71 (3 Jul 2018 17:43:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 17:43:31 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:692521

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes:

>john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:

>> The only way the asymmetrical GRCs can be explained is precession of 
>> the disc.

>No John, that’s not the only way. It’s a way you like but which has
>problems. Your response is to say, “no choice, it’s the only option,” which
>is an outright lie. 

Yes, John, Odd is correct. Why did you invent some oddball restriction and
claim it's "the only way"? It's not the only way, it's not even a valid
way, unless/until you come up with some source of some enormous torque
required for a precession, plus variable revolution periods that rule out
your beloved 2:1 precession, etc.

I guess the actual answer is it's "the only way" your OCD allows you to 
see it. Don't they have mental health professionals in Canada that can 
help you with that?